AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Simbrón Ribbeck Lourdes, Neuroradiology Fellow, Neuroradiology Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Manuel Velasco Suárez, E-mail: lousi87@hotmail.com
Citation: Simbrón Ribbeck Lourdes, Sandoval Paredes Josefina, Amador Sánchez Karen and Taboada Barajas Jesús (2019), Uncinate Fasciculus in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, J. Brain and Neurological Disorders, 2(2): DOI: 10.31579/2642-973X/010.
Copyright: © n Ribbeck Lourdes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 11 September 2019 | Accepted: 30 September 2019 | Published: 07 October 2019
Keywords: temporal lobe epilepsy; uncinate fasciculus; diffusion tensor imaging
Background and purpose: Temporal lobe epilepsy is the most common focal intractable epilepsy. Uncinate fasciculus is a white fiber bundle that connects the orbitofrontal cortex with the anterior temporal lobe, and is implicated in most of the superior mental functions. There is evidence of uncinate fasciculus as a propagation pathway of seizures from temporal lobe. The aim of the study is to determine uncinate fasciculus alterations in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, through fractional anisotropy.
Methods: Thirty-three patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (10 right and 23 left) were studied. All of them were right-handed and had left hemisphere dominance for language. A 1.5 T MR imaging scanner was used to obtain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Fractional anisotropy of uncinate fasciculus was calculated through TBSS (Tract Based Spatial Statistics). Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS (v. 25).
Results: Fractional anisotropy was higher in right uncinate fasciculus, regardless of epilepsy side. Right uncinate fasciculus, at the insula level, showed lower fractional anisotropy in patients with right temporal lobe epilepsy.
Conclusions: Results support the evidence of uncinate fasciculus as a pathway of propagation in temporal lobe epilepsy, specially at insular level.
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic disorders, affecting around fifty million people all over the world (World Health Organization, 2019). International League against Epilepsy (ILAE) defines epilepsy as a condition with two or more recurrent electrical seizures in 24 hours, without any identified cause. Among more than forty clinical epilepsy syndromes, temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most frequent and also represents two thirds of the surgical-required intractable epilepsy (Cendes, 2005) (Ladino, et al., 2014) (Allone, et al., 2017), with mesial temporal sclerosis being a hallmark, although not always present. However, some evidence suggests that TLE is rather a brain network disorder, with adjacent white matter fiber bundles microstructural changes, particularly uncinate fasciculus (UF), arcuate fasciculus, cingulum and external capsule (Rodríguez-Cruces & Concha, 2015). UF is a major fiber tract that connects orbitofrontal cortex with anterior temporal lobe, linking rostral portions of amygdala and temporal gyri with the gyrus rectus, because of this connectivity and localization, it is considered part of the limbic system and has been implicated in emotion, memory, behavioral process patterns, social situational awareness, language (Papagno, et al., 2011) (Nomura, et al., 2013) (Von der Heide, et al., 2013), and notably in temporal lobe epilepsy as an important pathway of seizure activity spread (Kim, et al., 2011). Microstructural changes in these white matter fiber bundles are evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging by using fractional anisotropy (FA), a parameter of diffusion tensor imaging sequence. It is an assessment of restriction and directionality of water molecules movement, with values ranging between 0 (no anisotropy) and 1 (maximus anisotropy) (Beaulieu, 2002) (Alexander, et al., 2007). It is also an assessment of white matter fiber integrity (Diao, et al., 2015), but is affected by fiber crossing within a voxel or partial volume effect (Chanraud, et al., 2010). Reported values of FA for the UF varies among 0.32 y 0.48 (Von der Heide, et al., 2013). However, there is discrepancy about side dominance, with some authors reporting right dominance (Rodrigo, et al., 2007) (Park, et al., 2004), specially at insular and temporal portions; and other reporting left dominance (Diehl, et al., 2008). Methodological variations in imaging acquisition or assessment are supposed to explain these discrepancies. Regarding microstructural changes in UF of TLE patients, some authors found FA values alteration of UF, suggesting fiber damage (Rodrigo, et al., 2007), specifically ipsilateral to epileptogenic focus (Diao, et al., 2015) (Diehl, et al., 2008) (Ahmadi, et al., 2009) (Concha, et al., 2012). The aim of this study is to determine UF alterations by depicting it in three major segments, through FA assessment, in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.
Materials and methods
Patients with TLE were selected among those who fulfill the following inclusion criteria: 1) epilepsy side consistently defined by clinic, MRI findings, FDG-PETCT and EEG, 2) left hemispheric dominance for language, and 3) right-handedness. Patients with brain malignancy and those who received radiation treatment for brain, head and/or neck, were excluded. Two groups were formed for analysis, right TLE and left TLE patients.
Image acquisition and analysis
Images were obtained from a 1.5-T Signa MR scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI), including a DTI sequence with 35 diffusion gradient directions, b value of 1000 s/mm2, 22 cm FOV, 128 x 128 acquisition matrix, 48 slices and Z resolution of 3 mm. DTI was analyzed in and independent work station and FA was calculated using TBSS (Tract Based Spatial Statistics) from FSL (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain´s Software Library) (Smith, et al., 2004) for iMac, this tool improves sensibility, objectivity and interpretability for DTI group analysis (Smith, et al., 2006).
FA was calculated automatically in each UF using the JHU White-Matter Tractography Atlas. Additionally, FA was calculated in three different right and left UF segments (frontal, insular and temporal). Then, the automatically obtained values were compared within each group and the three segments FA values were compared between both groups. Non-parametric U-Mann Whitney test was used. Age, sex, educational level and epilepsy time duration was compared between both groups, using t student test. Statistical analysis was done with IBM SPSS v25, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Thirty-three patients were selected, 10 were right TLE patients and 23 were left TLE patients. Female sex accounted for the 60% of patients. Most common age range was among 20-29 years old. Epilepsy time duration has a mean of 24.8 ± 11.7 years with a range of 5 to 44 years. There were no statistical differences for age, sex, educational level and epilepsy time duration between right and left TLE groups. Table 1.
| Right TLE (n=10) | Left TLE (n=23) | p |
Sex |
|
| 0.92 |
Female | 6 | 14 |
|
Male | 4 | 9 |
|
Age (years) | 38.4 ± 9 | 34.1 ± 10 | 0.26 |
Epilepsy time duration (years) | 25.5 ± 13 | 24.5 ± 11 | 0.82 |
Table 1. Mean difference of sex, age and epilepsy time duration, among right and left TLE
The analysis within groups showed side-to-side asymmetry with greater FA values in right UF, in both groups (p < 0.01). Table 2.
Mean | SD | p | |
Right UF-FA | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
Left UF-FA | 0.24 | 0.03 | |
Uncinate fasciculus FA in left TLE patients | |||
Mean | SD | p | |
Right UF-FA | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
Left UF-FA | 0.25 | 0.06 | |
Table 2. Uncinate fasciculus FA in right TLE patients
The analysis between groups, for each segment of UF, showed statistical difference only for the insular segment, with lower FA values in right UF in patients with right TLE (p < 0.05). Table 3.
| Right TLE | Left TLE |
Right frontal UF-FA | 0.28 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.09 |
Left frontal UF-FA | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 0.32 ± 0.10 |
Right insular UF-FA* | 0.43 ± 0.11 | 0.49 ± 0,12 |
Left insular UF-FA | 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.14 |
Right temporal UF-FA | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.16 ± 0.04 |
Left temporal UF-FA | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.06 |
Table 3. Three segments UF FA and epilepsy side
Seizure pathways in TLE has motivated a great amount of experimental studies, including in vivo models using electrophysiological recordings, kindling and metabolic studies. This data suggests a “single focus” that primary spread to parahippocampal cortex, then perirhinal, piriform and insular cortex toward frontal motor cortex (McIntyre & Gilby, 2008). However, there is evidence of additional temporal and extratemporal changes in TLE patients. In this sense, a “model network” has been proposed, considering several cortical and subcortical structures anatomically and functionally connected, with the same vulnerability to seizure activity (Palmigiano, et al., 2012). Regardless of a known seizure onset zone in TLE, diffuse changes in white matter tracts connecting temporal lobe with other regions are described. Also, evidence using FA to assess specific white matter fiber bundle suggests changes due to damage, particularly in UF. In this way, Rodrigo (2007), Diehl (2008), Ahmadi (2009), Concha (2012) and Diao (2015) have previously described FA values alteration of UF in TLE patients. In our study, we analyzed FA of UF in two groups of TLE patients categorized by epilepsy side, with no statistical differences among age, sex and epilepsy time duration. Table 1. Some variability between each side UF was found, with greater FA in right UF in both groups. Table 2. These results suggest a right UF dominance, as was described previously by Park (2004) and Rodrigo (2007), particularly at insular and temporal segments. Furthermore, Highley (2002) in a postmortem study, found that right UF was 27% larger and contained 33% more fibers than left UF. However, the reason for this asymmetry remains to be elucidated. Three different segments of UF were evaluated between both groups, these were at frontal, insular and temporal segments, from which only insular segment showed difference, with lower FA values ipsilateral to the epilepsy side in right TLE patients. According to animal models of McIntire & Gilby (2008), insular, perirhinal and piriform cortex are and important component to seizure spread and recruitment of motor neurons; so, we can assume insular UF portion as having the major role in seizure spread. As FA represents a combination of volume, density, myelination and coherence of fibers bundles (Park, et al., 2004); our results suggest that right TLE patients have microstructural injuries in ipsilateral UF, particularly at insular segment. These changes ipsilateral to epileptogenic focus would be the result of gliosis or microdysgenesis, findings commonly found in hippocampi of intractable TLE patients (Kasper, et al., 2003). Wallerian degeneration has also been implicated as a consequence of progressive neuronal loss in chronic epilepsy (Beaulieu, 2002). Interestingly, Diehl (2008) found bilateral UF values alterations in right and left TLE patients, demonstrating remote diffusion abnormalities to the presumed seizure focus, as was described previously by Concha (2005). Moreover, some other entities may alter FA values in greater or lesser degree, and these can be epilepsy related conditions such as postictal state (Diehl, et al., 2005), or other not related conditions such as cytotoxic or vasogenic edema, encephalopathy, psychiatric disorders and inflammation (Assaf & Pasternak, 2008). Unfortunately, we did not consider time interval between last seizure and magnetic resonance imaging, as the study was retrospective, which can originate pitfalls in FA values. Also, the lack of a control group and the small number of patients are significant limitations of this study.
Our results support the evidence of right dominance for the UF. Also, confirm changes in FA of UF ipsilateral to the TLE side, even though this white matter fiber bundle is not directly related to TLE, but more studies with bigger samples are needed to confirm these findings.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
