Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8914/340
1 Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, PMB 1526, Imo State, Nigeria.
2 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka Anambra State, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Ofoedum, A.F, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, PMB 1526, Imo State, Nigeria.
Citation: Ofoedum A.F, Owumanam C.I, Uyanwa N.C, Dike, B.C, Anyanwu, et al., (2025), Evaluation of the Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Properties of Waste from Maize (Zea mays) and Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in Pap Production, J. Nutrition and Food Processing, 8(10); DOI: 10.31579/2637-8914/340
Copyright: © 2025, Ofoedum, A.F. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 November 2025 | Accepted: 27 November 2025 | Published: 08 December 2025
Keywords: phytochemicals; antioxidants properties; maize waste; millet waste; protein
Background: The study was carried out to access the phytochemical and antioxidant properties in wastes material left after maize and millet grain processing. The waste mash was hygienically collected immediately after processing and transferred to the laboratory for analysis. The waste was sundried and packaged.
Methods: Standard analytical procedure was followed to analyze the phytochemical and assaying of antioxidant properties of the waste. The data was subjected to statistical analysis.
Results: The protein content of the millet scored 15.45% while the maize gave 11.40%. The crude fibre content of the maize 7.93% was significantly higher than that of the millet 5.02%. The total phenol of the maize left over mash 69.87 mg per 100g was significantly higher than that of millet 55.28 mg per 100g, while the total flavonoids of maize 253.93 mg per 100g was higher than that of the millet 196.08 mg per 100g. At 10 mg per dl maize waste recorded 68.73; millet 50.43 and gallic acid scored 78.59. The 2,2 Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) reduction activity of the wastes were comparable to the standard, the maize waste had 93.30 mg per dl while millet had 91.38 mg per dl.
Conclusion: Wastes from maize and millet are good sources of protein, crude fibre and the extracts are rich in bioactive compounds.
Cereal crops such as maize, millet, sorghum play a vital role in the food security and livelihoods of people in Nigeria. They are widely grown in different regions of the country, and their production contributes significantly to the economy of Nigeria. Cereals constitute a major part of human nutrition, being the important source of proteins and energy, particularly in developing countries. Cereals and their products are rich in antioxidant, phytochemicals that make them ideal for developing functional foods and ingredients (Serafini et al., 2002).
However, a significant amount of waste is generated during the processing of these crops. These wastes include materials such as germ, bran, hulls. These materials are by-products of the milling process and are often rich in nutrients such as fiber, vitamins and minerals. More than half of the world's grain production comes from cereals like wheat and rice, which are also a major source of waste in a number of nations (Zhang et al., 2011).
According to Crittenden et al. (2002), these wastes are also a good source of dietary fibers as well as bioactive substances such phenolics, pigments, flavonoids, tannins, and vitamins. Consequently, the creation of value-added items from food processing wastes, such as food additives and supplements, has received attention from all over the world (Wang and Chen, 2010). These wastes which are typically discarded after processing of food, which if not properly handled are known to constitute environmental hazard.
The problem of food Waste is increasing, involving all sectors of waste management from collection to disposal. Global food waste is approximately 1.3 billion times per year (Skendi, et al., 2020). It is estimated that more food is wasted in the industrialized countries compared to the developing nations on per Capital basis (Gustavsson et al., 2011). Wastes are collected and mostly dumped or burnt in the Open air. Recently, there is great emphasis on the recovery, recycling and reconditioning of food waste. The efforts are made to convert food waste into value added products (Cattaneo, et al., 2021). This food waste can be converted into useful value-added products like time.

Figure 1. Processing of Ogi from millet grain.
2.2.3.2 Production of extracts from the millet wastes
The wastes were transferred to a clean tray and were oven dried at 105oC for 6 hours. Distilled water, ethanol, methanol, and acetone separately were used to extract bioactive compound like phytochemicals from waste from maize and millet grains according to (Dent et al., 2013) with some slight modifications. Recovered extracts were evaluated in terms of total phenolic compounds, total flavonoid content and antioxidant properties. In brief, an amount of 5g of waste from maize and millet (in triplicate) was extracted with 100 ml of distilled water, ethanol, methanol and acetone respectively, in separate Erlenmeyer flasks and kept for extraction in a water bath at 500c. After 60 min, the supernatants will be separated by filtration using Whatman filter paper No 1.
2.4 Analysis Conducted on the Residue
24.1: Proximate Analysis:
The determination of Proximate Composition including the moisture contents, Ash, carbohydrates, crude fats, fibre and proteins were done using AOAC methods of 2006.
2.5. Analysis of Phytochemical Components
2.5.1 Flavonoid content and Total Phnols
The determination of total flavonoid content of various extracts was carried out using Liu et al. (2002), Adom et al. (2005); and Ofoedum, et al 2024 method. Total flavonoid content was calculated as milligram (mg) of catechin equivalent (CE) per 100 g of sample against a standard curve of catechin.
2.5.2 Carotenoids content
The carotenoids were assessed on cereal by-products using AACC-approved method 14–50 (AACC 2000). Briefly, A saturated mixture of n-butanol and distilled water (8:2 ratio) was used for carotenoids extraction. Ten mL of water-saturated butyl alcohol was added to 1 g of different cereal milling by-products, shaken and extracted for 16 h. Extracts were then filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and absorbance measured at 440 nm using a Spectramax i3x (Molecular Devices, Wokingham, UK) spectrophotometer. A calibration curve was made from pure β-carotene. The carotenoids content was expressed as µg β-carotene/g samples.
2.6 Analysis of the Antioxidant Components
2.6.1. Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay
The antioxidant activity was determined using the method described by (Yu et al. 2002). The absorbance of the various extracts and control was measured at 515 nm. The lower absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated higher free radical scavenging activity.
Antioxidant activity was calculated as a percentage of radical scavenging activity (% RSA) using the following equation:
% RSA=([(Ao-A1)⁄(Ao) ×100) (5)
{A0 =the absorbance of the control reaction containing all reagents except the test compounds.
A1 =the absorbance in the presence of the tested extracts after 30 min
2.6.2. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay
FRAP assay was carried out according to the literature (Benzie and Strain 2000). The absorbance of the reaction mixture was detected at 593 nm. The standard curve was constructed using FeSO4 solution, and the results were expressed as mmol L−1 FeSO4 g−1 dry weight of cereal milling by-products.
2.6.3. 2, 2′-Azino-Bis (3-Ethylbenzothiazoline-6-Sulfonic Acid) (ABTS) Assay
The scavenging activity using 2, 2-asino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS•+) was measured by the method described by Li et al., (2015). The radical scavenging activity (% RSA) of the samples was calculated as follows.
% RSA = ((1-A)⁄(Ao) ×100) (6)
(A0 is the absorbance at 734nm of the negative control: A is the absorbance at 734nm of the mixture with sample)
2.7. Statistical Analysis
The data obtained from the analysis was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) while separating the means using Fishers Least Significant difference (LSD) at (P less than 0.05).
| Samples | Moisture (%) | Crude Fibre (%) | Ash (%) | Crude Fat (%) | Protein (%) | CHO (%) |
| ABX | 11.96a±0.3143 | 7.93a±0.1253 | 13.45a±0.0503 | 4.07a±0.1527 | 11.40a±0.1500 | 51.19b±0.4851 |
| ABY | 9.89b±0.1101 | 5.02b±0.0764 | 12.00b±0.200 | 2.88b±0.1607 | 15.45a±0.1266 | 54.62a±0.6700 |
| LSD | 0.6539 | 0.2881 | 0.4049 | 0.4353 | 0.3854 | 1.6240 |
Table 3.1 Proximate Composition of the Samples of wastes from maize and millet processing in Nigeria.
The means ‘abc…’ with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p less than 0.05).
KEYS:
ABX= Maize waste
ABY=Millet waste
LSD= Least significant difference
3.1. Proximate composition of samples of wastes from maize and millet processing in Nigeria
Table 4.1 shows the percentage mean scores for the proximate composition of waste samples from cereals (ABX and ABY). Sample ABX gave the highest mean score for moisture, crude fiber, Ash, crude fat and protein, but lower in carbohydrate (51.19 %) compared to sample ABY with a mean carbohydrate score of 54.62 %. There were also significant differences (p<0>
3.2. Phytochemical Analyses
| Samples | Total Phenols | Total Flavonoids | Carotenoids |
| ABX | 69.87a±0.4650 | 235.93a±0.9780 | 12.83a±0.0625 |
| ABY | 55.28b±0.3800 | 196.08b±0.7319 | 11.42b±0.1929 |
| LSD | 1.1790 | 2.398 | 0.3980 |
Table 3.2 Mean Scores of the phytochemical components of the Samples of wastes from maize and millet processing in Nigeria. (mg/100g)
The means ‘abc…’ with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p≤0.05)
KEYS:
ABX= Maize waste
ABY=Millet waste
LSD= Least significant difference
3.2.1 Phytochemical composition of samples of wastes from maize and millet processing in Nigeria.
The mean scores for the phytochemical components were stated in Table 4.2. The total flavonoids content was highest in all the sample with means scores of 235.95 mg/100g and 196.08 mg/100g for samples ABX and ABY respectively. This is followed by total phenols which is highest in sample ABX (69.87 mg/100g), while carotenoids were lowest in all the samples with 12.83 and 11.42 mg/100g for sample ABX and ABY respectively. There were also significant differences (p<0>
| Samples | 10 mg/ml | 20 mg/ml | 40 mg/ml |
| ABX | 12.58a±0.1419 | 16.69a±0.1365 | 17.79a±0.1762 |
| ABY | 9.13b±0.0577 | 12.80b±0.06429 | 17.65a±0.1735 |
| LSD | 0.301 | 0.296 | 0.4854 |
Table 3.3. Mean scores of the Phenol contents at different Concentrations (mg/dl)
The means ‘abc…’ with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p lessthan 0.05).
KEYS:
ABX= Maize waste
ABY=Millet waste
LSD= Least significant difference.
3.3 Phenol components of samples of wastes from maize and millet processing in Nigeria at different concentrations (mg/dl)
Table 4.3 shows the percentage mean scores for the phenol composition of waste samples from cereals (ABX and ABY). Sample ABX gave 12.58 mg/dl at 10mg/ml and 17.79 mg/dl at 40 mg/ml. sample ABY at all concentrations recorded the lowest mean scores, thus; 9.13 mg/dl at 10 mg/ml and 17.65 mg/dl at 40mg/ml. There were also significant differences between the two samples (p less than 0.05).
[3.4 The Invitro Antioxidant Assays of the Extracts at different Concentrations (mg/ml)
| Samples | 10 mg/ml | 20 mg/ml | 40 mg/ml |
| CONTROL | 78.59a±0.3972 | 80.97a±0.3835 | 85.09a±0.3325 |
| ABX | 68.73b±0.3517 | 75.16b±0.151 | 80.52b±0.2857 |
| ABY | 50.43c±0.1234 | 54.63c±0.4461 | 68.95c±0.2550 |
| LSD | 0.7695 | 0.8581 | 0.7165 |
Table 3.4. Mean scores of Percentages FRAP activities at different Concentration (mg/ml).
The means ‘abc…’ with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p≤0.05)
KEYS:
FRAP = Ferric reducing Antioxidant Power
Control = Gallic acid
ABX= Maize waste
ABY=Millet waste
LSD= Least significant difference
3.4 FRAP activities at different Concentration (mg/ml).
Table 4.4 shows the percentage FRAP activities for the samples of waste from maize and millet grown in Nigeria analyzed. The control sample which served as the reference standard gave the highest means at all levels of concentrations with significant difference (p less than 0.05).
| Samples | 10 mg/ml | 20 mg/ml | 40 mg/ml |
| CONTROL | 95.23a± 0.4933 | 98.30a±0.100 | 98.77a±0.5134 |
| ABX | 93.30b±0.5613 | 95.16b±0.7346 | 94.90b±0.9834 |
| ABY | 91.38c±0.2306 | 92.16c±0.1185 | 92.48c±0.236 |
| LSD | 1.1047 | 1.0606 | 1.6027 |
Table 3.5. Mean scores of Percentage DPPH activities at different Concentration.
The means ‘abc…’ with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p less than 0.05).
KEYS:
Control = Buthylated Hydroxyl toluene
ABX= Maize waste
ABY=Millet waste
LSD= Least significant difference.
3.5 DPPH activities at different Concentration (mg/ml).
The mean scores for the percentage DPPH activities for the samples were stated in Table 4.5. Sample ABY had the least score of 91.38% at 10 mg/ml while the control gave the highest mean score of 95.23% with significant differences (p less than 0.05).
3.6 ABTS Scavenging activities at different Concentration (mg/ml).
Table 4.6 showed the mean scores of the percentage ABTS scavenging activities of the samples at different concentrations. The control sample recorded the highest mean scores of 63.13, 70.75, and 73.33% at 10 mg/ml, 20 mg/ml and 40 mg/ml respectively while 47.10, 52.46 and 61.55% at 10 mg/ml, 20 mg/ml and 40 mg/ml respectively for sample ABX. Consequently, sample ABY recorded means scores of 60.67, 68.43, and 72.10% for 10 ml, 20 ml and 40 ml respectively. In all, it can be said that Sample ABY performed better in all concentration unlike the previous results.
| Samples | 10 mg/ml | 20 mg/ml | 40 mg/ml |
| CONTROL | 63.13a±0.0851 | 70.75a±0.19079 | 73.33a±0.35656 |
| ABX | 47.10c±0.1000 | 52.46c±0.2914 | 61.55c±0.4597 |
| ABY | 60.67b±0.4651 | 68.43b±0.1081 | 72.10b±0.9416 |
| LSD | 0.6827 | 0.5136 | 1.5678 |
Table 3.6. Mean scores of Percentage ABTS Scavenging activities at different Concentration.
The means ‘abc…’ with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p less than 0.05).
KEYS:
Control = Buthylated Hydroxyl toluene
ABTS = 2-2-zino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
ABX= Maize waste
ABY= Millet waste
LSD= Least significant difference
4.1 Conclusion
From the study, it was revealed that the maize and millet wastes are rich in fibre and protein which can be utilized in food formulation rather than been discarded as wastes. The extracts of the wastes were found to be rich in antioxidants, phenol flavonoids and carotenoids and as such can be utilized in formulation of food supplements and pharmaceutical goods. The extracts of the wastes are rich in antioxidants because the assays revealed that they are comparable to gallic acid in reduction of free radicals. Hence the waste should be exploited for formulation of food that are beneficial to man rather than been discarded as waste to constitute environmental pollution. This research does not only contribute to scientific understanding of cereal waste but also paves way for meaningful advancements in the realms of nutrition, agriculture and sustainability.
4.2. Contribution to Knowledge
This project work contributes to knowledge by providing information on the benefits and effective utilization of waste from maize and millet wastes in producing animal feeds, it also serves as a frontier in the utilization of these wastes in development of pharmaceutical products that would improve the health of humans and finally it educates on a better way of using this wastes rather than creating pollution by disposing them.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,