AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Opinion
*Corresponding Author: Vidyadhar Bangal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital and Research Center, Jaipur, India.
Citation: Vidyadhar B (2023), Understanding Importance of “Golden hour” in Obstetric Emergencies -Common Observations and Suggestions, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 7(5) DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/178
Copyright: © 2023, Vidyadhar Bangal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 July 2023 | Accepted: 19 July 2023 | Published: 28 July 2023
Keywords: ,
.
Obstetric emergencies occur suddenly and at times unexpectedly, posing risk of serious maternal morbidity or mortality. The common life-threatening obstetric emergencies include accidental haemorrhage, postpartum haemorrhage, eclampsia, ruptured ectopic pregnancy, retained placenta and inversion of uterus. These emergency conditions are responsible for large percentages of cases, who in turn develop serious maternal morbidity or mortality.
The outcome of these conditions depends primarily on certain factors. Place of delivery or occurrence of emergency. Time lapse between occurrence of the emergency and admission to tertiary care hospital, readiness of the referral hospital to manage emergencies, time spent in decision making, stabilizing or preparing patients for surgical interventions, availability of required quantity of blood and its components and availability of competent expert team at the health facility.
Time is considered as most crucial factor that determines the outcome, especially when the obstetric emergency take place outside the tertiary care hospital. Patient generally receives first aid treatment, when she is in lower-level facility when emergency arrives. When it happens at the domiciliary level, it becomes a very big challenge to save these women.
Haemorrhagic shock due to large amount of blood loss in ante-partum and post-partum haemorrhage, retained placenta and ruptured ectopic pregnancies is usually cause of death. In cases with acute inversion of uterus, there is an additional component of neurogenic shock.
At times, the health workers including the doctors and nurses do not appreciate the importance of these golden hours that results into delay in provision of requisite care. Some of the examples of delay that take place at tertiary care hospital are worth quoting here.
It is well known that accidental haemorrhage needs prompt decisions regarding termination of pregnancy, either by induction of labour or emergency caesarean. Artificial rupture of membranes and some additional uterotonic drug needs to be administered as soon as possible to reduce induction delivery interval. When this interval exceeds 8 hours, there are more chances of complications like renal failure, DIC, severe couvelaire uterus leading to atonic PPH. Some cases of severe uterine atony due to couvelarie uterus need emergency obstetric hysterectomy as a lifesaving procedure.
Post partum haemorrhage (PPH) occurs in 2-5 percent of cases. It could be due to uterine atony or soft tissue trauma to genital tract. It is observed that there is delay in recognition of PPH in all types of health facilities as there is
always underestimation of blood loss or there is no quantitative assessment of blood loss in every delivery and in home deliveries. There is delay in starting intravenous fluids and arranging for transfer to higher centres. Patient vital parameters deteriorate, as patient starts loosing excessive blood. Zero-hour management in the form of starting intravenous fluids along with adequate dosage of oxytocics is not done even at lower-level facilities. Women who deliver at home and develop PPH have poor prognosis as they develop hypovolemic shock earlier. Time taken and the distance travelled to reach to higher centre decide the prognosis. It is observed that women who report to hospital after two hours of development of PPH have poor prognosis for the above-mentioned reason.
Ectopic pregnancies report quite often to tertiary care centres. Majority are ruptured tubal gestations and some are either corneal, rudimentary horn or ovarian ecopic pregnancies. These women present either in stable condition or with haemodynamic instability. Here again time interval between rupture of ectopic gestation and reporting to hospital is important. Due to advent and availability of ultrasonography, majority of cases are diagnosed by ultrasound and are thus referred to higher centres. Approximately 10-20 percent cases are un ruptured at the time of reporting to tertiary care hospital. Most of the cases of ruptured ectopic gestation have classical clinical presentation, which does not need pelvic sonography. There is tendency among the on-call doctors at the referral hospital to repeat ultrasound for re confirmation of diagnosis of ruptured ectopic. Un-necessary time is lost in getting this investigation done, especially when the USG facility is not available at hand, and thus requires shifting of the moribund patient to ultrasound unit of the hospital.
Eclampsia and cases with HELLP syndrome are often reported to tertiary care hospital with varied clinical and biochemical profile. After initial management and stabilization, decision of termination of pregnancy must be taken without further delay to avoid other complications. Whether to do induction of labour or perform caesarean section depends on various factors like gestational age, fetal viability or chances of survival, blood pressure value, condition of cervix and whether patient is in labour or not. Some obstetrician favour vaginal route over caesarean section, when there are no contraindication for vaginal delivery. Some prefer caesarean section, thinking that the baby is already compromised due to placental insufficiency and may not come up with the stress of labour. When patients of eminent eclampsia or eclampsis are kept for vaginal delivery, there is increased chance of repeat convulsion and placental separation which may further compromise fetal outcome. Interval between first convulsion and delivery nust be kept short to reduce the risk to mother and baby.
Cases of placenta praevia can bleed heavily form placental bed on table during caesarean section. Important time may be lost in managing these cases by conservative means. Quick decision must be made on table about the best possible method to stop or control the haemorrhage. There is also a possibility of adherent placenta with placenta praevia, which further complicates the picture and create a real threat to patients life and challenge to obstetrician. It is very important to rule out adherent placenta before we perform caesarean section or must be very vigilant in observing the signs of invasion of placenta after opening the abdomen. Casual approach and missing important intra operative findings can lead to nightmare. It is recommended that adequately trained manpower, blood and components are arranged, written informed consent is taken after counselling the patient and the relative so that important time is not lost in taking additional supplementary consents, when decision of obstetric hysterectomy or internal iliac ligation are needed on table to save life of the woman.
Retained placenta is one of the third stage complications that endanger life of parturient. Partially separated placenta is more dangerous that non separated placenta. Similarly, partially adherent placenta is more dangerous than completely adherent placenta. If woman has delivered at home, the risk of haemorrhagic shock is many a fold more than institutional delivery. Every obstetrician must follow standard protocol of management of third stage of labour, which is universally accepted by the name AMTSL. The nurse midwife or the attending doctor at peripheral hospital can attempt removal of placenta by gentle traction using Brand Andrew technique. Preparations must be made to transfer the case to nearest possible hospital, where manual removal of placenta can be performed. Possibility of adherent placenta should always be kept, whenever one gets a situation of retained placenta. Intravenous compartment should be maintained by infusion of Ringers lactate solution. Available oxitocics should be administered in correct doses and through correct route. Quick and safe transfer of the case can reduce the morbidity and mortality due to PPH.
Acute inversion of uterus, although rare, can occur suddenly and unexpectedly. Obstetrician or the nurse midwife un-prepared to face and manage this an un anticipated situation often express panic reaction. Inversion of uterus, if occurs at home, often results into maternal mortality due to haemorrhagic and neurogenic shock. I f it takes place in the hospital and if the nurse midwife is trained to identify this condition, manual reposition of uterus can be tried. If there is failure of reposition, patient must be shifted as early as possible to tertiary care hospital. Any delay in transfer may aggravate shock resulting in poor outcome. Gravitational drag on the inverted uterus can be reduced by keeping woman in lying down position and supporting the inverted fundus with the help of dressing and bandage like what is done for hydrocele. Intravenous fluids must be continued during transfer of the case. If placenta is not separated from the fundus, no attempt should be made to remove the placenta at lower-level facilities. Time is very crucial, when patient of inversion of uterus has atonic postpartum haemorrhage. Arranging quick transfer with prior communication with referral hospital giving them the details of the condition of patient and her blood group can prove beneficial.
Time becomes crucial factor for maternal and fetal wellbeing in few more conditions. These are prolonged labour, obstructed labour, scar dehiscence and prolong second stage of labour.
Prolong labour especially the second stage of labour is another condition which demands prompt decision making and appropriate action to avoid maternal and fetal complications. Partograph is the simple tool that helps us in monitoring the progress of labour. For various reasons and even after emphasising its importance to labour room staff which include doctors and nurses, partograph is either not used or is filled incompletely or in retrospect. The staff understands the importance of the partographs, but it is not reflected through its proper use in labour room. Failure to monitor labour results into prolong labour, both first stage and second stage. This ultimately results into increased maternal morbidity. The uterine rupture or the scar rupture, fetal distress, birth asphyxia, fresh stillbirths and increased need for neonatal care unit admissions. There is need for emergency caesarean section with possibility of complications of extension of uterine incisions and injury to pelvic vessels leading to excessive haemorrhage. There is also an increased risk of post-partum haemorrhage following prolong labour, whether woman deliver by vaginal route or abdominal route.
Labour monitoring using continuous electronic monitors, have compromised the clinical examination for assessment of progress of labour of patient. The attending doctor or the nurse neither palpate the uterus for frequency, duration and intensity of uterine contractions, nor assess the descent of the presenting part, as abdomen is covered with two straps or belts of the transducers. Many a times labour is monitored by just observing the fetal heart rate shown on the display of the electronic monitor. This leads to missing of important per abdominal findings leading to complications. There are incidences of even rupture uterus not being recognized till the time of caesarean section. Uterine hypertonicity, which is often a side effect of unsupervised actions or over dose of various oxitocic drugs that are in use in modern obstetrics, mainly include two types of prostaglandins and oxytocin. Many of the babies with unexplained birth asphyxia or stillbirths are result of inadequate intra-partum supervision. Timely recognition of prolong labour at any stage and prompt remedial measures will reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.
Assisted vaginal delivery using either ventouse or obstetric forceps is recommended when second stage of labour or the perineal stage is getting prolonged for some reason. Obstetrician should quickly decide the type of instrument that is ideal in the given situation. Repeated attempts of instrumental delivery and failed instrumental deliveries are associated with adverse perinatal outcome. It is essential that the Obstetrician should reassess the case and promptly take appropriate decision to avoid complications.
Umbilical cord prolapse is another obstetric emergency that create panic reaction in the labour room. It usually follows either artificial rupture or spontaneous rupture of membranes, when presenting part is not engaged or when there is abnormal lie. Prompt identification and avoidance of cord compression by manual pushing up of the presenting part or by postural means, while making preparations for emergency caesarean section, can prevent intrauterine fetal hypoxia or fetal death. Time interval between occurrence of cord prolapsed and delivery of baby determines the chances of fetal survival.
Similar to cord prolapse, difficulty in delivery of after coming head of the breech and baby with shoulder dystocia are two more situations, wherein time becomes crucial factor. Early recognition and prompt action for delivery of the baby by appropriate method and route is necessary to avoid perinatal morbidity and mortality. Obstetrician is required to possess sufficient skills in managing these obstetric emergencies.
In conclusion, it is suggested that everyone who is practising Obstetrics and dealing with obstetric emergencies must understand the importance of golden hour in obstetric emergencies. Intelligent anticipation and prompt recognition of the problem, avoidance of delay in instituting first-aid or definitive treatment ,calling for help from colleagues or who so ever is available ,timely referral to higher centres after stabilization, using effective techniques of communication, keeping facility readiness in every respect to provide emergency care, practising emergency drills and use of simulations, can help in improving the outcome and reducing maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in obstetric emergencies.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
