AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31579/2641-0427/014
1 Orthopaedics Department, Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College & Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India.
*Corresponding Author: Jacob Matthew, Orthopaedics Department, Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College & Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India.
Citation: Jacob Matthew and Mitchell Troy 2018, “Single lateral locked plate can be an effective implant in providing fracture stabilization of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures”, J. Orthopaedics and Surgical Sports Medicine. 1(3); Doi: 10.31579/2641-0427/014
Copyright: © 2018 Jacob Matthew. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 06 October 2018 | Accepted: 25 October 2018 | Published: 30 October 2018
Keywords: Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures, Locked Plates, Schatzker Classification, Rasmussen Knee score
Abstract
Background: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures present a therapeutic challenge to the orthopaedic trauma surgeon, both in terms of the osseous injury as well as the concomitant soft-tissue insult. Double Plating with single incision or dual incisions provide more insult to the compromised soft tissue. However, single locking plate combines the technical advantages of an angular stable plate with those of the modern biological plating technique.
Methods: The Study was held at Razi Orthopedic hospital in Kuwait. Between May 2012 and November 2013, 20 patients with a mean age of 37.65 years (Range from 24– 57 years) with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with or without metaphyseal extension. Patients were diagnosed clinically, checked with standard X-rays, CT was done for all cases. Patients were treated by single lateral anatomically contoured locked plate through LISS or Polyaxial locking plate systems with or without additional screws from medial side. Radiological evaluation and functional assessment was done according to the Rasmussen Knee score. Patients were followed-up for an average of 12 months.
Results: Union was achieved in all patients with a mean knee range of motion of 1.5°-130° (range: 0°-10° for extension lag, range: 100°-135° for flexion). The mean Functional Rasmussen Knee score at 6 month follow up (25.32±1.53 SD) ranged from (23.0-28.0). The mean Functional Rasmussen Knee score at last follow-up was (28.33±1.57 SD) ranged between (25.0-30.0) with significant P value (P value<0.001). The mean Anatomical Rasmussen Knee score at 6 month follow up (16.11±1.56 SD) ranged from (14.0-18.0). The mean Anatomical Rasmussen Knee score at last follow-up was (16.67±1.37 SD) ranged from (14.0-18.0) with insignificant P value (P value 0.096 ). Of the 20 patients, one patient had wound related problems, one patient had preoperative compartment syndrome, one patient suffered from hardware irritation and one patient had fixation failure upon which revision with double plating done for him.
Conclusions: Surgical treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with the single lateral locked plate
that was evaluated in our study can lead to a good functional and anatomical outcome and considered an
effective system for providing fracture stabilization provided that the correct surgical technique is used.
Awareness of potential hardware complications is essential.
Tibial plateau fractures constitute 1% of all fractures and 8% of fractures in the elderly [1]. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries and treatment these fractures is challenging. Ideal method is still controversial with risk of unsatisfactory results ifnottreated properly [2].
Several strategies have been advocated for management of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Treatment options include external fixation, circular or hybrid frames, or internal fixation. When internal fixation is chosen, either dual plating (medial and lateral plates) or lateral locked plating have been advocated. There is no consensus on the relative merits of single plate versus dual plate constructs or nonlocking versus locking screws [3].
Several Authors introduced the concept of ‘’indirectreduction’’ of fractures, the goal of which is to obtain reduction without damaging the surrounding soft tissues, or without operating directly in the fracture site. Based on these concepts, the LISS (Less Invasive StabilisationSystem) and ZPLP (Zimmer Periarticular Locking Platesystem) have been studied and developed. These minimallyinvasive systems have the function of an ‘’internalfixator’’ [4-6].
To assist in resolving this controversy, we hypothesised that bicondylar tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker V, VI) would be effectively stabilised using a single lateral anatomically contoured locked plate. Our main evaluation criterion was radiological stability and functional outcome from the immediate postoperative period till healing.
We conducted prospective study from May 2012 to November 2013. Twenty patients with a mean age of 37.65 years (Range from 24-57 years) having bicondylar tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker V, VI) were evaluated after obtaining informed consent to participate in our study. Table 1 reports the main epidemiological data.
Patient# | Age | Sex | Occupation | Mode of Trauma | Schatzker | Complication |
1 | 29 | Male | Mannual Worker | M.V.A. | VI | NO |
2 | 48 | Male | Manual Worker | F.F.H. | VI | NO |
3 | 49 | Male | Manual Worker | M.V.A. | V | NO |
4 | 39 | Male | Office Clerck | Domestic | V | NO |
5 | 27 | Female | Accountant | Domestic | VI | NO |
6 | 38 | Male | Engenier | M.V.A. | V | NO |
7 | 36 | Male | Manual Worker | M.V.A. | V | NO |
8 | 53 | Male | Retired | Domestic | VI | No |
9 | 24 | Male | Student | F.F.H. | VI | NO |
10 | 25 | Male | Manual Worker | M.V.A | VI | HARDWARE IRRITATION |
11 | 32 | Male | Office Clerck | M.V.A | V | NO |
12 | 34 | Male | Engenier | M.V.A. | V | NO |
13 | 38 | Male | Manual Worker | F.F.H. | VI | NO |
14 | 57 | Male | Retired | Domestic | V | NO |
15 | 28 | Female | None | Domestic | V | NO |
16 | 27 | Male | Manual Worker | F.F.H. | V | NO |
17 | 39 | Male | Police Officer | F.F.H. | VI | MALALIGNMENT |
18 | 51 | Male | Manual Worker | M.V.A. | VI | NO |
19 | 42 | Male | Manual Worker | M.V.A. | VI | Superficial Infection |
20 | 37 | Male | Manual Worker | M.V.A. | V | Preoperative Compartment S. |
Table 1: Main epidemiological data in the 20 patients.
Inclusion criteria were bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with or without metaphyseal extension. Fractures were classified by Schatzker classification. Exclusion criteria were patients with other types of fracture tibial plateau, patients have contraindications for surgery, patients with open fractures, patients with active infections and lack of patient compliance.
Description of surgery
I. Surgery was done within 24-48 hours from injury for all patients under epidural anaesthesia. Patient were placed supine with the knee semiflexed on radiolucent traction table to assist in reduction and maintain alignment by ligamentotaxis.
II. After proper draping, a short oblique anterolateral incision was made just proximal to the origin of tibialis anterior muscle distally and up to Gerdy’s tubercle just distal to the joint then the fascia is released. Exposure of the lateral surface of the proximal tibia is performed with a periosteal elevator. The knee joint can be exposed, if needed, via a minimal dissection and submeniscal arthrotomy where needed. If the meniscus is incarcerated in the fracture, it was extracted and stitched if possible.
III. In displaced intraarticular fractures, our priority was reducing the articular surface before plate application. First, Medial plateau fracture should be reduced and fixed. Once temporarily reduced, cancellous bone screws were utilized for compression independently outside of the plate as needed or within the metaphyseal head of the locked plate.
IV. Then, reduction of articular portion of lateral plateau by the same manner after elevation of depressed articular surface ifpresent. If there was large intercondylar imenence fragment, it was reduced and fixed. Calcium phosphate ceramic bone graft was used in 2 cases for filling defects.
V. According to availability of number of plate holes needed for fixation, we used Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS, Synthes USA, Paoli, PA, USA) for fixation of 14 tibial plateau fractures. Polyaxial Locked Plate System (Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana) used for remaining 6 fractures. No intention to treat by specific implant according to geometry of fracture.
VI. Finally, we confirmed fixation under fluoroscopic image guidance in both AP and lateral views. Then reexamined the limb for alignment before wound closure. A suction drain was used in all patients. Finally closure of the subcutaneous and skin layers was done. Post operative Plain X ray films (AP& Lateral views) were done for documentation and assessment of progress of bone healing later on.
Aftercare
1- Intravenous antibiotic in the form of third-generation cephalosporins (Ceftriaxone) as a prophylaxis was given for all patients starting from the day of surgery and continued till drain removal after 48 hours. An anticoagulation therapy and antiembolic stockings were used up to the start of ambulation from bed.
2- Continuos Passive motion (C.P.M) machine that started on the first postoperative day in conformity with the degree of stability of the fixation from (0-90) degree and continued till reaching the acceptable range. Knee brace was used between sessions of physiotherapy. Active-assisted isometric exercises of the knee were started at that time and were continued up to 6 weeks. Non Weight Bearing(NBW) was started after removal of drain using walking frame followed by crutches.
3- All patients were discharged from the hospital when wound condition was OK ( i.e no signs of infection), active range of motion at least (0-90°) and patients were walking steady N.W.B. on the affected limb with crutches.
Description of followup routine
1-First visit was within 14 days from surgery for check up of the wound and removal of stitches if wound looked healed. Range of Motion (R.O.M.) was checked and recorded. Second visit was at 6-8 weeks, third visit was at 4-6 months with the start of F.W.B., fourth visit was at 9 months and fifth visit was at 12 months unless complications occurred (Figure 1).
2-Each visit had clinical evaluation of the wound, measuring R.O.M. and plain (AP&lateral) X-rays.
3-Deep infection was defined as infection of the wound recurring debridement. Secondary loss of reduction was defined as an increase of 2 mm of intra-articular step-off and secondary loss of alignment was defined as an increase of 3° alignment when compared with the first post-operative radiograph.
4- Radiological union was defined as the presence of trabeculation crossing the fracture on radiographs of at least three cortices.
5-Clinical union was defined as the presence of painless full weight bearing. Nonunion was defined as no evidence of healing after 6 months.
6-Rasmussen knee scores (Functional and anatomical) [7] were used at serial intervals in the third visit with the start of F.W.B. and fifth visit.
7-The time of return to work from initial surgery was evaluated and compared between different age populations and type of fractures.
Variables, outcome measures, data sources, and bias
Assessment of post operative X rays as follows:
1- Assessment of articular incongruity: By measuring degree of step off (depth of depression) in AP radiographs. Malreduction was defined as intraarticular step-off of at least 3 mm measured on scaled radiographs.
2- Assesment of alignment of the proximal tibia: We defined alignment of the proximal tibia by measuring the the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) in the coronal plane and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) in the sagittal plane (Figure 2). These angles were measured according to Freedman and Johnson [8].
MPTA is the medial angle between the tangential line and anatomical axis of the tibia in AP radiographs. (normal range: 82°-92°).
PPTA is the angle between the tangential line of medial plateau and the perpendicular line of the anterior tibial cortex on lateral radiographs. (normal range:4°-14°). The following angles were considered Malalignment in our study (MPTA >92°or MPTA <82°, or PPTA >14°, PPTA <4°).
3- Each visit had clinical evaluation of the wound, measuring (R.O.M.) by goniometer and plain (AP&lateral) X-rays. All clinical evaluation was done by the same person trying to reduce inter observer variability as possible. All radiographs were checked for magnification, penetration and exposure before measurements and observations were taken to eliminate magnification errors. All radiographs included in our study were taken by staff members from the same radiology department adhering to local guidelines and the set up for knee radiograph was standardized Figure 3.
4- Functional Grading of Rasmussen knee score with a total score (30 points) include the following:
A. Subjective Complaints (Pain and walking capacity).
B. Clinical signs (Extension, Total Range of motion and Stability). Acceptable Score (Excellent: 27 points, Good: 20 points). Unacceptable Score ( Fair: 10 points, Poor: 6 points).
5- Anatomical Grading of Rasmussen knee score with a total score (18 points) include the following:
a. Depression
b. Condylar Widening
c. Angulation (Varus/ Valgus)
Acceptable Score (Excellent: 18 points, Good: 12 points). Unacceptable Score ( Fair: 6 points, Poor: 0 points).
Statistical analysis, study size
1- Paired t-test is the statistical hypothesis that was used in our study to compare Mean functional Rasmussen Knee Score during 6 and 12 months. p value was considered to be statistically significant at p≤0.05.
2- ANOVA test was used for comparison between repeated measures of Joint depression, MPTA, PPTA and Condylar Widening during postoperative period, 6 months and 12 months follow up. p value was considered to be statistically significant at p≤0.05.
3- All 20 patients were followed up for 12 months with no patient lost to follow up.
1- The average predefined hospital stay was 5.2 days.
2-During follow up, it was observed that all patients had achieved union within an average duration of 4.8 months (range: 4-6 months).
3- Average time for full weight bearing was 16.4 weeks.
4- Mean knee range of motion of 1.5°-130° (range: 0°-10° for extension lag, range: 100°-135° for flexion).
5- Functional evaluation was done using Rasmussen Knee Scoring system at third visit (6 months) with the start of full weight bearing and fifth visit (12 months ) at final follow up Table 2.
Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures associated with high-energy trauma are frequently complex injuries that portend a poor prognosis. The status of the soft tissue envelope typically mirrors the amount of energy imparted to the bone. Traditionally, internal fixation of these injuries has been fraught with complications, including infections and wound breakdown. Biologic surgical treatment emphasises preservation of vascularity and soft-tissue integrity by minimizing further insult to the soft tissues [9].
Fixation of tibial plateau fractures has undergone dramatic change within the last decade with the advent of periarticular locking plates. One proposed clinical advantage of the locking plate is the ability to support the medial plateau and prevent varus collapse of bicondylar plateau fractures through a single laterally based implant [10]. Additionally, some of these plating systems also have guide arms facilitating percutaneous insertion and limited dissection, which may further reduce the soft-tissue insult of the surgery. The advantages of so-called submuscular plating are probably particularly important in high-energy injuries with significant soft-tissue swelling, and early results of these plates have provided encouraging results treating bicondylar fractures with a single laterally based locking plate [11].
One proposed clinical advantage of the locking plate is the ability to support the medial plateau and prevent varus collapse of bicondylar plateau fractures through a single, laterally based implant. This hypothesis was investigated by Gosling et al [12]. In a cadaveric study, concluding that the LISS plate and dual plating with traditional plates both provided similar resistance to permanent deformation of the construct under load.
Uniaxial locking systems have the advantage of not being able to manoeuvre locking screws around obstacles such as screws or other implants, or to target fracture fragments at different levels. This has forced research towards the development of polyaxial technology. The option of using a multi-trajectory locking screw instead of a fixed-angle one is achieved with various techniques which are widely used in clinical practice [13]. Our study suggests that single lateral locked plate can be an effective implant in providing fracture stabilization of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.
By analysis of this table, single lateral locked plate can be an effective implant in providing fracture stabilization of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Understanding the potential hardware complications is important for anyone intending to use locked proximal tibial plate for the treatment of such fractures and it results in statistically significant functional outcome and good anatomical statistically insignificant outcome when utilized correctly.
Complications of our study are comparable to previous literatures studying this issue. Soft tissue complications are a major concern in the treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with plates. The surgical approach and number of incisions are reported to have an effect on the incidence of soft tissue complications following repair of tibial plateau fractures [18]. With LISS fixation, it is reported to range from 0 to 22% [19,20]. As regards dual plating fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures, papers reporting the results of dual plating through a single extensile incision had shown an incidence of deep wound infection of 23-88% [18,21]. With the two-incision double plating technique, the incidence drops to 4.7-8.4% [22,23].
The most debated complication of our study and other studies regarding efficacy of single lateral locked plate in providing fracture stabilization of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures is failure of fixation of medial component of the fracture. Parameters of failure in our case was ( joint depression 2mm., MPTA 83°, PPTA 9° and condylar widening 3mm.). By analysis of geometry of fracture of the failed case, we found that articular component of the medial column fracture had coronal fracture line and small posteromedial fragment. Analysis of failed cases in other studies revealed that geometry of fracture had one of the following or collection of them: Medial intraarticular fracture line, Small comminuted medial plateau fragment, Medial articular fracture having a coronal component with posteromedial fragment.
The significance of posteromedial fragments in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures was recently addressed in the literature although both incidence and subsequent displacement are usually underestimated. Barei et al. [2] and Higgins et al [24]. Reported that the incidence rate of posteromedial fragments in patients with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures was 28.8–59%. The presentation of posteromedial fragments makes reduction and fixation of complex plateau fractures more difficult, especially when a single fixed angle plate is used.
Several factors could explain why lateral locked plating is less effective for fractures with coronal medial fracture lines. The direction of locked screws is fixed and is, for the most part, parallel rather than perpendicular to a coronal fracture line. This may explain why the fixation failure was not seen with medial articular fracture lines in the sagittal plane. Furthermore, although the posterior medial fracture fragments may be small, it may serve a critical role in preventing posterior subluxation of the medial femoral condyle. Even when locking screws engage the fragment, the quality of the fixation may be inadequate to resist the forces of displacement [25].
limitations of our study include the following:Lack of a comparative group, therefore, we cannot determine if another method of treatment would have led to different results. The limited number of patients in our study is a weakness regarding statistical power. Short duration of study: the one-year results may not be sufficient for drawing final conclusions regarding functional outcome after these challenging fractures. It is possible that, with time, many of these patients may have post traumatic knee arthritic changes. It is possible, even probable, that the prevalence of degenerative change may increase with time.
Single lateral locked plate can be an effective implant in providing fracture stabilization of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. For optimal results, indication of surgical treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures by single lateral locked plate is: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with no medial articular fracture line. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with large non comminuted medial plateau fragment. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with medial articular fracture not having a coronal component. We suggest a future prospective study to compare different types of fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures, to know if there is any significant difference between them.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
