AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Rosman SV, Physician of functional diagnostics of SBIH, Regional psychoneurological clinic, Tver, Russian Federation, Russia.
Citation: Rosman SV, Shpak LV, Maximova NE. (2021) To the question of the paradigm shift of psychiatry. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 6(3); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/103
Copyright: © 2021 Rosman SV, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 December 2020 | Accepted: 15 January 2021 | Published: 20 January 2021
Keywords: new paradigm of psychiatry; diagnosis of mental illness; new EEG method DAFCAR
The main problem of psychiatry is that, having gained huge empirical experience in observing psychopathology, it has not become a full-fledged science. Perhaps this happened because Western medicine followed a path different from Eastern medicine - the path of deep study of private pro-phenomena of diseases and the search for their natural causes. However, huge problems lie along this path - the multifactorial impact of the external environment and the limited knowledge of man. As a result, a paradoxical state of affairs was created in psychiatrics and psychology: not a single objective method of research was created that allows you to diagnose mental illness due to the fact that there is still no one's idea of how the brain performs its main function - to think. That is, the reasons for psychiatry's failures lie in the deep crisis of neurophysiology.
The main problem of psychiatry is that, having gained huge empirical experience in observing psychopathology, it has not become a full-fledged science. Perhaps this happened because Western medicine followed a path different from Eastern medicine - the path of deep study of private pro-phenomena of diseases and the search for their natural causes. However, huge problems lie along this path - the multifactorial impact of the external environment and the limited knowledge of man. As a result, a paradoxical state of affairs was created in psychiatrics and psychology: not a single objective method of research was created that allows you to diagnose mental illness due to the fact that there is still no one's idea of how the brain performs its main function - to think. That is, the reasons for psychiatry's failures lie in the deep crisis of neurophysiology.
Solving all these problems is incredibly difficult, due to established scientific traditions, but it is absolutely necessary objectively - all sensible scientists understand this [16].
Since the ideas that it was the brain that has prevailed is the main creator of all our thoughts and behaviors, researchers have been convinced that the brain is analyzing and synthesizing incoming information - what else? These ideas were the basis of the work of artificial intelligence (AI). However, it is somehow overlooked what technological effort it cost. What complex devices you have to create for this. And most importantly, the resources that have to be used to do so. These are huge energy costs, giant data stores - all to get closer to the intellectual capabilities of the human brain. Unwittingly, the idea that the human brain, having received information, immediately, bypassing the stages of analysis and synthesis, "knows" what to do. Through this idea - the idea that the human brain, as a matter of fact, does not think about anything and cannot cross modern neurophysiologists, although this is what great Russian scientists - I.M.Sechenov and I.P.Pavlov - spoke about in their teaching about the reflex activity of the human brain[1,2]. They simply did not have sufficient knowledge of neurophysiology and cybernetics and were unable to complete their ideas. In general, from all this teaching remained only ideas about reflex arc (Fig. 1)
In many ways, the reflex hypothesis was clarified by P.K.Anokhin[3]. Unlike classical representations of modern scientists, he realized that in nerve centers there is not a simple switching of momentum to executive organs, but a process of "machine coding" of information, which he called afferent synthesis. Based on the results of this synthesis, neural ensembles are created, which are the semantic code of the incoming (afferent) information. Everyone still refers with delight to these advanced, by those times (1930s) ideas, "forgetting" to explain how all this happens. P.K.Anokhin himself was understandably unable to explain this and left the solution to these problems to future generations, creating a theory of functional systems based on the vague incredible computational abilities of neural networks (Fig.2).
Theoretical fabrications are good in that they suit everyone, but bad in that it is impossible to build real life on their basis. From the point of view of psychiatry, these remarkable complex constructions do not explain the mechanisms of psychopathology in any way.
It is clearly proven that the process of recognizing afferent information exists - otherwise, how would we distinguish a cat from a dog? So the afferent synthesis process exists. There is also a mechanism for creating neural associations. With the help of neuroimaging devices (fMRI) we can record the occurrence of clusters of excited neurons in the cerebral cortex, which vary depending on the co-maintenance of information. One question remains unclear - how is the process of transforming the results of afferent synthesis (neurophysiological code) into neural associations of a certain configuration (semantic images of information)?
To do this, we need to take a fresh look at the neurophysiological structure of the brain. Without going into functional details, brain tissue is an association of neurons and glial cells, the space between which is filled with a gel-like inter-weft substance - neural-glial brain network (NGBN) (Fig.3).
Until now, glial cells, in the view of neurophysiologists, represent a framework in which neurons performing computational functions are mounted. Trophic (nutritional) conversion and possibility of transformation of pulses, which are supplied to neuron and those transmitted via neural connections, are allowed. What if it’s not? According to the old reflex arc concept, the who-beat pulse from the receptor is transmitted directly to the neuron, switching on its synapses, and the neuron processes this pulse and generates an action potential, transferring it by axon to the overlying centers to other neurons. However, if this is the case, all neurons must constantly be in a state of excitation - either from receptors or through inter-neuron connections. Such a system is completely inoperable.
What if neuroglia plays a major role? Excitation from the receptor, entering the NGNB, activates not only the neuron, but also the neuroglia, creating a network-propagating fractal process.
NGNB is an iterative-recursive system. Excitation propagating through this network, moving through its loops, somewhere increasing, and somewhere mutually quenching, creates a complex configuration from neurophysiological conditions called fractal (Fig.4, C).
Until now, glial cells, in the view of neurophysiologists, represent a framework in which neurons performing computational functions are mounted. Trophic (nutritional) conversion and possibility of transformation of pulses, which are supplied to neuron and those transmitted via neural connections, are allowed. What if it’s not? According to the old reflex arc concept, the who-beat pulse from the receptor is transmitted directly to the neuron, switching on its synapses, and the neuron processes this pulse and generates an action potential, transferring it by axon to the overlying centers to other neurons. However, if this is the case, all neurons must constantly be in a state of excitation - either from receptors or through inter-neuron connections. Such a system is completely inoperable.
What if neuroglia plays a major role? Excitation from the receptor, entering the NGNB, activates not only the neuron, but also the neuroglia, creating a network-propagating fractal process.
NGNB is an iterative-recursive system. Excitation propagating through this network, moving through its loops, somewhere increasing, and somewhere mutually quenching, creates a complex configuration from neurophysiological conditions called fractal (Fig.4, C).
All these mechanisms work if all links of this flowchart are functionally sound. However, the process of entropy of NGBN interferes here. The essence of it is that NGSMH begins to break down during aging, functional overload or toxic effects, and its functional parameters begin to change and do not meet the necessary criteria. As a result, a distorted NSO is produced, and the NFS ceases to be socially acceptable. This is psychopathology.
The marker of this process is to change the properties of the alpha rhythm of the EEG. The main parameter of this change is dispersion of amplitude-frequency characteristics of alpha-rhythm of EEG - DAFCAR of EEG[8-12]. Apparently, there are other, parameters, for example, phase-frequency characteristic of alpha rhythm, but it is not yet developed in relation to psychopathology.
Simplistically, DAFCAR studies the spectral characteristic of the alpha rhythm, which must be normally distributed with the emphasized dominance of one frequency. This means that the alpha rhythm is produced by a strictly defined frequency, and its fluctuations are unacceptable. Normally, the adult alpha rhythm frequency is 9.5 - 11.5 Hz. Below this range, mental retardation or dementia (depending on age) is observed. Above - increase of cognitive ability, but above 12 Hz comes the limit of neurophysiological functionality of neurons, and the person becomes autistic: information is processed at terrible speed, but only excerpt fragments of it are reproduced (classic example - "Rain Man"). Variations in alpha rhythm frequency in the same person are possible, but only in case of acute functional necessity, for example, in case of stress or transition from rest to active action. At rest these oscillations are not more than ± 0.25 Hz. An extremely important parameter is the synchronization of DAFCAR values in all parts of the brain, especially in the frontal and occipital lobes. If the difference between the frontal and occipital departments exceeds 0.5 Hz, this results in pronounced deviations in human behavior [7, 13-15].
This question is very important for understanding the essence of schizophrenia. In the human brain there is a function of generation of freedom of will, which also distinguishes man from all other animals. It allows people to do not to the accepted standards, to give out an unusual scenario. This is due to the increase in the amount of human degrees of freedom. It is known that the play of the steering wheel of the car is allowed within 10 degrees, but the completely play-free attachment is not very favorable. This is how a person should have a certain degree of freedom to choose the scenarios of his actions in order to find new optimal solutions to life’s problems. Under normal conditions, this capability is realized and functional diagnostics are not recorded. However, when there are deviations in DAFKAR frontal lobes, in light degrees, along with deviations in human behavior, we see higher creativity than others. The degrees of these deviations are varied, and this is expressed in the common observation that all creative personalities are "wrong." Indeed, when we reach a frequency difference between the frontal and occipital lobes of 0.75 Hz or more, we already notice signs of schizophrenia [10].
Of course, this case is manifest, but on the basis of the cartogram alone it is not possible to diagnose schizophrenia, although if there are clinical manifestations and obvious deviating behavior, the diagnosis becomes quite obvious.
However, it should be understood that the body has many compensatory possibilities and even with such changes the patient may not be too different from others, although, of course, completely normal behavior is unlikely to differ. His complaints, history, should be examined. Collect information from others and relatives and only then make a judgment.
The issue of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like symptoms is particularly significant. Schizophrenia is likely an inherited disease; The chances of fully curing it are currently very low, and the level of aggression and autoaggression under it is quite high. At the same time, we often meet with acquired disease of toxic, vascular and traumatic origin, which is very similar to schizophrenia, but with proper targeted treatment of the main cause it is possible to achieve great success. Clinicians do not distinguish these conditions - they can only be distinguished on cartograms.
The application of the DAFCAR technique in childhood is particularly valuable, and it is still possible to restore normal neurophysiological changes in the brain. Without going into detail, it can be said that you can only send a child to school if the modal frequency of alpha rhythm in the occipital leads is not lower than 9 Hz. Otherwise, corrective training is needed. If a child has a significant difference in frequencies in the frontal and occipital leads (pituitary), this is a consequence of neurophysiological immaturity of the frontal lobe: usually accompanied by ADHD and other disorders of behavior, enuresis. Such children need special control and correction of neuro-physiological disorders, otherwise this can develop after the puberty period into schizophrenia-like syndrome, or even schizophrenia.
This study is particularly valuable when conducting mass examinations of persons who are subject to increased demands for mental stability. In addition to isolating suspicious patients for hidden pathology, the need for complex psychological testing is significantly reduced. At present, a device has been developed, which in automaton mode calculates DAFCAR parameters and creates cartograms.
Of course, psychiatrists will receive great help by monitoring DAFCAR parameters in dynamics treatment to find optimal therapy.
All these empirical observations lead us to a completely logical conclusion: psychopathology should be considered from the perspective of neurophysiological disorders, one of the markers of which is DAFCAR. This does not undo all the empirical experience of psychiatry accumulated over the past 3 centuries. On the contrary, reliance on a natural science basis will give a new impetus in the diagnosis and treatment of mental diseases.
We have already put forward general theoretical prerequisites for systematizing psychopathology in the system "3 + 3" [17].
Informational foundations of human psyche formation:
The main criteria for a person's mental state are:
The logical continuation of these theoretical provisions was the neurophysiological systematization of psychopathology, based on the neurophysiological marker - DAFCAR.
General systematization is based on historically very deep ideas about the human mentality. According to them, a person's mentality can be divided into 4 main groups: perfect (mental health), easily changed (in modern systematization - personality disorders), borderline mental disorders and psychopathology.
The systematization of psychopathology consists in the division of DAFCAR changes with a general deceleration of alpha rhythm in all leads (built along the blue arrow), and regional decelerations or accelerations of alpha rhythm (delayed and accelerated frontal expression), mainly in the frontal departments (changes located above and below the blue arrow. At the same time, the deceleration and acceleration of the alpha rhythm can be both monomodal (without a pronounced spread of indicators around the central value) and dispersive (with a pronounced spread of indicators around the central value). The proposed systematization is presented in Fig. 9.
The values of the coefficients presented on it are set forth in theoretical articles on DAFCAR. The basic principle is very simple: the increase in entropy (disorganization) of the neural network leads to a slowdown in alpha rhythm and a decrease in dispersion coefficients. Most often, pronounced slows in alpha rhythm and pronounced dispersion lead to dementia (mental retardation). Regional alpha rhythm disorders in frontal leads (deceleration and acceleration) most often lead to diseases of the "schizoid circle." Naturally, systematization can be expanded on the basis of old categorical diagnostic criteria. The main thing we can get from the application of new systematization is an understanding of the mechanisms of mental disorders and which disorders should be eliminated in order to bring the patient's consciousness back to normal. Thus, it becomes possible to treat not a diagnostic label, but the basis of the disease and the patient himself.
The goal of changing the paradigm of psychiatry and psychological sciences is:
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.