AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Anubha Bajaji, Histopathologist in A.B. Diagnostics, New Delhi, India.
Citation: Anubha Bajaji (2022), The Luxuriant Inundation- Benign Hyperplasia Prostate. J. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 8(6); DOI:10.31579/2692-9406/176
Copyright: © 2023, Anubha Bajaji. this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 14 November 2023 | Accepted: 23 November 2023 | Published: 28 November 2023
Keywords: hyperplasia; morphological
Preface Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a non-malignant hyperplasia of prostatic tissue which frequently engenders specific clinical symptoms implicating the male lower urinary tract. Prostate volume and magnitude are enhanced at nearly 2% to 2.5% per annum. Clinical symptoms and morphological features are usually not concordant.
Preface Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a non-malignant hyperplasia of prostatic tissue which frequently engenders specific clinical symptoms implicating the male lower urinary tract. Prostate volume and magnitude are enhanced at nearly 2% to 2.5% per annum. Clinical symptoms and morphological features are usually not concordant.
Disease Characteristics An estimated 50% males exceeding 50 years demonstrate benign hyperplasia prostate with occurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms, features which augment in a linear pattern. Prevalence of benign hyperplasia prostate enhances with advancing age and appears at an estimated 50% to 60% within sixties, nearly 70% in individuals between 60 years to 69 years and around 80% to 90% within subjects exceeding > 70 years [1,2].
African Americans and Caucasians delineate a significantly elevated prostatic volume in contrast to population from southeast Asia. Nevertheless, decimated prostate volume does not concur with lower urinary tract symptoms. Additionally, mean international prostate symptom scores (IPSS) is decreased within the Caucasians [1,2].
Clinical Elucidation Nodular prostatic transitional or peri-urethral zone compresses the urethra and engenders clinical symptoms of urinary tract obstruction with acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection, hypertrophy and trabeculation of urinary bladder. Bladder diverticula may appear and usually lack concurrence with prostatic adenocarcinoma [1,2]. Benign hyperplasia prostate is associated with definitive clinical symptoms such as obstruction of bladder outlet (BOO), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Thus, instances with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) with concurrent bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) are designated as “benign prostatic obstruction” [1,2]. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are engendered by disorders of male urinary bladder and prostate. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are subcategorized as “storage” symptoms such as frequency, nocturia, urgency and “voiding” symptoms as the urinary stream, straining, hesitancy and prolonged micturition [1,3]. Bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) clinically manifests as lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary retention or urinary infections arising due to incomplete voiding [1,3]. Extensive, untreated benign prostatic hyperplasia can engender chronic, high-pressure urinary retention which is a potentially life-threatening emergency. Additionally, detrusor muscle of urinary bladder can display modifications such as over-activity and diminished contractility [3,4]. Typical clinical representation necessitates evaluation of factors such as disease onset, age, duration, exacerbation and aspects which adequately relieve clinical symptoms [3,4]. Exclusion of pertinent urinary symptoms with concurrent urinary tract infections or overactive urinary bladder is required in addition to ascertainment of incriminated sites such as urinary bladder or prostate. Predominant clinical symptoms are nocturia, poor urinary stream, hesitancy or prolonged micturition. Possible occurrence of acute urinary retention enhances with increasing age [3,4]. Urinary symptoms arising due to serious conditions such as carcinoma of urinary bladder or prostate, neurological disease as cauda equina or chronic, high-pressure urinary retention terminating in renal failure mandate exclusion especially when accompanied by symptoms such as visible haematuria, bone pain, weight loss, neurological deficits, nocturnal enuresis or urinary incontinence [3,4]. Disease Pathogenesis Benign hyperplasia prostate occurs due to several factors. A direct hormonal influence of testosterone upon prostatic tissue is indicated. Testicular androgens are critical for occurrence of benign hyperplasia prostate wherein dihydrotestosterone (DHT) categorically interacts with prostatic epithelium and stroma and adheres to nuclear androgen receptors within stromal and epithelial cells with consequent activation of growth factors. Stromal cells engender 5-alpha-reductase which converts testosterone into dihydrotestosterone. Majority of total prostatic androgens (90%) configured within intact testes metamorphoses into dihydrotestosterone (DHT) under the influence of 5-alpha-reductase 2 configured within prostatic stromal cells [5,6]. Dihydrotestosterone directly impacts stromal cells situated within the prostate, induces paracrine effects within abutting prostatic cells and engenders endocrine outcomes within the bloodstream with consequent cellular proliferation and apoptosis. Benign hyperplasia prostate emerges on account of absent homeostasis between cellular proliferation and cellular demise with excessive cellular proliferation [5]. Consequently, enhanced epithelial and stromal cells accumulate between peri-urethral prostate. Additionally, oestradiol levels are enhanced within aging male subjects which elevate quantifiable androgen receptors [5,6].
Possible factors of disease emergence are subdivided into non-modifiable factors and modifiable factors. Contributors such as age, geographic location, genetic composition, metabolic syndrome, hypertension and obesity impact the occurrence of benign hyperplasia prostate [5,6].
Metabolic syndrome is constituted by hypertension, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia. Prostatic volume is significantly enhanced in metabolic syndrome and obesity. Subjects with elevated glycosylated haemoglobin (Hba1c) demonstrate elevated possible emergence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) [5,6]. Obesity is a component of metabolic syndrome, augments systemic inflammation and is associated with elevated levels of oestrogens.
Genetic predisposition is accompanied by a four-fold increase in possible occurrence of benign hyperplasia prostate in a first degree relative [5,6]. Lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction occurring in benign prostate hyperplasia is contingent to static and dynamic components. Static obstruction appears as a direct consequence of prostatic enlargement with peri-urethral compression and bladder outlet obstruction. Thus, peri-urethral compression necessitates elevated voiding pressure in order to overcome resistance to urinary outflow. Also, prostatic enlargement deranges bladder outlet with ensuing obstruction to urinary outflow [5,6]. Dynamic obstruction arises due to tension of prostatic smooth muscle on account of decimated elasticity and collagen within the prostatic urethra, features which exacerbate bladder outlet obstruction. Also, loss of tissue compliance and resistance to urinary outflow are factors which contribute to disease emergence [5,6].
Histological Elucidation Benign hyperplasia prostate is accompanied by pertinent histological modifications as benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) which demonstrates enhanced magnitude of the gland following benign hyperplasia and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with consequent urinary outflow obstruction. Benign hyperplasia prostate characteristically demonstrates proliferation of epithelial cells and stroma which commences within transition zone of prostate circumscribing the male urethra with consequent urethral compression and bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) [1,2]. Prostatic hyperplasia is usually confined to transitional and peri-urethral zones whereas around 5% instances appear within the peripheral zone. Peri-urethral prostatic nodules are discrete, enlarged and compress encompassing prostatic tissue. Glandular hyperplasia appears as yellowish-pink soft tissue which oozes prostatic fluids whereas foci of stromal hyperplasia are firm, greyish/ white and tough in consistency. Benign hyperplasia prostate demonstrates enhanced quantification, hyperplasia and proliferation of prostatic stromal and glandular cells within the peri-urethral and transition zones [2,4].
Specifically, peri-urethral zone delineates stromal nodules and nodular glandular proliferation within the transition zone. Glandular and stromal tissue depicts hyperplasia with articulation of papillary projections, in-folding buds and cysts. Foci of squamous metaplasia and infarction are discerned [2,4]. Prostatic enlargement commences with urethral circumscription upon point of entry of ejaculatory ducts into the prostate, a region designated as transitional or peri-urethral zone. Morphological continuum with the basal zone is observed. Associated stromal alterations are enhanced quantification of smooth muscle, ductular proliferation and lymphocytic infiltration. A concurrent infectious process or prostatitis is absent. Accompanying elastic tissue may be decimated [2,4]. Microscopic variations such as sclerosing adenosis, fibroadenoma-like hyperplasia, phyllodes-like hyperplasia, leiomyoma-like nodules and fibromyxoid nodules can be encountered. Prostatic enlargement may be associated with infarction [2,4]. Prostatic hyperplasia is immune reactive to CD10[2,3].
Figure 1: Benign hyperplasia prostate demonstrating urinary retention with outlet obstruction due to prostatic enlargement [9].
Figure 2: Benign hyperplasia prostate exhibiting prostatic enlargement with urinary outlet obstruction, hypertrophy of detrusor muscle and residual urine [10].
Figure 3: Benign hyperplasia prostate delineating hyperplasia of prostatic stroma along with glandular hypertrophy [11].
Figure 4: Benign hyperplasia prostate depicting concentric secretions impacted within the glandular lumen surrounded by hyperplastic glands [12].
Figure 5: Benign hyperplasia prostate demonstrating muscular hypertrophy encompassing islands of hyperplastic prostatic glands [13].
Figure 6: Benign hyperplasia prostate enunciating glandular hyperplasia surrounded by stromal hyperplasia with foci of muscular hypertrophy [14].
Figure 7: Benign hyperplasia prostate exemplifying significant glandular hyperplasia enmeshed within a hypertrophic and hyperplastic stroma [15].
Figure 8: Benign hyperplasia prostate exhibiting glandular hyperplasia enveloped within a muscular, stromal hyperplasia [16].
Differential Diagnosis Benign hyperplasia prostate requires a segregation from conditions such as •carcinoma of the urinary bladder or prostate
•cauda equina with associated acute retention
•high-pressure chronic urinary retention which manifests as an insidious process or acute renal failure
•urinary tract infections [7,8)]
•sexually transmitted infections
•prostatitis
•neurogenic urinary bladder which is secondary to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and associated neurological conditions
•calculi within the urinary tract especially the urinary bladder
•urethral strictures [7,8]
Investigative Assay Comprehensive physical examination, palpation of the urinary bladder and examination of abdomen and external genitalia to exclude meatal stenosis or phimosis is required. Digital rectal examination defines the prostatic contour, consistency as smooth, hard or nodular and magnitude of the gland with pertinent, discernible lobes. However, benign hyperplasia prostate characteristically depicts a smooth, enlarged prostate [7,8]. Evaluation of urinary infection, post-void residual urine volume and international prostate symptom score (IPSS) is recommended. Assessment of urinary outflow with maintenance of urinary frequency- volume chart is beneficial [7,8]. Assessment of renal function tests, urine analysis, prostate- specific antigen (PSA), ultrasonography, urinary outflow studies, evaluation of a neurogenic bladder and cystoscopy is beneficial [7,8].
Therapeutic Options Appropriate identification of probable causes of disease progression and subjects amenable to conservative management is necessitated in order to decimate disease- associated morbidity [7,8]. Benign hyperplasia prostate can be subjected to simple observation, medical management and surgical intervention [7].
Lower urinary tract symptoms can be managed with simple observation, medical therapy or surgical intervention contingent to magnitude of disease as assessed by international prostate symptom score (IPSS).
Weight loss, fluid restriction, minimizing caffeine and circumventing constipation is beneficial [7,8)]. Medical management is achieved by specific agents such as alpha 1-adrenoreceptors such as Tamsulosin and Alfuzosin, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors such as finasteride and dutasteride. Values of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate volume are decimated.
Antimuscarinics such as solifenacin, tolterodine and oxybutynin can be employed to decrease smooth muscle tone and suppress an overactive bladder. Alternatively, β-3 adrenoreceptor agonist such as mirabegron may relax the detrusor muscle [7,8]. Combination of an alpha-blocker and alpha-reductase inhibitor is efficacious. Employment of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors reduces the prostatic volume and alpha-blockers relax prostatic smooth muscle. Alternatively, minimally invasive treatment option such as ethanol ablation can be adopted [7,8]. Surgical extermination of benign hyperplasia prostate is indicated with refractory urinary retention, recurrent urinary infection, refractory haematuria, renal insufficiency, calculi of urinary bladder, enhanced post-void residual urine and high-pressure, chronic urinary retention. Recommended surgical procedures are transurethral incision of prostate, transurethral resection of prostate, contemporary techniques as the laser vaporization and holmium laser enucleation. Open prostatectomy is principally obsolete [7,8]. Catheterization of the urinary bladder and surgical eradication with a trans-urethral prostatic resection (TURP) in order to relieve outflow obstruction is optimal. Long term catheterization is adopted to manage high-pressure urinary retention [7,8]. Intermittent self-catheterization can be employed. Following catheterization post-obstructive diuresis may ensue. Gradual decompression of the urinary bladder may be as efficacious as rapid decompression [7,8]. Deterioration of lower urinary tract symptoms or increasing difficulty in urinary voiding symptoms is an indicator of disease progression. Complications associated with benign hyperplasia prostate are acute and chronic urinary retention, urinary tract infection as a consequence to incomplete voiding, haematuria and calculi of urinary bladder [7,8]. Diverticula of urinary bladder may ensue within the residual gland following transurethral resection of prostate [7,8]. Complications may also arise on account of bladder catheterization employed to manage lower urinary tract symptoms and are designated as
•failed trial with a catheter along with an absence of catheterization
•blocked catheter, urinary retention, haematuria or urinary tract infection arising due to extensive and extended catheterization [7,8].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
