AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/097
Mielec, Poland
*Corresponding Author: Jan Myjkowski, Mielec, Poland.
Citation: Jan Myjkowski, (2023), Our Sense of Smell, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice. 6(5); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/097
Copyright: © 2023, Jan Myjkowski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 June 2023 | Accepted: 07 July 2023 | Published: 26 July 2023
Keywords: adenosine triphosphate; carbon dioxide; inositol triphosphate
Smell is one of the most highly developed senses in some insects, animals and fish. It conditions the survival of species on Earth. It serves to locate the food source, senses danger and helps to find a partner to extend the species. With the help of smell, individuals communicate with each other. The smell of the insect, the silkworm, is excellent. The male recognises in the air single particles of an odorous substance secreted by the female from a distance of 10 km. Fish use their sense of smell and memory in their journeys of thousands of kilometres from rivers to seas. A shark can smell blood in the water from several kilometres away. Ants leave an olfactory trail for their brethren, indicating a food source, or leave a "death scent" when they warn of danger. Man, not having such a good sense of smell, uses dogs with 10 times better sense of smell to track down drugs or criminals. The record-holder among sniffers is the male nocturnal peacock butterfly (Eudia Paonia), which can smell the pheromones of a female from a distance of 11 km, when the signal produced has only 0.0001 mg of scent per dose. The signal sent by the female into the ether is perfectly produced molecules according to her own code. The partner has a specific coded receptor and reads the transmitted information. Butterflies do not have a nose, the olfactory cells are located on the antennae and further information is transmitted to the central nervous system, where it is analysed. The paper highlights the molecular basis of olfactory information transmission and reception.
H-2 - 2 hydrogen atoms
Å - Angstrem 10-10 m
Nm - nanometre 10-9 m
Hz - Hertz
ATP - adenosine triphosphate
ADP - adenosine diphosphate
cAMP - cyclic adenosine monophosphate
IP3 - inositol triphosphate
DAG - diacylglycerol
CO2 - carbon dioxide
PIP2 - phosphatidylinositol diphosphate
In the first century BC, the Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius (Titus Lucretius Caruso c. 99 BC - 55 BC) believed that odours were created by differences in the shapes and sizes of the 'atoms' that stimulate the organ of smell. This was the 'theory of shapes'. There are many indications that Lucretius got a lot of things right. Research on the sense of smell was carried out by Americans Richard Axel and Linda Buck from 1980 onwards. The announced their work in 1991 and were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2004. The work was mainly concerned with which neural pathways information about a particular odour reaches the brain. The second major topic concerned the coding of odour receptors in the olfactory organ [1]. The authors state "that all olfactory receptors belong to a superfamily of proteins having seven transmembrane domains and are coupled to G proteins. Secondary messengers are formed, and the conductance of membrane ion channels is altered. It is assumed that only one olfactory receptor gene is expressed in the olfactory neuron. The question arises: How are thousands of odorous substances, which have a similar structure but give a completely different odour sensation, recognised. It was therefore assumed that one receptor could recognise multiple odour substances. Furthermore, it was assumed that one odorant can be recognised by many receptors. It was concluded that there is a complex receptor code. According to this code, a specific odour substance stimulates a defined set of neurons, each of which has only one type of receptor [2]. In the first stage of sensory information processing in the olfactory epithelium, the information carried by odorous substances is analysed. A given odorous substance stimulates a specific combination of olfactory neurons in the nasal cavity." The authors showed that there is only one type of receptor on a single olfactory cell, which is able to detect several different odour molecules.
Is this substantiated?
Our sense of smell
It has been 32 years since the Nobel laureates published their work describing the mechanisms of the olfactory organ [3]. During this time, there have been tremendous advances in quantum chemistry, allowing a better understanding of the processes that make up the reception, processing, and transmission of olfactory information [4,5]. These processes take place at the sub molecular and subatomic level. They are very complex and extremely interesting [6]. Organic molecules - as olfactory signals - are multi-atomic and have numerous proton and electron donors and acceptors. Sometimes one side of a molecule has a whole system of donors and acceptors. Such an arrangement waiting to be paired with a competent acceptor is called a synthon. The donor of a molecule has free pairs of electrons on its surface waiting for a positive acceptor ion, and in addition has similar dimensions. If the dimensions of the donor and acceptor are ideal or close to ideal, it is a lock-and-key combination - known and described in allergology and immunology for 100 years. If the donor has to match the dimensions of the acceptor - it is a template (rack) connection. Molecular recognition occurs when the donor molecule adopts a new conformation with a higher energy than in the original donor conformation. If the donor and acceptor have to change conformation before joining - this is a hand-in-glove connection. This is energetically disadvantageous. Each molecule is made up of nuclei of positively charged atoms, connected by ionic, covalent or hydrogen bonds, forming different angles (valence-flat, between bonds, torsion-double bond, between bonds). Negatively charged electrons circulate in different orbits of the atom, having their own energy and spin. The nucleus of an atom with a size of 10-15 m consists of protons and neutrons. Other constituents of the atom are: quarks, antiquarks, mesons, leptons, baryons, bosons, fermions and gluons. Electrostatic and magnetic interactions between atoms play a certain role. Opposite charges attract each other even from a great distance, univalent charges repel each other. Each atom has electrons, orbiting the nucleus in their own orbits. The binding energy depends on the electron energy, which consists of the orbital angular momentum with the intrinsic angular momentum or spin. The binding energy of the donor to the acceptor is equally -weighted with the dissociation energy necessary to separate the donor and acceptor after the transfer of information. Otherwise, the acceptor would be permanently locked. The size range of olfactory molecules is gigantic. The smallest hydrogen molecule, H-2, contains 2 protons and 2 electrons and has a molecular mass of 2 Daltons. Its bond length = 0.74A. The largest molecule is 1µm long, 10 nm in diameter. It contains 17 million atoms and has a molecular weight = 200 million Daltons. Atomic bond lengths undergo constant lengthening and shortening due to the normal vibrations of the atoms. The atoms reach their maximum deflections at the same time. They perform constant rotational vibrations and vibrations around their equilibrium positions. The frequency of vibration is between 1013 Hz and 1014 Hz. The period of vibration is on average 10-12 s. The vibrational deflections are 10% of the bond length. For the hydrogen molecule H-2 this is about 0.1 Å. Each molecule has its own fundamental energy. The external energy (signal) causes a change in the potential energy of the acceptor (receptor), rotational excitation, a change in bond length, a change in valence and torsional angles, a change in the total energy of the molecule and finally a change in the conformation of the acceptor molecule. Receipt of information by the receptor leads to the activation of a specific trans-membrane protein G, seven times across the receptor cell membrane. The G protein activates adenylyl cyclase, which catalyses the conversion of ATP to cAMP and this initiates a series of reactions in the olfactory cell. Signalling molecules play an important role: ATP, cAMP, IP3, DAG and Ca++ that regulate the activity of intracellular target molecules: Calcium levels in the cell increase, ion channels of the cell membrane work, depolarisation of the cell occurs. In an excitable cell such as the nerve and auditory cell, a transmitter is produced, packed in portions into synaptic vesicles, transmitted to the synapse, where the chemical energy of the bonds is converted into electrical energy. An excitatory potential is created and, in excitable nerve cells, an action potential is formed, which is conducted via nerves to the central nervous system. In bipolar olfactory cells, transmitters have not been described. To understand these processes, elements of quantum chemistry are taken into account, playing an important role in the molecular transformations of smell: Oscillatory levels, rotational excitation, rotational levels, potential energy for the motion of nuclei, electron excitation, electron ground state, harmonic oscillator, resonant state, rotational potential, bond energy, normal vibration. Since the final results of translation, rotation, vibration and other actions depend on the signal's own variables, the final result is the sum and partly the product of the individual actions. In contrast, the total energy of the signal after reception is the sum of the translational, electron, rotational and oscillatory energies. At the slightest approximation of the molecules, there is a valence interaction associated with the overlap of the electron clouds of the two molecules. This is a repulsive effect, increasing rapidly with excessive proximity. Valence interactions are very important in being able to specifically match spatially approaching molecules, which is crucial in molecular recognition: signal - receptor. The chemical reaction to connect the donor (signal) to the acceptor (receptor) occurs when the forces seeking to connect outweigh the valence interaction. The reaction barrier must be overcome, which determines the specificity of the signal-receptor reaction. There are changes in the occupancy of the acceptor orbitals by electrons. This causes a change in the electron hypersurface, a change in the energy of the acceptor (receiving the signal), conformational changes, changes in the vibration of the atoms and the molecule as a whole and finally the transmission of the signal from the olfactory cell membrane receptor to the cell interior via the trans-membrane G protein. The resonance of vibrations of atoms and whole molecules, and the resonance of atomic bond vibrations play a certain role in the transmission of signal energy. The transmitted signal energy is quantised, i.e., it is a multiple of a full number of 1 energy quanta. This is exactly the same as in the organ of hearing or sight, where the energy transfer is quantised [4]. The external signal heading for the receptor is a type of energy of different kinds for the different senses. For hearing, it is the mechanical energy of a sound wave [7]. For smell, it is energy encoded in molecules, ions or even atoms reaching a specific receptor. In the olfactory organ, metabotropic receptors that recognise chemical molecules - ligands, called molecules - predominate by far. It is thought, perhaps incorrectly, that the olfactory organ uses only metabotropic receptors that bind to G-proteins on the inner side of the cell membrane of the olfactory cells. Olfactory recognition of hydrogen sulphide, oxygen, CO2, or acidic environments can hardly be linked to the metabotropic receptor and G protein. The new signal-specific energy acts on trans-membrane proteins that pass 7 times through the membrane of the olfactory cell - the G proteins. The transferred energy inside the cell acts on a variety of proteins and chemicals linked to the α β γ subunits of the G protein: (adenylate kinase, ADP, ATP, phospholipase C-PLC, phospholipase A -PLA22, cAMP, IP kinase3 -inositol triphosphate kinase, protein kinase-A - PKA, other kinases and phosphatases, calcium binding proteins - calmodulin. Ca++ plays a major role in the cell. Protein kinase C - PKC plays a role in the transcription of genes in the cell, also olfactory receptor genes. A membrane potential is formed, Na, K, Ca, Cl ion channels work. Ion pumps and ion transporter’s function. The mechanism of intracellular signalling is working efficiently, communication pathways are being established. All this contributes to the mechanisms of processing and transmission of olfactory information in the olfactory cell. Ligand-receptor binding acts on the α β γ molecule of the G protein trans-membrane. With the involvement of tyrosine kinase, PIP hydrolysis occurs2 , followed by the formation of second-order informants: IP3 , DAG, which initiate the Ca++ signalling pathway. IP3 binds calcium channel proteins causing the channel to open, allowing Ca++ ions to flow into the cell from the environment and from the stores of the endoplasmic reticulum, nucleus and mitochondria by force of the concentration difference on both sides of the membrane. Ca++ levels must not increase excessively in the cell. At a certain point, excess Ca++ in the cell causes activation of the IP phosphatase kinase3, resulting in closure of calcium channels and activation of the mechanism to remove Ca++ ions from the cell to the outside and to the endoplasmic reticulum, nucleus and mitochondria. The cell only responds to the signal at low calcium levels inside the cell, thousands of times lower than outside the cell. Calcium activates calmodulin, which binds specific kinases and stimulates a signalling cascade, affecting multiple signal amplification. The problem that remains to be clarified is how intracellular molecular changes and depolarisation of the olfactory cell leads to the formation of an action potential, conducted to the brain. In the organ of hearing, intracellular transformations lead to the production and secretion of transmitter into the synapse, where a postsynaptic excitatory potential is formed that is conducted to the nerve cells of the spiral ganglion, and it is only here that an action potential is formed [7]. In the olfactory organ, the transmitter was not described; the whole focus of the Nobel laureates was mainly on genetics, the G protein and the pathway of the action potential to the brain. A very important step in the pathway of the olfactory signal to the centre - in the olfactory cell itself - was omitted.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
