AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8914/028
1University of Oslo, Institute of Health and Society, Box 1130 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
*Corresponding Author: Arne T. Høstmark, MD, PhD, University of Oslo, Institute of Health and Society, Box 1130 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Citation: Arne Torbjørn Høstmark, (2020) Association between Relative Amounts of White Blood Cell Counts: a Case of Distribution Dependent Correlations. J. Nutrition and Food Processing, 3(2); DOI:10.31579/2637-8914/028
Copyright: © 2020 Arne Torbjørn Høstmark, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 27 July 2020 | Accepted: 10 August 2020 | Published: 17 August 2020
Keywords: white blood cells; segmented neutrophil leukocytes (N); lymphocytes (L); random numbers; man
We previously observed a positive association between relative amounts of particular body fatty acids, provided they had low-numbers relative to sum of the remaining ones. Additionally, theoretical considerations and computer experiments suggested that, with two high-number variables relative to one with much lower numbers, we should expect a negative relationship between relative amounts of the high-number variables. Moreover, the correlation outcomes with true values could be well reproduced using random numbers, provided that the numbers had the true ranges (distributions). This finding led to the concept of Distribution Dependent Correlations. Since counts of segmented neutrophil leukocytes (N) and lymphocytes (L) are normally much higher than sum of the remaining (R) white blood cells (WBC), it was suggested that %N might possibly be negatively associated with %L. In the present work, random numbers were sampled in lieu of reported WBC subgroup values, but using the measured mean ± SD values. The results demonstrate that relative amounts of random number “N” and “L” were indeed inversely related in both sexes: Spearman’s rho = -0.9, p <0.001, n = 200, as observed using within-person data, and between-person data as well. Furthermore, an alteration in distributions (variability) of the WBC subgroup changed the correlation outcome, as evaluated by scatterplots and correlation coefficients. Decreasing (increasing) values of %R improved (made poorer) the negative association between %N and %L. Thus, the observed negative association between %N and %L seems to be a case of Distribution Dependent Correlations. Hypothetically, by directing WBC subgroup counts to particular places on the scale, a powerful tool is available to govern the associations between relative amounts of WBC subgroups.
In diet trials we may raise the question of whether relative amounts of particular blood or tissue variables are positively or negatively associated. In this regard, we previously reported that relative amounts of e.g. particular body fatty acids can be positively associated as a consequence of their particular distributions (range), and named such associationsDistribution Dependent Correlations, DDC [1-9]. Thus, if variables Aand B have very low numbers and low ranges relative to C, then we might expect a positive %A vs. %B association [4]. It is not surprising that percentages may be correlated, if they are computed from the same sum. Indeed, in 1897, Pearson reported that there could be a spurious correlation between two indexes having the same denominator [10]. However, our previous analyses with random numbers show that significant correlations between percentages of the same sum are not always obtained. Additionally, and such correlations may be positive or negative depending on the distribution (range)of the variables. Furthermore, a particular feature of DDC seemed to be that an alteration in distributions of the variables would change the relationship between their relative amounts. Previously, we raised the question of whether evolution might possibly utilize DDC as a regulatory mechanism in physiology [1, 9]. Additionally, theoretical considerations suggested that, if S is the sum of 3 positive scale variables (S = A + B + C) and A (and B) have high-numbers relative to C, then we should expect a negative %A vs. %B association [3, 4]. Searching for such a condition in physiology, it occurred to us that counts of segmented neutrophil leukocytes (N) - and of lymphocytes (L) - are normally much higher than sum of the remaining (R) white blood cells (WBC). Therefore, in the present work we raise the question of whether %N and %L might be negatively associated, thereby representing a case of DDC. If so, the negative association should be influenced by an alteration in the ranges of WBC subgroups. The aim of the present work was accordingly to investigate this possibility, using published data [11] of WBC counts. It is, however, beyond the scope of this work to discuss the role of WBC in health and disease. We only mention that N are phagocytic cells that may destroy bacteria, whereas L may produce antibodies, kill malignant cells, and destroy virus - infected cells [12, 13].
Calculations and statistical analysis
In this work, we use previously published data [11] on white blood cell counts, i.e. of lymphocytes (L), segmented neutrophil leukocytes (N), monocytes (M), basophil leukocytes (B), and eosinophil leukocytes (E). Of the reported [11] total WBC count, N provided about 63%, L 30%, and M 7%. For each sex, the article presented between-person and within-person data. For example, in men (n = 409), the within-person counts ± SD (*103/µl) of N were (4.02 ± 0.92), of L 2.05 ± 0.32, and of M 0.57 ± 0.10. The article provided amount basophils and eosinophils as percent of the total WBC count, i.e. of 6.89 ± 1.05 (103 /µl). On the basis of these data, we calculated B and E counts (*103/µl) in men to be: 0.04 ± 0.02 and 0.20 ± 0.05, respectively.
Thus, with WBC there seems to be a situation with two high-number variables (L and N) and 3 (M, B, E) with much lower numbers. Thus, %N + %L + %M + %B + %E = 100, or %N = - %L + (100 -%R), where R = M + B + E. Since R is small compared with N and L, a crude simplification of the above equation could be: %N = -%L +100. This is the equation if N and L were the only WBC to consider. It follows that, if this equation were valid, we should expect a perfect inverse relationship between %N and %L. However, since R is far from zero we should not expect close to a straight-line scatterplot for the %N vs. %L association. Based upon the reported [11] mean (SD) values of N, L, M, B, and E, we computed the following distributions (ranges): N 1.37 – 6.75; L 1.02 – 2.75; R 0.48 – 1.18 (*103/µl). Using these ranges, we generated random numbers (n = 200) with uniform distribution. Additionally, random numbers with normal distribution were sampled (n =200), using the reported mean (SD) values. Next, we did computer experiments in which we applied the above equation %N = - %L + (100 -%R) to study how alterations in ranges might influence the association between the relative amounts of N and L. In the article referred to, between-person mean ± SD values in each sex included about 1200 subjects, and the within-person data more than 400 subjects. In the present computer experiments, however, a lower number (n = 200) was used to represent the “subjects”, in order not to over-estimate the correlation outcomes.
Based upon the random numbers that were generated, we computed sum (S) of the numbers representing the reported WBC subgroups (S = N + L + M + E + B). This S was used in the denominator when calculating relative amounts of “WBC subgroups”. For simplicity, below we omit question marks when using random numbers in lieu of the true (measured) values. Unfortunately, the measured values were not available. However, our previous works [1, 8] indicate that correlations between percentages of the same sum are caused by the particular distribution of the variables. Thus, the previous correlation outcomes obtained with true values were well reproduced using random numbers, provided that they were sampled with the true ranges. In the current context, percentage N was computed as: %N = (N/S)*100, and % L = (L/S)*100. We computed correlation coefficients (Spearman’s rho) to assess associations between the N and L percentages. Additionally scatterplots were made to illustrate associations between relative amounts of N and L. Finally, we did some computer analyses to investigate whether random number %E and %B might be positively associated, since E and B represent two low-number variables relative to N and L, and our previous studies indicated that this condition should give a positive correlation between relative amounts of the low-number variables [4].
Alteration of distributions (ranges).
As reported previously [1-5], with fatty acids the distribution per se seemed to be crucial for the positive correlation outcome between particular fatty acid percentages. If this conclusion is valid for the current analyses related to %N and %L, then we should expect to influence the negative correlation between %N and %L by changing the ranges of N, L, and R. We accordingly first generated normally distributed RANDOM numbers, based upon the reported WBC subgroup mean counts (± SD), and next, after experimentally altering SD values to achieve varying ranges of N, L, and R. We additionally utilized the reported mean ± SD values to find the physiological ranges, which were subsequently used to generate random numbers with uniform distribution. In separate experiments, these ranges were altered, to obtain uniformly distributed random numbers having ranges deviating from the reported ones.
Thus, by experimentally replacing true ranges with hypothetical ones in computer experiments, we aimed at further clarifying whether ranges of N, L, and R do govern the association between N and L percentages of S. For each analysis, we made several repeats with new sets of random numbers; the general outcome of the repeats was always the same, but the correlation coefficient (Spearman’s rho), and scatterplot, varied slightly. We accordingly present the results as correlation coefficients, scatterplots, and regression analyses. SPSS 25.0 was used for the analyses, and for making figures. The significance level was set at p<0.05. The experimental conditions are presented in more detail under “Results and Discussion”.
Will we obtain a negative %N vs. %L association, using random numbers in lieu of the measured values, provided that the numbers are generated with the true variability?
Above we reasoned that, since N and L are high-number variables relative to sum of the remaining white blood cells (R= M + E + B), then the equation %N = -%L + (100 -%R) should apply. With very low %R values, this equation would approach%N = -%L + 100, showing an inverse relationship between %N and %L. Our previous random number analyses [2-4] suggest that the negative association might prevail also with higher values of %R. The results shown in Figure 1 seem to support this suggestion: Relative amounts of random numbers (with normal distribution), however keeping the true ranges, gave a strong negative %N vs. %L correlation in each gender, irrespective of whether the random numbers were generated on the basis of the reported [11] within-person or the between-person measurements (Spearman’s rho being at least -0.9 in each of the conditions, p < 0.001, n = 200). This finding seems to be in line with the reasoning that relative amounts of N and L in human blood do represent a case of Distribution Dependent Correlations. However, to substantiate this suggestion, we need to show that alterations in distributions (ranges) of WBC subgroup counts will change the %N vs. %L correlation coefficient, as well as the scatterplot. But first we investigate the correlation outcome when using random numbers with uniform distribution and with the true ranges, to control for a factor which might possibly influence the results.
Will we obtain a negative %N vs. %L association when using random numbers with uniform distribution?
The results shown in Figure 1 refer to random numbers with normal distribution. As a control experiment, we additionally investigated the %N vs. %L correlation outcome using random numbers with uniform (“rectangular”) distribution, however generated with true ranges, i.e. based upon the reported within-person values in men. The ranges were; for N: 1.37 – 6.29; for L: 1.26 -2.74; for M: 0.24- 0.88; for E: 0.06 – 0.35; and for B: 0.00 - 0.09 (*103/µL). It turned out that the %N vs. %L scatterplots (Figure 2) were very similar, irrespective of whether the random numbers had normal or uniform distribution. It would appear, accordingly, that the shape of the random number histograms (not shown) did not have a major influence on the correlation results. With normal distribution of the random numbers (Figure 2, left), we found Spearman’s rho for %N vs. %L to be: -0.955, p <0.001, n = 200. Corresponding value when using uniformly distributed random numbers was: rho = -0.934, p <0.001, n =200.
Will we obtain a change in the %N vs. %L association when altering ranges of the variables?
An improved approximation of the above equation between relative amounts of the WBC subgroup counts would be: %N(p – q) = -[(%Nmax - %Nmin)/(%Lmax - %Lmin)] * %L(r – s) + (100 -%R(t – u)), where R = M + E + B, and subscript parentheses indicate ranges of the percentages. Thus, distribution per se (place on the scale/range/variability) of all types of WBC should influence the negative correlation between N and L percentages. Since M consists of about 0.5; E about 0.2; and B about 0.04 (*103/µl) of R [11], the order of potency for influencing the %N vs. %L correlation, among the “R-cells”, should be: M > E > B. The current %R values were far from zero, as indicated by quartiles of the computed (random number) %R distribution, being about 10, 12, and 15%, respectively (histogram not shown). Still, the strong negative %N vs. %L association prevailed, as shown in Figure 1.
From the above equation, we should expect an improved (poorer) %N vs. %L association (scatterplots) with decreasing (increasing) values of %R. To test this hypothesis, a computer experiment was carried out to examine how a hypothetical increase and decrease in %”R” would influence the %”N” vs. %”L” correlation, using random numbers. To better illustrate the point, in order to achieve decreased (increased) %R values, uniformly distributed random numbers with greatly varying hypothetical ranges were generated, i.e. variability of R was changed appreciably. The (random number) range of R, obtained from the reported [11] mean and SD values was 0.28 – 1.36 (*103/µL), giving Spearman’s rho = -0.898 for the %N vs. %L association. Quartiles of the %R histogram were 9.6, 11.9, and 15.7%, respectively.
First, the hypothetical R-range was narrowed to 0.1 – 0.2 (*103/µL), and next broadened to 0.2 – 3.0 (*103/µL, emphasizing that these ranges probably are far from what might be encountered in health and disease.
As shown in Figure 3, the negative correlation between %N and %L improved greatly in response to narrowing the random number R range appreciably, i.e. to 0.1 - 0.2 (*103/µL); rho for %N vs. %L: = -0.996, p<0.001, n = 200. In this example, quartiles of the %R distribution were low, i.e. 1.9, 2.3, and 2.9%, respectively, showing that the %R distribution had moved towards lower values. Equation of the regression line was %N = -1.05 (0.01)*%L + 99.2 (0.2), i.e. the slope was close to -1, as expected. Furthermore, the extrapolated regression line seemed to cross axes at about 100% (Figure 3, left panel).
As predicted, the scatterplot of the %N vs. %L association, and correlation coefficient, became appreciably poorer in response to broadening the R range, Figure 3, right panel); rho = -0.504 (p<0.001), n = 200. Quartiles of the %R distribution after broadening the R range had changed to 10.6, 20.5, and 27.4%, respectively, showing that the %R distribution had moved towards higher values. Equation of the regression line had changed to: %N = -0.8 (0.1)*%L + 74.8 (2.4).
In additional computer experiments where ranges of R were altered in many ways, the outcomes were as predicted above: narrowing (broadening) of the R range (either directly by altering the R range, or indirectly by changing the N and/or L ranges) improved (made poorer) the negative %N vs. %L association (not shown). The experiments seem to support the idea that the negative association between N and L percentages of total WBC is a case of Distribution Dependent Correlations.
Obviously, it is not justified to relate the present findings to health and disease in man, since random numbers were used to replace the true values, and effects of large alterations in the ranges were studied. Nevertheless, the results demonstrate the powerful influence of changing ranges (variability) upon the negative association between percentages of the same sum, raising the question of whether evolution might possibly utilize this mathematical principle to obtain an inverse %N vs. %L relationship. In other words, a regulation of where WBC subgroups are placed on the scale will determine whether their relative amounts must be positively or negatively associated, or not associated at all. Interestingly, the N/L ratio has been used as a risk factor [14-15]. It is, however, beyond the scope of this work to discuss physiological implications of the DDC hypothesis, and mechanisms involved to determine ranges of WBC subgroups. In general, regulation of enzymes catalyzing synthesis or degradation of particular (blood) cells, e.g. allosteric regulation of enzyme activities, and/or interconversion between phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of key enzymes, could be involved.
The N/L ratio.
The N/L ratio, which has been used as a risk factor [14 -15], is equal to the ratio between N and L percentages of WBC, since %N and %L in each subject are computed from the total WBC count. Thus, the N and L percentages of total WBC count allow calculation of the N/L ratio, as well as evaluating whether the relative amounts of N and L correlate. However, the N/L ratio per se does not provide sufficient information to evaluate how N and L percentages of total white blood cell count are correlated. However, from the above equations of the regression lines for %N vs. %L (based upon random numbers), it is seen that the slopes are not far from -1, which would be the slope when computing %N and %L from the sum of N and L counts only, i.e. %N = -%L +100. In this case, rho for %N vs. %L should be equal to -1.000, irrespective of the N and L ranges, and the extrapolated regression line should theoretically cross axes at exactly 100%. Conceivably, there was no significant correlation between absolute counts of N and L (rho = -0.059, p=0.407, n = 200), Figure 4.
Is there a positive correlation between relative amounts of low-number WBC subgroups?
As discussed above, with two variables having low-numbers and low variability relative to a third variable, we might expect percentages of the two former ones to be positively associated [4]. This situation seems to be encountered with basophils (B) and eosinophils (E) relative to the remaining white blood cells (R = N + L + M). Thus, the equation %B = -%E + (100 - %R) would seem to apply. If having very high values of %R, the equation should approach %B = [(%Bmax - %Bmin)/(%Emax - %Emin)]* %E, showing a positive association; the slope being determined by ranges of the B and E percentages. It is emphasized that the idea of doing the below computer experiments was solely based upon a mathematical consideration, since values of B and E are low (0.6% of WBC for B; 2-3% for E), relative to N (60%) and L (30%). Using random numbers, generated on the basis of the reported mean (SD) values [11], there was no significant correlation between %B and %E (results not shown). However, using random numbers in lieu of the true values, and SD = 10 % of the mean value for B and E, then there was a significant positive %B vs. %E association (rho = 0.785, p <0.001, n = 200). As expected, the positive correlation improved (became poorer) when further lowering (increasing) variabilities of B and E, as observed by scatterplots and correlation coefficients (results not shown). The results suggest that the association between relative amounts of E and B may be sensitive to alterations in their distributions (including place on the scale/range/variability). It is accordingly tempting to speculate that, provided that SD had been about 10% of then mean value, then we might possibly wonder whether a decrease or an increase in %E was accompanied by a corresponding increase in %B. From the present results one might also wonder to what extent –in general - the measured range does reflect the true physiological, within-subject variability, and to what extent the true biological variability might be masked by external errors, for example related to sampling, storage, and measurement. Additionally, since the N/L ratio has been implicated in the Covid-19 infection [15], it might be of interest to investigate whether relative amounts of lymphocyte subgroups might be positively correlated, e.g. NK cells, and the cells making antibodies. It is, however, emphasized that the present work is solely based upon mathematical considerations. Further studies are needed to evaluate possible implications of the results in health and disease.
Since this work was confined to studying the association between relative amounts of N and L, based upon reported data from human blood, control studied should be performed. Furthermore, more studies are required to evaluate to what extent the suggested phenomenon of Distribution dependent correlations/-regulation is valid for WBC subgroups in general. Additionally, studies should be performed in other species to assess generalizability of the results. Since the current data suggest that Distribution Dependent Correlations (DDC) seem to apply with human WBC, future studies should be done to investigate the possible modifying influence of environment and lifestyle, including diet and physical activity. Additionally, studies should be carried out to explore how DDC of WBC subgroups might be influenced in various disease conditions.
The results of this work suggest that relative amounts of segmented neutrophil leukocytes and lymphocytes in human blood are negatively associated. This inverse relationship seems to be a case of Distribution Dependent Correlations, which might be a novel regulatory principle in physiology.
Variability: the width or spread of a distribution, measured e.g. by the range and standard deviation.
Range: showing the highest and lowest values.
Distribution: graph showing the frequency distribution of a scale variable within a particular range. In this article, we also use distribution when referring to a particular range, a – b, on the scale.
Uniform distribution: every value within the range is equally likely. In this article, we may write “Distribution was from a to b”, or “Distributions of A, B, and C were a – b, c – d, and e - f, respectively”.
“Low–number variables” have very low numbers relative to “high-number variables”.
WBC = White Blood Cells; N = segmented neutrophil leukocytes; L = Lymphocytes; M = Monocytes; E = Eosinophil leukocytes; B = Basophil leukocytes
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
