Ophthalmology is a branch of medicine and surgery that deals with the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the eye. Experimental and Clinical Ophthalmology (ECO) aimed to deliver critical analysis and a wide-ranging overview of Clinical issues in Ophthalmology, and also to facilitate and stimulate the discussion to serve a display place for surgeons, researchers, academics from across the globe to share their research findings. ECO is a Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal that aims to publish Scholarly Articles describing clinical examinations, investigative studies, and practices related to etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. All the articles submitted to ECO subject to a rigorous double-blind peer-review process under the guidance of an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of Ophthalmology researchers and reviewers.
Aim and Scope
Experimental and Clinical Ophthalmology (ECO) peer-reviewed, Open Access journal devoted exclusively to the publication of high-quality research papers in the fields of clinical related to all aspects of medical innovations and Research. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles, making them available to the researchers and the young scholars worldwide without any restriction.
We invite authors to submit their original articles, reviews, opinions, short communications, case reports, clinical perspectives, news, proceedings, health policies, etc.
All published articles will be assigned DOI provided by CrossRef.
Open Access Policy: This journal is an open access journal which provides immediate, worldwide, boundary-free access to the full content of every distributed article without charging readers or their institutions for access. Readers are given the authorization to read, circulate, copy, print, download, search, or link to the full texts of all articles in NMIR.
Fees and funding
Auctores is a self-reliance organization and does not receive any funding from neither from government nor private sectors. Hence, the management of the journal is exclusively supported by the article processing fees received from authors. We ask that authors, institution, funding agency should pay the article processing charges to facilitate our publication process. Our article processing charges are quite flexible compare to many other emerging publishers and we provide wide range of offers to the authors from the middle income and low-income countries. Authors will be sent an invoice along with the galley proof of the accepted article. Authors can pay the processing charge through the online payment portal by using credit card and or can transfer the APC to the publisher’s account furnished in an invoice as an open access publishers Auctores do not charge to authors for Manuscript submission fee and we only charge to authors for Article processing Charges.
Indexing Services
Auctores publications appear in a wide range of abstracting and indexing databases. Different journals are listed in different databases. See our dedicatedAbstracting and Indexingpage for a detailed breakdown of journals per repository.
Review Policies
Peer-Review Policy
Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and originality of articles for publication. Reviewers play an essential role in validating the research submitted and providing constructive feedback to the editors and authors. You can find more detail about the Peer Review Process here.
Editorial Policies
Our editors evaluate submitted manuscripts, and those that warrant further consideration are sent out for in-depth review. Manuscripts require a minimum of two reviews to be accepted.
Auctores does not accept pre submission inquiries or accept resubmissions of manuscripts that have already been rejected for reasons related to novelty or impact.
If authors disagree with a reject decision made on the basis of serious reviewer error on a technical point they can appeal the decision by submitting a formal appeal .Authors must submit appeals within four weeks of the decision date to be considered.
Editors will review appeals and decide on appropriate next steps. Responses to reviews and revised manuscripts will not be considered with appeals unless requested by editors.
Auctores uses a highly selective peer review process drawing from and beyond the full pool of reviewers
Appeals and Complaints
Even in cases where editors did not invite re-submission, some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. These are considered appeals, which, by policy, must take second place to the normal workload. Although we strive to provide a decision on an appeal within 14 days, on some occasions it may take several weeks.
Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the editors are convinced that the original decision was made in error or critical new information or data has been added. If the manuscript was previously reviewed the editor may also discuss the appeal with one or more of the referees or even obtain advice from an additional referee. If the manuscript was not reviewed the editor may solicit informal opinions from one or more external experts.
Authors who wish to submit their manuscript elsewhere while it is under appeal at our journal must first withdraw their appeal.
Citing Articles in Auctores Journals
Articles in the Auctores journals are cited in the same way as articles in a traditional journal.
Article citations follow this format
References should follow the standards summarized in the APA Citation Guide
Journal References
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., & Munro, M. J. (2002). Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(4), 245-259
Why publish your article with Auctores Journals
Immediate and free access to the published articles: High visibility and readership through international dissemination.
High quality and rigorous peer review: Immense quality and meticulous peer-review.
Rapid publication: Rapid approval and quick publication of manuscript.
Language Editing Services: Auctores Editing Services greatly improves the chances of your manuscript being accepted. Offering expert help in English language editing, translation, manuscript formatting and figure preparation, Auctores Editing Services ensures that your manuscript is ready for submission.
Promoting Your Publication
Articles published in Auctores journals are included in article alerts and regular email updates.
In addition, articles published Auctores journals are may be promoted by press releases to the general or scientific press.
These activities increase the exposure and number of accesses for articles published in Auctores.
Manuscript preparation Guidelines
Auctores supports you throughout the manuscript preparation process, from writing and preparing a great article to ensuring it is seen, read, and cited. This section provides general style and formatting information. You can find more detail about the Formatting Guidelines.
Copyright: Once the manuscript has been accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author gets the copyright under Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license. This license allows articles to be freely downloaded from the Auctores website, and also allows articles and data to be re-used and re-distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is correctly cited.
Journal Segments
Cataract
Excessive tearing
Proptosis
Eye tumors
Diabetic retinopathy
Dry eye syndrome
Glaucoma
Macular degeneration
Refractive errors
Strabismus
Uveitis
Ocular tonometry
Refraction assessment
Retina examination
Slit-lamp examination
Visual acuity
Anterior segment surgery
Cornea
Ocular surface
Glaucoma
Neuro-ophthalmology
Ocular oncology
Oculoplastics
Orbit surgery
Ophthalmic pathology
Paediatric ophthalmology
strabismus
Refractive surgery
Medical retina
Uveitis
Veterinary
Vitreo-retinal surgery
Dear Editorial Team,
Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports.
My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal.
Best wishes from,
Elena Popa.
Dr Elena Popa
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos
Dear Grace Pierce,
Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports,
Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future.
Best wishes from,
Robert W. McGee
Robert W McGee
Dear Grace Pierce,
Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports,
Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal.
Best wishes from,
DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
Aibing Rao
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Kashani Mehdi
Dear Mercy Grace,
Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences,
We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage.
We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences!
Best wishes from,
Alla Konstantinovna Politova,