AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case report
*Corresponding Author: Ecler Jaqua, Loma Linda University Health - Family Medicine Department
Citation: Genovez M, Tran MN, Jaqua EE. (2022). May. The Importance of the Respiratory Physical Exam: A Case Report. J. Clinical Research Notes. 3(6); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8816/070
Copyright: © 2022 Ecler Jaqua, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 03 May 2022 | Accepted: 15 May 2022 | Published: 18 May 2022
Keywords: Case report; physical exam; pneumothorax; cornerstone; imaging
A 34-year-old male with a history of quadriplegia following a spinal cord injury presented to the clinic endorsing persistent dry cough and mild chest pain for the past three weeks. The patient appeared comfortable, in no acute distress, and with stable vital signs during the visit. His physical exam was unremarkableexcept for no air movement in the right lung. An urgent in-house chest X-ray showed a large pneumothorax with a small layering fluid component and near-complete right lung collapse. The physical exam has been the cornerstone of medical practice since its inception. This tradition has been passed down from physician educators to learners for centuries. Our case is unique because patients with severe pneumothorax usually exhibit urgent symptoms, such as respiratory distress and desaturations at presentation. However, our patient presented with only mild non-specific symptoms and did not have significant risk factors.Therefore, performing a thorough physical exam is essential to help uncover life-threatening pathologies even in patients with no severe symptoms.
Unfortunately, several recent studies show that the new generation of physicians underutilizes the physical exam.1 In addition, as technology advances and with the current COVID-19 pandemic, physicians are becoming less confident in performing a comprehensive physical exam and questioning the value and importance of what many physicians call "the cornerstone of medicine [1,2]. Furthermore, the increased dependence on images and laboratory testing, the time restriction for each patient encounter, and the growth of telehealth have encouraged physicians to skip the physical exam and rely only on the history and other diagnostic tools [1,2]. Through this case, our purpose is to demonstrate the importance of a physical exam in diagnosing deadly disorders in a patient with normal vital signs and mild, non-specific signs and symptoms. "This case report was prepared following the CARE Guidelines [3].
Timeline
| Table 1. Timeline | |||
Relevant Past Medical History and Interventions A 34-year-old male with a history of methamphetamine use, stab wound to the neck, spinal cord injury to C1-C7, intraventricular hemorrhage, and quadriplegia. | |||
| Date | Summaries from Initial and Follow-up Visits | Diagnostic Testing (Including dates) | Interventions |
| 1/27/2022 | The patient was complaining of a 3-week history of persistent dry cough. The patient inquired about getting an anti-tussive as his coughing was associated with chest pain in the last twoweeks. An examination revealed right-sided absent breath sounds. An urgent chest x-ray was ordered. | A chest x-ray showed a massive right-sidedpneumothorax.
| The patient was called and was asked to go to the ED immediately for further management of his right-sidedpneumothorax.
|
| 1/27/2022 | ED visit: The patient was evaluated by the ED physician. A chest x-ray confirmed the right-sidedpneumothorax | Chest x-ray re-demonstrated massive right-sidedpneumothorax | A pigtail chest tube was inserted in the second intercostal space. |
| 1/29/2022 | The patient's pigtail became dislodged. A repeat chest x-ray was ordered. | Chest x-ray showed interval resolution of his pneumothorax. | The patient was informed regarding interval resolution of his pneumothorax and was asked whether he wanted re-insertion of the pigtail chest tube, but the patient declined. |
| 1/30/2022 | The patient was discharged home and asked to follow up with his primary care physician. The patient'svitals were within normal limits. | ||
Case Narrative
A 34-year-old male with a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, methamphetamine use, quadriplegia secondary to a thoracic spine injury from a stab wound, and consequently wheelchair-bounded presented to the family medicine residency clinic with a chief complaint of mild chest pain and persistent cough for the past three weeks. The patient described the cough as dry and constant and aggravating by prolonged talking. He also reported a choking feeling in his throat when talking excessively. His chest pain started one week ago and was intermittent, occurring several times a day, lasting fifteenminutes each time, usually after coughing. The pain was rated as 5/10, and he believed it was secondary to excessive cough.
During the visit, the patient was comfortable in no acute distress. His vital signs were within normal limits, and he had an oxygen saturation of 98%
on room air. His physical exam was significant for no air movement in the right lung. The left lungwas clear to auscultation without wheezing or rales. There was no evidence of tracheal tugging or intercostal usage. An urgentchest x-ray was ordered in-house, and it showed a large pneumothorax with a small layering fluid component and near-complete right lung collapse (Figure 1). There was no evidence of a significant midline shift to suggest tension physiology (Figure 2). The results were communicated to the patient immediately, and he was sent to the nearest Emergency
Department (ED) for further management. Pneumothorax was resolved via
a pigtail (Figure 3).
Pneumothorax occurs when the air between the lung and the chest cavity causes the lung to collapse. This is relatively common and can happen to patients at any age. A study by Bobbio et al. in 2015 estimated the prevalence of pneumothorax at 23,000 per 100,000 people in the US yearly.4 Pneumothorax management depends on symptoms, size, and degree of impairment to cardiac and respiratory system.5 Patient presentation can range from mild pleuritic chest pain to life-threatening medical emergency due to its potential to lead to respiratory failure and hypoxia.5 Furthermore, it could also lead to cardiovascular instability by increasing pulmonary arterial pressure [6].
Pneumothorax can be divided into primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), and traumatic pneumothorax. PSP mainly occurs in two age groups, before 20 years old without underlying lung pathologies and after 50 years old with underlying chronic lung disease.4 These occur predominantly in men with a women-to-men ratio of 1:3.30.4 The exact incidence is uncertain, but the yearly frequency has been reported to be 18-29/100,000 for males and 1.2-6/100,000 for females [5].
SSP usually occurs in patients with a history of underlying lung disease or current smokers older than 45 years.7 Many lung conditions predispose patients to SSP, with the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease being the most common.5 These lung conditions include obstructive airway disease (COPD, asthma), suppurative lung disease (bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis), malignancy (lung cancer), interstitial lung disease (pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, histiocytosis X, extrinsic allergic alveolitis), infectious (pneumonia, tuberculosis) and other causes (adult respiratory distress syndrome, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers Danlos syndrome, catamenial, rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue disease).5 Traumatic pneumothorax is caused by direct injury to the chest. These injuries can be accidental or iatrogenic. A penetrating chest injury or a rib fracture damaging the visceral pleura are common causes of unintentional injuries.5 There are many causes of iatrogenic injuries, including insertion of central vein line, pleural tap, transbronchial biopsy, fine needle aspiration, acupuncture, intravenous drug users, intubation barotrauma.5 These injuries can, in turn, lead to a tension pneumothorax where there is a mediastinal shift and cardiac collapse [5].
A chest X-ray (CXR) is part of the traditional imaging modality of choice, with computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard.8 CXR shows absent lung markings from visceral pleura to chest wall but can be misinterpreted due to artifact.5 CT scan is usually done to distinguish unclear cases, such as lung disease or large bulla.5 Both of these modalities require the patient to be moved and exposed to radiation. Because of these limitations, lung ultrasound is an emerging modality that could be more useful in the acute trauma setting at the bedside with point-of-care ultrasound.8 Lung ultrasound has reported better sensitivity for non-traumatic pneumothorax [9].
Pneumothorax treatment depends on the severity, size, and other underlying lung diseases.5 According to the guidelines from the British Thoracic Society, the pneumothorax size of small (<2>28%) to preserve oxygenation,but caution should be taken in the cases with COPD, who may retain carbon monoxide [5].
In the United States, traditional management of a PSP involves a large-bore chest drain to decompress the collapsed lung rapidly. Chest drain insertion is preferred over simple needle aspiration [5]. In a randomized trial, immediate success demonstrated by pneumothorax resolution occurred in 62% of patients with needle aspiration versus 68% having a chest drain inserted.10 Nevertheless, recent treatment includes more conservative practices such as smaller pigtail catheters or observation for a small SSP pneumothorax.8 These changes in practices would help decrease the length of stay, complications,and pain.8 There is still a 20% chance for recurrence despite these treatments, and patients should be warned to monitor for symptoms.5 With persistent cases or patients at high risk of recurrence, referral to thoracic surgery may be necessary for definitive treatment.5 Because these clinical practices vary, there are not many high-quality clinical trials to establish a consensus standard of treatment.
A patient with pneumothorax commonly presents as a young, tall, thin man with no predisposing factors with sudden onset shortness of breath and pleuritic pain. Physical exam findings include reduced breath sounds, reduced ipsilateral chest expansion, tracheal shift, tachycardia, tachypnea, and even hypotension.5 However, our patient was not in respiratory distress and maintained appropriate oxygen saturations despite having half of his respiratory system collapse. Utilizing the physical exam via lung auscultation was critical to uncoveringthe lack of airflow of his right lung. Our patient's lack of symptoms may have occurred due to his quadriplegic state, which did not allow for his body to be tested under high oxygen demand situations such as physical activity.
Consistent data shows that physical exam deficiencies lead to missed diagnosis and increased morbidity and mortality.1,11 For example, Verghese et al. demonstrated that of a cohort of 208 physicians, 63
Typically, pneumothorax is recognized easily if the classic signs and symptoms are present. However, this case illustrates the need for a thorough physical exam to uncover signs that are not readily evident upon a patient's initial presentation. In our case, to reach the correct diagnosis, a more detailed physical exam was needed. In addition, a chest X-ray would not have been ordered if a comprehensive physical exam were not performed, and a fatal diagnosis would have been missed. Therefore, don't overlook your physical exam; it can save lives.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
