AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Yuriy Bychkov, Medicine Doktor, Marienhaus Clinic St. Elisabeth Neuwied, Germany.
Citation: Yuriy Bychkov, Zdravena Doneva, Björn Buchter, Margarita Kreuzer, P. Christian Schulze, et all (2022). Treatment of Patients After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation - Combined Use of a High-Density Map and Robotic Navigation. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 5(8); DOI:10.31579/2641-0419/274
Copyright: © 2022 Yuriy Bychkov, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 August 2022 | Accepted: 25 August 2022 | Published: 29 August 2022
Keywords: high-density mapping; unipolar; bipolar; stereotaxis; pentaray
Objectives and Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is still associated with higher recurrence rate. This is prospective study of Redo pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) combined with remote magnet navigation. We have done high density mapping and in retrospective Analysis we tried to find criteria for better Ablation success.
Materials and Methods: 50 patients (male 36, female 14) with indication for Redo-PVI ware included. A 20 polig multielectrode catheter was used for mapping. Mapping data were collected bevor and after ablation and processed in terms of low-voltage areas bipolar (3 groups: 0.05-0.15 mV, 0.15-0.25 mV, 0.25-0.5 mV) and change in unipolar amplitude at the ablation lesions. The primary endpoint (symptom freedom at 12 months) was evidenced by follow-up examinations at 3, 6,9,12 months. Non-parametric statistical methods were used for variables with non-normal distributions. Trends in success rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared using a log-ranking test.
Results: In all analysed low-voltage bipolar groups occurs a change in the distribution after ablation in patients with AF. There are 3 parameters which related with endpoint: area of bipolar signals 0.05-0.15 mV (Me +32%, [95% CI: -10% to +167%], p<0.001), the unipolar amplitude at the applied ablation lesions (Me -0.45mV [95% CI: -0.15 to -1], p<0,001) and unipolar amplitude at the attached ablation lesions (lower amplitude was with recurrence associated, p=0.004). According to ROC analysis and logistic regression: failure to meet all 3 criteria accompanied with a 67% probability of symptomatic recurrence, if all 3 criteria are met, it is expected to have an approximately 81% success rate within the 12 months.
Conclusion: Analysis of high-density map including 3 criteria, help us to improve ablation success.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important clinical problem because affected patients suffer from decreased performance, dyspnea, palpitations, which accordingly lower the quality of life while increasing the mortality rate.[1,2]
A trigger (e.g., atrial extrasystoles, in most patients from arrhythmogenic myocardium in and around the pulmonary veins) and a substrate (fibrosis and remodeling of the atria) are necessary for the development of AF. [3,4] Several therapeutic approaches to atrial fibrillation exist. [5] These include the maintenance of normal ventricular frequency (frequency control) and the maintenance of sinus rhythm (rhythm control). The two strategies can be approached with drugs and/or interventions. [6,5]
Despite the emergence of different ablation methods, the recurrence rate remains relatively high in AF and according to various reports is 25-80
Settings and participants
The results presented below are from an analysis of 50 patients treated at St. Elisabeth Hospital Neuwied for repeat ablation therapy of persistent AF after recurrence. Data collection and follow-up examinations were performed after the written informed consent of the patients and prior review of the study protocol by the ethical committee of the Marienhaus Clinic St. Elisabeth Neuwied. The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.
A total of 50 patients participated in the study from 2017 to 2020. These patients had received pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the past and had a clinically relevant, symptomatic, drug-refractory recurrence. After the patient's consultation, the decision was therefore made to repeat PVI as a treatment strategy. AF was classified as persistent in all patients. [5,9]
Variables and assessment
All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) of the heart before ablation. Furthermore, transesophageal as well as transthoracic echocardiography with the recording of hemodynamic as well as morphological parameters (LV ejection fraction, LA dimensions as well as LAA flow, valvular vitiation) was performed in all patients after a detailed work-up. Electrophysiology studies (EPS) were performed under deep sedation and heparin as an anticoagulant (ACT (activated clotting time) target of 300 seconds). [9] The robotic magnetic navigation system Niobe® was used as a catheter control system. The right vena femoralis was used for venous access. Transseptal puncture and placement of SL1 sheath, RA-CS catheter, and His bundle catheter were performed.
The 5-arm 20-polig high-density mapping CARTO® Pentaray catheter was used as the examination catheter for the preparation of electrophysiological maps of the left atrium in all patients. Half of the examinations were performed with a mapping catheter with 4-4-4 mm sensor spacing on each of the 5 arms, and the second half of the cases were performed with a catheter with 2-6-2 mm spacing.
Data collected with CT were fused with electrophysiological data. After the creation of the map, ablation was performed using the robotic magnetic navigation system. The ThermoCool RMT 4-mm EPS catheter was used as the ablation catheter. Ablation was performed by radiofrequency current method, for each ablation lesion 35W, 30 sec, cooling flow 30 ml/min.
All atrial maps were collected in a sinus rhythm. Electrophysiological data were processed using CARTO® 3 software. All bipolar maps were filtered between 30 and 500 Hz. The applied settings were: “Confidense” filter setting, position 10, density 1mm, mapping criteria wavefront. The low-voltage zone was defined as 0.25 to 0.5 mV bipolar. All maps were also tested with limits 0.05 to 0.5 mV bipolar.
The maps were analyzed peri-intervention for low-voltage zones as well as reconnections of the pulmonary veins to devise an appropriate ablation strategy (re-isolation of the pulmonary veins, mitral isthmus line or roofline, etc.). [9] After the ablation procedure, the electrophysiological data were again collected using the CARTO® Pentaray catheter. In this way, differences in signals before and after ablation could be studied.
Using the program extension "Voltage Histogram", a measurement of the areas of the voltage zones selected for the setting and their distribution in the left atrium before and after ablation was performed (Example shown in figure 1). 
* Due to programming limitations, it was not possible to determine a variable interval (3) in set amplitude limits (2), so for respective maps analysis was done in 2 stages (0.05-0.25 mV bipolar with an interval 0.1 mV as well as 0.25-0.5 mV bipolar with an interval 0.25 mV).
Figure 1: Example of an area measurement corresponding to the various voltage zones in the left atrium. 1 - Program extension "Voltage Histogram". 2 - Set amplitude limit where analysis is necessary. 3 - Set interval. 4 - Calculated amplitude intervals based on the set interval (3) and selected amplitude limit (2). 5 - Color marking of the calculated amplitude intervals (*). 6 - Calculated area of amplitude intervals in relation to the total measured LA area. 7 - Calculated area of amplitude intervals in mm2.
To visualize the changes in low-voltage areas before and after ablation and to perform further analysis of specific signal groups, the bipolar low-voltage areas were experimentally divided into 3 areas (0.05mV - 0.15mV, 0.15mV - 0.25mV, and 0.25mV - 0.5mV) and processed for the respective map before and after ablation.
The change in the total amplitude of unipolar signals at the site where the ablation lesion was placed was calculated before and after RF delivery. Analysis of unipolar mapping was performed based on visual detection of amplitude change (measurement limits 0.5-2.0 mV, interval 0.1 mV) at the ablation lesions, which were marked accordingly by the CARTO® 3 program on LA maps (Example shown in figure 2).
Figure 2: An example of the distribution and the corresponding colored marking of the amplitude of unipolar mapping. 1 - Labeled ablation lesion (spatially localized identically on "pre-ablation as well as post-ablation map"). 2 - Color labeling with corresponding signal amplitude (3).
For this purpose, the zones around pulmonary veins were divided into 2 segments each - above as well as below the respective pulmonary vein (8 in total). If the ablation occurred at deviating locations (e.g., roofline, mitral isthmus line, etc.), the corresponding zones were also analyzed. Then, determination of the mean amplitude of unipolar signals at ablation points was performed based on the colored marking of the corresponding amplitude intervals before as well as after ablation. The marked ablation lesions were without spatial displacement both before and after ablation thanks to an equally used pre-and post-ablation fast anatomical map (FAM).
Normality was assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, or when appropriate, Shapiro-Wilk test. Median and interquartile range (IQR) were computed for continuous variables with non-normal distribution. Descriptive statistics for categorical data were expressed in absolute numbers and percentages. For variables with non-normal distributions, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. For comparing frequencies, the Chi-square test was used. Trends in success rates were evaluated using the
Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared using a log-ranking test. A 2-sided P-value of <0>
As shown in table 1 a total of N=50 (male=36; female=14) patients participated in the study from 2017 to 2020 with a mean age of 64 years [95% CI (Confidence interval): 46-79]. 48 patients had established antiarrhythmic therapy (12 amiodarone, 17 dronedarone, 18 flecainide, and 1 propafenone). 42 patients discontinued antiarrhythmic therapy 6 months after ablation (symptom-free, sinus rhythmus). 16 patients had coronary artery disease (CAD), 9 patients cardiomyopathy, 12 reduced LV pump function left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (5: LVEF 45-54%, 7: LVEF 30-44%), 30 patients arterial hypertension, and 5 diabetes mellitus. A total of 14 patients had a history of impaired thyroid function with appropriate therapy (euthyroid at the time of the study). Twenty patients had a history of other cardiac arrhythmias (isthmus-dependent atrial flutter 18, AVNRT and isthmus-dependent atrial flutter 1, left atrial tachycardia 2.
Patients N (%) 50 (100%) | |
| Male | 36 (72%) |
| Female | 14 (28%) |
| Age (median), years | |
| Total | 64 (95% CI 46-79) |
| Male | 60 (95% CI 46-79) |
| Female | 64 (95% CI 55-74) |
| BMI (median), kg/m2 | 29.5 (95% CI 23-36.3) |
| Form of disease: | |
| Persistent | 50 (100%) |
| Antiarrhythmic Therapy: | |
| Amiodarone | 12 (24%) |
| Dronaderone | 17 (34%) |
| Flecainide | 18 (36%) |
| Propafenone | 1 (2%) |
| Other arrhythmias: | |
| Isthmus-dependent atrial flutter | 18 (36%) |
| AVNRT | 1 (2%) |
| Left atrial tachycardia | 2 (4%) |
| Total* | 20 (40%) |
| Underlying cardiac disease: | |
| Coronary artery disease | 16 (32%) |
| Cardiomyopathy | 9 (18%) |
| Other comorbidities: | |
| Arterial hypertension | 30 (60%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (10%) |
| Hypothyroidism** | 11 (22%) |
| Hyperthyroidism*** | 3 (6%) |
| LV ejection fraction (%): | |
| normal (>55%) | 38 (76%) |
| slightly reduced (45-54%) | 5 (10%) |
| moderately reduced (30-44%) | 7 (14%) |
Table 1: Clinical characteristics, comorbidities and antiarrhymic therapy
The primary endpoint was freedom from symptoms 12 months after AF ablation. This was evidenced by follow-up examinations at 3,6,9,12 months after ablation by interview, clinical examination, and an ECG recording for 7 days. A total of 15 of 50 patients (30%) experienced AF recurrence within the first 3 months after ablation. Cumulatively, 30 of 50 (60%) patients remained symptom-free at 1 year, and 22 of 50 (44%) patients were free of AF.
In this analysis, it was shown that in patients with AF, there is a difference in the distribution of diverse bipolar low-voltage groups after ablation (Example shown in figure 3).
Figure 3: Example of changes in the distribution of voltage zones before (upper picture) and after ablation (lower picture) for a bipolar mapping (measurement limits 0.25-0.5 mV).
Of particular interest as shown in table 2 was the increase in area of bipolar signals with an amplitude of 0.05-0.15 mV (+32%, [ 95% CI: -10% to +167%], p<0>
| Voltage-Zone | median (%) | 95% CI | p - value* |
| Bipolar 0.05-0.15 mV | 32 | [ -10, 167] | <0> |
| Bipolar 0.15-0.25 mV | 6 | [ -39, 101] | 0,001 |
| Bipolar 0.25-0.5 mV | -8 | [ -52, 70] | 0.03 |
| Unipolar (%) | -39 | [-15, -76] | <0> |
| Unipolar (mV) | -0.45 | [-0.15, -1] | <0> |
| *p-value alpha ≤ 0.05 by Wilcoxon-Test | |||
Table 2: Increase and decrease in areas in all studied patients
The two predictors correlate with each other (r Spearman -0.38; p=0.01) and with ablation success in terms of follow-up examinations within the first 12 months after ablation (increase in area of bipolar signals 0.05-0.15 mV, r Spearman -0.29; p=0.04, decrease in unipolar amplitude r Spearman 0.28; p=0.05). Other voltage groups no difference.
| Voltage-Zone | symptomatic recurrence | symptom-free | |||
| (mV, %) | median (%) | 95% CI | median (%) | 95% CI | p - value* |
| Bipolar 0.05-0.15 | 21 | [ -8, +156] | 52 | [ -10, +167] | 0.04 |
| Bipolar 0.15-0.25 | 4 | [ -31, +101] | 12 | [ -39, +59] | 0.21 |
| Bipolar 0.25-0.5 | -2 | [ -45, +44] | -16 | [ -52 +70] | 0.07 |
| Unipolar (%) | -38 | [ -15, -57] | -39 | [ -17, -76] | 0.59 |
| median (mV) | median (mV) | ||||
| Unipolar (mV) | -0.35 | [-0.75, -0.15] | -0.5 | [-1.15, -0.1] | 0.05 |
| Unipolar (mV) amplitude at the ablation sites | 1,1 | [0,6 - 2,3] | 1,4 | [0,6 - 1,8] | 0,004 |
| * p-value alpha ≤ 0.05 by Mann-Whitney U test | |||||
Table 3: Increase and decrease in areas in patients with symptomatic recurrence within the first 12 months after ablation and symptom-free patients
As shown in table 3 a difference is observed in the change of the amplitude of the bipolar signals of the lowest voltage group (0.05-0.15 mV). However, if the unipolar signals are not considered in their relativity, but as an absolute change, the data already provides other distribution, which is different from the one given above.
No association was found between atrial enlargement or the presence of CAD (coronary artery disease) as an underlying disease and outcome (freedom from symptoms at 12 months after AF ablation). This proves that already structurally altered atria can be treated with a corrective ablation strategy and a comparable prognosis can be expected.
With the considerable variability of the investigated parameters and a limited patient group, it can be assumed that not all existing correlations could be detected statistically. Even for parameters already found, a boundary determination in the sense of "false-true" was difficult due to a large overlap of the distributions. Nevertheless, utilizing ROC analysis a cut-off limit for the increase of bipolar signals 0.05-0.15 mV, decrease of unipolar amplitude as well as mean unipolar amplitude at the locations selected for ablation could be calculated (sensitivity and specificity corresponding to 67% and 70%, 67% and 55%, 70% and 73%) (Figure 4).
Figure 4: ROC curve of the probability of symptomatic recurrence of AF within the first 12 months after ablation depending on the increase (in percentages) of the bipolar voltage zone 0.05-0.15 mV, p=0.04 (upper left picture); ROC curve of the probability of symptomatic recurrence of AF within the first 12 months after ablation depending on the decrease in unipolar signals at ablation sites, p=0.05 (lower left picture); ROC curve of the probability of symptomatic recurrence of AF depending on the unipolar signals at the ablation sites, p=0.004 (selected ablation site) (lower right picture).
The cut-off limits were a +30% increase in the 0.05-0.15 mV bipolar zone, a -0.4mV decrease in unipolar amplitude at the attached ablation lesions, and greater than 1.23 mV for the mean unipolar amplitude at the ablation sites.
A prognostic model could also be calculated, according to which failure to meet all criteria (+30% increase in the area of the 0.05-0.15 mV bipolar zone, a -0.4mV decrease in unipolar amplitude at the attached ablation lesions, and greater than 1.23 mV for the mean unipolar amplitude at the ablation sites) would be associated with an approximately 67% probability of symptomatic recurrence within the first 12 months. However, if all 3 criteria are met, it is expected to have an approximately 81% success rate.
Bipolar mapping is used for diagnostic purposes [16, 17] as well as to guide treatment of AF. [22] This involves measuring the signal amplitude between two sensors located at the LA surface. The extent of bipolar low-voltage areas correlates with the substrate of the AF. [23,24] However, the acquisition of bipolar atrial electrical data is complicated.[18] The vector of activation, angle of the catheter, the size of the sensor, electrode spacing, tissue contact, filtration of signals, and the density of signal acquisition can all impact bipolar amplitudes. [21] As a limit for pathologically altered areas in bipolar mapping, a signal amplitude of <0>
The complexity of the examination as well as the decision on therapeutic consequences, ablation strategies and periinterventional success could be simplified and made safe by using some software features of the robotic magnetic navigation system. For this reason, the ablation procedures in the patients studied were performed using the e-Contact module as a quality indicator of catheter tip-to-tissue contact as well as the Ablation History feature, which visually displays a record of the actual energy delivered and accumulated at each ablation site using power output and duration of energy.[26,27]
The use of unipolar mapping in clinical practice is much less common. [28]This mapping method can detect the signals or signal amplitude from a measurement point compared to an indifferent electrode and can be used as an important complement to bipolar mapping [19].
According to the distribution between recurrent (symptomatic, within the first 12 months) and symptom-free patients, the differences occurred in the 0.05-0.15 mV bipolar in both groups, which could be used as a prognostic marker for clinical outcome and ablation procedures.
The unipolar amplitude measured at the ablation points before as well as after ablation changed in a statistically relevant way. Decrease of the signal in all cases by more than 40% is rather to be seen as unrealistic, since greater care must be given at thinner walls to reduce the risk of perforation and collateral damage to adjoining structures. Therefore, we consider the absolute changes in unipolar amplitude to be more usable. The unipolar voltage amplitude at the ablation sites in the patients who suffered a symptomatic recurrence within the first 12 months is lower (1,1 vs 1,4 mV). This could reflect possible fibrosis in the depth of atrial tissues, but could also be used to guide ablation strategy in such patients.
Moreover, the correlation between the energy delivered during ablation and the decrease in unipolar amplitude as well as the relationship between unipolar signals and physical thickness of the atrial wall (e.g., by MRI) and their decrease after ablation and in the long-term course has not yet been investigated. Such analysis would allow the calculation of therapy delivery goals that optimally balance safety and recurrence rates.
AF is one of the complex diseases in which a therapeutic strategy is equally complicated. At the same time, unipolar mapping provides much information on the sequence of electrical processes in the atrium and correlates with bipolar signals.
High-density mapping provides a great deal of data on the electrical state of the atrium and can both better explain the excitation processes and be an important aid in choosing an ablation strategy. Furthermore, the use of a remote magnetic navigation system offers advantageous technical assets both hardware- and software-wise for improvement of the ablation procedure. First, it enhances safety as no complications occurred during this study and we delivered comparatively low fluoroscopy time during ablation.
Analysis of high-density map including 3 criteria (increase in the area of the 0.05-0.15 mV bipolar zone, a -0.4mV decrease in unipolar amplitude at the attached ablation lesions, and greater than 1.23 mV for the mean unipolar amplitude at the ablation sites), help us to improve ablation success.
Further development of the examination methods - ultra-high-density mapping, would probably provide more in-depth information on the electrical status of the atrium and therefore allow more effective strategies in AF ablation, particularly in complex cases.
ACT : activated clotting time
AF : atrial fibrillation
CT : tomography
CAD : coronary artery disease
EF : ejection fraction
EPS : electrophysiology studies
FAM : fast anatomical map
LA : left atria
LAA : left atria appendage
LV : left ventricle
LVEF : left ventricle ejection fraction
PVI : pulmonary vein isolation
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
This research is supported by a grant from Biosense Webster.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
