Editor Profiles

Editor Profiles

Leonardo Roever , Assistant Professor, Editor Profiles

Dr. Leonardo Roever was graduated in 2002, had his specialization in Unifesp (2003), Masters degree (2008), and PhD ( 2015-current) in Health Sciences from the UFU. Editor in Chief - Evidence Based Medicine and Practice (EBMP), Internal Medicine and Care (IMC) and Quality in Primary Care. Section Editors - Current Atherosclerosis Reports (Impact Factor - 3.006). Academic Editor of Medicine (USA - Baltimore, Maryland - Impact Factor - 2.133). Editor-in-Chief of Research Topics: Cardiac Remodeling: New Insights in Physiological and Pathological Adaptations of Frontiers in Physiology (Impact Factor - 4.031) in Switzerland, Editorial Advisory Board - Cardiology Journal (Impact Factor - 1.130), in Poland. Guest Editor - Special Issue on Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease(Journal of International Medical Research - Impact Factor - 1.431) - Special issue entitled: Coronary Artery Disease (Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis). Executive Editor of Atherosclerosis: Open Access. He has acted or works as a member of the editorial board of 65 scientific journals and a reviewer of 189. Editorial board member of the Journal of Epidemiology, Internal Medicine, Translational Medicine, Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis, Interventional Cardiology, Emergency Medicine and others. Reviewer journals such as British Medical Journal (BMJ), Circulation, European Heart Journal, JACC, JAMA Internal Medicine, Scientific Reports, Stem Cells, Nature (EJCN), Stroke, Neurology, Chest, Critical Care Medicine, Circulation: Heart Failure‏, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, JAHA, The American Journal of Medicine, The American Journal of Sports Medicine and others. Ad Hoc is the American Heart Association (AHA-USA) and the National Institute of Health (NIH-USA). The total of publications comprises 123 articles in journals specialized as an author and/or co-authored, 19 abstracts in conference proceedings, and 2 international book chapter. He has experience in health care, with emphasis in Cardiovascular Research acting on the following topics: Evidence based medicine and practice, network meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis, umbrella reviews, meta-epidemiologic studies, cross-sectional studies,diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of atherosclerosis, ectopic adiposopathy, biomarkers, inflammatory markers, metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular prevention, heart failure, hypertension, arrhythmia, diabetes, aging, stroke, clinical epidemiology, clinical research, biostatistics and development of new diagnostic and therapeutic methods.


Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova