AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Ali Mohamed Gargoom, Dermatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benghazi University. Benghazi-Libya
Citation: Gargoom AM, Duweb GA (2019) Ultra-pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Melanocytic Nevi. J Dermatol Dermatit DOI: 10.31579/2578-8949/054
Copyright: © 2019 Gargoom AM. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 02 July 2019 | Accepted: 20 July 2019 | Published: 25 July 2019
Keywords: UCO2, laser, melanocytic, nevus, acquired, congenital
Abstract: Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) even small-sized as well as acquired melanocytic nevi (AMN) are of common cosmetic concerns and getting rid of them remain challenging. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ultra-pulsed CO2 laser for the treatment of melanocytic nevi. 15 male and female Libyan patients with 16 AMN and 7 CMN were treated with multiple sessions of ultra-pulsed CO2 laser at 1-month intervals. Clinical response at 6 months after final treatment was graded as poor (< 50%), moderate (50–75%), good (> 75%) and excellent where the skin of the lesion returned normal as the rest of the surrounding skin. All treated nevi showed good to excellent cosmetic outcomes after 2 or 4 treatment sessions. The post laser complication were minimal and transit except for one atrophic scar. No recurrence of pigmentation during the six months of follow-up period.
Conclusion: Ultra-pulsed CO2 laser seems to be effective and associate with minimum adverse side effect in the treatment of small CMN and AMN.
Melanocytic nevi may present at birth in about 1% - 6% of newborn infants and referred as congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) or may developed later on in life where known as acquired melanocytic nevi (AMN) [1, 2]. Depending on the clinical examination solely, sometimes it is hardly possible to differentiate between congenital and acquired nevi and documentation since birth may be the only way to prove the congenital origin [3].
Congenital melanocytic nevi classified according to their surface areas into; small CMN with a diameter <1.5 cm, medium-sized CMN measure between 1.5 and 19.5 cm and large CMN with diameters > 19.5cm [2,4]. Acquired melanocytic nevi are benign proliferations of melanocytic cells
(Also known as nevus cells) that are characterized histopathologically by presence of nests of nevus cells in the dermo-epidermal junction (junctional nevi), or in the papillary dermis (compound nevi) or deep in the dermis (dermal nevi) [5].
Different modality of treatment were tried to treat melanocytic nevi including; surgical excision, cryotherapy, dermabrasion, curettage and chemical peeling. Although some of these modality of treatment is effective in removing the nevi but the risk of dyschromia and scar formation limit their uses. Nevertheless, nevi in esthetically sensitive or surgically challenging areas and large nevi is another important obstacle. In these conditions laser treatment of melanocytic nevi is the appropriate alternative choice [5, 6]. Both pigment-specific alexandrite (Al, 755 nm), neodymium: yttrium aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG,1064 nm ) and frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser ( fd Nd:YAG, 532 nm) and ablating lasers such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Er:YAG) and in combination with each other, have been found to be effective in the treatment of melanocytic nevi but with variable outcome and sequels [5-8].
Histological examination after various laser procedure reveals persistence of nevomelanocytic cells in the papillary dermis which increase the possibility of recurrence. For this reason, long-pulsed pigment-specific laser and ablating laser are more efficient [5].
Carbon dioxide laser considered as the gold standard in ablative lasers with its wavelength (10.600nm) which is selectively absorbed by water. Since approximately 77% of skin consists of water, this absorption was the optimal condition for the ablation effect. The major drawback of CO2 laser in the continuous mode is considerable possibility of texture changes because of its uncontrollable penetration depth [5]. The emergence of the superpulsed CO2 laser and more recently the ultrapulsed CO2 (UCO2) laser which delivers high energy beam in very short impulses minimizes the risks of scarring [8,9]. The present work was designed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of UCO2 laser ablation in the treatment of melanocytic nevi in a group of patients with skin type IV and V.
Between January 2016 and October 2017, fifteen male and female Libyan patients aged between 15 years to 35 years (mean age 19.3 years) with a total of 23 clinically benign-appearing melanocytic nevi were enrolled in the present study. Sixteen out of the 23 studied nevi were AMN and seven were CMN. Melanocytic nevi with a diameter of 3 cm or larger or with variable color, irregular border, and asymmetry were excluded. Melanocytic nevi with sudden increase in size or textural changes were also excluded. All included patients had Fitzpatrick's skin types IV and V. Pregnant or lactating female or patients with keloid tendency or family history of melanoma were excluded.
Laser procedure, the potential complications and the expected outcomes were explained to every patient prior to laser session. An informed consent was obtained from each patient. The lesions were cleaned with disinfecting solution then infiltrated with 2% Lignocaine via insulin syringe attached to 29-G needle. Lesions were treated with UCO2 laser (Fraxis from ilooda; 10,600 nm; 100-200 Hz; 200-400 μs) with fixed spot-size handpiece (spot diameter 100 mm). The photoablated tissue was gently removed with a cotton swap soaked in normal saline and the end point was the appearance of fine punctuate bleeding (level of papillary dermis). Laser photoablation and gentile removal of photoablated tissue was repeated for 2-4 passes until the appearance of underlying pink tissue which was considered as the endpoint of laser photoablation. Post-operatively, patients were instructed to apply fucidic acid cream till crust formation and to keep the area clean and dry for the same duration. Photographic documentation of the lesion before laser treatment and immediately afterward and then reviewed at day 2, day 7, 1 month,2 months and finally at 6 months. Before and after photo were taken with Canon XUS 220 HS camera.
The clinical response is graded by the treating physicians into four categories: excellent clearance (the skin of the lesion returned normal as the rest of the surrounding skin and does not need further treatment); good clearance (> 75% cleared); moderate clearance (> 50 - 75% cleared); and poor clearance (< 50% cleared).
Patients satisfaction questionnaire using a 4-point grading scale as follows: very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied and dissatisfied was completed by every patient at the end of follow up period. Any possible complications and side effects (erythema, texture changes, and scarring, post inflammatory pigmentations) were recorded during post-operative follow-ups.
Fifteen patients (11 female and 4 male) with 23 clinically benign-appearing melanocytic nevi completed the study. The mean age of the patients was 19.3 years (range 15–35). All included melanocytic nevi were involving the face. Among the sixteen AMN, 9 (39%) were flat or just palpable pigmented lesion and categorized based on naked eye examination as junctional AMN while 7 (30%) were dome-shape pigmented lesion and considered as compound AMN. While among the seven CMN, 6 (26%) were smaller than 1.5cm and categorized as small CMN and one (4%) measured 2.3cm which was considered as medium sized CMN (Figure 1).
Melanocytic nevi can be simply classified into congenital and acquired based on their first appearance since birth or thereafter. However, some CMN may not be obvious at birth but they gradually develop pigment over time and become apparent [2,4]. Generally, CMN are found to be much larger in diameter than acquired nevi. Majority of CMN are 5 mm or more in diameter at birth while most of AMN never grow to more than 5 mm [4]. AMN are benign proliferations of melanocytic naevus cells which occur initially within the epidermis at the dermo-epidermal junction hence called junctional melanocytic nevi. Further cellular proliferation results in the migration of nevus cells and their localization within the papillary dermis forming what is known as dermal melanocytic nevi. When the melanocytic naevus cells present in the dermo-epidermal junction and in the dermis, they are termed compound melanocytic nevi [5].
Various laser modality were used to treat melanocytic nevi including; pigment-selective ( AL, Nd:YAG and fd Nd:YAG ), ablative lasers (Er:YAG and CO2) and combination of pigment-selective and ablating lasers; all have been found to be effective in the treatment of MN with variable outcomes and sequels. There are two types of pigment-selective laser the long-pulsed (msec) and short-pulsed (Q-switched nsec lasers) devices [5]. Most authors have agreed that the use of pigment-selective lasers either in the short-pulsed mode (Q-switched nsec) or in the long-pulsed mode (msec) is effective in superficial nevi i.e. junctional nevi but with limited results in deeper lesions (compound and dermal nevus). Moreover, associated with high rate of recurrence [5, 10]. This is because pigment-specific lasers treat the superficial nevomelanocytes located in papillary dermis, but is unlikely to affect the deeply-seated nevomelanocytes. Which has been demonstrated histologically as persistent nevomelanocytic nests in the mid papillary and deeper dermis at depths of 0.16–0.44 mm following pigment-specific lasers sessions [7].
The principle of combination of pigment-selective and ablating lasers is to facilitate the delivery of laser beam of the pigment-selective lasers to reach to the deeply-seated nevomelanocytes after ablation of the superficial cells by the ablating lasers. This is in contrary to August et al. Who concluded that pretreatment of CMN with CO2 laser appears no more effective than pigment-specific laser alone and may increase the incidence of adverse effects [7,8].
Ablating lasers (Er: YAG and CO2) work by destroying the target cells directly and the depth can be achieved by adjusting the dose. Er: YAG laser ablates nearly 5–50 μm per pass while the UCO2 laser has a higher ablation depth of 20–60 μm per pass and causes higher thermal coagulation which explain its complete destruction of nevus cells that minimize the risk of recurrence [5].
The overall results of our study pointed out that all included patients showed good to excellent results (Table1). This is come in accordance with Eggen et al. who recently systematically reviewed 24 studies with 20 different types of laser treatments in 434 patients and concluded that good to excellent result can be achieved in all laser categories (8). The best result in our series where accomplished from the AMN patients where 52% of patients showed good clearance (> 75% cleared) and 48% showed excellent results i.e. the skin returned to almost normal appearance. This promising outcome from our series is attributed obviously to the included AMN patients which comprise only junctional and compound nevi. The response of junctional and compound AMN is much better than dermal one, this is in consistence with many other studies [5,7,8].
Regarding the studied six small size CMN, (67%) showed good response and (23%) showed excellent outcomes. The only one medium size CMN which measured 2.3cm ended with complete clearance of the pigmentation but with mild textural changes though patient’s satisfaction is very good.
The small number of included patients in our study is the major limitation. Furthermore, the lack of post-treatment histopathological report and the relatively short follow up period (6 months) represent another important drawback.
Malignant changes in nevi as a consequence to laser therapy remain of much worry and obstacle for practitioner in this field of dermatology but such burden have not been proved clinically [7]. Moreover recently, according to Eggen et al; treatment of melanocytic nevi with laser carry low risk of malignant transformation in contrary to the old assumption [8]. According to the author’s opinion, this recent assumption will open the doors and will account for more liberal use of laser in this critical dermatological issue.
In conclusion, UCO2 laser is a marvelous device especially by expertise practitioner and represent a convenient substitute to the classical methods in the treatment of melanocytic nevus. It is a quick out-patient procedure, well tolerable by patient, need minimal postoperative care and associated with low risk of visible scarring. Moreover, a positive esthetic outcome. Therefore; we recommend the UCO2 laser for the treatment of melanocytic nevi but further studies with larger number of patients and longer duration of follow up is needed to prove the efficacy and safety of this procedure.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
