AUCTORES
Review article
*Corresponding Author: Gudisa Bereda, Department of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Negelle Health Science College, Guji, Ethiopia
Citation: Gudisa Bereda (2022). Ubiquitous Usage of Over the Counter Medications in Pregnancy: Perspectives of Maternal Apprehensiveness. J. Women Health Care and Issues. 5(1); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/097
Copyright: © 2022 Gudisa Bereda, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 22 November 2021 | Accepted: 29 December 2021 | Published: 06 January 2022
Keywords: over the counter; medications; pregnancy; ubiquitous; usage
The World Health Organization delineates self-medication as the utilization of medications by individuals in search of treating symptoms or self-diagnosed health state. During pregnancy, drug utilization is complicated because of incomplete data as clinical trials frequently don't enclose pregnant women, with reference to benefits and implicit undesirable outcomes on both the mother and the foetus. Bestowed limited data on the variety of over the counter medications applicable, physicians seek to counsel pregnant women about implicit pitfalls, and it is beneficial to give information on entire over the counter medications the patient is receiving at the preconception visit and entire distinctive ordinary visits. Antacid that containing sodium bicarbonate can cause fluid buildup in the tissues if used during pregnancy redundantly. Hypericum perforatum is ordinarily not recommended in pregnancy because of a dearth of human data and it perhaps antecedent miscarriage and it also escalates the birth deformities of fetus. Early aspirinusage at the time of conception or in the 1st several weeks of pregnancy does not escalate the pitfall of spontaneous abortion.
Pregnancy care imposes a consummate challenge to both the health care furnishers and pregnant women because drug utilization during pregnancy perhaps negatively influences the lives of the mothers and the growing fetus. Medication usage during pregnancy has consistently created a challenge in antenatal care owing to the potential foetal peril consociated with the use. Drug utilization studies display that consummate women use medications during pregnancy with estimations varying from 44% to 99% [1]. The WHO delineates self-medication as the utilisation of medications by individuals in search of treating symptoms or self-diagnosed health state [2]. OTC medication is taken by over 90% of pregnant women [3]. Although OTC medications have attested to be efficient and secure and are intended for self-medication, but wrong usage or abuse suggest serious consequences, particularly in geriatrics, pediatrics, pregnant and lactating women [4, 5]. Pregnancy is a special bodily processing state where medication uptake is a considerable concern and presents a remonstrance as revamped medication pharmacokinetics and medication crossing the placenta perhaps causes detriment to the foetus [6]. In pregnant women, self-medication is narrated to be ubiquitous because of a variety of complaints affiliated to pregnancy, like back pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, heartburn and haemorrhoids [7, 8]. During pregnancy, drug utilization is complicated because of incomplete data as clinical trials frequently don't enclose pregnant women, with reference to benefits and implicit undesirable outcomes on both the mother and the foetus [9]. Pregnant women are ordinarily excluded from medical trials and sequences from animal studies seek not apply to human population. Consequently treating pregnant women with certain medications is a terrible and consummate clinicians have a rather bounded approach to the usage of medications during pregnancy. Fear of causing fetal affliction and death through medication usage in pregnancy has sequenced in multiplex challenges to clinical research about the safety of medications in pregnancy. Thereupon medication safety information in pregnancy is frankly acquired through case reports, epidemiological studies and animal studies; entire of which have limitations, which make determining pitfalls of a medication usage during pregnancy difficult [10]. Medications that a pregnant woman takes can influence the fetus in several ways. They can act directly on the fetus causing detriment or abnormal development leading to birth anomalies or death. They can also revamp the work of the placenta ordinarily by constricting blood vessels and downgrading the blood supply of oxygen and nutrients to the fetus from the mother and thus sequencing in a baby that is underweight and underdeveloped. Furthermore they can cause the muscles of the uterus to contract forcefully; indirectly damaging the fetus by de-escalating the blood supply or triggering pre-term labor and delivery [11]. Whereas there are no randomized controlled trials to mentor the usage of OTC medications during pregnancy, women frequently use them for skin, allergy, respiratory, and gastrointestinal circumstances in addition to general analgesia. Entire physicians caring for reproductive-aged women should be familiar with the indications, perils, and benefits of OTC medications in pregnancy. Bestowed limited data on the variety of OTC medications applicable, physicians seek to counsel pregnant women about implicit pitfalls, and it is beneficial to give information on entire OTC medications the patient is receiving at the preconception visit and entire distinctive ordinary visits [12]. Ubiquitously used medications during pregnancy consummately were narrated beneath: During pregnancy heartburn happens in up to 80% of pregnant women by the end of the 3rd trimester. Antacids containing aluminum, calcium, or magnesium are frequently thought-out 1st-line treatment in pregnancy. Nevertheless, at high doses, antacids containing calcium can cause milk-alkali syndrome and interferes with contractions during labor [13] and antacids with aluminum can cause neurotoxicity. Antacid that containing NaHCO3 can cause fluid buildup in the tissues if used during pregnancy redundantly. Selective histamine H2 blockers have been used in entire trimesters with no known teratogenic effects; H2 blocker medications, such as famotidine, cimetidine, and ranitidine, attested in the United States for acid reflux, pose no significant perils for the fetus [14]. Proton pump inhibitors nowadays became attainable OTC. Entire PPIs medications are USFDA, classifications category B, which delineated as entire of them are secure during pregnancy, because there is no concrete evidence that they cause miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm, delivery, birth deformities, and low infant birth weight. Proton pump inhibitors and H2 blockers are thought-out secure in pregnancy [15]. Topical steroid creams perhaps dysregulated placental hormones and likely obviate indispensable proteins from getting to the baby, and women used the ointments were also more probably to have asthma and to receive other high peril medications during pregnancy than those who didn’t. Usage of topical retinol such as skin cream is not consociated with perils on fetus deformities. Topical antifungals are ubiquitously used during pregnancy for treatment of vulvovaginitis. Imidazoles and nystatin is well studied and thought-out secure during pregnancy. Nystatin is minimally absorbed and is effective for vaginal therapy [16-18]. During pregnancy, herbal remedies are used for nausea, respiratory symptoms, urinary tract infections, pain, and disparate nonspecific issues. Using herbal medicine in 1st 3 months and late in 3rd trimester is detrimental for the fetus. The ubiquitous detrimental effects of using herbal remedies in pregnancy are heart burn; escalate blood flow, premature labor, miscarriage, allergic reactions and abortion. Distinctive survey’s displayed that using herbal remedies during the 1st 12 weeks and the last 12 weeks of gestation is detrimental for the fetus [19]. Hypericum perforatum is ordinarily not recommended in pregnancy because of a dearth of human data and it perhaps antecedent miscarriage and it also escalates the birth deformities of fetus [20, 21]. Dextromethorphan is a nonnarcotic antitussive isomer of codeine that was found to be teratogenic in chicken embryos. Nevertheless, a human epidemiologic study and a smaller controlled study did not demonstrate escalated perils of congenital malformations, but it perhaps negatively affect the pregnant women and her fetus if overused or misused [22]. Up to 15% of women usage an antihistamine during pregnancy to treat allergic rhinitis or nausea [23]. Studies continually reveal no significant pitfall of fetal malformations with 1st-generation antihistamines, and these agents are thought-out secure and certain 2nd generation antihistamines usage perhaps consociated with pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Preponderance of antihistamine medications are USFDA category C, solely a few antihistamines are category B delineated as either animal-reproduction inquests have not substantiated a fetal peril but there are no restrained inquests in pregnant women or animal-reproduction inquests have reveal an adverse effect (other than a de-escalate in fertility) that was not inveterate in restrained inquests in women in the first trimester (and there is no confirmation of a pitfall in later trimesters) or there is survey in animal that revealed the medication is safe in pregnant animal, but there is no fetal pitfall confirmation in pregnant women. Medications in this class are typically thought-out secure. Recently there are no safety guidelines for the usage of antihistamines during pregnancy [24-26]. Early aspirin usage at the time of conception or in the 1st several weeks of pregnancy does not escalate the pitfall of spontaneous abortion [27]. Suppression of prostaglandin synthesis perhaps harmfully affects the pregnancy and/or the embryo/foetal [28]. During the 1st and 2nd trimester of pregnancy, ASA should not be bestowed [29]. During the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, entire prostaglandin generation inhibitors perhaps expose the foetus to antecedent cardiopulmonary toxicity (with premature closure of the ductus arteriosus and pulmonary hypertension); renal dysfunction, which perhaps advances to renal failure with oligohydraminosis [30]. Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors perhaps expose both the mother and the child at the end of pregnancy to: attainable prolongation of bleeding time/escalated INR, an anti-aggregating outcome which perhaps happen even after very low doses; suppression of uterine contractions sequencing in holding pattern or extended labour or ASA is pregnancy category C (pitfall can’t be ruled out) signifies either inquests in animals have displayed adverse effects on the fetus (teratogenic or embryocidal, or other) and there are no restrained inquests in women or inquests in women and animals are not avail. Drugs should be accustomed only if the implicit advantage maintains the implicit peril to the fetus or the survey in animal model displayed slight pitfall to the pregnant animal, but there is no confirmation in fetal peril of human survey in pregnant women [31]. Collectedly, ASA should be avoided during organogenesis and in the 3rd trimester unless a physician particularly prescribes it and the patient understands the pitfalls and benefits NSAIDs are not recommended in the 3rd trimester because of the peril of premature closure of the ductus arteriosus and subsequent initial pulmonary hypertension in the newborn [32]. The National Birth Defects Prevention Study, which analyzed data from 16,110 children in the United States exposed to acetaminophen in utero, found no escalated perils of birth anomalies with acetaminophen use. In pregnant women using acetaminophen particularly for febrile illness, there were de-escalated pitfalls of various cranial and facial deformities and gastroschisis, acetaminophen perhaps protective because fever heightens the peril of these deformities [33]. Acetaminophen is sole of the consummate broadly used medications in pregnancy and is ordinarily thought-out secure [34]. Unfortunately, acetaminophen is also among the consummate ubiquitously narrated agents implicated in overdoses during pregnancy [35]. High quanta of data on pregnant women indicate neither malformative, nor feto/neonatal toxicity. Epidemiological surveys on neurodevelopment in children exposed to paracetamol in utero reveal inconclusive sequences [36, 37]. Paracetamol-caffeine is not recommended for use during pregnancy owing to the probable escalated peril of spontaneous abortion consociated with caffeine devour [38, 39]
In pregnant women, self-medication is narrated to be ubiquitous because of a variety of complaints affiliated to pregnancy, like back pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, heartburn and haemorrhoids. Medications that a pregnant woman receives can influence the fetus in several ways. They can act directly on the fetus causing detriment or abnormal development leading to birth anomalies or death. OTC medication is taken by over 90% of pregnant women. Entire PPIs medications are USFDA, classifications category B, which delineated as entire of them are secure during pregnancy, because there is no concrete evidence that the cause miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm, delivery, birth deformities, and low infant birth weight. Topical steroid creams perhaps dysregulated placental hormones and likely obviate indispensable proteins from getting to the baby, and women used the ointments were also more probably to have asthma and to receive other high peril medications during pregnancy than those who didn’t.
Abbreviations
ASA: Aspirin; INR: International normalized ratio; NaHCO3: Sodium bicarbonate; OTC: Over the counter; PPI: Proton pump inhibitors; USFDA: United States food and drug administration; WHO: World health organization
Data Sources: Sources searched include Google Scholar, Research Gate, PubMed, NCBI, NDSS, PMID, PMCID, and Cochrane database. Search terms included: over the counter medications used during pregnancy.
Acknowledgments
The author acknowledg
ed Endnote-8, Google scholar, Medscape, Wikipedia, and PubMed.
Conflicts of interest
The author declared that they have no competing interest
Funding
None
Declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during the current study are available with correspondent author.
Competing interests
The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any of material discussed in this article.
Author’s contributions
GB contributed to preparing the first draft, review and editing the draft, and finally read and approved the manuscript.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.