AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Bin Zhao, School of Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Citation: Xia Jiang, Jinming Cao, Bin Zhao. The field of biomedicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clinical Research and Reports, 5(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/098
Copyright: © 2020 Bin Zhao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 June 2020 | Accepted: 13 July 2020 | Published: 28 July 2020
Keywords: mathematical modeling; biomedicine; application
This article introduces the mathematical modeling method and its important role in the field of biomedicine. Combining practical problems such as DNA sequence classification and infectious diseases, it explains the establishment and application of mathematical models, and introduces the specific steps of mathematical modeling in biomedicine. It also specifically introduces: DNA sequence classification model, infectious disease model, curative effect evaluation model, deterministic model and randomness model, and promotes in-depth research on biomedical mathematical modeling methodology.
Mathematics is a highly abstract art. It is precisely its high abstraction that determines its wide application. In particular, with the development of science and technology and the application and popularization of electronic computers, mathematical methods are used in agriculture, forestry, medicine, and economics. , Energy, transportation and other fields occupy more and more important positions. This also validates Marx’s words: “A science can only be considered perfect when it successfully uses mathematics.” In fact, the application of mathematics in the field of biomedicine can be traced back to the 17th century, when the “blood circulation system "Existing problems" and "blood flow problems" are outstanding examples of applying mathematical methods to study life science problems. However, the great potential of mathematics in the field of biomedicine was only realized in the middle and late 20th century: British physiologists, biophysicists Hodgkin and Huxley applied differential equations to describe the transmission of nerve fibers and nerve impulses, and thus gained The Nobel Prize in Medicine and Biology in 1963; American scientist Cormac created the CT theory using the two-dimensional Radon transform and won the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology in 1979; the Danish scientist Jerne K applied mathematical principles to study immune network theory, He won the 1984 Nobel Prize in Medicine and Biology [1]. All these awards strongly prove the role and influence of mathematics in the field of biomedicine.
2. The process of mathematical modeling
Biomedicine is a cross-edge discipline. It combines the methods and theories of medicine, biology and engineering. It mainly uses engineering techniques to study and solve life sciences, especially related problems in medicine. Of course, mathematics is also indispensable. Methods. There are two types of mathematical methods often used in the research of medical problems in biomedicine: statistical analysis and mathematical modeling. Statistical analysis methods are one of the most widely used, direct, and effective mathematical methods used in medicine at this stage. They are mostly used for medical problems that require clinical trials, such as: the efficacy of drugs and the detection rate of medical instruments. For medical problems that require mechanism analysis, mathematical modeling methods are used more often, and the effect is better, which is also easy to guide the practical application.
The so-called mathematical modeling refers to the use of mathematical symbols, expressions, programs, graphics, etc. to describe the essential attributes of real problems or practical topics. It is required that such characterization should be as accurate and concise as possible, and the mathematical solutions obtained by the model must be able to Reasonable interpretation of objective phenomena may predict future development trends. The specific modeling process is as follows:
2.1 Model preparation
First of all, we must understand the actual background, look for the internal laws, form a relatively clear outline, and ask questions.
2.2 Model assumption
On the basis of clarifying the purpose and grasping the information, grasp the essence of the problem, discard the secondary factors, and make reasonable simplifying assumptions on the actual problem.
2.3 Model establishment
Under the assumptions made, appropriate mathematical methods are used to characterize the relationship between variables, and a mathematical structure is obtained, that is, a mathematical model. In principle, on the basis of being able to achieve the desired effect, the mathematical method chosen should be as simple as possible.
2.4 Model solution
After modeling, the model must be analyzed and solved. The solution involves different mathematical methods such as graphical solutions, proofs of theorems, and solving equations. Sometimes, it is necessary to use a computer to find numerical solutions.
2.5 Model analysis, inspection and application
The results of the model should be able to explain the existing phenomena, and the processing method should be the optimal decision-making and control scheme. Therefore, the solution of the model needs to be analyzed and tested. Return the obtained mathematical result to the actual problem and test its rationality. If the theoretical result is in line with the actual situation, then it can be used to guide practice, otherwise it is necessary to put forward hypothesis, modeling, and solution again, and the actual application cannot be carried out until the model result is consistent with the actual. In short, mathematical modeling is a creative work, it is impossible to use some rules and regulations to stipulate very rigid, as long as it can achieve comprehensive consideration, can grasp the essence of the problem, and the final test result is a good mathematical model.
3. Application of mathematical modeling in biomedicine
3.1 DNA sequence classification model
DNA molecules are the basic unit of genetic information storage, and many major problems in life sciences rely on in-depth understanding of this particular molecule. Therefore, the question of DNA molecular structure and function has become one of the most important topics in the 21st century. The problem of DNA sequence classification is the basis for studying the molecular structure of DNA, and its commonly used method is cluster analysis [4]. Cluster analysis is a method of simplifying data using data modeling. It divides the data into different classes or clusters. The data in the same cluster has great homogeneity, while the data in different clusters has great data. Dissimilarity. When classifying DNA sequences, you need to first introduce sample variables, such as the abundance of a single base, the ratio of abundance of two bases, etc.; then calculate the sample variable value of each DNA sequence and store it in a vector; Finally, according to the principle of similarity measurement, the Lance and Williams distance between all sequences are calculated, and the classification is based on the distance. For the quality of the model, the DNA sequence of the known classification can be selected for testing. If the classification made according to the model is consistent with the known classification, the model is preferable. Otherwise, the sample variables need to be debugged until a satisfactory result is obtained.
3.2 Infectious Disease Model
In order to quantitatively study the spread of infectious diseases, people have established various types of models to predict and control the occurrence and development of diseases, for example, SI model (for difficult to cure after disease), SIS model (for disease The patient does not have immunity after being cured), SIR model (applies to the patient with lifelong immunity after being cured), SIRS model (applies to the patient with temporary immunity after being cured), etc. Here, the SIR model is used as an example for specific explanation.
Assuming that factors such as birth, death, and migration of the population are not taken into consideration, let the total population always maintain a constantN, the number of susceptible persons, infected persons and recovered persons at time t are S(t), i(t) and r(t) respectively, then the following three-bedroom model can be established:
di/dt=ksi-li dr/dt=li s(t)+i(t)+r(t)=N
i(0)=i0,r(0)=0
Among them, k is the infection intensity of the disease in the area, l is the recovery coefficient of the disease in the area.
Solved by:
i(t)=i0+s0-s(t)+p(ln(s(t)/s0)), where p=1/k
From the above solution, it can be seen that if S0 ≤ ρ, then i(t) will monotonically decrease to 0, that is, the infectious disease will not spread; if S0> ρ, then i(t) will increase monotonously, that is, the infectious disease will spread, but in As i(t) increases, s(t) will decrease monotonically. When s(t) decreases to less than or equal to ρ, i(t) stops increasing and begins to decrease until the disease disappears in the area. Therefore, in order not to spread the disease, it is necessary to increase ρ and reduce S0 as much as possible. Common methods are to reduce the contact rate with infected persons, improve the health level, improve the medical level, and increase the group immunity.
3.3 Efficacy evaluation model
For the same disease, doctors often formulate different treatment plans based on their different experiences, and each plan has different economic costs and will produce different degrees of side effects. Therefore, it is of great significance to reasonably evaluate its efficacy. The commonly used curative effect evaluation models include multiple nonlinear regression models, fuzzy evaluation models, gray correlation models, and BP neural network models. No matter which model you need to determine the evaluation parameters first, the so-called evaluation parameters refer to what measures the efficacy. For example, in the evaluation of AIDS efficacy, CD4 concentration, HIV concentration, or the ratio of CD4 to HIV concentration can be used to measure the efficacy Good or bad [6]. When selecting a model, as long as it can objectively and truly reflect the comprehensive efficacy of the sample, it is effective.
3.4 Deterministic model and random model
Mathematical models in biomedicine can be divided into two main types: deterministic and random. For the deterministic model, given the initial conditions, there is a completely definite solution. On the contrary, both the stochastic model and its solution involve probabilistic conditions and use probabilities to describe what happens. Deterministic models are widely used in biomedicine. Most tracer applications are based on deterministic models. Model, hydrodynamic model of circulatory system, etc.
Generally it is deterministic. But many aspects of biomedicine use random models. For example, the biostatistical model is random, and today's popular disease simulation method and electrocardiogram analysis also include random elements. In short, in biomedicine, both deterministic models and more and more random models are used. Although the model is divided into deterministic and random types, although it is simple and clear, in practice, this division is not too simple. All deterministic models used to represent realistic measurable quantities are limited by the accuracy of the measurement, and these limitations cause uncertainty, so that the probabilistic elements must be introduced into the initial conditions of the model and the quantities predicted by the model. In some cases, the stochastic model may also be reduced to a deterministic model.
Mathematical modeling plays an important role in research in the field of biomedicine, especially higher-level medical research often depends on the establishment of reasonable mathematical models. Therefore, to train high-level medical researchers, it is necessary to strengthen mathematical modeling Position in teaching in higher medical colleges. At present, the importance of mathematics teaching in higher medical colleges is far from enough. Whether it is the content of mathematics teaching or the setting of the curriculum system, it needs urgent reform.
We have no conflict of interests to disclose and the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors.
This work was supported by the Philosophical and Social Sciences Research Project of Hubei Education Department (19Y049), and the Staring Research Foundation for the Ph.D. of Hubei University of Technology (BSQD2019054), Hubei Province, China.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
