AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8876/026
Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital
*Corresponding Author: Richmond R Gomes, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital.
Citation: Richmond R Gomes. (2022) Lemierre Syndrome: a Forgotten Disease, Complicated by Nocardial Necrotizing Fascitis and Pyomyositis of Right Calf. J. Immunology and Inflammation Diseases Therapy. 5(2); Doi:10.31579/2637-8876/026
Copyright: © 2022 Richmond R Gomes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 25 December 2021 | Accepted: 06 January 2022 | Published: 13 January 2022
Keywords: lemierre syndrome; fusobacteriumnecrophoru; necrobacillosis; septic thrombophlebitis; pyomyositis
Once coined the “Forgotten Disease,” Lemierre’ssyndromealso known as human necrobacillosis is a rare condition that results from oropharyngeal infection with an obligate anaerobic gram-negative bacterium Fusobacteriumnecrophorum characterized by septic thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein, high fevers, and metastatic septic emboli. Necrobacillosis is the English term describing the necrotic abscesses associated fusobacterium sepsis. Most cases of F. necrophorum occur in association with an antecedent pharyngitis or head/neck infection; We describe an unusual case of necrobacillosis later complicated by lower extremity nocardialpyomyositis and necrotizing fasciitis in a 9 year old otherwise healthy female child with a history of a preceding pharyngotonsillitiswhich required incision and drainage with surgical washout in addition to long term systemic broad antibiotics.
Lemierre Syndrome (LS), also known as human necrobacillosis, was first described in 1900 by Courmont and Cadebut In 1936, the French bacteriologist Andre Lemierre published a report detailing the link between septicemia and pharyngitis that he had observed while working at the Claude Bernard Hospital in Paris1. The postanginal septicemia which now bears his name is most often precipitated by a suppurative oropharyngeal infection. The infection is typically caused by the gram-negative, anaerobic Fusobacteriumnecrophorum. Fusobacteria can be found as normal flora inthe upper respiratory tract of humans 2. Other anaerobic bacteria have been identified as sources of infection, but these are atypical 3. The disease mostly affects young, otherwise healthy adults. The first symptom is typically a sore throat secondary to exudative tonsillitis or peritonsillar abscess. The infection then spreads into adjacent structures,such as the internal jugular vein and carotid artery. Thrombophlebitis of the neck veins can cause pain, swelling, and dysphagia. Sepsis with complicating metastatic spread of septic microemboli is the typical progression of illness[4].The most common site of metastatic spread is the lungs, with 85% of cases demonstrating pulmonary infiltrates [5]. Other feared complications include spread of infection along the carotid sheath and into the mediastinum [4]. Mortality rate before advent of antibiotics was extremely high, with 18 of Andre Lemierre’s 20 identified patients succumbing to their disease[1]. In the modern era of medicine, mortality rates range from 6.4 to 17% [6,7].Timely recognition and prompt treatment are cornerstone’s in prevention of complications.
Case Report
An otherwise healthy 9-years-old female child from rural Bangladesh presented with 1-week history of sore throat and high fever. The pain was continuous and was radiating to the right ear and the right side of the neck. The pain was aggravated by swallowing both solid and liquid diet. The pain was also aggravated by neck movements. There was no breathing difficulty.4 days before, she hadstarted amoxicillin by a local physician (250 mg od) for suspected streptococcal acute pharyngotonsillitis,obtaining only partial relief of the throat pain.She denied any recent dental procedures or tooth infections. She had no significant past medical history and was taking no medications. On examination, she was alert, conscious but hypotensive(blood pressure 90/50 mm of Hg), her temperature in the emergency department was 104° Fahrenheit, and her heart rate was 120 beats per minute (bpm), respiratory rate 15 breaths per minute.Neck palpation revealed swollen neck with fullness and tenderness in the anterior and posterior cervical lymph nodes bilaterally. She was unable to open his mouth more than 1.5–2 inches due to pain and swelling. Her oropharynx appeared erythematous. On respiratory system examination,she had good air entry bilaterally without wheezes or crackles.Laboratory tests showed neutrophilic leukocytosis(white blood cells count 16.26 × 109/L, neutrophils 87%), and elevated C-reactive protein (135.9mg/dL). An unexpectedly high procalcitonin value (29.4 ng/mL) raised the suspicion of bacterial sepsis. Other lab reports were normal: creatinine was 1.03mg/dl, glucose 105mg/dl, albumin low at 2.6, sodium 138 mmol/L, potassium 3.7mmol/L, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 30U/L. The chest radiograph showed a right perihilar infiltrate.After drawing blood culture (aerobic,anerobic culture was not available),an empirical treatment with meropenemwas started. Two days later, the patient was stillfebrile and mildly lethargic, with toxic appearance. Bloodculture failed to revealed growth of any organism.A neck ultrasoundwas performed, showingmultiple enlarged cervical lymph nodes,bilateral peritonsillar multiloculated enhancing fluid collections. It also showed punctate foci within the rightinternal jugular vein, which was thought to represent partialthrombosis. Surgical debridement was done and as wound swab gram stain showed Fusobacteriumnecrophorum, ananaerobic gram negative rod(figure 1), intravenous clindamycinwas added to meropenem.
Five days later, which she noted right calf pain that she attributed tom“slipping and hyperextending her ankle”. On local examination Her right calf was moderately swollencompared to the left and was tender. She had good pulses inboth dorsalis pedis and posterior tibialis in both legs inaddition to full range of motion in his ankles. A right lower extremityultrasound was ordered due to the pain and swelling in hisright calf. This study was negative for deep vein thrombosis. There was edema within the fascial compartments between thegastrocnemius and soleus muscles, as well as in the superficialfascia. A crescent-shaped subfascial fluid collectionwas also noted over the medial head of the gastrocnemius
muscle, indicative of right lower leg fasciitis. The decisionwas made to proceed with incision and drainage of the fluidcollection, in addition to a debridement of the right legnecrotizing fasciitis (figure 2). Abscess drainage resulted in approximately500 ml of purulent foul-smelling fluid, some of whichwas sent for gram stain and culture. A wash out of the rightlower extremity wounds would be performed several dayslater with subsequent placement of negative pressure wounddressing. Gram smear (Figure 3 ) showed Gram-positive filamentous bacteria which were weakly acid fast (Nocardia sp.).
She was initiated on treatment with intravenous amoxycilin and clavulanic acid. With regular dressing and antibiotic treatment her condition improved. On discharge, antibiotics were switched to oral from. There was a plan to continue clindamycin for 6 weeks and amoxycilin and clavulanic acid for 6 months. On follow up, 4 weeks later she was asymptomatic and doing well.
Discussion
The increased use of antibiotics to treat pharyngitis has led to a decreased occurrence of Lemierre’s Syndrome, earning it themoniker “the forgotten disease.” One source states incidencein the early 1990s was as low as 0.8–1.5 per million persons per year [8].However, there have been an increased number ofcases reported over the last 20 years[9].There have beenseveral proposed reasons for this increase in incidence. Onepossible cause is a decreased use of antibiotics to treat uncomplicated
pharyngitis.Another postulate is that improved anaerobic culturing techniques have led to increased
detection of Fusobacteriuminfection.Yet another theory is that the increased number of cases is due toemerging antibiotic resistance amongst Fusobacteriumspecies.A recent study showed the resistance rate to erythromycinwas as high as 15% amongst strains of Fusobacteriumnecrophorum[10]. Penicillin resistance has also been reporteddue to production of beta-lactamase by some strains ofFusobacteriumnecrophorum[11].
The first case of human necrobacillosis was reported in 1900 by Courmont and Cade [12]. This was followed by a report in 1936 by Lemierre, which identified a series of patients with Fusobacterium spp. infections; since this report, the eponym “Lemierre’s syndrome” has been used to describe Fusobacterium spp. infections of the internal jugular vein complicated by metastatic abscesses[1]. In both original and recent case descriptions, most patients had an antecedent pharyngotonsillitis presenting as a sore throat and pharyngeal hyperemia. In a recent review among 87% of cases, the primary source of infection was the palatine tonsils and peritonsillar tissue[6].Up to one third of patients presents a mixed infection frequently with streptococci and other gram negative anaerobes.
F. necrophorumis a non-spore-forming gram negative anaerobic rod belonging to the normal flora of the oropharynx and is recognized as the causal agent of approximately 10% to 20% of pharyngitis cases in adolescents[2,13-15].The disease is often initially misdiagnosed as a viral pharyngitis, especially mononucleosis2. Several clinical clues can be helpful in distinguishing Lemierre’s syndrome from mononucleosis. For instance, mononucleosis typically presents with more generalized lymphadenopathy in contrast to the more localized cervical lymphadenopathy of Lemierre’s syndrome. Another clue, and one of the most typical findings of a Lemierre’s syndrome, is the presence of lung infiltrates. In young patients with pharyngitis, the presence of concurrent lung lesions should raise the clinical suspicion for Lemierre’s syndrome. Critical to the diagnosis of Lemierre’s syndrome is the prompt collection of blood cultures and the culturing of any fluid drained from abscesses that may be present. However, Fusobacteriumnecrophorumtakes at least 48 hours to grow in culture and sometimes as long as seven days [2], so clinicians may find it necessary to treat empirically while awaiting culture results.
Infection typically occurs in distinct stages beginning with pharyngitis followed by local invasion into the pharyngeal space leading to thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein. Timing of the second stage is variable, but usually occurs within one week. Patients with Lemierre’s syndrome may have a proceeding bacterial or viral (e.g., infectious mononucleosis) pharyngitis, which may contribute to the translocation of the Fusobacterium spp. into the deep spaces of the neck. The third stage of infection is metastatic spread, most commonly to the lungs (80%) followed by the joints (17%); occasionally, the liver, spleen, bones, kidneys, and meninges are involved6. Today, the term “Lemierre’s syndrome” is used to describe Fusobacterium spp. infections originating not only in the pharynx, but in any structure in the head and neck (e.g., otitis, sinusitis, mastoiditis, parotitis, odontogenic infection, or facial skin infection) [7].
Most cases of classic Lemierre’s syndrome occur in young, otherwise healthy, adults, ages 16-23 years, with a propensity for development among males[10]. Necrobacillosis may occur in association with a primary infection of the skin, genitourinary or gastrointestinal systems16, as F. necrophorum is part of the normal flora of these areas as well as in the oropharynx. Bacteremia may occur when host defenses are compromised and the organism penetrates the mucosal surfaces such as cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy who develop mucositis.
Thediagnosis of Lemierre’s syndrome requires full awareness of this rare condition and high index of clinical suspicion. The disease should be suspected in young patients with history of oropharyngeal infection who failed to improve either spontaneously or after antibiotic treatment and developedclinical and laboratory evidences of sepsis, respiratory symptoms, or atypical unilateral neck pain and swelling. The latter symptoms are characteristic of Lemierre’s syndrome, being the consequence of unilateral jugular vein thrombosis. Confirmation of the diagnosis requires the detection of the internal jugular thrombophlebitis and septic embolization to lung and other organs by imaging studies (duplex ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance ) and by blood and wound cultures that demonstrate F. necrophorum; anaerobic cultures are required for growth of this organism. Laboratory data may reveal leukocytosis (75%), thrombocytopenia (24%), increased bilirubin (19%), or hematuria (6%)6; elevated liver function tests and creatinine have also been described[17,18]. Chest radiography may show a cavitating pneumonia, pulmonary infiltrates, an abscess, pleural effusions, pneumothorax, pneumatoceles, or may be normal.
Our patient was a young, immunocompetent children who presented with fever, neck pain, dysphagia, pharyngitis later complicated with pyomyositis and fasciitis of his lower extremity. The origin of his Fusobacterium spp. infection remains unclear (as in 8% of cases)[6].
We searched the English literature (MEDLINE, 1950-2006; EMBASE 1980-2006) for cases of pyomyositis due to Fusobacterium spp. using the search terms “Fusobacterium” or “Lemierre’s” and “pyomyositis” or “myositis”. Four cases with detailed clinical information have been published in the literature, all of which occurred in association with an adjacent septic joint (most frequently the hip, shoulder, or knee)[19-22], and all were due to F. nucleatum. Our case is unique in that there was no evidence on arthroscopic examination or synovial fluid cultures of a concurrent septic arthritis and that the organism was the more virulent species of Fusobacterium, F. necrophorum.
Pyomyositis, classically an infection of the tropics, is defined as a primary suppurative infection of the skeletal muscle, first described by Scriba in 1885[23]. Predisposing factors include conditions characterized by immunodeficiency (T cell deficiency, Chronic granulomatous disease, hyper-IgE syndrome, HIV, Malignancy, Diabetes, use of steroids and immunosuppressants), trauma, concurrent infection (with Toxocariasis, Varicella or Arbovirus) and malnutrition.[24,25]. The common causative organisms are Gram positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus (90% in tropics and 75% in temperate regions) and Group A Streptococcus (1-5%).[25]. Seventy-five percent of cases occur in immunocompromised individuals, the thigh being a common site[26]Nocardial pyomyositis is extremely rare but responds well to treatment if initiated early [27].Three clinical stages of disease process have been described: invasive (bacterial seeding), suppurative (abscess formation) and septicaemic stage (dissemination in blood with multiple organ dysfunction). The presentation of localised muscle pain, edema, low grade fever in first stage leads to misdiagnosis of muscle strain or contusion. Pain and swelling in the second stage leads to differentials of deep vein thrombosis, septic arthritis or osteomyelitis. By definition, pyomyositis never occurs secondary to contiguous infection of soft tissue or joints nor due to penetrating trauma. However in third stage as a part of septicaemia when it involves skin, leading to cutaneous gangrene, it can present as necrotising fasciitis like picture.
Aspiration of pus from the muscle or muscle biopsy (in case of absent macro abscess as in the early invasive stage) with culture and gram staining is the gold standard for diagnosis. But in tropical regions, pus cultures are sterile in 15-30
Lemierre disease is suppurative thrombophlebitis of internal jugular vein secondary to oropharyngeal infection and can be complicated by septic emboli. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment with long term antibiotics with beta-lactamase anaerobic activity results in complete resolution of the condition.The present casesuggests that (1) the recommended oral antibiotic treatmentfor acute pharyngeal infections does not always prevent theprogression of the disease into the life-threatening Lemierre’ssyndrome; (2) an anaerobic infection and the Lemierre’ssyndrome should be suspected in patients affected by pharyngotonsillitis with a severe and unusual course; (3)in these patients an empirical antibiotic therapy, active alsoagainst anaerobic microorganism, has to be started early;moreover, an imaging study of the neck, searching for jugularthrombophlebitis and parapharyngeal abscesses, should beobtained as soon as possible.
Conflict of Interest: None declared
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
