AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Meprobamato, Department of Oncology, Cuba
Citation: Meprobamato , Theory of bladder urothelial carcinoma by serum tumor markers CA19-9 and bHCG, J Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics, Doi: 10.31579/2640-1053/001
Copyright: © 2017 Meprobamato. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 16 November 2017 | Accepted: 30 November 2017 | Published: 08 December 2017
Keywords: Urothelial Carcinoma; Cystectomy; Tumor Markers; CA19-9; bHCG
Tumor markers such as beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (bHCG) and Carboxyhydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) have long been associated with bladder cancer and although their expression is associated with poorer oncological outcomes, they have little role in the routine clinical management of this disease. Recent advances in engineered antibody technology have lead to renewed interest in these markers as potential targets for new therapeutics. Here we report the case of a patient with locally advanced bladder cancer and the response of serum bHCG and CA19-9 to endoscopic resection and then radical cystectomy and serves to highlight how these tumor markers might be used to measure treatment effect.
AFP: Alpha Fetoprotein; bHCG: Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin; CA 19-9: Carboxyhydrate Antigen 19-9; CEA: Carcinoembryonic Antigen; CT: Computed Tomography; PET: Positron Emission Tomography; TURBT: Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor.
The use of serum tumor markers such as beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) and carboxyhydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in the routine evaluation for bladder cancer remains undefined despite their association with aggressive disease characteristics [1,2]. With the emergence of antibody-based therapy for solid malignancies in the form of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates [3], there has been renewed interest in these little used biomarkers as they may constitute tumor specific targets at which chemotherapeutic payloads can be directed, or allow for specialized imaging techniques through engineered antibodies.
Pre-clinical data suggests that both CA19-9 and bHCG might be targeted with such new therapeutics in bladder cancer, and whilst studies have previously focused on their utility as prognostic or screening biomarkers, their response to therapy in bladder cancer is not well known. In their report, Malkhasyan and colleagues describe a case of metastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma and the dramatic response of serum bHCG to systemic chemotherapy [4]. In a similar report but in the context of surgical excision, we present a case of locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the response of both serum bHCG and CA19-9 to endoscopic resection followed by radical cystectomy.
A 51 year old female was referred to our service with a pelvic mass. She had originally presented to her general practitioner and subsequently our emergency department with several months of hematuria and symptomatic anemia requiring blood transfusion. She had a past history of hypertension and irregular menstruation, with no significant occupation exposure or history of tobacco smoking. There was no family history of malignancy.
After blood transfusion with three units of packed red blood cells, her hemoglobin level improved from 40g/L to 67g/L. Imaging with pelvic ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) with contrast revealed a 4.6 × 4.8 cm mass arising from the bladder (Figure 1) which extended to the right vesico-ureteric junction as well as marked hydronephrosis and hydroureter. Other staging investigations including CT chest and whole body bone scintigraphy showed no evidence of distant metastasis. No staging positron emission tomography (PET) scan was ordered at this time. Due to an uncertain initial diagnosis and the prospect of gynecological malignancy, tumor markers to evaluate a pelvic mass had already been ordered and revealed a CA19-9 of 53 kU/L (Reference range 0-35 kU/L), and bHCG of 5 U/L (Reference range 0-2 U/L). Other markers including alpha fetoprotein (AFP) (3.8 ug/L; Reference range 0-10 ug/L) were within normal range.
At cystoscopy an extensive solid and papillary tumor that encompassed the entirety of the right lateral wall and extended to the dome was encountered and the patient proceeded to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). The tumor was incompletely resected and follow-up CT scans showed the extent of residual tumor as well as the proximity to the iliac artery and vein (Figure 2A and 2B). It also showed ongoing right sided hydronephrosis and hydroureter, which was unchanged from the previous CT scan. Histopathological examination of the tumor chips demonstrated high grade muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma with squamous cell differentiation. Approximately 8 × 5 × 1 cm of the tumor was resected during the TURBT. Tumor markers remained elevated following TURBT (CA19-9: 53 kU/L, BHCG: 7 U/L).
The patient continued to be symptomatic with transfusion dependent haematuria. Her case was presented as the urology multi-disciplinary team meeting (consisting of urologists, oncologists, radiologists and pathologists) for further management. Due to the ongoing hydronephrosis and bleeding, it was felt she was not a suitable candidate for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, instead being more suitable to proceed directly to an anterior pelvic extenteration. This was discussed with that patient, and she agreed to the operation.
She proceeded to anterior pelvic exenteration with radical cystectomy, hysterectomy, bilateral pelvic lymphadenopathy and ileal conduit formation. During her operation, she was confirmed to have T4 disease with spread to the pelvic wall. Unfortunately, her tumor was incompletely excised with tissue remaining adherent to the pelvic wall and right sided iliac vessels.
Pathology of the tumor confirmed urothelial carcinoma with moderate squamous cell differentiation and metastases to 3 out of 9 regional lymph nodes on the left side (Figure 3). Immunostaining for bHCG was positive (Figure 4), but we were unable to stain for CA19-9 for technical reasons. Her post-cystectomy tumor markers normalized with respect to our standard reference ranges a week later (CA19-9: 11 kU/L and BHCG: 2 U/L). No other preoperative cause was found to explain the increase in the tumor markers.The patient recovered well following her cystectomy, and was referred onwards for adjuvant chemotherapy with a course of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin.
Quantitative analysis of serum bHCG was performed using the Immulite hCG assay on an Immulite 1000 instrument according to manufacturer’s instructions (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Germany). Measurement of serum CA 19-9 was performed using a Unicel DxH 800 Coulter Cellular Analysis System according to manufacturer’s instructions (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA).
Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a Roche Ventana XT Ultra automated stainer (Roche Ventana) according to manufacturer instructions. Briefly, relevant histology slides were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval performed for 16 minutes in CC1 solution. The sections were then incubated with anti bHCG antibody (1:8000, Dako cat no. A0231, 28 minutes at 37°C), followed by the detection step with DAB (Roche Ventana Optiview DAB kit, cat no 760-700). Counterstaining was performed with haematoxylin and bluing reagent (Roche Ventana, cat no. 760-2021, 760-2037).
The CT scan was performed with a Siemen 64 slice CT scanner. Iohexol (Omnipaque 350) solution was used for contrast. Following a pre-contrast scan, 40ml of intravenous Omnipaque 350 solution was injected and a ten minutes delay phase captured. A further 50ml of Omnipaque 350 solution was injected and the scan repeated to capture an arterial phase.
We have presented a case of locally advanced bladder urothelial carcinoma where serum CA19-9 and bHCG were both elevated pre-operatively, remained elevated in response to TURBT (in the case of bHCG, elevated slightly), yet resolved to within normal reference ranges following radical surgical excision, albeit with residual tumor remaining. Similar findings have been previously reported in a case post cystectomy of a tumor expressing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 [5]. Serum levels of CEA and CA 19-9 reduced post operatively. Both CA19-9 and bHCG have previously been shown to correlate with more aggressive disease and poorer outcomes in bladder cancer.
CA19-9 is a carbohydrate antigen related to the Lewis A blood group antigen with a role in E-selectin mediated metastasis in cancer and is best known for its association with pancreatic cancer [6]. Although immunohistologically positive in only up to 30% of bladder cancers [1], elevation of serum levels prior to cystectomy appear to confer a worse five year survival [2,7]. Although a fall in serum CA19-9 levels has been demonstrated in the context of chemotherapy [8], there has not been a documented improvement in survival for bladder cancer as has been similarly shown in pancreatic cancer [9]. Nevertheless, the location of the CA19-9 glycoprotein on the outermost layer of the cell membrane allows ease of antibody targeting, and Girgis and colleagues have demonstrated in a preclinical study the ability to target CA19-9 with radiolabelled anti CA19-9 antibodies to produce antigen-specific microPET images. This in turn promises to translate to therapeutic payloads targeted via engineered antibodies against CA19-9 and new systemic agents for bladder cancer [10].
In contrast, therapies towards bHCG already exist and the secretion of this gonadotropin itself has been associated with bladder cancer since 1904 with an abundance of literature to this effect [4]. Approximately 35% of bladder cancer cases involve ectopic bHCG production and elevated levels of urinary, serum, or immunohistochemical bHCG have all been correlated to higher tumor grade, stage, metastatic potential, worse prognosis, and poor response to radiotherapy possibly through inhibited apoptosis [11-14]. Furthermore, Douglas and colleagues reported a dramatic reduction in five year recurrence free survival from 75% to 26% for patients with elevated serum bHCG following cystectomy [2]. Efforts towards the development of effective contraception through bHCG vaccines has in turn lead to a potentially new therapy against bHCG secreting bladder cancer, particularly if specific immunogenicity can be improved [15]. Preclinical studies suggest that bHCG targeting antibodies can be used for targeted cancer therapy [16], and indeed a Phase II trial for a vaccine against bHCG-secreting bladder cancer is already underway [17].
The potential development of agents targeting these well-known tumor markers through antibody technology could provide avenues to new treatments such as intravesical targeted chemotherapy. This could be a novel treatment option for symptom control in patients too co-morbid for radical surgery. In such a case, these markers could also serve to indicate treatment response and potentially to monitor for future recurrence. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the behaviour of these markers in contemporary clinical practice.
The tumor was unable to be stained for CA19-9 as the relevant antibody was unavailable for validated clinical use in our laboratory at the time of writing.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
