AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Leonard B. Goldstein, Assistant Vice President for Clinical Education Development
Citation: Leonard B. Goldstein, Victoria Ferguson, James F. Keane, (2024), Treatment of OUD in the Emergency Department, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 6(3); DOI:10.31579/2692-9562/116
Copyright: © 2024, Leonard B. Goldstein. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 23 February 2024 | Accepted: 06 March 2024 | Published: 11 March 2024
Keywords: opioid use disorder; emergency; HIV
From the late 1900s to the early 2000s, various pharmaceutical companies encouraged healthcare providers to treat patients with opioids, suggesting that they were highly effective and non-addictive [1]. This resulted in a significant rise in the rate of opioid prescribing. Along with increasing prescribing rates, came increasing rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and overdose. Opioid overuse deaths and opioid use disorder (OUD) in the United States have dramatically increased over the past decade, with approximately 128 people dying every day from an overdose of prescription or illicit opioids
From the late 1900s to the early 2000s, various pharmaceutical companies encouraged healthcare providers to treat patients with opioids, suggesting that they were highly effective and non-addictive [1]. This resulted in a significant rise in the rate of opioid prescribing. Along with increasing prescribing rates, came increasing rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and overdose. Opioid overuse deaths and opioid use disorder (OUD) in the United States have dramatically increased over the past decade, with approximately 128 people dying every day from an overdose of prescription or illicit opioids [2]. Due to direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. Emergency Departments (EDs) have seen a 30% increase in opioid overdose related visits [3]. The initial response of the healthcare system was to reduce or stop prescribing opioids, however logical this approach did not lead to a solution. In addition to expanded prescribing, the opioid crisis was escalated by the improved purity of heroin and the introduction of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. The decrease in prescribed opioids led to a surge in the production and consumption of illicit opioids further amplifying the crisis. As patients were no longer able to obtain prescribed opioids, many turned to illicit opioids to manage their pain and/or dependence. These illicit substances are often cheaper to obtain, and contain unregulated levels of potent opioids, such as fentanyl, making them extremely dangerous.
To adequately address the OUD crisis, ED’s can serve a much-needed role in initiating and maintaining long-term treatment of OUD. The ED is highly trafficked by patients grappling with OUD and exhibiting high-risk behaviors. Treatment for such patients often is based on utilizing an opioid agonist or antagonist treatment (OAT) with or without psychosocial treatment [4]. Currently, only one third of patients seen in the ED for opioid overdose in 2023 received treatment within the following year [5]. As the ED is the primary point of contact for patients with high-risk opioid use, ED physicians have a unique opportunity to play a role in mitigating the opioid crisis. Based on these factors, ED-initiated OUD treatment should be developed and applied, rather than supporting the traditional route of referring patients to an outpatient or inpatient OUD treatment facility from the ED.
Treatment Options:
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic, relapsing illness of a problematic pattern of opioid use, including use despite adverse consequences. This disorder manifests with physical and psychological symptoms. Physical symptoms of acute intoxication include decreased level of consciousness, respiratory depression, and miosis. Long-term use leads to the development of tolerance, in which patients no longer exhibit acute effects at their typical dose [6]. Psychological symptoms include maladaptive behaviors related to obtaining and using opioids. Successful recovery is possible with evidence-based, long-term treatment of OUD using opioid agonist treatment (OAT) with or without concurrent psychosocial treatment (7). OATs relieve withdrawal symptoms and eliminate cravings and are associated with higher rates of success and retention compared to abstinence-based therapies [8]. Treatment of OUD with OATs is also associated with lower rates of HIV/Hepatitis C transmission, opioid overdose and all-cause mortality [9]. Buprenorphine and methadone are the first-line OATs recommended for OUD. The goal of treatment is once-daily dosing with no withdrawal between doses [10].
Methadone
Methadone is a full opioid receptor agonist that treats withdrawal symptoms of OUD and opioid cravings. It has been proven to reduce the likelihood of dying from an overdose by up to 50% [11]. Methadone is also associated with higher treatment retention rates than buprenorphine due to methadone’s action as a full opioid receptor agonist [12]. Methadone is subject to stricter prescribing regulations compared to other OATs due to the fact it’s a full opioid receptor agonist. This raises concern about overdose potential. It is only prescribed by providers at designated opioid treatment programs (OTP) registered under the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and certified by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration [13]. Providers were required to complete special training and submit waivers to the DEA. Methadone is administered as a directly observed therapy (DOT), meaning individuals must travel to an OTP and be witnessed taking the medication. Methadone is a DOT in order to prevent a patients’ ability to take the drug home to prevent risk of relapse and/or overdose [14].The highly regulated method of administration of methadone has been criticized as an act of “exceptionalism” given the fact that other full opioid agonists, such as oxycodone, are prescribed without the same constraints [15]. Patients are required to travel to an OTP daily for the first 90 days of treatment. Physical distancing related to the COVID-19 pandemic pushed lawmakers to relax methadone prescribing regulations for the first time since it’s FDA approval for OUD in the mid-1960’s [16]. Under the new guidelines, providers were granted the ability to prescribe up to 28 days of take-home doses [17]. Many states are working to maintain these more relaxed guidelines as no adverse effects were reported [18]. Another criticism of the strict prescribing regulations of methadone is that they are becoming increasingly obsolete [19]. Specifically, they have remained unchanged for the past 50 years with all patients receiving the same initial dose of 30 mg daily for the first 90 days of treatment. Public health professionals argue that this dose is miniscule against the highly potent illicit fentanyl and fentanyl analogues available today. The aforementioned criticism regarding strict and obsolete methadone prescribing practices call for policies that make prescribing practices more accessible and individualized.
Methadone in the ED:
Methadone is long-acting, meaning most can miss a single day’s dose with no or minimal withdrawal symptoms [20]. Therefore, patients who present to the ED after having missed a single dose of methadone without signs of withdrawal may be discharged. ED physicians are allowed to administer methadone in the ED for management of acute opioid withdrawal given the lethality of withdrawal. Initiation of OATs in the ED for the purpose of management therapy has sparked the attention of public health professionals and lawmakers as a means mitigate the opioid crisis. This topic has become increasingly relevant as illicit opioids continually become more potent and prevalent [21]. A 2019 study found that over half of the patients who died of opioid overdose had a previous ED visit relating to opioid withdrawal or overdose [22]. However, in 2023 only 18% of individuals with OUD were receiving treatment [23]. This calls for intervention from ED providers to initiate treatment in vulnerable patients with untreated OUD. Recently, the DEA established the “72-Hour Emergency Rule” allowing non-OTP providers to administer methadone for opioid withdrawal for up to 72 hours while arranging continuity of care [24]. Current literature describes use of the “72-Hour Emergency Rule” in the ED setting to address opioid withdrawal in patients unable to make it to an OTP clinic due to another acute medical issue or weather emergency [25].
Buprenorphine
Buprenorphine is a partial opioid receptor agonist used as a long-term preventative medication that decreases recurrence of opioid overdose [26]. As a partial opioid receptor agonist, buprenorphine causes minimal euphoria and has a lower potential for overdose compared to methadone. Buprenorphine is subject to strict prescribing regulations due to its opioid agonist effects, but regulations are less strict compared to those of methadone. Only providers who have obtained Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA) waivers may prescribe buprenorphine [27]. This creates a disproportionate number of patients seeking treatment compared to the number approved prescribers, which leads to long wait times for initiation or continuity of care [28] This is particularly alarming as any delay in care of OUD could be lethal. The Biden Administration responded to this issue in April 2022 by eliminating the training requirements for prescribers for treatment of up to 30 patients at a time [29]. The DATA waiver is still required. These updated prescribing guidelines granted ED physicians the ability to administer buprenorphine for management of acute opioid withdrawal.
Buprenorphine in the ED:
ED physicians are allowed to initiate buprenorphine at time of discharge for patients with OUD who have not yet begun treatment. Buprenorphine works to manage OUD similar to methadone, but is viewed as the safer option due to the “ceiling effect”. The “ceiling effect” is a phenomenon in which further increases above 24 mg in dosage do not illicit respiratory and cardiovascular depression, as would be seen with methadone [30] Initiation of buprenorphine in the ED with referral to outpatient treatment has been associated with increased treatment engagement 30 days after discharge compared to referral-only interventions [31].
The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine have addressed this association by recommending ED physicians initiate buprenorphine with outpatient follow-up care to patients with OUD who have not yet begun treatment [32]. Buprenorphine is also subject to the “72-Hour Emergency Rule”, in which a dose can be administered daily for three consecutive days [33]. A few EDs have taken care one step further by collaborating with community providers to increase accessibility of buprenorphine in their communities. Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (PPMC) established the Center for Opioid Recovery and Engagement (CORE) ED Buprenorphine Program which offers buprenorphine treatment to patients who self-identify as having OUD [34]. Under the guidelines of this program, OUD identification involves patient self-identification of OUD or ED providers will assess accordingly. ED providers identify patients based on presentation for OUD-related illnesses such as cellulitis or using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS). When deemed a candidate for outpatient treatment, a referral is made to multidisciplinary providers within the University of Pennsylvania Healthcare System who continue buprenorphine therapy. This includes family medicine, internal medicine and psychiatric providers. Furthermore, referrals are made based on patients home or work locations, transportation and insurance. The result of the program was 68% of patients who received ED-initiated buprenorphine with referral were in treatment, compared to less than 5
Based on multiple social- and health care system-related factors, ED providers have a unique opportunity to initiate and maintain effective care as they meet high-risk patients with OUD at their most vulnerable moments. Life-saving maintenance therapies exist, however under the current system of outpatient clinic OUD care, the issue of access and consistent follow up remains. Creating standardized treatment approaches specifically made for ED physicians to initiate OUD treatment during times of crisis, such as after a near fentanyl overdose, would be an effective measure to address the OUD crisis.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
