AUCTORES
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8914/122
1 Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Agriculture, VC Farm, Mandya, 571405, INDIA.
2 Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Mysore, Mysuru, 570 006, INDIA.
*Corresponding Author: Jamuna Prakash, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Mysore, Mysuru, 570 006, INDIA
Citation: Vijayalaxmi Kamaraddi and Jamuna Prakash., (2023), Quality Characteristics of IET-13901 and Rajamudi Rice Varieties Subjected to Varying Degree of Polishing, J. Nutrition and Food Processing, 6(3); DOI:10.31579/2637-8914/122
Copyright: © 2023, Jamuna Prakash. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 30 January 2023 | Accepted: 24 April 2023 | Published: 01 May 2023
Keywords: nutritional composition; antinutrients; starch digestibility; physico-chemical characteristics; cooking quality; sensory attributes
The study was planned with an objective of analyzing the various quality parameters of two rice varieties subjected to different degree of polishing, namely, ‘IET-13901’ and ‘Rajamudi’. The samples were polished for 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds and analyzed for nutritional composition, antinutrients, starch digestibility, physico-chemical characteristics, cooking quality, and sensory attributes. Results indicated that the level of protein, fat, ash, and fiber decreased exponentially with increase in the polishing time in both rice varieties, whereas starch showed an increase. There was a decrease in phytate, tannins and oxalates as the milling levels were increased. Protein and starch digestibility were higher in well-milled rice, however, brown rice samples were better as they had a higher amount of slow digestible and resistant starch. Cooking and sensory quality of well -milled rice was better, though some attributes of lesser polished rice were also liked by panel members. The study showed that quality parameter of rice were greatly influenced by degree of polishing.
Rice in an important cereal crop contributing as a staple to most of the South Asian population. By virtue of its proportion used in daily diet, it becomes a significant source of nutrients, though the highly polished rice being consumed now by majority is nutritionally not the best. Primary processing of paddy is essential to remove the outer husk and make the rice grain edible, however, further processing and excessive milling affect the nutritional properties adversely. Consumption of whole grain is said to be beneficial for health as any kind of processing can alter the composition of the grain (Prakash, 2013). Whole grain has many health associated components such as lignans, tocotrienols, phenolic compounds, and antinutrients including phytic acid, tannins, and enzyme inhibitors. In the process of milling or polishing, the bran is separated, resulting in the loss of dietary fiber, vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, phenolic compounds, and phytic acid and the resultant grain has more of starch fraction (Oghbaei and Prakash, 2016; Schatzkin et al., 2007; Slavin, 2004).
Degree of milling or polishing refers to the extent of abrasion applied to remove the outer layers of grain which in turn determines the amount of nutrients retained in rice. Degree of milling has been categorized into four classes such as undermilled (3-4%), medium milled (5-6%), fully milled (7-8%), and over milled (>8%) (FAO, 1992). The distribution of nutrient across the rice grain is not uniform, hence milling causes uneven loss of nutrients making the grain richer in starch and poorer in other components (Slavin et al., 1999). In rice grain, protein, fats, vitamins and minerals are present in greater quantities in the germ and outer layers than in the starchy endosperm, which get removed on milling. Under-milled rice or brown rice, though more nutritious, has its own drawback in terms of lower storage stability on account of increased lipid peroxidation, generating rancid off-flavour. In contrast, white or highly milled rice has a very good keeping quality. White rice is also preferred by consumer due to its attractive appearance and superior organoleptic quality. Parboiled rice, on the other hand has more of nutrients because of even distribution of water soluble vitamins during hydro-thermal processing, and a much lesser degree of milling (Oghbaei and Prakash, 2010). There are many rice varieties available in different parts of the world, and new varieties are brought out with improved agricultural traits for better yield. It is essential to investigate new varieties for their quality characteristics. Hence, the present study focused on analysing a new variety of rice for various quality parameters in comparison with a traditional grown variety. Both rice samples were subjected to different degree of polishing for comparative evaluation. The quality parameters evaluated were nutritional composition, antinutrients, protein and starch digestibility, physicochemical and cooking characteristics and sensory attributes.
Methodology
Materials
For the present study, two varieties of Indian rice, namely, IET-13901, and Rajamudi were selected. They were procured from Agriculture Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, located at Mudigere of Chikmagaluru district of Karnataka State, India. The IET-13901 is high yielding paddy variety of hill zone, whereas Rajamudi is a traditionally grown variety of paddy, which was used for comparison. The grains were harvested at full maturity, cleaned, graded and stored at room temperature (25-30oC) in airtight storage bins for aging up to 6 months. The paddy samples were then exposed to the laboratory air for 1-2 days before analytical work in order to equilibrate the moisture. The chemicals used for the study were of analytical grade. Glass double distilled water was used for all the analysis and experiments were carried out in quadruplicates.
Sample processing
The paddy samples were dehusked using laboratory scale dehusker (Rubber Roll Sheller: Model: ASR -1103). Husk and brown rice were collected separately. Further 150g of intact kernels of brown rice was subjected to different polishing time (Zero, 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds) using laboratory scale rice polisher (Model: ASR -1104). The milled rice was sifted and separated from bran and used for further studies.
Proximate composition
The proximate principles of a food indicate the basic nutritional value in terms of major nutrients and are an indication of its physiological importance. There are major variations in the proximate composition of food depending upon the class of food it belongs, for example, cereals, legumes, or fruits, or vegetables. All rice samples were analyzed for proximate principles, and the procedures used were as follows, the moisture content was estimated following standard oven drying and repeated weighing method of AOAC (AOAC, 2000). For protein content, nitrogen was estimated by using Kjeldahl equipment (Kel plus, Pelican system, India), and the value converted using a factor of 5.95 (Ranganna, 1986). Fat was estimated by Soxhlet distillation method by repeated extraction of fat by petroleum ether, removal of solvent and weighing of residual matter. Total ash, which is an indication of mineral content of food was determined by incineration of sample in a furnace and weighing of residual inorganic material (AOAC, 2000). Dietary fiber is considered a valuable component of all foods on account of its numerous physiological functions. Insoluble and soluble dietary fiber were measured on the basis of separation of non-starch polysaccharides by enzymatic and gravimetric assay of Asp et al., (1983) which is equivalent to physiologically unavailable fiber. Total starch is the available polysaccharide which is a primary source of energy. Starch was estimated by degradation of starch to glucose with amyloglucosidase followed by determination of glucose (Batey and Ryde, 1982; Raghuramulu et al., 2003).
Antinutrients content
The antinutrients estimated in rice samples were phytates, tannins and oxalates. Phytates and oxalates bind with minerals thus decreasing their absorption from the gastro-intestinal tract. Tannins, though lower digestibility of some nutrients, are also considered beneficial on account of their antioxidant function. Phytic acid was extracted and determined according to the supernatant difference method (Thompson and Erdman, 1982). Colorimetric estimation of tannins was based on the measurement of blue color formed by the reduction of phosphotungstomolybdic acid by tannin like compounds in alkaline solution. Total tannin content was expressed as mg tannic acid equivalent per 100 g of sample (Raghuramulu et al., 1983). Total oxalates were extracted with hydrochloric acid, precipitated as calcium oxalate from the deproteinised extract and were estimated by subsequent titration with potassium permanganate (Raghuramulu et al., 1983).
In vitro digestible protein and starch
To determine in vitro starch digestibility, modified method of Kon et al., (1971); Holm et al., (1985) and Som et al., (1992) was followed. A 100 mg sample was digested with α-amylase, pepsin, pancreatin and amyloglucosidase sequentially with appropriate pH adjustment and incubation as required. Finally glucose was estimated in digest and converted to starch by multiplying the value by 0.9. The percent starch digestibility was calculated taking total starch into consideration.
In vitro protein digestibility was estimated according to Akeson and Stahman, (1964). A 2.0 g sample was digested with pepsin and pancreatin enzymes to follow gastric digestion, insoluble protein precipitated with trichloroacetic acid and soluble protein estimated through Kjeldahl method. The percent protein digestibility was calculated by taking total protein into consideration.
Starch profile
The starch profile is determined to establish the proportion of starch fractions which have different digestibility rates in the gastro-intestinal tract. According to the rate and extent of digestibility, starch is designated either as rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS) or resistant starch. Resistant starch is not digested and is similar to dietary fiber (Englyst et al., 1992; Sergio, 2012). The starch profile of all samples was determined using the method of Englyst et al., (1992). The samples were digested with enzymes following physiological digestion procedure and the starch fractions were estimated as glucose released at different time intervals. The residual fraction was considered as resistant starch.
Physical Parameters
Physical parameters like kernel length, breadth, and linear elongation ratio were recorded as per Juliano and Parez, (1984). The alkali spreading score (ASS) of milled rice, which is an indication of gelatinization temperature was determined by the procedure suggested by (Little et al., (1958). Estimation of amylose content was done as per simplified procedure of Juliano (1971). Gel consistency was analyzed based on the method given by Cagampang et al., (1973). Cooking quality was determined by linear elongation ratio, which was the ratio of mean length of cooked rice to mean length of milled rice (Juliano and Parez, (1984).
The amylose content was estimated as per simplified colorimetric procedure of Juliano and Sukuraj (1985). In brief, a 100 mg finely ground sample, was treated with 1.0 ml of rectified spirit and 9.0 ml of 1N NaOH and heated on boiling water bath (15 min) to gelatinize the starch, transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and volume was made up. Five ml of this solution was drawn in a 100ml volumetric flasks, 1.0 ml of 1N acetic acid and 2.0 ml of KI reagent was then added, shaken well, volume made up and allowed to stand in dark for 20min to develop colour. Absorbance of the solution was measured in a spectrophotometer at 620nm and amylose content expressed on a dry weight basis using purified potato amylose for standard curve.
Sensory Analysis
For evaluating the sensory attributes of rice samples, rice was cooked by standard procedure and was offered to panel members with a score card. Panel members numbering 30 were semi-trained and well versed with judging the quality parameters of rice samples. The score card was designed to evaluate both the visual and eating quality of samples on a grading scale of 1-10 representing from poor to excellent quality. The visual attributes tested were whiteness of the grain, grain intactness, degree of separation and fluffiness. The edible quality included firmness, stickiness, chewiness, aroma and taste. Final overall acceptability was also scored.
Statistical Analysis
Data were computed to obtain mean and standard deviation and analyzed using analysis of variance to determine significant differences between various parameters with a statistical software SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), further Duncan’s multiple range test was used as post-test to determine significant difference between samples, if any (Duncan, 1995).
1.Effect of degree of polishing on nutritional composition of rice varieties
Results of effect of polishing time on proximate composition of IET-13901 and Rajamudi rice varieties are presented in Table 1. As can be seen from the table, as the polishing time increased from zero to 60 sec., moisture, protein, fat, ash, insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and soluble dietary fiber (SDF) were found to decrease significantly whereas total starch content increased from 71.81 to 80.04%. Moisture content reduced from 12.57% in brown rice sample to 11.61% in well milled sample. This could be due to removal of the outer layers of bran that holds moisture. Protein content reduced from 6.81 to 5.65g in well milled samples. Significant decrease of 1.61 to 0.31g was observed in the fat content of IET-13901 as the polishing time increased from zero to 60 seconds. Similar trend of steep decline was observed in the total ash content, indicating the presence of most of the fat and ash contents in the outer aleuronic and bran layers of the rice kernel. This phenomenon was again substantiated by significant reduction in the dietary fiber content (both IDF and SDF).
Similar observations were made for Rajamudi rice, wherein with increase in the polishing time all the analyzed constituents except starch decreased significantly. The total starch content increased from 64.22 to 76.03%. Moisture content reduced from 12.49% in brown rice sample to 11.61% in well milled sample. Protein also decreased from 8.22 to 7.12% in highly polished rice. A significant reduction of 74.5% was observed in the fat content of Rajamudi rice polished for 60 seconds. Total ash and dietary fiber were also significantly lower in well polished rice in comparison to rice grain with zero polish and intact outer layers. Between two rice varieties, Rajamudi had higher protein and lower starch content than IET-13901.
While it is very well known that excessive polishing of rice grain decreases its nutritional quality, the data obtained demonstrate very well that the differences between brown (undermilled) and white rice (well milled) is significant. Polishing reduces the protein content by 17% in IET-13901 rice and 13.4% in Rajamudi rice. Though rice grain is not a good source of fat, the extent of reduction in fat content on polishing was 74.5 to 80.7%. Similar reduction was seen in ash content (75.6-76.4%). IDF reduced by 83% in IET-13901 rice and by 49.7% in Rajamudi rice, the extent of reduction being dissimilar in this case. SDF reduction varied from 86-90.9%. In contrast to all these, starch content was up by 11.5-18.4% showing dominance of starch in well milled rice.
The milling procedures are controlled to suit different varieties of rice after dehusking with the objective of retaining the optimum sensory quality. Highly milled rice has lesser moisture, protein, lipid, and ash contents in comparison to rice milled to a lesser degree (Juliano, 1993). This can be attributed to removal of the caryopsis coat, aleurone, and subaleurone layers, which have high ash, lipid, and fiber contents (Kim et al., 1994; Park, et al., 2001). As reported by Pedersen and Eggum (1983), highly refined rice had a lower protein content, though the amino acid composition and net protein utilization were not affected. Békés and Wrigley, (2016) studied protein and energy utilization of brown, under milled and milled rice samples of IR-32 by preschool children through diets in which 2/3 of N was from rice. They reported that brown rice was not significantly inferior to milled rice in terms of nitrogen absorption and retention by the children. Its energy and fat contents were, however, less utilized than those of milled rice. The protein quality of brown rice was reported to be higher than that of milled rice because of higher lysine content (Juliano and Bechtel, 1985). For prevention of lifestyle disorders, using whole grains such as brown rice as a staple can be significant as supported by many scientific studies (Anderson, 2003; Fardet, 2010; McKevith, 2004; Priebe et al., 2008).
1.Effect of degree of polishing on antinutrients of rice varieties
Effect of polishing time on antinutrient content of rice samples is presented in Table 2. As most of the antinutritional factors are embedded in the outer bran layers of the rice kernel, they were found to decrease exponentially as polishing time increased. The reduction observed in IET-13901 rice in phytate and tannin content were from 182 to 121mg/100g and 8.43 to 3.29mg/100g respectively which were statistically significant. Rice generally has a very low content of oxalates, which was reduced from 0.99 to 0.09mg/100g in IET-13901. Rajamudi, being red rice variety, had a higher tannin content. In this sample also, all constituents decreased concomitantly with higher degree of polishing as seen for IET-13901. The reduction observed for phytates, tannins and oxalates were from 193.75 to 121.0 mg/100g, 10.37 to 5.22 mg/100g and 0.82 to 0.12 mg/100g.When the data were analyzed in terms of percent reduction between brown and white rice, it was by 33.5% and 37.5% for IET-13901 and Rajamudi rice respectively. Tannins were reduced more in former (by 61.0%) than the latter (49.7%). Oxalates, though present in minute quantities, decreased significantly by 85.4-90.9%. Overall observation of data indicates that polishing influenced the chemical composition of rice extensively.
Apart from milling, the process of parboiling, puffing, and flaking can also cause alteration in nutrient content of rice grain. Rice can be flaked to different degree of thickness following a process of soaking paddy in hot water and roller pressing. It was reported that flaking altered the phosphorus, phytin phosphorus, and dietary fiber content of flaked rice with a decrease in proportion to thickness of flakes, the lesser the thickness, the lower was the constituent, whereas the iron and calcium contents were not affected (Suma et al., 2007).
1.Effect of degree of polishing on Starch and Protein digestibility of rice varieties
Protein and starch digestibility of rice samples is compiled in Table 3. The in vitro protein digestibility of both rice varieties showed an increase with enhanced milling levels. In IET-13901, it increased from 2.13 to 3.42 g/100g, whereas in Rajamudi, it increased from 2.13 to 3.42 g/100g. This is in contrast with actual protein content which decreased significantly with polishing in both rice samples. This shows that the distribution of protein in rice grain is not uniform, with outer layers having a higher proportion of protein in comparison to endosperm which has lesser amount. Between two rice varieties, Rajamudi had higher digestible protein. This also can be correlated to a higher protein content of Rajamudi rice as seen in Table 1.
Oghbaei and Prakash, (2010) studied the digestible protein in uncooked and cooked rice samples of raw and parboiled rice and reported the amount of digestible protein in the range of 6.62 to 8.10 g/100g. They also reported improved protein digestibility on cooking from 73-81% and 76 to 86.8% in raw rice and parboiled rice respectively. The increase in the protein digestibility of rice on cooking may be attributed to the inactivation of proteinase inhibitors and opening up of the protein structure through denaturation on heating. In rice flakes, the percent starch digestibility varied from 78.1 to 84.1% in flakes of different thickness (Madhu et al., 2007). Degree of flaking in rice did not influence starch digestibility significantly.
In vitro starch digestibility also increased with higher milling in both rice, the value being 24.54 to 30.22 for IET-13901 and 20.13 to 25.27 g/100g for Rajamudi. This also correlates well with initial starch content which was higher for the former and lower for the latter variety. Unlike protein, starch showed an increase both in content and digestibility with polishing. When protein and starch digestibility were computed as percent of total as depicted in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 respectively, the observations indicated that in brown rice 31.3 to 42.9% protein was digestible and it increased to 60.5 and 73.3% on high degree of polishing. For starch differences between brown and well milled rice were smaller, the range being, 34.2 to 31.3% for brown and 37.2 and 33.2% for white rice. This indicated that polishing influenced protein content more than the starch content.
Nutritionally starch fractions are significant as they are associated with glucose release from food and determine the rate of rise of blood sugar levels. A slow and sustained release is considered beneficial in preventing common chronic diseases such as obesity and chronic diabetes (Ludwig et al., 2001). Slowly digestible starch fraction is completely digested but at a lower rate in comparison to rapidly digestible starch, whereas resistant starch functions like fiber (Englyst et al., 1992; Sergio, 2012). Resistant starch is not digested in the small intestine to produce short chain fatty acids, thus serves as substrate for growth of gut micro flora especially for lactic acid bacteria (Chung et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2010). Thereby it is shown to have various therapeutic health benefits such as prevention of colon cancer and hyperglycemia.
Effect of polishing time on starch profile of rice variety IET13901 presented in Table 3 shows that RDS content increased as the polishing time increased from 57.94 to 76.83%. On the other hand, SDS and RS content of rice samples decreased significantly from 8.63 to 2.11% and 5.24 to 1.11% respectively on polishing. This indicated that increased polishing time associated with increased abrasive milling and consequent removal of bran and aleuronic layers adhered to endosperm decreased SDS and RS content significantly. Similar trend was seen for Rajamudi rice, wherein RDS content increased significantly from 52.22 to 72.62%. SDS and RS content reduced from 8.13 and 3.87% in brown rice samples to 2.14 and 1.27% in well milled samples respectively (Table 3). It has been reported that in pre-processed expanded rice products such as puffed rice, popped rice, and rice flakes, the starch digestibility was higher than raw milled rice. Parboiled rice also exhibits higher starch digestibility than raw rice, however, it was lower than ready-to-eat expanded products (Chitra et at., 2010). Kamaraddi and Prakash (2015) studied the effect of varietal differences of rice on nutritional characteristics of expanded rice and reported a range of 69.7–76.2% of protein digestibility and 80.3– 82.8% of starch digestibility.
1.Effect of degree of polishing on physicochemical and cooking characteristics of rice varieties
The data on physico chemical and cooking characteristics of rice varieties is compiled in Table 4. Disruption of bran layer with increase in degree of milling resulted in more water uptake on cooking with increased kernel elongation ratio (KER) from 1.15 to 1.96 and volume elongation ratio (VER) from 2.23 to 4.072 in IET-13901. A slight increase in percent loss of solids with increase in the polishing degree was witnessed from 5.31 to 5.64% as a result of leaching out of starch from grains and brokens. Amylose content increased from 25.21 to 28.40% with resultant increase in alkali degradation score (ADS) and gel consistency values from 3.75 to 5.40 and 33.75 to 48.18 mm in brown rice and well milled samples of IET-13901. Comparative values for Rajamudi rice demonstrated a slightly lower extent of KER with a maximum of 1.41, and a higher VER at 4.32. This could be attributed to their grain size and shape. Gruel loss was almost in similar range to IET-13901. The amylose content showed a marginal increase from 25.28 to 26.78% In Rajamudi. An amylose content of 25-33% is said to be high and based on this both varieties could be classified as high amylose rice (Juliano, 1971; Juliano and Bechtel, 1985). Amylose content is important as it is the key determinant of the cooking and processing qualities of rice (Bhattacharya, 2011). Varieties with high amylose are dry and flaky and are suitable for making canned and quick cooking rice. The alkali degradation score of Rajamudi rice also increased significantly on polishing. The differences in gel consistency on polishing were similar in both varieties. Based on gel consistency values, the unpolished grain, and the grain milled for 15 seconds could be classed as ‘hard’, and the rest could be classed as ‘medium’ ( Cagampang et al., 1973). Rajamudi is basically a brown rice variety eaten in a lesser polished state, hence, it is said to be more nutritious. Rice with higher degree of polishing carry better cooking quality because of textural changes which is due to the removal of dietary fiber and reduction of protein contents (Park et al., 2001).
1.Effect of degree of polishing on sensory attributes of cooked rice varieties
The results of sensory analysis of cooked samples of both rice are presented in Table 5. As the polishing time increased, whiteness of the IE-13901 rice kernel increased from 4.90 to 9.25 due to removal of bran, least score (4.90) being given to brown rice samples, and the highest was for well milled samples. At 30 seconds of polishing time, rice sample had the whiteness score of 7.58 which differed significantly from ‘reasonably well-milled’ and ‘well-milled’ samples respectively. Fluffiness was found to increase significantly due to increased absorption of water. Firmness was also found to increase significantly as the polishing time increased. Degree of separation was more in brown samples with lowest stickiness scores. As stickiness increased, the degree of separation decreased. Chewiness was more in lesser milled samples, and reduced thereon significantly (from 4.72 to 2.67), contributing to the palatability of rice. Aroma and taste were also given higher scores for well milled samples, however, differences between samples were smaller. Overall acceptability scores of the cooked rice sample of IET-13901 showed that 45 seconds of polishing resulted in highest acceptability followed by rice milled for 30 seconds indicating that over milling may not improve the sensory characteristics, and rice with partial polish could be favored by consumers.
Rajamudi is a preferred red rice variety, valued for its characteristic taste and flavor. Even though it has reduced head rice recovery upon milling, it is preferred by the traditional rice consumers. The sensory scores of cooked rice samples milled at different polishing time were found to vary significantly when evaluated by semi-trained panel. Whiteness increased from 4.47 to 8.08 with >80% reduction in red color. Grain intactness improved with increase in the time. Degree of separation decreased and was found to differ significantly. Increase in fluffiness was observed from 6.50 to 8.47. Firmness increased up to 4-5% of polishing as Rajamudi has more percentage of stress cracks; cooked rice was stickier due to increased stickiness score as polishing time increased, chewiness values significantly reduced from 3.82 to 2.75 and the rice was found to be highly palatable. Aroma increased initially, lightly milled samples scored highest for characteristic aroma (9.02) and found to decrease significantly with increase in polishing time. Branny taste (still preferred) reduced with increase in polishing time. Brown rice as well as under milled rice samples of Rajamudi and IET-3901 variety were acceptable by the semi trained panel members with slightly more score for lightly milled samples. Polishing significantly improved the grain intactness and fluffiness of both rice varieties by 30 to 60%. Chewiness reduced significantly by around 32-40% in Rajamudi and IET-3901. Polishing significantly improved the aroma and taste in both rice types. Overall results of sensory analysis shows that rice with partial polish could be accepted by consumers, and flavor of brown rice was also accepted.
The results of the study indicate that all analyzed quality parameters of rice were greatly influenced by level of polishing. As the level of polishing increased, there was a decrease in protein, fat, ash, and dietary fiber content and an increase in starch content. Antinutrients also showed a concomitant decrease with polishing levels. In vitro digestible protein and starch were higher in well-milled rice, though brown rice (with lesser polish) had a higher proportion of SDS and RDS. Well-milled rice had better cooking quality. Sensory analysis indicated mixed response where both brown and white rice were accepted for certain attributes. In conclusion, it can be said that degree of polishing significantly influenced all quality parameters of rice and from health point of view, partial polish can be recommended to retain the health benefits organoleptic quality of rice.
Conflict of Interest: Authors have no conflict of interest with anyone regarding the research work reported in the paper
Funding: There was no direct funding received for this research from any source.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.