AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8914/002
1 Nutritionist. Masters in Clinical Nutrition. Associate professor at El Bosque University, Clinical Nutritionist at Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pediatric Nutrition Center, Gastronutriped, Bogota, Colombia.
2 Pediatric gastroenterologist, Masters in Clinical Nutrition. Associate professor at El Bosque University, Director of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pediatric Nutrition Centet, Gastronutriped, Bogota, Colombia.
3 Pediatrician, Pediatric researcher at Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pediatric Nutrition Center, Gastronutriped, Bogota, Colombia.
4 Pediatrician, Professor at El Bosque University, Delegate of Colombian Society of Pediatrics, Bogota, Colombia.
*Corresponding Author: Wilson Daza, School Medicine Universidad El Bosque, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Center, Gastronutriped, Colombia.
Citation: Silvana Dadán, Wilson Daza, Michelle Higuera, Bertha Calderón, Complementary Feeding In A Latin America Country (Colombia): Practices By Pediatricians And Residents Of Pediatrics Versus Espghan Guidelines 2017, 1(1); DOI: 10.31579/2637-8914/002
Copyright: © 2018 Wilson Daza et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 February 2018 | Accepted: 09 March 2018 | Published: 15 March 2018
Keywords: complementary feeding; infants; health personnel; pediatrics
Background: Complementary feeding supplements nutritional requirements, fosters the child’s growth and development, and helps to insure the future health of the child. Given its impact, it is important to be aware of the practices in Colombia with respect to the timing of complementary foods, the schedule of the introduction of common allergens, and the progression in food textures.
Methodology: Pediatricians and pediatric residents were asked to complete a survey available at the outlets of Gastronutriped and the Colombian Society of Pediatrics. The data were analyzed using Epi Info 7.1.3.10. Absolute and relative frequency measurements were estimated.
Results: 420 professionals participated: 83.5% pediatricians and 65% females, with a median age of 38. 82.6% start complementary food at 6 months of age, and 52% start with fruit compotes. 26% introduce egg at 9 months, 27.6% start gluten at 7 months, 30.9% recommend fish after one year of age, and 83.8% allow cow's milk at approximately one year of age. About 90% of respondents recommend liquefied food or porridge between 6 and 8 months of age. However, about 60% suggest progressing toward more solid food during this same period.
Conclusions: Cow's milk is mostly introduced after one year of age according ESPGHAN Guidelines 2017. Contradictorily, its derivatives (yogurt, cheese, and desserts) are allowed before one year of age. It is advised that some foods with greater allergenic potential, such as fish, seafood, dried fruit, and nuts, are avoided during the first year of life contrary to the current recommendations of allergen introduction by ESPGHAN Guidelines 2017.
Maternal breast feeding and the timing of complementary foods are fundamental determinants of the growth, development, and health of children, during early childhood as well as during adulthood [1].
The World Health Organization (WHO), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the European Society of Gastroenterology, Hematology, and Pediatric Nutrition (ESPGHAN) are entities that evaluate and permanently work on guidelines for complementary feeding. In 1982, ESPGHAN suggested that complementary feeding should begin between 4 and 6 months of age [2]. In 2002, the WHO and the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) developed a worldwide strategy for feeding of infants and small children, recommending exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months [3]. The strategy has been updated on several occasions. Nevertheless, it has not varied with respect to the suggested age for beginning complementary feeding. Likewise, the Feeding Guidelines for boys and girls under two years old of 2004 in Colombia propose exclusive maternal breastfeeding up to 6 months old [4]. In 2008, ESPGHAN published new guidelines, specifying that between 17 and 26 weeks after birth would be the suggested period for beginning feeding [5]. Recently the Committee on Nutrition of ESPGHAN published this year a position paper which concluded that complementary foods should not be introduced before 4 months but should not be delayed beyond 6 months, infants should be offered foods with a variety of flavours and textures, continued breast-feeding is recommended alongside complementary feeding, whole cows’ milk should not be used as the main drink before 12 months of age and allergenic foods may be introduced when complementary feeding is commenced any time after 4 months.
In practice, feeding norms are influenced by multiple factors, such as the family environment [6], the community, the culture, the socioeconomic level, and the availability of foods [3,7,8], and doctors’ recommendations [9], all of which are aspects that affect the decisions of citizens with respect to the feeding of the baby. The health professional, particularly the pediatrician, is the one who guides, for the most part, the onset and evolution of feeding, in the context of the above-mentioned factors [10, 11].
The available studies dealing with the practices and the guidance that pediatricians and health professionals give with respect to complementary feeding are scarce. Because of the importance of feeding for health [1,3], the aim of the present study was to identify some guidelines and recommendations made by pediatricians and pediatric residents in Colombia, because they are the ones that guide it, in great measure. Among the guidelines are the age at which it is begun and the type of food that is recommended, the age at which foods with more allergenic potential (eggs, fish, gluten, soy, seafood, peanuts or dried fruit and nuts, unmodified cow’s milk) are started, progression of textures, and suggested quantity of fruit juice.
Patients and method:
Design. It is a cross sectional study. Pediatricians, subspecialists and pediatric residents were invited, between May and July, 2015, through an Internet portal, email, and social networks, to fill out a virtual survey available in the official pages of Gastronutriped and the Colombian Society of Pediatrics.
The survey was designed to collect data with respect to the age of introduction of complementary food, the type of food, and how it was recommended to introduce it, with special emphasis on those classified as having high allergenic potential and the evolution of textures, among others.
Statistical analysis. The data were compiled in a database designed with Microsoft Excel 2010® software and were analyzed with the Epi Info 7.1.3.10 statistical package (CDC, Atlanta). The descriptive analysis of the variables of interest for characterizing the sample was carried out; measures of absolute and relative frequencies were estimated for the categorical variables.
Ethical considerations. The data were collected anonymously. The study was based on Resolution 8430 of 1993 of the Colombian Ministry of Health, which establishes scientific, technical and administrative norms for health research. The four principles stipulated in the Helsinki Declaration, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy, were observed.
Sociodemographic data:
420 professionals participated. 83.6% (351/420) were pediatricians and subspecialists, 65% (273/420) were female, with a median age of 38 (RI 32–49), and 40.5% practice in the country’s capital. 92.4% of the professionals (388/420) considered that they had received guidance about complementary feeding during their pediatric training, and 36.4% (153/420) that it had been sufficient. (Table 1).
N(420) | % | ||
| Gender | Feminine | 273 | |
| Masculine | 143 | 35 | |
| Distribution by Region | Caribbean Region | 83 | 19.9 |
| Andean Region | 274 | 65.6 | |
| Pacific Region | 44 | 10.5 | |
| Amazonian Region | 8 | 2.0 | |
| Orinoquian Region | 9 | 2.0 | |
| Present Occupation | Pediatricians | 283 | 67.4 |
| Pediatric Residents | 69 | 16.4 | |
| Pediatricians with Subspecialty | 68 | 16.2 |
| N (420) | % | ||
| Age of introduction of complementary food | 3 months | 3 | 0.7 |
| 4 months | 27 | 6.4 | |
| 5 months | 35 | 8.3 | |
| 6 months | 347 | 82.6 | |
| 7 months | 6 | 1.4 | |
| 8 months | 2 | 0.4 | |
| Recommended first food | Fruit compost | 218 | 51.9 |
| Fruit juice | 45 | 10.7 | |
| Porridge | 43 | 10.2 | |
| Liquidated vegetables | 39 | 9.2 | |
| Vegetable soup and meat or chicken | 35 | 8.3 | |
| Vegetable purée | 25 | 5.9 | |
| Meat or chicken purée | 10 | 2.4 | |
| Eliminated* | 4 | 0.9 |
Table 1. Some sociodemographic characteristics of the participants in the national survey of pediatricians and pediatric residents in Colombia (2015)
Table 2. Timing of complementary foods suggested by pediatricians and pediatric residents surveyed in Colombia (2015)
Timing of initiation of complementary foods:
97.3% (409/420) suggest beginning complementary feeding between 4 and 6 months of age, although the majority, (82.6%, 347/420) advise it around 6 months old. About half of the professionals (51.9%, 218/420) propose beginning with fruit in the form of a compost. 10.7% (45/420) recommend fruit juice for beginning complementary feeding, and 10.2% (43/420) suggest porridge (Table 2).
Meat (beef or chicken) is recommended between 6 and 7 months (35.4% and 34.8%, respectively).
*Eliminated because the question asked one to indicate only one food and the participants listed two or more
Age for introducing food with a greater allergenic potential:
More than half of professionals (51.3%, 216/420) recommend eggs between 6 and 9 months of age. Nevertheless, 33% (139/420) advise waiting until age 12 months or older for incorporating them. 62.6% (263/420) suggest beginning egg yolk between 6 and 9 months, and 17.5% (74/420) wait until wait until 12 months or older. 37% (156/420) recommend egg white between 6 and 9 months, and 38.5% (162/420) wait until one year of age or older to introduce it. As far as fish, 29.1% (123/420) of professionals recommend it between 6 and 9 months of age, while 63.6% recommend it at age one year or older (237/420) (Table 3), (Figure 1).
As far as unmodified cow’s milk 83.8% (352/420) recommend introducing it at or after one year of age. Nevertheless, with respect to derivatives made with unmodified cow’s milk protein, 33.6% (141/420) suggest yogurt for babies between 6 and 11 months, although 61.4% (258/420) recommend it at one year or even after. 26.5% (112/420) suggest introducing cheese between 6 and 11 months of age, and 71.7% (301/420) recommend it at one year or later. Around half of the professionals (48.8%, 205/420) suggest introducing gluten between 6 and 7 months of age. 8.8% (37/420) recommend it at one year or later (Table 3), Figure 1).
As for seafood, 12.1% (51/420) recommend it between 6 and 11 months, and 79.2% (333/420) at 12 months or later. With respect to soy, 48.8% (205/420) suggest that it be between 6 and 11 months, and 35.7% (150/420) at one year or later. 16.7% (70/420) recommend introducing dried fruit and nuts between 6 and 11 months of age, and 72.8% (306/420) at one year or later.
Textures of the food:
70.5% (296/420) of the professionals propose liquidated foods, creams, or soups between 4 and 6 months, and 61.6% (259/420) at 6 months (Table 4). 8% (34/420) recommend them between 8 and 10 months. 6.4% (27/420) suggest beginning food with more texture at 6 months, while 84% (353/420) recommend it between 7 and 10 months of age.
Fruit juice:
As far as the quantity of fruit juice recommended, 21.43% (90/420) suggest less than four ounces/day and 32.62% (137/420) from 4 to 6 ounces/day. On the other hand, 17.62
Complementary feeding fulfills different functions, among them helping to complete the amount of nutrients and micronutrients that are insufficiently consumed, challenging textures and flavors, developing healthy habits, social integration, maturation, and modulation of the microbiota and the immune system [12,13]. In terms of age, it has been stipulated that 4 to 6 months is a “safe” period for beginning the feeding. A series of negative effects have been described when the food is incorporated before 4 months or after 7 months of age, such as specific nutritional deficiencies (iron, zinc, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin D), malnutrition, disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, greater susceptibility to food allergy, diabetes, and obesity [14-16]. Menon et al. [17] found that the lack of variety of foods and progression in children from 6 to 23 months of age were associated with retarded growth and underweight.
In Colombia, Olaya noted that the timing of complementary foods is after 6 months, more exactly between 6 and 8 months of age [18]. Ortiz et al., in a survey aimed at general practitioners, showed that the majority recommended starting at 6 months [19]. Similarly, in our survey, 6 months was the age most recommended by pediatricians and pediatric residents, in agreement with the guidelines of the WHO and the AAP? However, if we add the professionals that recommend it between 4 and 6 months, it equals almost all of our sample (97.3%), coinciding with the findings in Ireland [20] with respect to the practices of caretakers, who introduce food between 17 and 26 weeks, according to ESPGHAN [5]. Nevertheless, the data of the National Health and Nutrition Survey in Colombia (ENSIN 2010) show that at 2.7 months liquid food different from maternal milk (juice, broth, sugarcane water, soft drinks, herbal tea, chocolate, coffee) is already introduced, and at 5.3 months, soft and semisolid food [9]. In Bolivia, Cruz Agudo et al. report that 39% of the caretakers start food during the first three months of life, with food of low nutritional content [21].
To begin feeding, according to Ortiz et al. general practitioners recommend fruit (57.7%), followed by cereal (35.9%), and a smaller percentage (2.6%) meat and eggs [19]. These data are similar to those of Ireland, where caretakers mainly begin with cereal for infants or with fruit [20]. The participants in our survey agree with fruit as the first option, but do not agree with the recommendation of cereal. Only 10.2% recommend it as the first alternative.
Puréed meat and fortified cereal for infants are the options recommended by the Committee on Nutrition of the AAP for beginning complementary feeding, because they help complete the requirements for nutrients such as iron and zinc, which are very susceptible to deficiency [22].Likewise, the Committee on Nutrition of ESPGHAN emphasizes that between 6 and 6 and a half months meat should be incorporated [5], for this same purpose. However in spite of these recommendations, only 11% of the participants in our survey suggest some type of meat as the first food, but more than half recommend it between 7 and 9 months of age.
The principal micronutrients that are deficient in Colombian children are iron, zinc, vitamin A, and vitamin B12, according to the data of ENSIN 2010 [9]. In the first year of life, 23.7% of children are deficient in iron and 27.5% of 5-year-old children suffer from anemia, and of those, 31.4% correspond to iron deficiency anemia in the first year of life, more frequently in rural areas [9]. Furthermore, in the first year of life 41.8% of children suffer from a deficiency of zinc, 27.6% from a deficiency of vitamin A, and 20% of 4-year-old children suffer from a deficiency of vitamin B12.
Correlating the alteration of the state of iron with feeding habits, ENSIN 2005 [23] showed that the consumption of animal protein by 2-year-old children is low. 20% of children between 6 and 23 months do not eat meat or eggs, a figure that rises to 34% in the 6- to 11-month age group. That is to say, in spite of the documented deficiency of iron and anemia, from the perspective of the professional, meat is not given priority in complementary feeding. This practice coincides with the findings in Brazil in 5 surveys of children between 6 and 12 months of age, between 1998 and 2008, which documented a tendency toward low consumption of food rich in iron [24].
As has already been noted, more than half of pediatricians and pediatric residents in our survey recommended fruit as the first food. Fruit, as such, in compost or in juice, natural or industrialized, is not a source of iron nor of other critical nutrients such as zinc and vitamin B12, which are deficient in Colombian children. In Colombia fruit juice is a deeply ingrained habit, under the concept of “healthy food”. The AAP recommends a consumption limit according to the age of the child, starting at 6 months of age [22]. Excessive consumption has been associated with malabsorption of nutrients, deficiencies, alteration of the bone mineralization, lack of appetite, malnutrition, and maladies such as functional diarrhea and constipation, among others [3]. ENSIN 2010 found that almost 20% of Colombian children under 2 years of age suffer from chronic malnutrition, which could be aggravated by the excessive consumption of juice [9]. In our findings, it was shown that more than half of the professionals recommended juice in the second semester of life, in quantities according to the recommendation of the AAP. However, some suggest a greater quantity, or even don’t warn about it.
In a manner very similar to that described in our study, in Mexico Pantoja Mendoza et al. found that a high percentage begin before 6 months of age with fruit, industrialized juice and sugared drinks, with low consumption of animal protein and iron [25].
With respect to textures, according to the WHO and the AAP, between 6 and 8 months semisolid food should be introduced [1]. More than have of the participants in our survey (61%) recommend starting with liquid and semisoft food (soup, liquidated food, creams), at 6 months, and around 60% suggest progression to more solid food between 6 and 8 months of age. In Argentina, Gatica et al. evaluated the feeding practices for 2-year-old children by caretakers. 64.24% of the children received food starting at 6 months in the form of porridge or purée, enriched with unmodified cow’s milk or vegetable oil [26].
With respect to the introduction of food with greater allergenic potential, in decade of the nineties it was advised to wait until after the first year, and even eggs and fish until after 2 o 3 years old, respectively, in healthy children with a family history of allergies [9]. Starting in 2008, the AAP and ESPGHAN recommend introducing all of the foods with allergenic potential in the first year of life, because there is no evidence that delaying it reduces the risk of food allergies [5,12,13]. In 2016, Romero et al. published the consensus of complementary feeding for 2-year-old children, with recommendations similar to ESPGHAN, AAP, and WHO [27]. In 2017, ESPGHAN again recommends that allergenic food can be introduced at any time, when complementary feeding is begun after 4 months and before 12 months. Infants with a high risk of allergy to peanuts should be introduced to them between 4 and 11 months, after an evaluation by a qualified specialist [28].
In our survey, among the foods with a greater allergenic potential, fish, seafood, and dried fruit and nuts were those that were mainly recommended for delayed introduction. However, egg yolks and soy were recommended for earlier ages.
García Díaz et al. found that 15.4% of professionals in health centers suggested introducing gluten starting at 4 months in children with maternal breastfeeding [29], following recommendations of ESPGHAN in 2008. However, in 2017, ESPGHAN concludes that the age of the introduction of gluten does not impede nor delay the expression of celiac disease when the child has a genetic disposition. Likewise, they conclude that the gluten associated with maternal breastfeeding does not avoid the occurrence of celiac disease and that it should be introduced between 4 and 12 months of age, although neither the daily quantity nor the recommended preparation are specified.
Among the participants in our survey, the introduction of gluten agrees with these last-named guidelines, because mainly they suggest that it be before 12 months of age. Only 1.9% recommend it after the first year of life.
WHO, AAP and ESPGHAN recommend avoiding whole cow´s milk in the first year of life, among others, because of the negative impact on the bioavailability of iron and the state of iron [1,3,28]. The foregoing results in a key recommendation for Colombia, where this is an ongoing and serious problem. In ENSIN 2010 it was found that cow’s milk and its derivatives had been introduced to half of the non-breast fed infants of 9 months of age [9]. In our study, we documented that one fifth of the professionals recommended introducing unmodified cow’s milk around one year or later. Nevertheless this restriction was not so strict with respect to derivatives made from unmodified cow´s milk, such as yogurt, desserts for babies, and/or cheese. Greater flexibility was seen in relation to its recommendation before the first year of life, which could be evidence of the mistaken conception that these derivatives are different or have greater nutritional value than unmodified cow’s milk, and that therefore they are ideal for complementary food before the first year [3]. In 2017, ESPGHAN emphasizes that whole cow’s milk should not be used before 12 months of age [28].
One of the principal limitations of our study is that the majority of the participants work in large cities, in an urban zone. That is to say that there was little participation by those that work in marginal arias with a high prevalence of malnutrition, specific nutritional deficiencies, and infant mortality.
The majority of the professionals surveyed follow the recommendations presently available with respect to the age of starting complementary feeding. However, there exists an opportunity for improvement with respect to the earlier introduction of food with a greater allergenic potential, reduction of the recommendation of fruit, compost or juice as the first food, and more rapid progression toward food with a greater texture before 10 months of age, a critical stage for the acceptance of textures. Likewise, it can be seen that there is a lack of awareness of the importance of restricting the introduction of unmodified cow’s milk and its derivatives during the first year of life because of its negative impact on infant nutrition and health.
It is important to know the nutritional situation in each country for precisely adapting the recommendations for complementary feeding and to respond to these necessities, in particular so that the norms include ideal foods, part of the culture and accessible, that help to minimize the problem of public health. In the case of Colombia, where there are great deficiencies of iron, vitamin B12 and zinc, foods such as meat and fortified infant cereal would be an ideal option, as recommended by the AAP.
Although it was not the aim to qualify the recommendations as correct or not, this paper is a first source of reference for the guidelines that are laid down in the country and can serve as the basis for developing and consolidating strategies for unifying criteria, thus diminishing the variability in the recommendations. It is fundamental to carry out more studies that include a larger sampling and thus will allow corroborating our findings, in order to establish better practices in Colombia according to current guidelines.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
