AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Editorial Letter
*Corresponding Author: Huang Wei Ling, Infectious Diseases, General Practice, Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition Doctor, Acupuncture and Pain Management specialist. Medical Acupuncture and Pain Management Clinic, Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Citation: Huang W Ling. (2021) What We Need to Do to Improve Our Immune System Despite the Use of Vaccination for COVID-19?. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 5(1); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9406/081
Copyright: © 2021 Huang Wei Ling, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 12 August 2021 | Accepted: 28 September 2021 | Published: 07 October 2021
Keywords: immune system; covid-19; vaccination; immunity; asymptomatic sars-cov-2
In our daily practice, we have heard more and more frequent reports of people infected with SARS-CoV-2, even having received one or two doses of vaccine for COVID-19. In the article written by Angel et al. (2021) entitled Association Between Vaccination with BNT162b2 and Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Health Care Workers, the authors concluded that the effectiveness of the vaccine in symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection reduced the incidence of this infection if you compared with unvaccinated health care worker. But the incidence was not reduced in the asymptomatic health care workers, where they found that vaccinated people were more likely to have SARS-CoV-2 if compared to unvaccinated people.
In our daily practice, we have heard more and more frequent reports of people infected with SARS-CoV-2, even having received one or two doses of vaccine for COVID-19. In the article written by Angel et al. (2021) entitled Association Between Vaccination with BNT162b2 and Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Health Care Workers, the authors concluded that the effectiveness of the vaccine in symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection reduced the incidence of this infection if you compared with unvaccinated health care worker. But the incidence was not reduced in the asymptomatic health care workers, where they found that vaccinated people were more likely to have SARS-CoV-2 if compared to unvaccinated people [1].
This fact could not be different because the author had already studied the energy pattern of her patients since 2010. Since then, changes in the energy type of her patients have been going on. [2].
Since 2015, the energy pattern of her patients has changed in that the vast majority of their patients including babies, children, teenagers, adults and the elderly are all in the same category, regardless of the type of disease they present, that is a very low energy standard in all analyzed patients’ chakras’ energy centers [3].
In the article written by Huang (2021) entitled Are We Vaccinating Immunocompetent or Immunocompromised People for COVID 19?, the author said that most people who are receiving vaccine today are being classified as immunodepressed due to the low energy found in the patients she studied. These results are due to the influence of electromagnetic radiation that is disseminated all over the world and therefore, she thinks that the sample she took in the study in Brazil, could be a sample representing what may be happening in the world nowadays [2].
In the study written by Callegaro, et al. (2021) entitled Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is extremely vivacious in subjects with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, the authors are saying that in persons that have previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, the use of single dose of vaccine can result in production of antibodies similar to full vaccine scheduled in naïve persons [4].
In the article written by Bradley et al. (2021) entitled Antibody responses boosted in seropositive healthcare workers after single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, the authors are saying that after single dose of Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, the persons who had prior SARS-CoV-2 infections will have higher antibodies levels than persons that had no history of previous infection [5].
In the article written by Hellerstein (2020) entitled What are the roles of antibodies versus a durable, high quality T-cell response in protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the author is saying that there are concerns about if the antibodies response means that they can give protective immunity. According to the author, antibodies response is a poor marker of prior coronavirus infection (mainly in mild infections) and strong antibody response is related to more severe clinical evolution diseases. When there is T cell response, this means less clinical severe disease. It is still unclear whether the antibodies production is pathogenic or protective in infections by coronavirus [6].
In the article written by Fergie and Srivastava (2021) entitled Immunity to SARS-CoV-2: Lessons Learned, the authors are saying that their knowledge about the durability and extend of immunity and the spectrum of vaccine coverage against SARS-CoV-2 variants still evolving [7].
In the article written by Stiepan (Mayo Clinic-2021) entitled COVID-19 infection among vaccinated people: What you need to know, the author is saying that vaccinated people can still spread COVID-19. In this same article, in the interview with Dr. John O’Horo (that is the infectious diseases specialist in Mayo clinic) he is saying that people should know about the transmission and infections of COVID-19 among people who have been vaccinated for COVID-19. In this article, he is saying that fully vaccinated people still have the potential to transmit COVID-19 to others. The potential of reduction of transmission it is not reduced to allow unmasking in all situations (because people usually understand that the potential of reduction of transmission with vaccination). They are recommending that people still continue using masks even after vaccination, to protect those who are at high risks of transmission, even from vaccinating people. They are also saying that even people that are vaccinated have high levels of virus in the nose and in their throat, even asymptomatic. They affirm that many types of vaccines can prevent illness but do not necessary prevent the transmission of that illness to others [8].
In the article written by Gobbi., et al. (2021) entitled Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Subjects with Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection, they are saying that antibody levels progressively decrease after SARS-CoV-2 infection, that are persistence of immune memory for months and in naturally contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection are expected a more rapidly and sustained response to COVID-19 vaccines than in naïve people [9].
In the article written by Poland et al. (2020) entitled SARS-CoV-2 immunity: review and applications to phase 3 vaccine candidates, they are saying that it is unknown the immunological correlation of protection against COVID-19 and the role of the antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 and the production of T-cells in elimination the infection. All this information is not identified yet in humans [10].
In the article written by Hacisuleyman et al (2021) entitled Vaccine Breakthrough Infections with SARS-CoV-2 Variants, they are saying that there is a potential risk of COVID-19 disease after vaccination with variant virus and it is important to continue the preventive and diagnosis of infection by variants in vaccinated people [11].
In the article written by Zhou and Wang (2021) entitled Fast-spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants: challenges to and new design strategies of COVID-19 vaccines, they are saying that SARS-CoV-2 replication is accompanying by high mutation rate, that could make the virus more contagious and difficult to eliminate and had been dominated worldwide [12].
In the article written by Huang (2021) entitled Is SARS-CoV- 2 Strong or Our Body Is Weak? the author is demonstrating that patients today are weak in energy and in immunity, as she demonstrated in the article Are We Vaccinating Immunocompetent or Immunocompromised People for COVID 19? In all these articles, the author is showing that the type of population that we have nowadays is different from the type of population that exists 7 years ago, due to lack of energy in the internal massive organs, that is responsible for the production of diverse energy pattern to maintain health and the author is considering that the majority of the population nowadays is considered immune deficient and not immune competent [2, 13].
This problem is not discussed in medical faculties and in many scientific articles about this subject because it is in the energy level and this cannot be seeing by the naked eyes. But as said by Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955), the major greatest physics is this world and also said by Capra (1975) in his book Tao of Physics, they both are saying that all the things are made by energy, even all the things that we can see my naked eyes is made by energy. So, we can conclude that human being is also made by energy and it is this part that is affected nowadays, that is not recognized by the scientific community, due to some implementations in the past, after Flexner report, that only consider scientific only what you can proof by laboratorial or radiological level. This made the Western diagnosis were late because all diseases come from energy imbalances (that is characterized by alterations in the phase one to three of the evolution from health to disease) [14-16].
To improve vital energy of all organs that are weak nowadays, as demonstrated by Huang (2021) in the article Energy Alterations and Chakras’ Energy Deficiencies and Propensity to SARS-CoV-2 Infection, the author is demonstrating that we can increase the energy of the internal massive organs, to increase the energy of the Spleen-pancreas ( that is deficient in 97% of the patients studied by the author and it is responsible for the production of blood and white blood cells ) and to increase the Zheng-Qi of the patient ( that is the energy to protect the body against the invasion of the external pathogenic factors ( and SARS-CoV-2 is considered invasion of external pathogenic factor) [2, 3].
To improve the immunity of those people who have already taken the COVID-19 vaccine, because nowadays, the people that is receiving vaccination still have poor immune system to produce antibody and poor immune defense against the protection of many other infectious and non-infectious diseases. That is why, the author is showing the necessity of treating this deficiency, even the people received vaccination, to improve the energy of the 5 massive internal organs (Liver, Heart, Spleen, Lung and Kidney), as Huang (2021) showed in article Energy Alterations and Chakras’ Energy Deficiencies and Propensity to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and in the article Are We Vaccinating Immunocompetent or Immunocompromised People for COVID 19? Using these kind of tools, the people will be more protected due to the defense and the energy that is responsible for the production of white Blood and production of T and B cells inside the body, will be working more efficiently, because you will give the energy that is lacking nowadays due to the influences of the electromagnetic waves, that is affecting our body, leading to this immune suppression [2, 3].
In Chine, when some people have internal massive organ deficient in energy, they usually use the Chinese herbs to tone the energy of one specific organ. As the author lives in Brazil, she has some problems in prescription and to have this kind of herbs to prescribe for her patients and she started to learn homeopathy in 2015. During her course, she noticed that homeopathy is a very efficient medication to be used in a diverse situation nowadays and she began to write another theory linking homeopathy (that was created by Hahnemann and exists for 242 years since the first publication) with traditional Chinese medicines reasoning (that exists for more than 5000 years) . All her articles were following Hippocrates thoughts that said that it is important to consider other ancient medical traditions prior to the knowledge we have nowadays. So, Huang (2020) created a theory entitled Constitutional Homeopathy of the Five Elements based on Traditional Chinese Medicine, that is the way that medical doctors can use to treat these lack of energy, responsible for the formation of the majority of chronic diseases, including the formation of this pandemic of COVID-19, due to this reduced immune system in the whole population in this globe [17].
To tone the Liver (first chakra) or other internal organ, the physician needs to tone all the internal organs that are weak in energy also, because all organs are interconnected by energy flow, different from the Western perspective, that thinks that all organs are independently and do not exert influences in other organs. To analyze which organ is low in energy, the author uses the radiesthesia procedure, measuring all the chakras from all her patients. If we measure the chakras’ energy centers of the patient, we will be measuring the energy of the five massive organs, as showed in most articles written by the author such as in the article Why Are Diabetic Patients Still Having Hyperglycemia despite Diet Regulation, Antiglycemic Medication and Insulin? [14].
To tone the Heart (third chakra) the physician need to use Sulphur. To tone the Spleen (fifth chakra), it can use Calcarea carbonica. To tone the Lungs (fourth chakra) the doctor can use Silicea and to tone the Kidney (second chakra) the physician can use Natrum muriaticum. All this information is written in diverse publication of the author, as in the article Constitutional Homeopathy of the Five Elements based on Traditional Chinese Medicine [17].
In addition to the use of these medications, the author recommends the use of nosode of SARS-CoV-2. This is a homeopathic medicine, that is made by secretion of patients who had COVID-19, following Hahnemann reasoning that said that, if you give any substance for a health person, he can have this disease. But if you dilute this same substance in a very infinitesimal mode, this same substance can be the medication to treat this infection. Depends on, if the physician will give the medication for prevention or for treatment, the potency of the medication will differ, These information were published by Huang (2021) in the article entitled Chakras Energies Deficiencies as the Cause of Fatigue Post Sars-Cov-2 Infection Patients Treatment [18].
Homeopathy was discovered by the German doctor Hahnemann (1755-1843) and as soon as it was created, it received many barriers to its application since inside it, there are no signs of matter but only energy. But according to Arndt Schultz Law, created by two German researchers, they said that highly diluted medications can improve the vital energy, and highly concentrated medications can reduce the vital energy. That is why homeopathy is considered the medication of choice nowadays; to treat all kinds of diseases, as showed in the article Is the population the same as in the past? [19, 20].
In the book written by Manning and Vanrenen (1993) entitled Bioenergetic Medicines East and West: Acupuncture and Homeopathy, the authors are saying that homeopathy works as bioenergy as an effect of acupuncture [21].
Therefore, the author recommends that even if the patient had been vaccinated to prevent COVID-19, patients should improve their internal energy and improve their immunity, which nowadays is impaired due to the constant exposure to electromagnetic energy, by which they are being affected and which nowadays Western medicine still cannot identify because after the implementation of Flexner's report in 1913, changing the entire curriculum of medical schools in the three largest continents on the planet, they understand that only what is scientific is what they can see with their naked eyes and what can be proven in laboratory and radiological examinations. But the part of the energy that makes up the body, that is considered unscientific nowadays but it is the part that is of extreme importance to understanding of the causes of reactions, complications and deaths in this COVID-19 pandemic scenario. This lack of energy can explain the reduced response of the patients to the vaccination, as showed in the article written by Jevanathan et al (2020) entitled Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies, where the authors are saying that the neutralizing antibody production in asymptomatic individuals decrease faster and it is small than in symptomatic individuals. In this article, they are saying that quality and longevity of vaccine induced protection is unavailable [22].
Therefore, the understanding of the human being as a holistic being made of energy and matter, is important for understanding how to prevent the acquisition of COVID-19 even if today they have already been vaccinated by the disease, because the energy of quite entire population in this world is affected by the exposition to electromagnetic waves, reducing the energy of the five massive organs, that are responsible for the production of Blood cells, that is responsible for the antibody production. As said by Huang (2021) in the article entitled Are the Vaccines the Only Solution to Control COVID-19 Pandemic? the author is saying that due to this lack of energy, leading to the state of immune deficiency, there is the necessity of treating this part of deficiency that still not studied by Western medicine, that is the real cause of the persistent infection, either with vaccination, caused in the infection of other strains of SARS-CoV-2. If we increase the energy or immunity of all population, we will protect the people against all infections, including all SARS-COV-2 strains that is existed nowadays [23].
As said by Hippocrates, we need to treat the patient and not the disease. According to him, it is more important to know which kind of person has the disease than to know which disease the person has [24].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
