AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review ariticle
*Corresponding Author: Luiz de Oliveira Sellmann, Travessa Roberto Rosa, n° 62, apt. 303, Mendes, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Citation: Luiz De Oliveira Sellmann, Luiz A. Nora, Joaquim Carlos Fest da Silveira, Tatiana Federici S. Fest da Silveira, Cintia Gonçalves de Oliveira Sellmann, (2024), The use of Bioceramic Cements in the Obturation of the Root Canal System, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 19(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/547
Copyright: © 2024, Luiz de Oliveira Sellmann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 18 September 2024 | Accepted: 30 September 2024 | Published: 07 October 2024
Keywords: root canal sealers; hydraulic root canal sealer; root canal treatment; bioceramics; bioactivity
As one of the main areas of Dentistry, Endodontics aims to repair periradicular tissues, allowing the affected tooth to reestablish its functions through its treatment. With this objective in mind, different types of root canal sealers (RCS) have been created in order to improve the healing of desired tissues. The main objective of this work is to analyze, through a literature review, studies on the use of second generation bioceramic cement in the voids of root canal systems, highlighting the essential properties in its clinical use, its advantages and disadvantages, and also compare its effectiveness with the oldest cements on the market. The methodology used was bibliographic research, exploring in sources such as research articles, meta-analysis and clinical trials published in Portuguese and English, selected through the search descriptors PubMed, Lilacs and Scielo. The results of the studies showed the efficacy in the use of bioceramic cement in the voids of root canal systems, since they have the ability to fill and seal, manifesting dimensional stability, avoiding the recontamination of the canals, among other benefits. However, in relation to retreatment, this type of sealer presented some difficulties in its removal when traditional techniques were used, being indicated to associate the use of mechanized techniques to improve its removal. It could also be observed the need for further studies in this area, as the analyzed studies have limitations, due to such types of cements being still relatively new to the market, meaning that the long-term success rate of the treatment is still unclear.
RCS : Root Canal Sealers
SC obturation : Single Cone Obturation Technique
CSBS : Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers
MTA : Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Sealers
The endodontic treatment can be simplified into three main phases: the coronal access, the cleaning and shaping of the canal and the obturation of the root canal system, with neither phase being of greater importance than the other. However, as Siqueira [1] states, a special attention to the obturation phase must be given due to the need of eliminating empty spaces previously occupied by the pulp tissue, that can serve as voids to the proliferation of unwanted microorganisms. In order to improve the tridimensional sealing of the root canal and to promote further healing of the periradicular tissue new types of RCS’s, such as bioceramic cements, have been created. These new materials have increased adhesive capabilities due to its ability to produce hydroxyapatite, which provides a direct bond between the dentin and the cement, known as tubular diffusion, as stated by Reyes-Carmona [2].
These materials also have further benefits, since they use the moisture naturally present in the dentinal tubules to commence and complete their setting reaction, due to their hydrophilic and insoluble nature. They are also nontoxic, biocompatible and chemical stable in biological ambient, which make then ideal for use by Dental professionals as Zamaprini [3] described.
Such characteristics are desirable for RCS, however, bioceramic sealers also have undesirable features, especially in regards to the retreatment therapy of the root canal. As stated by Bek Kurklu [4] it is not known how the bioceramic pastes are removed and how they affect the adhesion of self-etch adhesives on coronal dentin, which can be a challenge for the Dentist aiming to rehabilitate a tooth that needs devices such as intracanal poles, that requires for partial removal of the Gutta-Percha and endodontic cement from the root canal.
It is also primordial to emphasize that bioceramic sealers were first developed to be used in conjunction with cold obturation technique, in particular with the single cone obturation technique (SC obturation), as Donnermeyer [5] states in his systematic review, meaning that the Dentist should diverge from the traditional lateral condensation obturation technique. Therefore, according to Alegre [6], the common view of maximum Gutta-Percha material and minimal sealer became obsolete, as bioceramic cements have superior flow, antibacterial and biological capabilities when compared to traditional sealers, meaning that a high sealer proportion was no longer though as a disadvantage.
On the other hand, Schilder [7] observed that during the SC obturation the gutta-percha and calcium silicate-based sealer requires a low condensation pressure, making this type of obturation incapable of adequately filling any complicated root canal anatomy. For this reason, modern bioceramic sealers complement the SC technique, filling empty spaces in the canal that are difficult to access with the single Gutta-Percha cone. Therefore, the aim of this article is to evaluate previous articles, researches and meta-analyses about the performance of such RCS. Moreover, more data is required in order to have a complete understating about the long-term results of these materials.
Ideal RCS Properties
For the purpose of a successful endodontic treatment, an RCS should have specifics characteristics that allow them to thrive in the obturation of the canal. Authors such as Grossman [8] described the ideal proprieties that any root canal filling material must have:
I. The material should be easily introduced into the root canal.
II. It should seal the canal laterally as well as apically.
III. It should not shrink after being inserted.
IV. It should set slowly.
V. It should be impervious to moisture.
VI. It should be bactericidal or, at least, should discourage the growth of bacteria.
VII. It should be radiopaque.
VIII. It should not stain the tooth structure.
IX. It should not irritate periradicular tissues or affect the tooth structure.
X. It should be sterile, or easily and quickly sterilized immediately before insertion.
XI. It should be easily removable from the root canal if necessary.
With these goals in mind, a bioceramic cement must also comply to a certain level of requirements, such as:
a) Biocompatibility. Biocompatibility is an essential requirement for any RCS, as such materials will have some level of contact with vital tissue. Williams [9] defined it as the ability of a material to achieve a proper and advantageous host response in specific applications, meaning that the material should not trigger any adverse response from the patient organism when applied. Most bioceramic sealers are considered to be biocompatible, as most of them have calcium phosphate in their composition, an inorganic material present in hard tissues such as bone and teeth. Consequently, works such as Haddad [10] concluded that many bioceremic cements have the potential to promote bone regeneration when extruded through the apical foramen during root canal filling or when used for repairs of root perforations.
b) Setting Time. The ideal setting time for any RCS sealer is enough time for the Dental Professional to properly obturate and seal three-dimensionally the canal. It is important to observe that a slow setting time could result in irritation in biological tissues, as most RCS produce some degree of toxicity until being completely set. Some Bioceramic manufactures even imply that their sealers can accelerate their setting time when in contact with moisture present in the dentinal tubules, which is a different behavior when compared to traditional RCS. Yang [11] explained in his patent that while the normal setting time for bioceramic RCS is four hours, in patients with particularly dry canals, the setting time might be considerably longer, implying that the amount of moisture in the dentinal walls is affected by the use paper points, presence of smear layer, tubular sclerosis or any fact that may interfere with how damp the root canal is during its obturation.
c) Flow. This is an important property that allows the material to enter narrow spaces present in the canal, such as irregularities of the dentin, isthmus, accessory canals, and voids, that the Gutta-Percha is not able to enter. Entities such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) [12], described that the RCS should have a flow rate of not less than 20 mm. This means that cements with superior flow rate have a greater capability of penetrating lateral, accessory and many others ramifications of the canal, that may serve as proliferation areas for microorganisms.
d) Solubility. Solubility refers to ability of the material dissolving itself in the presence of water. According to ADA [13], the solubility of a root canal sealer should not exceed 3% by mass. In endodontics, this means that sealers with high solubility rate are undesirable, since moisture can lodge itself in dentil irregularities, voids and anatomic variations.
e) Radiopacity. Raman [14] explained that is also known as Radiodensity, and it can be resumed as the ability of a material to be visible in a radiographic exam. For RCS, they should be sufficiently radiopaque in order to be distinguishable from adjacent anatomical structures and other dental materials. According to the ISO, the minimum radiopacity for an RCS is based on a reference standard of 3.00 mm of aluminum.
f) Adhesion. This property is defined as the capability to adhere to the root canal dentin and promote Gutta-Percha cone adhesion to the RCS and the dentin wall. There is no standard to measure the adhesion of an RCS, however, such materials should have enough adhesion to the dentinal walls in order to properly seal the root canal three-dimensionally, impeding the microleakage of the obturation as Schwartz [15] highlights.
g) Discoloration of Tooth Structure. As the tooth is an aesthetic organ, an RCS should not interfere in the tooth coloration. Studies of this specific topic, such as Ioannidis [16], emphasizes that when an excess of sealers is not removed from the coronal dentin of the pulp chamber, they can affect the dental chroma structure.
h) Antimicrobial Properties. One of the most important properties for any RCS refers to the ability to prevent the proliferation of any source of microorganism in the root canal. According to Desai [17], the key antimicrobial to RCS´s properties of lie in their alkalinity and release of calcium ions, that stimulate repair through deposition of mineralized tissue. There are two main methods to evaluate the antibacterial activity of bioceramic-based RCS, the agar diffusion test and direct contact testing, as both Tanomaru-Filho [18] and Morgental [19] asserted in their articles.
i) Retreatability. Retreatbility refers to how difficult is to remove completely an RCS in order to retreat the root canal, this is necessary when the length of the obturation is insufficient or when the obturation does not properly seal the canal. For a successful retreatbility endodontic treatment it is fundamental for the complete removal of any material used in the obturation of the root canal, such as RCS. Nevertheless, as previously assessed, bioceramic RCS have a strong adhesion into the dentinal walls, which requires different protocols for its removal as shown by Martins [20] in his work about the use of mechanical systems and irrigation protocols with chemical agents to remove filling materials.
Types of Bioceramic Sealers
In order to analyze and understand the use of bioceramic sealers, it is necessary to know the different types and compositions currently available in the market. They can be segregated into four main compositions: Calcium Silicate-Based, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Tricalcium Silicate and Calcium Phosphate-Based Sealers.
a. Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers. Unlike conventional root canal sealers, Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers (CSBS) have a particular setting process, as described by Donnermeyer [5], they produce calcium hydroxide by hydration, which affects water sorption and solubility. Therefore, these materials can use moisture present in the canal to accelerate their setting time creating a mineral layer that induces a chemical bond with dentin walls, which contributes to their sealing ability as Silva Almeida [21] infers in his systematic review of in vitro studies. Authors such as Asawaworarit W [22] concluded that the calcium silicate sealer exhibited a better seal after complete setting when compared to traditional RCS.
b. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Sealers (MTA). According to Cervino [23], MTA sealers were developed for dental root repair in endodontic treatment and it is formulated from commercial Portland cement, combined with bismuth oxide powder for radiopacity. They represent an optimum option for pulp capping, perforation repair, root-end filling and apical barrier producers due its bioactive properties, however, Parirokh M [24] implied that its long setting time and difficult handling properties are among its recognized downsides. It is also important to emphasize that there are different compositions for MTA sealers, with studies like Ahuja L [25] evaluating the apical microleakage of MTA RCS and other materials, highlighting that the ProRoot® MTA from Denstply Sirona have calcium silicate-based materials, while the MTA Fillapex from Angelus does not.
c. Tricalcium Silicate Sealers. These materials aim to have the save advantages as CSBS, interaction with the root canal wall, alkalinity with antimicrobial potential activity and the ability to set in a wet field, while having a different composition. One particular advantage when compared to CSBS is the ability to be used with both warm and cold obturation techniques, depending on the commercial product, as Aminoshariae [26] affirmed.
d. Calcium Phosphate-Based Sealers. Similar to Tricalcium Silicate Sealers, Calcium Phosphate-Based Sealers aim to replicate the same clinical properties as CSBS. Nonetheless, there are a plethora of Calcium Phosphate Sealers in the market, with some even having Calcium Silicate in their composition. Overall, these materials may improve the sealing ability, as Zamparini [27] concluded in his work, since they deposit Calcium Phosphate at the material-root dentine interface, which could promote bone and periodontal tissue regeneration in situations such as endodontic surgery.
Authors such as Nagas [28], Zang [29] and Chybowski [30] identified in their respective works that bioceramic sealers have been introduced into endodontics mainly due to their biocompatibility. This ability is fundamental for the repair of periradicular tissue as Jung [31] described in his ex vivo study of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells. In relation to both chemical and physical properties of the bioceramic RCS, Zamparini [32] in his meta-analysis and Lee [33] in his review exposed that these RCS have excellent flow, dimensional stability, adhesion and enough setting time for the Dental professional to successfully repair the desired tissues. Out of the main characteristics of such RCS, the biocompatibility and adhesion or sealing potential are the biggest advantages of bioceramic sealers when compared to conventional RCS. As previously stated, biocompatibility refers to the ability to heal vital tissue without any harm, while the sealing of the root canal is fundamental to ensure long term success of the endodontic treatment. Ferreira [34] evaluated the dentinal tubule penetration of two tricalcium silicate–based sealers in an ex-vivo study using a confocal laser scanning microscopic. This research, revealed the correlation between the obturation technique and the sealer, where the warm obturation technique may cause the sealer to lose moisture due to the heat generated during obturation, affecting the adhesion and flow of the material, corroborating with past researches like Camilleri [35]. With the different compositions of bioceramic RCS, confocal laser scanning microscopy studies like Martins [36] are fundamental to understand that calcium silicate–based sealers have different behaviors to tricalcium silicate–based sealers. In her research, Martins showed that the results suggest that the lateral condensation technique promoted a higher percentage of root canal perimeter penetrated by a ready-to-use CSBS than the single cone technique in the apical segment of mandibular premolars after endodontic retreatment, opposing the results obtained by Ferreira. Both articles present themselves as relevant studies for the Dentist, as they give scientific support for different obturation techniques. Ghoneim [37], in his comparative study, stated that in relation to the resistance to fracture in endodontic treated teeth, bioceramic cements have increased strength when compared to epoxy resin-based sealers and glass ionomer cements. It is also primordial to analyze clinical studies about the use of bioceramic sealers, as demonstrated by Li [38] in his research about the clinical outcome of iRoot SP extrusion in root canal treatment and Toubes [39] in her two case report about the use of Bio-C Repair for root perforation management. Both authors concluded that their respective sealer used during each research proved a successful material, with the iRoot SP overall success rate for teeth with sealer extrusion being 95.8%, with 69.4% healed, 26.4% healing, and 4.2% unhealed in Li´s study and Toubes´s Bio-C Repair demonstrating that could be an effective therapeutic alternative to MTA, as observed at one-year follow-ups. Regarding the retreatability of such materials, Jamleh [40, 41] evaluated in two studies different retreatbility scenarios, which implies that bioceramic RCS requires a special attention from the Dentist, as they are significantly harder to completely remove when compared to traditional RCS. Firstly, Jamleh [40] assessed the influence of bioceramic RCS on force and torque generation during retreatment, and then compared the retreatability of the AH Plus and TotalFill bioceramic sealer in latter research [41]. In both studies were used mechanized instruments, which emphasizes the need for specific techniques in order to have a successful retreatment therapy of bioceramic sealers.
After the analysis of several articles and researches, it is clear that bioceramic cements are a valuable tool for the dentist, as they have desirable characteristics, like their physical and chemical properties with considerable few drawbacks as other literatures reviews like Lim [42] concluded.
These materials can be used in a plethora of situations, such as root perforations, normal endodontic therapy and sealer extrusion. They can also have a higher healing and sealing ability when in contrast with resin epoxy sealers, with increased success rate as they have a low cytotoxicity, but a general higher bioactivity, due to the liberation of Calcium as demonstrated by Badawy [43].
Their retreability still is the main disadvantage in comparison to other types of sealers, however, the outcome of this study through the evaluation of many articles is that bioceramic cements are an excellent filling material when used correctly.
The authors declare the absence of any conflict of interest.
[List here any individuals who contributed in the work and grant details.]
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
