AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Zekrollah Morovati, Associate Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Psychology, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Citation: Leila Bitarafan., Zekrollah Morovati., Tahereh Elahi., (2023), A the Relationship of Theory of Mind, Emotional Intelligence, and Social Information Processing with Prosocial Behavior in Elementary School Students, Psychology and Mental Health Care, 7(7): DOI:10.31579/2637-8892/223
Copyright: © 2023, Zekrollah Morovati. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 31 October 2023 | Accepted: 22 November 2023 | Published: 06 December 2023
Keywords: theory of mind; social information processing; emotional intelligence; prosocial behavior
The purpose of the present study was examining the relationship between theory of mind, emotional intelligence, and social information processing with prosocial behavior in elementary school students in Zanjan. To this purpose 380 students has been selected with using multi- stage random sampling. The research instruments were: Theory of mind questionnaire, Schutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test, social information processing questionnaire and Child Behavior Scale. The results showed the positive and significant relationship between theory of mind, social information processing, emotional intelligence and prosocial behavior. Also, multiple regression analysis showed that 76 percent of prosocial behavior variance are predicted with predicted variables.
Prosocial behaviors have been the subject of intense research in different areas of psychology with respect to situational, cognitive, and emotional factors (Penner, Dovido, Piliavin and Schroeder, 2005). A prosocial behavior is voluntary/intentional behaviors that benefit others, such as helping, sharing, cooperating with, and comforting others (Gross, Stern, Brett, & Cassidy, 2017). Prosocial behavior is in contradiction with anti-social behavior such as violence, aggression, and malicious actions (Knickerbocker, 2003). Prosocial knowledge is the recognition of people on how they behave in interpersonal relations rather than technical knowledge of facts and principles (Martin-Raugh, Kell and Motowidlo, 2016). Although it is indeed the behavior related to the welfare of others, in some cases, it can be motivated by a selfish behavior (Carlo and Randall, 2000). It has no direct benefit for the subjects and even may pose risks for them (Baron, Byrne and Branscombe, 2008). Types of prosocial behavior include altruism (Carlo and Randall, 2002, Bowles and Gintis, 2011, Farrelly 2019), cooperation (Bhogal, 2019), and trustworthiness (Ehlebracht et al. 2018). Children with prosocial behavior would have a tendency toward procreator and suitable social skills and low levels of negative emotions (Eisenberg, Fabes, Karbon, Murphy and Wosinski, 1996). Eisenberg divides the motivation of prosocial behavior into five levels in terms of age. Level One: At this level, children do prosocial behaviors based on the principle of pleasure and self-esteem. Preschool children are at this level. Level 2: Children at this level pay attention to the needs of others, although they conflict with their own needs. Decent environment situations are effective in the emergence of these behaviors. Primary school children have this feature. Third level: At this level, children have a stereotyped image of goodness and badness, and work to confirm others’ opinions and to be good. Children are at this level at the end of elementary school. Level Four: At this level (early high school), children express prosocial and sympathetic responses based on feelings of guilt and duty. At the fifth level, which includes the high school level, people make prosocial behaviors based on internal motivations. Eisenberg’s pattern was confirmed through a longitudinal study conducted by him. It should be noted that the occurrence of prosocial behaviors at each level depends on the environment and family situations (Eisenberg, 1998). As students enter the teenage stage from childhood, they would be dependent on social relationships with their Peers (Kidron and Fleischman, 2006). Teenagers who are close friends with each other are more likely to engage in such behavior (Barry and Wentzel, 2006). One of the factors related to prosocial behavior is the theory of mind (TOM). Researchers have shown understanding one’s own thoughts and emotions, understanding the thoughts and emotions of others, and compassion, empathy, and motivation facilitate prosocial behavior (Eggum et al, 2012). TOM is making reactions to the content of your mind and others (Kaysili and Acarlar, 2011).During the early years of school, children’s TOM becomes more advanced and the mind acts as an active information processor in thinking (Wellman, Cross and Watson, 2011). It has been evidenced that talking about the mind is an important factor in determining individual differences in TOM (Bianco, Lecce and Benerjee, 2015). Emotional intelligence (EI) is related to empathy and empathy, in turn, is related to prosocial behavior. Therefore, EI is also associated with prosocial behavior(Charbonneau and Nicole, 2002). Goleman (1998) defines emotional intelligence as the ability to manage and control one own behavior in dealing with others.Moreover, it is the ability to recognize and respond to their own and others’ emotions in the social interaction context. EI has two major natures including intelligence or a personality trait (Petrides and Furnham, 2003). It has been documented that people with great efficiency could improve their emotional intelligence level. This process initiates with the development of self-awareness through understanding thoughts and feelings about people and different situations. When they achieve a level of self-awareness, they likely move to understand others’ feelings and use the obtained information to provide an appropriate response to others (Diggins, 2004). Emotionally intelligent people are those who are balanced, have insight into themselves and others, operate with integrity, respond well to challenges and connect to people (McPheat, 2010). Some studies have reported a significant positive relationship between prosocial behavior and goals of social information processing (SIP). Social information processing theory is about how children make decisions in social interactions (Crick and Dodge, 1994). Crick and Dodge (1994) proposed a model called social information processing. Based on this method, children view themselves in social situationsand when faced with a difficult situation encode information and interpret social clues. Finally, they make the information available to their cognitive treasury according to this information, decide and evaluate possible responses to a given situation, and make their decision and act based on the selected response (Burgess, Wojslawowicz, Rubin, Rose‐Krasnor and Booth‐LaForce, 2006). SIP is a mechanism for encoding, acquiring, and retrieval of social data that improve people’s social behavior (Bennet, Farrington and Huesmann, 2005). SIP model in addition to explaining successful social interaction of children also has various applications in identifying the causes and prevention of behavioral problems in children and teenagers (Li, Fraser and Wike, 2013).
Subjects and procedure
Participants were all sixth-grade elementary students from Zanjan city, Iran.According to Krejcie & Morgan (1970) table for determining sample size for a 30,000 population, 380 (202 girls, 178 boys; Mage = 11.37 years, SDage = 1.62) students were selected using multi-stage random sampling and completed the questionnaires. Also, teachers completed prosocial behavior questionnaires for each student. We obtained written informed consent from the parents of the participants in this study. Also, the research plan was approved by the Ethics Committee of the university.
Tom Test
The original form of this test has 78 questions developed by Steerneman (1994, quoted by Morris et al., 1999) to assess the TOM in normal 5 to 12 years children and children with pervasive developmental disorders. This instrument provides information about social understanding, children's sensitivity and insight, and the degree of their ability to accept others' feelings and thoughts. In this study, we used the 38-question form of the TOM that has been used by Ghamarani, Alborzi, and Khayer (2006) on a normal group of students in Shiraz. The test has three sub-scales: a) precursors of the theory of mind (TOM 1; 20 items), b) first manifestations of a real theory of mind (TOM 2; 13 items), and c) more advanced aspects of the theory of mind (TOM 3; 5 items). The test is administered individually and includes some images and stories. The tester after providing these materials makes some questions to ask. Using this tool, a correct answer receives a score of 1 and a wrong answer receives 0. In the present study, the validity of the total test and each subtest level of TOM 1, TOM 2, and TOM 3 were 0.71, 0.66, 0.51, and 0.85, respectively.
The Schutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence (SREIS) Test
This test is a 33-item self-report measure of emotional intelligence developed by Schutte et al. (1998). The SREIS has been designed to survey the Salovey and Mayer (1990) model of EI. The instrument comprises of three widely recognized sub-scales, which were described as follows: 1. appraise expression of emotion comprising 13 items, for example “I am aware of the non-verbal messages I send to others”. 2. Regulation of emotion with 10 items, for example “I seek out activities that make me happy”. and 3. Utilization of emotion with ten items, for example “When I feel a change in emotions, I tend to come up with new ideas”. In this study, reliability for total test and subscales and expression of emotion, the emotion exploitation, and emotion regulation were 0.84, 0.66, 0.74, and 0.73, respectively.
Social Information Processing Skills
Different scales were used to measure social information processing skills as part of the data collection and evaluate the social purposes in the present study. An example of these images with explanation was “A Day in the school you’re doing work on a research project with another friend, almost when you have finished half of your work, your friend says “I do not like your job” and rejects all your work” (Crick and Werner, 1998). The main scale includes seven purposes.Because Dlveaux and Daniels have reported a low correlation of the efficiency and overlap variables with other objectives, the goals avoiding trouble (i.e., stay away from trouble with powerful figures) and to maintaining equality (i.e., work with a mutually agreed solution) were not evaluated in the current study. So, children evaluated five goals for each story: 1) pursuing self-interests (trying to re-acquire the target), 2) having personal control (not letting classmates bully), 3) revenging (reprise classmates act), 4) maintaining the relationship with classmates (trying to keep up with classmates), 5) and maintaining relationships with other groups (ensuring that the other classmates like him). Students on a 5-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) determined how much they have a tendency to happen any purpose. The average score for each goal is between 1 and 5. According to Delveux and Daniels (2000), Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency was in the range of 0.84 to 0.96. In Martins’ study (2010), Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85 and 0.79 for the purposes of revenge and peace, respectively. In terms of the validity of the measures, it was found that communication can predict the choice of solutions; i.e., the purpose of revenge and physical aggression stems (Delveaux and Daniels, 2000). The reliability of SIP questionnaire and subscales of self-interests maintaining, personal control, revenge, relations with peers, and relations with the group were 0.65, 0.64, 0.66, 0.76, 0.63, and 0.70, respectively.
Child Behavior Scale
The Child Behavior Scale (Ladd and Profilet, 1996) was used to measure aggression, withdrawal, and prosocial behavior in children. The present study deals only with prosocial behavior that included eight items assessed by the teacher. The teacher’s child behavior evaluation form was adapted from the Achenbachʹs child behavior scale. The average score of each person varies from 0 to 16, where a higher score indicates a stronger prosocial behavior. According to Ladd and Profilet (1996), there is a significant correlation between the two scales with aggressive behavior (Prosocial with Peers, r = -0.19, p < 0>r = 0.39, p < 0>r = 0.23, p < 0>r = -0.19, p< .01) during free play periods at school, and with aggression (Prosocial r = -0.45, p < 0>r = 0.71, p < 0>r = -0.35, p < .001; Aggressive r = 0.08,ns) scores on the Teacher Report Form, the teacher version of Achenbach s Child Behavior Checklist.
In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha reliability of the Child Behavior Scale for the studied samples was 0.92, which is satisfactory.
Descriptive statistics and results of the correlation coefficient between study variables are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Correlation matrix and descriptive statistics
As shown in Table 1, all the predictor variables have a significant relationship with prosocial behavior, except personal interests, revenge, and the TOM3. The correlation between self-interest and prosocial behavior (r=0.01), maintaining personal control and prosocial behavior (r=0.70), revenge and prosocial behavior (r=0.01), relations with peer and prosocial behavior (0.76), relationship with group and prosocial behavior (r=0.89),regulation of emotion and prosocial behavior (0.63), appraisal and expression of emotion and prosocial behavior (r=0.67), utilization of emotion and prosocial behavior (r=0.70), TOM1 and prosocial behavior (r=0.33), the TOM2 and prosocial behavior (r=0.59), and finally between the TOM3 and prosocial behavior (r=0.59) were all significant at (p=0.01), except the TOM3, revenge, and personal interest. To investigate the role of the predictive role of TOM, emotional intelligence, and social information processing in the dependent variable stepwise regression analysis were used. The obtained results (Table 2) show the predictive role of mentioned factors in prosocial behavior.
Table 1: Multiple regression analysis of the TOM, emotional intelligence, social information process, and prosocial behavior
Based on the results of multiple regression analysis and by stage method (Table 2), multiple correlation ratios for the linear combination variables of the TOM, emotional intelligence, and social information processing, and prosocial behavior were MR=0/93 and RS=0.87, which are statistically significant at P<0 P=0.01), P=0.01), P=0.01), P=0.01), P=0.01), P=0.01),> The obtained correlation coefficients show that about 87% of the variance of prosocial behavior variable is specified by predictor variables. Also, all three variables of social information processing, emotional intelligence, and TOM are essential to predict prosocial behavior. However, regarding the values of the regression coefficients in terms of the potency of prediction, relationship with the group was β=0.90 (P=0.01), with peers β=0.28 (P=0.01), and personal control β=0.15 (P=0.01), regulation of emotion =0.10 (P=0.01), utilization of emotion β=0.08 (P=0.01), TOM1 β=0.04 (P=0.01), have more prediction power.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between TOM, emotional intelligence, and social information processing with prosocial behavior. As the results showed, estimated correlation coefficients between all three variables TOM, emotional intelligence, and social information processing with prosocial behavior were statistically significant. In general, it can be stated that the higher the scores of TOMS, emotional intelligence, and social information process, children show more prosocial behavior. The results are consistent with those reported in previous works. For example, Renouf et.al (2010) showed children with less aggression have more TOM ability. To explain these findings, researches have shown that understanding one’s own thoughts and emotions facilitate understanding the thoughts and emotions of others. So, it increases the capacity of empathy, sympathy, and prosocial behavior (Feshbach, 1987, quoted Eggum et al., 2012). People who have a tendency toward understanding others’ emotions are expected to have more advantages due to their level of moral reasoning and show empathy tendencies to help others (Eisenberg, Spinrad and Sadovsky, 2006). When people participate in social interaction, they perceive the mental states of others, realize the underlying motivations of others’ behavior, predict the next behavior, and then form their behavior and attitudes based on it (Astington, 2003).If children would not understand false beliefs, they cannot understand that others may have the social conditions that are contrary to them.Sharing behaviors needs to understand others’ mental states; however, participating in society is a social norm that children have more opportunities to get it. Helping, peace, and cooperation are significantly related to children’s TOM. Overall, this correlation suggests that prosocial actions are built based on expanding sensitivity to the other’s views (Dunfield, 2014).The deep relationship of the TOM and correlation is based on the fact that unlike other forms of prosocial behavior, this correlation needs continuous interpretation of social-emotional symbols and one’s own will to maintain it. In addition, correlation provides visible interpersonal interaction feedback that facilitates the development of children’s TOM (Imutsa, Henry, Slaughter, Selcuk and Ruffman, 2016). Prosocial children have more opportunities for experience and they view the emotional benefits of these actions for themselves and others (Van Duijvenvoorde, Zanolie, Rombouts, Raijmakers and Crone, 2008). The relationship between social information processing and prosocial behavior was also positive and significant.The social information processing is a mechanism for encoding, processing of acquiring, and retrieving of social data that improves social behavior in people (Bennett, Farrington and Huesmann, 2005).Results have shown that people with prosocial behavior, have social-cognitive patterns that protect their social-interest nature. For example, the results of document analysis demonstrate that people who have prosocial behavior, have attribution bias to be kind. In addition, prosocial people pursue social purposes less than their peers that encourage them to respond to stimuli and thus involve them with negative emotions such as revenge actions (Nelson and Crick, 1999).The relationship between emotional intelligence and prosocial behavior was also positive and significant. Studies of Charbonneau et al. (2002) showed that higher emotional intelligence in people caused more altruistic behavior and social virtues. Also, prosocial positions are predicted with low levels of distress; this result is in accordance with hypothetical arousal. Prosocial people have far less turbulence in the face of provocations. They are also less likely to experience negative emotions associated with aggression (i.e., maladaptive reactions). People are more capable to understand and manage their own emotions and feelings of others and they are more likely to respect prosocial behaviors (Martin-Raugh, Kell and Motowidlo, 2016). Goleman considers that empathy and altruism behavior are deeply connected to emotional intelligence; in other words, both concepts are key species of prosocial behavior (Jena, Bhattacharyya, Hati, Ghosh and Panda, 2014).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
