AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Reports
*Corresponding Author: Walid bai, University Hospital Center Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morroco.
Citation: Walid bai, Mahdi Graiouid, Messian gallouo, larache yassine, doumer abderrahman, Jandou issam, Dakir Mohammed, Adil Debbagh, Rachid Aboutaieb (2019) Urethral stenosis of women about a case Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 1(1); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/002
Copyright: © 2019 Walid bai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 07 December 2019 | Accepted: 16 December 2019 | Published: 19 December 2019
Keywords: Stenosis; urethra; woman, urethroplasty
Introduction:
Non-tumoral urethral strictures are a rare clinical entity in women with little literature.
Observation:
We report a case of a 56-year-old woman who consults for acute retention of urine with impossibility of sounding, preceded by dysuria. She had an unexplained retention episode 8 years ago without urologic investigations.
Conclusion:
Urethral stricture is an infrequent condition in women, the most dangerous etiology being stenosis of cancerous origin. Non-malignant tumoral causes such as that reported in our observation are exceptional.
Urethral stricture in women is a rare clinical entity. It represents 3 to 8% of the obstructive causes of the low device in the woman [1]. Its incidence is significantly lower than in men. This may be explained by a shorter length than the male urethra, greater mobility and the fact that it is better protected by pelvic bones [2]. The search for a tumor should be done first by a biopsy, because it is the most feared etiology. Non-tumoral causes occur in 25 to 40% of urethral strictures. The etiology of non-tumor lesions is mainly obstetric trauma and anterior urogenital surgery, ie incontinent surgery, urethral diverticulum, vaginal gynecology surgery, and rarely endoscopic surgery. Radiation therapy, postmenopausal hormone deficiency vulvar atrophy, and acute and subacute urethritis are other possible causes of narrowing of the urethra in women. Periurethral fibrosis is the possible evolutionary complication whatever the etiology.
Observation
Mrs. K.H aged 56, consults for acute retention of urine with impossibility of sounding. During the interview, the patient reports the notion of acute urinary retention that appeared in 2011, without fever, urethral burns or trauma in the antecedents. No urological investigation was performed at this time, it only benefited from a bladder catheterization and the catheter removed 10 days later; the survey was considered easy and not traumatic. She had no difficulty urinating in the process. Moreover, it does not present other medical or surgical pathologies. She is single and still a virgin.
Clinical examination reveals atrophy of the vaginal lips, a malformation of the vaginal opening and a rounded blistering lesion of the urethral meatus which occupies all the caliber of the meatus with impossibility of sounding. The vaginal touch not done, the patient being virgin (Fig. 1).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), performed in August 2018, revealed a regular and significant non-tumoral thickening of the urethral walls over 20 mm, its walls are in T1 isosignal and T2 hypersignal with regular thickening. bladder walls and a collapsed vaginal cavity (Fig. 2).
Uretro-cystography (UCR) shows narrowing of the distal urethra associated with a urethro-vaginal fistula (Figure 3).
A biopsy was performed. Histology concludes with a nonspecific inflammatory reaction with collagen fibrosis without signs of malignancy.
It is proposed to perform a fistula treatment with progressive urethral dilatation successfully performed.
After discussion with the patient and her sensitization on the fact of coming consulted at the slightest finding of a decrease of the urinary flow for dilations, and that in case of a recurrence urethroplasty will be proposed. Since then, the patient is easily urinating and satisfied.
SUF was described by Brannan in 1951 and reported for the first time in 1828 [3]. The term urethral stricture refers to the healing of the urethral epithelium with or without spongiofibrosis. The result is a narrowing of the urethral light. Smith et al. [4] defined SUF as "a fixed anatomic narrowing of the urethra so that light cannot receive instruments without disturbance of the urethral mucosa".
Pugh [2] in 1924 conducted a study based on several clinical observations and the work of Lisfranc. In his study, it appears that urethral strictures are often of distal and meatal seat. The main etiologies he finds are gonococcal urethritis and obstetric trauma. The diagnosis was made by progressive calibration with probes or candles performing both a technical and therapeutic test.
Women with ED usually have lower urinary tract disorders such as low urine output, pollakiuria, urgency, and incontinence. Recurrent urinary tract infections can occur, and on rare occasions, urine retention [5].
The true incidence of SU is not known. Bladder obstruction in women is rare, and has been reported at less than 8% [6]. In a study of women with urodynamic signs and symptoms of urinary tract urology, SU accounted for only 7% of cases [7].
Urethral stenosis in women is defined as anatomical narrowing of the urethral caliber by urethral wall injury that does not permit or make difficult the catheterization of the urethra [8]. It must be distinguished from obstructive functional disorders that can be used in physiological and radiological investigations, but which are usually passable by a catheter. Contrary to man, the contracture of the sphincter, in case of vesicosphincter dyssynergia, is easily probed.
Careful examination of the patient should be done to eliminate extrinsic causes such as invasion of cervical cancer or vulva. It is also necessary to look for a hormonal deficiency with alteration of the trophicity and vaginal dryness.
The anamnesis will look for obstructive signs such as dysuria but also signs of overactive bladder by bladder control upstream of the obstacle.
Regarding the diameter from which to consider the urethra as stenosis, there is no consensus. Brannan [9] suggests that an urethra that does not allow the passage of a ch20 probe is stenotic.
In the literature, obstructive disorders appear as soon as the urethra no longer allows the passage of a ch14 probe. The positive diagnosis of urethral stenosis in women is also based on imaging. Retrograde urethrocystography is a simple examination that reveals the stenosis, its extent, except in case of tight stenosis that cannot be catheterizable like our patient. In this case, vaginal ultrasound can be used and, especially, pelvic MRI which has the advantage of specifying the alterations of the urethral wall and looking for periurethral lesions.
The etiology of narrowing of the urethra in women in most cases is unknown. In developing countries the most common cause is urinary tract injury during prolonged labor during delivery.
In industrialized countries, the most frequent causes are: post-traumatic, iatrogenic injuries (during urethral diverticulectomies, endoscopic and gynecological surgeries), pelvic radiotherapy or acute and chronic urethritis [10]. Vulvar atrophy is another associated factor in postmenopausal women [10].
Edwards et al. [11] described on an animal model the effects of different materials and diameter of the probes on the urethral mucosa. They find that all materials cause inflammation of the mucosa. However, silicone and small caliber catheters are those that induce less inflammation. This can be explained by the fact that they allow the flow and evacuation of urethral secretions. Prolonged probing time increases the risk of bacterial colonization that promotes inflammation of the mucosa and increases the risk of stenosis. A probe left for a long time in traction on the urethra causes ischemia and devitalization of the urethral mucosa. The authors therefore recommend the use of small caliber silicone catheters placed in a non-traumatic manner and with the shortest possible sounding time. Proximal fixation of the probe should be done to prevent traction.
Therapeutic management of urethral stricture in women:
The goal of treatment of urethral stenosis is to correct anatomic and functional obstruction, with the preservation of urinary continence. The treatment of urethral strictures in women depends on the location and length of narrowing, the length of the proximal healthy urethra, the integrity of the bladder neck, and the existence of incontinence. [12]
Dilation of the urethra
Historically, dilatation of the urethra has been a pillar of ED treatment, although evidence of its effectiveness is limited. Some favorable long-term results for dilatation of the urethra for SU have been reported. Smith et al. reported a success rate of 57% at an average follow-up of 21 months in seven women after dilatation to 30 Fr. In the largest series published on urethral dilatation, Romman et al. had a success rate of 51% in 91 patients for initial dilatation to 41 Fr.
Endoscopic management with cold blade or laser incision of the midurethral stenosis was suggested, usually by incision at the 3 h and 9 h positions. The urethral catheter is recommended in these cases, with or without postoperative CIC. Urethrotomy associated with dilatation of the urethra showed short-term success in a single study involving ten patients. It is thought, however, that this treatment has a potential risk for the sphincter mechanism and may lead to urinary incontinence [12].
Urethral reconstruction
When urethral stenosis involves the distal urethral meatus in isolation, a meatotomy or a meatoplasty may be a prudent option. Circumferential excision of the stenosis of the meatus followed by approximation of the lumen of the urethra to the vaginal epithelium performed on a Foley probe has been described. Due to the more proximal continence mechanism in women, this may be appropriate for stenoses involving up to 1 cm of the distal urethra. [12]
Several reconstruction techniques for managing more extensive FUS have been described to date. These included vaginal or labial flaps, as well as vaginal and oral mucosa transplants.
The vaginal flap urethroplasty includes some of the oldest published urethral reconstruction techniques. Blavais described it as an alternative to bladder neo-urethra formation in 1989. In 2002, Tanello et al. described their pedicle flap of the labia minora, which is a tunnel under the vaginal epithelial layer and which was successful in both patients with a 2-year follow-up. [12]
Montorsi et al. published the largest series of vaginal flap urethoplasty in 17 patients. Importantly, they represented narrowing of the distal urethra without prior intervention and used a dorsal approach. An 88% success was noted with a postoperative calibration of 28 Fr. Several published series examined the use of urethroplasty of the ventral vaginal flap with success rates between 80 and 100% [12]
Uretroplasty with vaginal transplant was described by Tsivian and Sidi in 2006, two patients who had a successful reconstruction with a dorsal vaginal transplant. Petrou et al. Published the largest series of uterine and vaginal graft uretroplasties, based on the technique of Tsivian and Sidi. They reported their experience in 11 patients, three of them requiring a subsequent dilatation of the urethra during a followed by 6-46 months. [12]
Three series examined the use of labial uterine graft uretroplasty in the ventral insert, with success rates ranging from 75 to 100%, and average follow-up between 15 and 24 months.
Vaginal flaps and graft uretroplasty are advantageous because they do not require oral graft harvesting and rely on easily accessible local tissues. [12]
Transplants of the oral mucosa
Several published series have shown excellent results after urethroplasty using oral or lingual mucosa in a backbone technique [12]. While the individual series is limited by the small number of patients and the lack of long-term data, the results are indeed promising.
Oral mucosal graft uretroplasty using the ventral layer technique was presented in two separate series comprising two patients each. In the case of patients with high blood pressure, it was difficult to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of this technique because of the limited number of patients. A new modification of a ventral inlay technique using a vaginal saving approach has been described, which may minimize the risk of postoperative complications. [12]
Urethral stricture is an infrequent condition in women, the most dangerous etiology being stenosis of cancerous origin. Non-malignant tumoral causes such as that reported in our observation remain exceptional.
The treatment is not currently clearly codified but it is lawful to propose, for the small primitive stenosis, a minimalist treatment by dilatation or internal urethrotomy with a risk of recidivism non-negligible. In case of extensive or recurrent stenosis, it is necessary to propose a surgical treatment by plasty using pedicled flaps taken from the vagina or the labia minora or free flaps taken from the level of the oral mucosa. In case of extensive fibrous stenosis with destruction of the urethra, it is possible to propose a continous cystostomy as our patient has benefited from, an option that modifies the body's schema the least and which makes it possible to preserve continence.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
