AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Muna Alkhaifi, Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
Citation: Malika Peera, Sanam Tabataba Vakili, Elwyn Zhang, Samantha K. F. Kennedy, Sarina Sadeghi, et al., (2024), To Close the Gap of Survivorship Education: A Series of Breast Cancer Webinars in Collaboration with Wellspring, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 8(6) DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/230
Copyright: © 2024, Muna Alkhaifi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 18 July 2024 | Accepted: 31 July 2024 | Published: 09 August 2024
Keywords: breast cancer survivorship; webinar series; wellspring; patient empowering; knowledge; post-webinar evaluation
Background and Aims: Breast cancer survivors face uncertainties post-treatment, requiring ongoing support and education. Digital media online training courses may be used to disseminate evidence-based cancer information. In this study, we hosted a series of webinars which aimed to empower survivors with evidence-based survivorship information.
Materials and Methods: A four-part weekly online webinar series (1 hour each) including expert presentations, survivor insights, and interactive question-and-answer sessions, was held in October 2023 during Breast Cancer Awareness Month, via the Zoom digital platform. Topics covered included surveillance, mental health, adjuvant antihormonal therapy, and sexual health. After the webinar series, participants completed a post-webinar survey electronically. The post-webinar survey assessed participant satisfaction, understanding of topics, and suggestions for improvement. Likert scales were used to measure self-reported changes in understanding of the discussed topics.
Results: 99 participants took part in the Breast Survivorship and Surveillance webinar, 97 participated in the Mental Health in Breast Survivorship webinar, 108 participated in the Adjuvant Antihormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer webinar, and 74 participated in the Sexual Health after Breast Cancer webinar. 25 participants completed the post-webinar survey, administered after the final webinar (sexual health). Among the 25 survey participants, 96% (24/25) expressed that the information presented in the series of webinars was very useful or extremely useful. Furthermore, 80% (20/25) noted significant knowledge improvement.
Conclusions: This breast cancer webinar series effectively bridges the knowledge gap in survivorship, offering valuable insights, emotional support, and practical guidance. The results emphasize the importance of ongoing education and support for breast cancer survivors.
Breast cancer currently constitutes 1 in 8 cancer diagnoses [1]. The prevalence of breast cancer was around 2.3 million globally in 2022 [2]. This global prevalence has been on the rise, especially in nations undergoing socioeconomic transition [3]. Breast cancer is a complex journey extending beyond active treatment, which necessitates a comprehensive approach to survivorship support [4]. Breast cancer survivors experience a wide range of long-lasting side effects, which may include physical, emotional, psychological, and cognitive health effects related to their cancer or cancer treatment [5,6]. This includes fertility issues in young women, impaired social and work integration, and risk of recurrence [5,6]. Alongside these, breast cancer survivors also face general health needs, such as management of chronic preexisting, or new health concerns [6]. Despite the progress made in treatments to improve the lives of breast cancer survivors, a persistent gap exists in education focused on breast cancer survivorship for survivors and those close to them. This leaves survivors without the necessary tools to navigate this intricate phase effectively [7–10].
Online webinars emerge as dynamic vehicles to bridge the survivorship education gap, providing real-time engagement and online accessibility. Webinars are a form of telehealth that refers to the delivery of educational or instructional material over the internet. Webinars can be accessed online via different devices such as a computer or smartphone, providing an accessible resource for acquiring information, support and education for people affected by cancer [11]. In the literature, various studies have investigated the effectiveness of webinars in disseminating breast cancer information. The Cancer Council Victoria (CCV) designed and evaluated a suite of webinars including four for people affected by cancer and two for healthcare professionals. A majority of participants (90.1%) indicated that the webinar content was relevant to their interests and needs. However, (63.9%) of participants indicated that they had not participated in a webinar before [11]. Furthermore, a systematic review focused on the use of telemedicine for post-treatment cancer survivorship care found evidence focused on the benefits of telemedicine for the management of psychosocial and physical effects [12]. This demonstrates that webinars are a feasible modality to deliver quality information on breast cancer treatment.
The goals of the Breast Cancer Webinar Series included delivering evidence-based information, offering practical strategies for survivors, and providing an effective and accessible option for breast cancer survivorship information. The goal of the webinar series was to reach a wider audience through active engagement. The aim of this study was to delineate the procedures and assess participant perception of this series of webinars.
This paper reports on the general processes and evaluation outcomes of four weekly webinars conducted by Wellspring in 2023 via the Zoom platform. The methods employed aimed to ensure accessibility, engagement, and effectiveness throughout the webinar series. The planning phase prioritized audience engagement. A variety of multimodal and targeted promotional strategies were deployed. The team leveraged the Wellspring platform by utilizing social media, email campaigns, and partnerships with relevant organizations to maximize reach. The webinars were open to the general public. Participants were encouraged to register in advance through the Wellspring website. This approach aimed to not only inform but also actively involve potential participants in the breast cancer survivorship discussion.
2.1 Registration and Delivery with Focus on Feedback Collection
The registration process was streamlined to cater to the preferences of the audience. Prior to each session, participants had access to the webinar timetables and could register through the Wellspring website. After registering, they received webinar links for easy access.
Each webinar was overseen by a subject matter expert who gave instructions to participants, introduced presenters, and managed each segment of the webinar. In the Breast Survivorship and Surveillance webinar, the importance of post-treatment follow-up, screening, and monitoring was discussed. The Mental Health in Breast Survivorship webinar explored the mental and emotional challenges faced by survivors. Participants were offered insights and strategies to manage anxiety, depression, and other common emotional struggles. This session aimed to provide support and tools for maintaining a positive mindset during survivorship. The involved breaking down the complexities of hormone therapy, discussing its benefits, side effects, and adherence. In the final webinar, Sexual Health after Breast cancer, issues surrounding how breast cancer and its treatments can impact a survivor's sexual health and intimacy were addressed. Strategies for managing changes, communication with partners, and reintegrating intimacy into life after breast cancer were discussed. Each webinar concluded with a Question and Answer (Q&A) period, where participants could ask questions regarding the topics covered in the session.
2.2 Feedback from participants
As part of an effort to improve the effectiveness of these workshops for future webinars, participants were encouraged to provide ideas or feedback, through a voluntary post-webinar evaluation survey. This anonymous 9-question survey was administered through SurveyMonkey and was presented online to all participants immediately after the final webinar, automatically loading into the web browser upon the webinar's closure. This survey (Appendix 1), sought to capture feedback on various aspects, including webinar format, core content, and participant interest in future participation.
The survey featured Likert scales to measure the usefulness of the presented information, the relevance of the information presented, self-reported changes in understanding of the webinar topics, and willingness to attend future webinars. Participants were also asked what their preferred method of learning about breast cancer survivorship-related topics was, including webinars, printed materials (brochures, handouts, and handbooks), videos, support groups, one-on-one consultations and other. Additionally, participants were asked which topic in the webinar series they found the most informative and helpful.
Moreover, participants were given the opportunity to provide insights into areas of improvement for the webinars or share suggestions for enhancing the overall experience. Participants were invited to express topics they would like to focus on in upcoming sessions. Questions included: “Are there any specific questions or topics related to breast cancer survivorship that you would like to see addressed in future webinars?”, “Would you recommend that these webinar series continue? If yes, which topics would you like us to continue exploring in future webinars?” and “Do you have any suggestions for areas of improvement for our webinars or the overall experience?”. This open-ended approach allowed participants to offer constructive feedback, ensuring that future webinars are finely tuned to meet their expectations and address specific areas of interest and concern.
2.3 Evaluation
A descriptive, inductive approach was used to analyze the open-ended questions, which included topics to cover in future webinars and feedback on the overall webinar experience. Two study team members (MP, SZ) reviewed the open-ended responses multiple times and independently assigned inductive codes using constant comparative methods previously described by Percy and Kostere [13]. Results were compared between coders, and discrepancies were resolved through a consensus approach between the two study team members (MP, SZ). If new codes were suggested, a discussion occurred and new codes were added and assigned themes as necessary, followed by a re-evaluation of the previously coded text. The team further grouped the codes into categories, sub-themes, and higher-level themes, and quotes were extracted to serve as thematic examples.
Participants included breast cancer survivors, their loved ones, healthcare professionals, and individuals seeking knowledge and support in navigating life after breast cancer treatment. An average of 95 participants took part in the four webinars delivered through Wellspring (99 participants for the Breast Survivorship and Surveillance webinar, 97 participants for the Mental Health in Breast Survivorship webinar, 108 participants for the Adjuvant Antihormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer webinar, and 74 participants for the Sexual Health after Breast Cancer webinar). Through delving into areas like breast cancer survivorship surveillance, mental health, adjuvant antihormonal therapy, and sexual health, this webinar series provided a platform for knowledge dissemination and empowerment. After the completion of the last webinar, participants were provided with a post-webinar survey. 25 participants completed the post-webinar survey, with some participants choosing to skip certain questions. Survey respondents included breast cancer survivors, family members and caregivers.
Participants were asked to self-rate the usefulness of the information presented in the webinars. Of the 25 respondents, 60% (15/25) of participants responded that the information presented in the webinars was extremely useful, 36% (9/25) responded that the information was very useful, and 4% (1/25) responded that the information was somewhat useful. None of the participants responded that the information was not so useful or not at all useful (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Self-rated usefulness of the information presented in the webinars (n=25).
Participants were also asked to rate how much the webinar series improved their knowledge about breast cancer survivorship and related topics and how relevant the webinars were to their specific needs and interests. Of the 25 respondents of the post-webinar survey, 32% (8/25) reported that the webinar
series improved their knowledge about breast cancer survivorship and related topics by a great deal, whereas 48% (12/25) noted that their knowledge improved by a lot. 44% (11/25) and 48% (12/25) of participants expressed that the webinars were relevant to their needs and interests to a great deal and a lot, respectively (Table 1).
Question | How much has the webinar series improved your knowledge about breast cancer survivorship and related topics? | To what extent were these webinars relevant to your specific needs and interests? |
A great deal n (%) | 8 (32) | 11 (44) |
A lot n (%) | 12 (48) | 12 (48) |
A moderate amount n (%) | 4 (16) | 2 (8) |
A little n (%) | 1 (4) | 0 (0) |
None n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Table 1: Participants’ answers regarding the impact and relevance of the webinars (n=25).
Participants were also asked how likely they were to participate in future webinars on related topics. There was strong support for the continuation of the webinar series; of the 25 respondents, 80% (20/25) of participants expressed a very likely inclination to participate in future webinars and 16% (4/25) of participants expressed a likely inclination to participate in future webinars (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Participants’ self-rated likelihood of participating in future webinars (n=25).
Participants were also provided a list of methods for learning about breast cancer survivorship-related topics and were requested to select the method(s) they best preferred. Of the 24 survey respondents, 95.83% (23/24) favored webinars as their preferred learning method of choice, 25% (6/24) of participants favored printed materials, 20.83% (5/24) preferred videos, 20.83% (5/24) preferred support groups and 12.50% (3/24) chose one-on-one consultations as their preferred method of choice (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Participants’ preferred method for learning about breast cancer survivorship-related topics (n=24).
Furthermore, participants were asked what topic(s) presented in the webinars they found the most informative and helpful. Of the 25 respondents, 40% (10/25) selected the Breast Survivorship and Surveillance webinar, 20% (5/25) chose the Mental Health in Breast Survivorship webinar, 36% (9/25) chose the Adjuvant Antihormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer webinar, and 80% (20/25) of survey respondents selected the Sexual Health After Breast Cancer webinar (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Topics covered in the webinars reported as the most informative and helpful, based on participants’ choices (n=25).
Additionally, participants were asked three open-ended questions, which allowed them to provide additional feedback on the webinar series. Participants’ feedback was categorized into two categories: topics for future webinars and feedback on the structure of future webinars.
Participants highlighted various topics to focus on in future webinars, including sexual health and partner relationships, returning to work, transitioning through different phases of recovery, accessing services, developing care timelines, mental health support, managing post-treatment symptoms, and lymphedema/lymph node management. Participants also
asked for webinars focused on current research and resources, including finding reputable resources, patient advocacy programs and new treatment research (Table 2).
Participants also provided feedback on areas of improvement and the overall webinar experience. This included having longer webinars, more time for questions, submitting questions prior to the webinar, posting question and answer responses on the handouts distributed post-webinar, incorporating more group discussions, having a variety of speakers, and providing a balanced perspective in the webinars (Table 2).
Category | Themes | Codes | Supporting Quotes |
Topics for Future Webinars | Sexual Health and Partner Relationships | Sexual Health Advocacy | “How to advocate for your sexual health when under duress e.g. from new diagnosis, chemo, surgery, radiation etc.” |
Partner Relationships | “Partner relationships after breast cancer, including separation and divorce after cancer treatment, identity and self-awareness crises after breast cancer” | ||
Achieving Normalcy | Returning to Work | “Return to work or ‘normalcy’” | |
Transitioning Through Different Phases of Recovery | “Yes, more about transitioning through different phases of recovery and how long it takes to feel normal” | ||
Treatment-Specific and | Accessing Services | “How to advocate with hospitals that offer no survivorship programme. How to access services that are suitable post-treatment. Making a post treatment wellness plan…” | |
Developing Care Timelines | “Outlining timelines for breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, the roles of GP [General Practitioner], surgeon, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, etc. I feel like there is not 1 person in charge of my care and I have to figure it out when I’m not sure what I know/don’t know. A flowchart/log diagram and key questions to ask.” | ||
Mental Health Support | “Yes, specific tools and tips for mental health…how to handle scan anxiety and as new health issues arise” | ||
Managing Post-Treatment Symptoms | “...How to manage lingering physical symptoms after treatment. What to expect from recovery.” | ||
Lymphedema/Lymph Node Management | “...A seminar on lymph node removal and dissection and side effects/treatments for lymphedema.” | ||
Research and resources | Reputable Resources | “Help in finding reputable resources - both online and in person across Canada, not just in the GTA [Greater Toronto Area]” | |
Patient Advocacy Resources and Programs | “Yes, patient advocacy resources and programs for aftercare” | ||
New Treatment Research | “Yes, new treatment research or pelvic health” | ||
Feedback on Structure of Future Webinars | Webinar Format
| Longer Session | “...The length of the webinars could be longer, as some topics felt constrained by the time limit. Maybe a 90 minute session?” |
Question Period Duration | “More time at the end for questions and answers.” | ||
Prior Question Submission | “Have attendees submit questions prior to the webinar for the presenter to discuss during the presentation.” | ||
Question & Answer Responses | “It would be great if you could collect the questions posted at q&a and add the answers to them with the handouts to the webinar” | ||
Group Discussion | “...Opportunity for group support for participants…” | ||
Diversity of Patient Experiences | Variety of Speakers | “I think it would be beneficial to have a variety of survivors speak, as one person’s experience isn’t another’s with BC…” | |
Balanced Perspective | “I like the idea that a breast cancer survivor was included to share her experience. In this case, I found the speaker to be somewhat negative. I understand the need to share the perspective that this is/ can be very difficult experience to go through, however I think a more balanced perspective (including some positive outcomes) would also be beneficial.” |
Table 2: Qualitative analysis of feedback from participants regarding topics and structure of future webinars.
Figure 5: Webinar format and recommendations for future webinars.
This 4-part webinar series was developed to teach participants the basic concepts of cancer survivorship care. After analyzing the participants' post-webinar feedback, we discovered that a large majority of participants found the webinars useful and expressed a strong inclination to participate in future webinars. Of the 25 survey respondents, 60% of participants responded that the information presented in the webinars was extremely useful and 80% of respondents expressed a very likely inclination to participate in future
webinars. This may be partly attributable to the webinars' accessible and interactive format which facilitated engagement and allowed these workshops to be tailored to participant’s needs [11]. Therefore, this provides insights on the value webinars hold in increasing awareness of cancer survivorship care [11,12].
Unfortunately, many cancer survivors report lack of information and support during cancer survivorship care, making webinars a new and innovative way to provide this information [14,15]. The Breast Cancer Webinar Series aimed to tackle this issue, by providing participants with information on various areas of cancer survivorship care, including breast cancer survivorship surveillance, mental health, adjuvant antihormonal therapy, and sexual health. With the growing number of breast cancer survivors worldwide [1,16], there is a greater need to provide an overview of cancer survivorship care to the general public [9,10,17]. There is also a clear need to provide more quality online resources to support the mental health and wellbeing of those with breast cancer, along with their caregivers [18–20].
The Breast Cancer Webinar Series utilized digital technology, enabling the engagement of diverse audiences, including breast cancer survivors and their families. The convenience of this medium delivered by subject-matter experts, coupled with the overarching objective of delivering empowering information and engaging new audiences, has showcased the utility of webinars in addressing the gap in breast cancer survivorship knowledge. Webinars have been shown to be correlated with positive gains in knowledge and serve as a good supplement to traditional educational methods, particularly when there is need for greater geographical flexibility [21,22].
The audience expressed a high likelihood of intention to attend future webinars (96%), which indicates their interest and a positive response to the series. This positive response can be attributed to the effectiveness and flexibility of webinars in the delivery of patient education [11]. In one study, Alaska’s rural tribal health workers were offered 10 one-hour cancer education webinars. All 11 participants reported that, because of the webinars, they planned to change their own behaviors to minimize cancer risks and planned to communicate cancer prevention strategies to their patients [23]. Additionally, the preferred method of learning among participants was webinars followed by printed material, which was voted by 95.83% and 25% of participants respectively. This supports earlier findings which list webinars as a favorable means of receiving quality survivorship information [24].
During the webinars, the discussed topics included breast cancer survivorship and surveillance, mental health, adjuvant antihormonal therapy, and sexual health. Participants were asked which webinar topic they found most informative and helpful, and 80% of survey respondents selected the Sexual Health After Breast Cancer webinar. Research shows that cancer survivors continue to lack the necessary resources needed to support sexual rehabilitation following cancer treatment [25–30]. For example, in one study, of the 25 cancer centers contacted, 87% reported having no sexual aids available for male cancer survivors, and 72% reported having no sexual aids available for female cancer survivors [25]. Furthermore, a qualitative study found that female breast cancer survivors who completed treatment reported difficulties adapting to the physical and emotional traumas of breast cancer surgery and treatment, navigating sexual communications with partners, and negotiating intimacy and closeness without sexual intercourse with existing partners [26]. This demonstrates the persistent gap that exists in sexual rehabilitation resources for cancer survivors.
The practical strategies discussed were found applicable by 92% of attendees, emphasizing the series' practical relevance and potential impact on real-life situations. Furthermore, participants expressed a desire to have longer and more interactive sessions. They also highlighted the importance of bringing diverse survivor speakers, which underscores the need for inclusivity in future webinars. This is especially true, since various studies highlight the inequities faced by cancer survivors in the healthcare system [31–33].
After the webinar series, participants were invited to provide feedback on topics to include in future webinars. Suggestions embodied areas such as sexual health and partner relationships, achieving normalcy, access to survivorship services, post-treatment wellness resources, timelines for breast cancer treatment, a seminar clarifying lymph node information, and current survivorship research and resources. Participants were also invited to provide feedback on the value and informativeness of the sessions, as well as share their suggestions. This feedback highlighted the importance of a balanced perspective from speakers, more opportunities for interaction and support and extended durations for Q&A sessions. These valuable insights will inform the development of future webinars, ensuring that they align with participants' preferences and expectations.
Despite the various strengths of this study, there were some limitations as well. The webinar series had an average of 95 participants across the four webinars. However, only 25 participants filled out the post-webinar survey, with some participants choosing not to answer certain questions. This resulted in a small sample size, providing less feedback on the webinar format and content. Participants may have decided not to complete the survey since it was delivered after the completion of the final webinar. In the future, a dedicated period can be provided to complete the survey during the session. Additionally, the post-webinar survey was administered exclusively after the fourth session, which focused on "Sexual Health After Breast Cancer." This introduces a potential bias, as certain participants solely attended this webinar and may have disproportionately rated it as the most valuable and informative. Nonetheless, having open-ended questions provided greater insight on participants’ understanding and feedback for future webinars. Additionally, since participant responses were only collected at the end of the webinar series, statistical analysis regarding the effectiveness of the webinar series could not be performed. Furthermore, specific demographic information (e.g., participants' age and racial ethnicity) were not collected, which may limit the generalizability of these results. Future studies should focus on conducting pre- and post-webinar surveys, collecting specific demographic information of participants, and conducting post-webinar surveys after each webinar, to gain a better understanding of which sessions and topics resonated most with participants.
In summary, the Breast Cancer Webinar Series seeks to bridge the gaps in breast cancer survivorship support. Through these informative sessions, participants have gained knowledge, emotional support, and practical guidance, empowering them to face their survivorship journey with confidence and optimism. Based on the responses provided by the participants in the post-webinar survey, there is a strong recommendation to continue the webinar series. Participants expressed their interest in various topics related to cancer survivorship and recovery. The interactive nature of this webinar has served to bridge the gap between healthcare professionals, advocates, and patients, facilitating a deeper understanding of the intricate issues that affect breast cancer survivors. The recommendations provided by participants will be used to inform the development of future webinars. Future studies should evaluate whether incorporating experiential learning, group activities, and more diverse speakers improves knowledge and attitudes of participants.
This webinar did not receive any financial support.
Dr. Kwan holds the Hold'em for Life Early Career Professorship in Cancer Research, a University Named Professorship at the University of Toronto.
Ethical statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Research ethics: Ethical review and approval were not required for this study as unidentified data was used and anonymous post-webinar surveys were administered.
Informed consent: Written informed consent was not required as unidentified data was used and anonymous post-webinar surveys were administered.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner