AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1045/135
Independent researcher.
*Corresponding Author: Florent Pirot, Independent researcher.
Citation: Florent Pirot (2023), The Crematory Oven and Mash & Homosexuality Loop Demonstrated : the Origins of the Gay Nazi Trope, Homosexuality In The Soviet Union and Lessons For Modern Times, J. Endocrinology and Disorders. 7(3): DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/135
Copyright: © 2023, Florent Pirot. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 April 2023 | Accepted: 30 May 2023 | Published: 09 June 2023
Keywords: hypocalcemia; hyperphosphatemia; hypoparathyroidism; idiopathic; GCM2
This short article shows the nature of the link between homosexuality and crematory oven, crematory tokamaks and mash. It demonstrates the strong relation and suggests political steps against it, to eliminate the problem safely and while accounting for the bacteriological and viral risk.
The crematory oven system appears historically as the main vector of the homosexual conversion effect described in this article, leading to the title formulation, which is explained by the crematory oven ashes falling into the body, typically above the kidneys but also in the thyroid area [1], and having a particular stickiness related to the combination of the biological matter and of the alpha emitters dominantly of shuriken nature.
The clog pattern is particularly acute with oxidized crematory oven ashes altogether with shurikens, creating a blot, anchored onto the glands with an endocrine disruption activity, fixating within the body the hormonal disruption that is the key of the sexuality disruption. Heat-up near the crematory oven also fosters recirculation of shuriken atoms into the bloodstream, increasing testosterone loss in particular, fostering again the homosexual pattern (see again [1] for reference).
Historical observations and analysis resulting:
It is quite clear that the law of Philippe Pétain against homosexuality, on August 6th 1942, was taken after observations resulting from the last studies on iodine-bromide crematory that led to Dr Poher’s medical PhD defended on July 29th [2]. The initial policy of fighting private crematory ovens with a simple talion law that drove Nazism gained a supplementary idea with the fight against homosexuals, spilling from these observations.
The case of Bradley / Chelsea Manning and of the Bradley tank’s usual pattern can be taken as beacon of an extreme version with transgenderism roots nevertheless based in the homosexual desire. The Bradley tank’s crematory oven is used typically in areas where militants have adopted the same pattern as talion law. The exposure nevertheless creates in the soldier two factors of sexual deviation, with the intakes of crematory ashes during cleaning, and with the crematory antigravitons during firing up of the resulting crematory rockets bringing the ashes inhalated into the glands above the kidney. Bradley Manning’s transgender conversion has to be seen as large scale denounciation of the pattern resulting from the use of this tank, which is a natural effect related also to the expected diminution over time of the targets with crematory ovens.
The “Gay Aryan Skinhead” movement can be seen as a natural resultant of the conjunction of modern capitalism and crematory ovens in private hands. The latent homosexuality of pro-crematory nazi groups was observed frequently by the author. In Khrushchev’s Soviet Union, Stalin’s anti-homosexual policies started to be phased back softly, with assimilation of homosexuality to pedophilia supporting the implicit tolerance for relations between adult men, and the idea that “homosexuality developed in the Gulags” as way to favour both the tolerance of homosexual relations between Soviet MVD agents doing mash from uranium mine retchlag victims, and extermination of Gulag inmates within uranium mines to feed the mash supply (with the exposure of victims condemned to death in the uranium mines certainly fostering homosexual tendencies, and the anti-gay laws still in the penal code, as channel to death of the victims). Khrushchev’s extermination policies with uranium mine retchlags [3] have driven this political choice. The nuclear accident of Ivanovo in 1971 [4] precedes by two years the first State-tolerated contestation of the anti-gay consensus, in 1973 [5] and it is after the Chernobyl nuclear accident that the consensus really crumbles with public discussion re-allowed on the topic.
The development of the nationalist Vaps league in inter-war Estonia can also be seen as resulting from the pattern of tolerance to homosexuality fostered by the independent Estonian republic. Indeed the pattern of sword execution before throwing of the victim in a crematory boiler, ensuring with its black vapours (hence the Vaps movement’s name) the black line typical of the Estonian flag, in this nationalist scheme, caused crematory contamination that favoured an homosexual development of the movement, that also like the SA of the Third Reich was not so favourable to antisemitic ideas. The issue of latent homosexuality can also be seen through the Jasenovac extermination camp in Croatia, where the one-on-one pattern of murdering has to be related with random men being invited to face their own homosexual tendencies by the Nazi elite, in a fight pattern where they have to kill the individual they would be latently attracted to otherwise (solar pressure [1] explaining this particular pattern).
Boris Elstine’s re-legalization of homosexual acts has to be seen in relation to his own exposure to crematory boilers, deliberate attempt at rejuvenating by taking in ashes of children or babies killed within a T90m tank, combinated with later cannabis use to maintain the fresh DNA within the body. This pattern allowed him to change identity (his earlier name was Konstantin Tchernenko) but also explains his downfall into alcoholism, with the alcohol used to avoid losing the young DNA, unadapted to the body.
Political suggestions
The use of the spinning water rocket with sodium-mash in water (see [6] and [7]) is a pattern that allows eliminating the culprits of crematory oven or tokmash or mash activities into their crematory or tokamak or mash structures efficiently, eliminating both altogether. The combination of sodium and water allows a relatively good nuclear yield that reduces the total level of alpha emitters through both transmutation and fission. This is also possible in other patterns with cement-plutogenized rockets, with rapid cement (see [8]) with the crematory, tokmash or mash antigravitons facilitating sometimes the targeting (the parallel version of the microchip presented in [9] fig 1.b also allows targeting by wiring a missile’s flaps onto it). Carl von Clausewitz’ argument that war is the continuation of politics by other means has to be understood as solely an ancient precursor of the policy recommended there, as economics show that it is the most efficient and that radicalism against the authors of crematory ovens, of mash plants, and of crematory tokamaks, is the best way to deter these installations whose construction has ratchet effects and fosters economic depression [10]. Police forces may be entitled to do the targeting with small rocket launchers carried on pickups, where the bottom area of the pickup also allows to place the Fermionic condensator (for instance – see [11]) powering also the rocket launch. Dismantling of the crematory oven, tokmash or mash structures without an early nuclear blast involving a significant quantity of fast neutrons exposes dismantlers to exposure to crematory oven ashes or mash. The nuclear heat-up dissociates a good amount of the ashes or mash in this pattern with fast neutrons coming earlier to the alpha emitters stuck in the walls of the structure, sublevating the ashes or mash and allowing easy cleaning. The flash sterilization pattern with the nuclear blast within immediately after the detachment allowed by the fast neutrons unlocking the alpha emitters from the walls through deshurikenization (transmutation) is needed for bacteriological / virological control reasons. Robotic dismantling only transfers the risk further away into other infrastructures, exposing the cleaners of the robots to the dangerous contamination. It creates the possibility for a gulag-like pattern, unlike the atomic explosion of the crematory, tokmash or mash infrastructures.
Cement-plutonium strikes (“Sunflower” [8]) appear to be more appropriate for cases where collective decisions have led to the development of the extermination structure, without anyone to blame a priori precisely. The cement component of the fallout also allows some treatment of the people in the area from which the missile is fired [12], and behind them, allowing protection of the individuals behind from later homosexual effects and reduction or elimination of the existing ones, while crematory ash or tokmash or mash is usually well-separated from the cement in the plume thanks to differing levels of frangibility and of agglomeration, as well as of density variations. Clean saltwater spinning rockets (of the “Lancet” style) have also well proven their reliability in these tasks and sodium fallout altogether also allows reduction or elimination of the homosexual effects through the same patterns of neutron acceleration facilitating transmutation ; it is also clear that the water component also facilitates the coexistence in the plume of slow neutrons from delayed fission neutrons, in the fission products cloud together with the fast neutrons, allowing some immediately complete elimination, protecting the subjects from a theoretical immediate weaponization. While some pain results from fission within the body, the resulting beta emitters in the bottom of the body where plutonium falls down usually will also encourage protection of the brain against supplementary alpha emitters and excretion of the existing brain contamination into the bottom of the body.
Toxin accumulation associated to the oxidized ashes, in the usual description associated with green tea treatment thereof, leads to the ultimate proposal of “society detoxification” as description pattern. The heats of green tea can be related to a microscopic version of the nuclear heatup needed and its alkali composition describes the later effects of the fission products in the destroyed crematory structure or crematory tokamak (in particular – mash structures with sodium do not suffer from the same issues) helping more detachment of the ashes from the walls, altogether with the liquid washing. Magnet acupuncture [1] with missiles another description.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
