AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Lydia Pratanu, Faculty of Medicine, Kristen Krida Wacana University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Citation: Lydia Pratanu, Jeanne Adiwinata P, Damar Prasmusinto, Johanes Edy Siswanto (2023), The Effects of Sample Quality in the Long-Term Culture and Chromosome Abnormalities Found in Early Pregnancy Loss, J. Women Health Care and Issues. 6(4); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/153
Copyright: © 2023, Lydia Pratanu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 12 June 2023 | Accepted: 17 July 2023 | Published: 24 July 2023
Keywords: early pregnancy loss; sample quality; chromosome abnormalities
Background: Blighted ovum and fetal death are conditions when the zygote fails to develop during the first trimester and are classified as early pregnancy loss (EPL). Fetal chromosomal abnormalities cause more than 50% of EPL; therefore, every EPL case should undergo chromosomal analysis. Conventional cytogenetic analysis, as the gold standard, can only be done by culturing living cells undergoing mitosis. A chromosomal diagnosis cannot be established if the tissue condition is not good.
Objective: This study aimed to identify the effects of sample quality associated with the successful long-term future growth of the tissue and chromosome abnormalities in early pregnancy loss specimens.
Method: The design of this study design was cross-sectional. The long-term culture cytogenetic technique was done by applying collagenase enzyme as pre-treatment in fibroblast culture from curettage tissue. Chromosomal analysis was done using Wright staining with G-banding and analyzed using the Applied Imaging Computerized Cytogenetic system according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature 2016.
Result: A total of 32 tissue specimens were enrolled in this study. The success rate of fetal fibroblast culture in this study was 56.3% (18 samples). Sample quality did not have a significant association with culture growth. Still, the presence of necrotic tissue (p<0.001), blood clots (p=0.005) and mucous (p=0.016) was significantly associated with bad quality of the chromosomes. Based on chromosome analysis done in successfully grown samples, we obtained seven samples (38.8%) with chromosomal abnormalities, such as aneuploidies and mosaicism.
Conclusion: This study concluded that the successful growth of tissue culture is not affected by the sample quality. However, the quality of chromosomes valid for diagnosis is influenced by the sample quality, i.e. the presence of necrotic tissue, blood clot, and mucous.
According to Cunningham GF et al., abortion is the termination of pregnancy before 20 weeks gestation or termination of pregnancy with a fetus weighing less than 500 grams. Based on the gestation age, abortion can be classified as early abortion / early pregnancy loss (EPL), namely abortion that occurs under 12 weeks and late abortion, which occurs above 12 weeks gestation [1]. It is estimated that around 20-30% of normal pregnancies will experience bleeding before 20 weeks' gestation, and half of those numbers end in spontaneous abortion [2]. Various factors, including blighted ovum and fetal, maternal and environmental factors, can cause early pregnancy loss. Blighted ovum – known as anembryonic pregnancy, happens when the zygote (fertilized egg) does not develop as it should. The gestational sac is formed in a pregnancy with a blighted ovum, but the embryo fails to develop, so fetal echo does not detect it [2]. Early pregnancy loss caused by fetal factors can be caused by bacterial, viral or parasitic infections in the fetus or due to chromosomal abnormalities in the fetus. Chromosomal abnormalities account for more than 50% of EPL. These chromosomal abnormalities can be in the form of numeric abnormalities or structural abnormalities. Abnormalities in the number of chromosomes can cause aneuploidy and polyploidy. More than 50% of chromosomal abnormalities in ELP are aneuploidy – the addition of one or two chromosomes (2n+1 or 2n-1) or polyploidy – the addition of a haploid set of chromosomes (e.g. triploid). Aneuploidy is most often found in the form of autosomal trisomy (> 50%), and a small number (0.21%-2.8%) are in the form of double trisomy [3,4]. Structural chromosomal abnormalities can be translocations (exchange of intrachromosomal segments), deletions (reduction of segments in one chromosome), inversions, insertions, isochromosomes, dicentric, and ring chromosomes. According to Friedman JM et al. and Ledbetter DH et al., chromosomal structural abnormalities are more common in infertile couples (2-4%) and newborns with congenital abnormalities [5,6]. Maternal factors that affect EPL include maternal age. Advanced maternal age (over 35 years) is often associated with a non-disjunction process in oogenesis. This results in nullisomic or disomic gametes, which, when fertilized, produce a trisomic or monosomic zygote. Environmental factors that affect EPL include smoking habits, alcoholic beverages, therapeutic radiation for malignancy treatment, and intrauterine contraceptives. Chromosomal abnormalities in EPL tissue can be examined through conventional cytogenetic tests using the long-term culture method. The chorionic villi will be separated from the decidual tissue and other debris during this process. Afterwards, collagenase is given as an enzyme that dissociates stromal core villus cells into fibroblasts, proliferating rapidly beyond maternal cells. In long-term culture, maternal decidual cells are not viable in culture media, so maternal cell contamination (MCC) can be reduced. According to Songster et al. (1992), using long-term culture, it is estimated that MCC can be reduced by up to 0.5% [7].
One thing that influences the success rate of the cell culture until the release of analysis results is the quality of the tissue sample. Sample quality is influenced by several factors, starting from the sampling method to the time factor. One of the sampling techniques for the conception product is ERPC – the evacuation of retained products of conception. This technique carries out the curette process while monitoring using abdominal ultrasound. This technique can reduce MCC and bacterial contamination. If the sample is processed immediately, then the success rate of chromosome analysis of the conception product is 48-59%. Based on several previous studies, it was also found that samples mixed with blood, maternal decidual cells, mucus and other debris would affect the success rate of cytogenetic culture [8-10].
It is important to perform sample processing as soon as the laboratory receives the transport media with the conception product. Blood clots, mucus and other debris, are good media for bacterial growth. In addition, necrotic tissue must be cleaned immediately so the sample can grow properly. Samples that remain in the laboratory for a long time will show a higher failure rate.
Methodology
The research design was descriptive and cross-sectional descriptive on the product of conception (PoC). This research was conducted at the Cytogenetics Laboratory, Harapan Kita Women and Children Hospital. The study was held from January 2010 to June 2012.
This research design and proposal have been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia with the record document: 144/pt02.FK/ETIK/2010. The research sample was the product of the conception of the study population that is, EPL cases in Indonesia. The sample is not limited, whether it comes from pregnancy with IVF or not. The sample is also not limited, whether it comes from single or
multiple pregnancies. The research sample was obtained from EPL cases in several hospitals in Jakarta from March 2010 to December 2011. The minimum sample size, 35 people, is calculated using the hypothesis test formula to get the proportion in one population. The inclusion criteria of this study were abortive tissue from every pregnant woman who experienced EPL in the first trimester, the cause of EPL was unknown, and the patients were willing to be included in the study. While the exclusion criteria from this study were pregnant women experiencing infection, trauma, using drugs, herbs, teratogenic substances, exposure to chemicals and pregnant women with anatomic abnormalities of the internal genitalia before the EPL incident. Recruitment of research subjects was carried out consecutively in 7 hospitals in Jakarta. The subject was asked to sign an informed consent before taking the tissue specimen. The medical history is obtained from the patient's medical record.
The main research materials are tissue specimens of a blighted ovum or dead fetus removed by dilation and curettage. Not using the Betadine solution is required when obtaining the samples in the curette room. If samples are obtained using suction curettage, the sample must be taken from the end of the suction pipe to remain aseptic. The tissue sample will then be placed on the previously prepared transport medium. The villus tissue was cleaned and isolated from the curette scraping tissue, then dissociated in two stages using the enzyme collagenase (=pretreatment). Furthermore, cleaning procedures, selection and isolation of the chorionic villi were examined under a dissection microscope. The final result is expected to be a suspension of fibroblasts from villi that appear dissociated in the form of sand/dots/debris or fine particles. The fibroblast suspension was then cultured and saved in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 37oC with 95% humidity. For several days to get fibroblast culture growth was observed periodically using an inverted microscope. The media was replaced every two days until the culture showed sufficient confluency. After the confluence reached almost 70-80%, monolayer/subculture fibroblast cells with new culture bottles and media were performed. After incubation, these fibroblast cultures will be harvested and spread on glass objects. After that, the object glass was stored in an oven at 50oC overnight, and then the slides were ready to be stained with trypsinization of G-banding. Each glass object that has been G-banded is ready to be examined and analyzed with Cytovision CDI and prepared to be diagnosed based on the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) 2005 [6,7]. A total of 20 cells from two or more glass objects were analyzed. If mosaicism is found, ten more cells are added for observation and counting. The results are recorded in the analysis sheet and then photographed with the CDI to be concluded in the interpretation results sheet.
A total of 32 pairs of research subjects were studied. The mean age of the mother was 33.8 + 5.3 years, with a range of 25 to 42 years. The mean age of fathers was 36.2 + 5.5 years, ranging from 27 to 45 years. We found 13 samples with advanced maternal age (aged >35 years old) and ten samples with advanced paternal age (aged >40 years old). The mean gestational age was 9.8 weeks + 1.5 weeks, ranging from 6 to 12 weeks. Most of the gestational age is at 9-10 weeks. Three pairs were excluded from the study from the 35 pairs collected for this research period due to the wrong transport medium, which caused tissue damage (Table 1.).
| Variable | n | % |
Maternal age
|
19 13 |
59.3 40.6 |
Paternal age
|
22 10 |
68.8 31.2 |
Gestational age
|
1 4 19 8 |
3.1 12.5 59.4 25 |
Table 1. Subject Characteristic
| Category | n (total) |
Good culture growth
|
10
11
3 4 |
| Poor culture growth | 4 |
| Total | 32 |
Table 2: Final EPL tissue culture results and their diagnosis
Table 2 shows that out of 32 samples, there were 28 viable samples. A total of 18 samples showed good chromosome quality, and ten samples showed poor chromosome quality, so the diagnosis could not be made.
Variable
| Good Culture Growth (n=28) | Poor Culture Growth (n=4) | p-value
| ||
| n | % | n | % | ||
| Necrotic Tissue | |||||
| 11 | 78.6 | 3 | 21.4 | 0.295 |
| 17 | 94.4 | 1 | 5.6 | |
| Blood clot | |||||
| 12 | 75 | 4 | 25 | 0.101 |
| 16 | 100 | 0 | - | |
| Mucus | |||||
| 13 | 92,9 | 1 | 7.1 | 0.613 |
| 15 | 83,3 | 3 | 16.7 | |
Table 3: Factors Affecting the culture growth
Table 3 shows that samples with necrotic tissue and blood clots show slightly lower growth rates. Based on this study, we can see that mucus existence in the tissues did not show a significant difference in success rates, but still, there are higher growth rates found in tissues without mucus.
Variable | Chromosome quality | p-value | Odds Ratio (CI 95%) | |||||
| Good quality (n=18) | Poor quality (n=10) | |||||||
| n | % | n | % | |||||
| Necrotic tissue | ||||||||
| 17 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | <0> | - | ||
| 1 | 9.1 | 10 | 90.0 | ||||
| Blood clot | ||||||||
| 14 | 87.5 | 2 | 12.5 | 0.005 | 14.00 (2.08-94.24) | ||
| 4 | 33.3 | 8 | 66.7 | ||||
| Mucus | ||||||||
| 13 | 86.7 | 2 | 13.3 | 0.016 | 10.40 (1.62-66.90) | ||
| 5 | 38.5 | 8 | 61.5 | ||||
CI: confidence interval
Table 4: Factors affecting chromosome quality
Table 4 shows that contamination of necrotic tissue, blood clots and mucus is related to chromosome quality. Samples without necrotic tissue produced good-quality chromosomes, while blood clots and mucus contamination led to poor-quality chromosomes.
| Karyotype | n | % |
| 46, XX | 6 | 33.3 |
46, XY 45, X 47, XY, +12 46 XX, +21, -16 Mos 46, XY / 46, XX Mos 47, XX, +21 / 46, XX / 46, XY Mos 47, XX, +12 / 46, XX | 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 | 27.8 11.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 |
| Total | 32 | 100 |
Table 5: Karyotype results
Out of 18 samples with high-quality chromosomes, we discovered that 11 had a normal karyotype (61.1%), while four exhibited aneuploidy (22.2%), and three presented mosaic patterns (16.7%) (Table 5.)
Theoretically, EPL is related to the age of the mother and father. A mother's age over 35 and a father's age above 45 statistically increase the likelihood of EPL. In this study, EPL was higher in mothers aged <35>
Out of 32 samples, we found 28 (87.5%) successful culture growth EPL tissue samples. The rest of the samples (12.5%) did not grow. We observed a fragile macroscopic appearance with contamination in blood clots, mucous tissue and other debris. Sometimes, these contaminants are difficult to separate from the villi properly. When these samples are cultured, these contaminants tend to be carried away. During the cleaning and isolation/separation stages, although the tissue has been treated with an aseptic technique using media added with antibiotics and antimycotics, the possibility of bacterial or fungal contamination can still exist [8,9].
Poor sampling techniques can also cause culture failure [10-12]. Theoretically, it is stated that the tissue sampling technique through the ERPC procedure guided by transabdominal ultrasonography is proven to improve sample quality in terms of MCC and bacterial contamination [10]. However, the ultrasound-guided ERPC procedure in Indonesia has yet to be performed and thus cannot be compared.
Unfavorable cell culture growth can occur due to non-optimal enzymatic pretreatment processes. The pretreatment process with collagenase is crucial to determine whether the culture will succeed [13]. The collagenase enzyme is packaged in the form of hygroscopic lyophilized protein. Care must be taken when opening the enzyme package so that it is not exposed to a room with high humidity. It is recommended that when removed from the refrigerator, the enzyme should be placed in a desiccator at room temperature and can only be used after the bottle is no longer cold. Tissues that grow poorly can also occur because villi undergo extraordinary apoptosis (defective apoptosis) in embryogenesis. This apoptotic tissue is not visible macroscopically, so there is still a possibility that villi tissue macroscopically looks good and viable but has undergone apoptosis. Various studies stated that apoptosis might be involved in the pathophysiology of IUGR. Placental apoptosis increases in first-trimester spontaneous abortion, and trophoblast apoptosis in the placenta increases in growth-restricted fetuses. [14,15].
The success rate of diagnosis in this study was 56.3%. This is quite significant compared to the culture success rate, which is much higher, 87.5%. From this study, we observed that the success rate for diagnosis is higher in samples that do not contain necrotic tissue, blood clots and mucus. This is because samples not polluted by necrotic tissue, blood clots and mucus contain good villi, so cells are capable of mitosis and produce good chromosomes that can be analyzed. Chromosomal abnormalities in the sample can also cause diagnostic failure. There is literature which states a correlation between the proliferation and mitosis of cells with chromosomal abnormalities [16]. In a cytogenetic study, it was found that cells with chromosomal abnormalities were still able to proliferate at the beginning of the culture period but were unable to show a perfect mitotic stage, so the number of metaphases that can be analyzed is under 20cells, the standard requirements [15-18].
The normal karyotype found in this study was 34.4%. This number is much lower than data from various studies, which state that around 50% of spontaneous abortions in the first trimester show normal chromosomes. This number may go higher or lower than stated above because chromosome samples cannot be assessed due to poor quality [1,3].
The most aneuploidy seen in this study was 45, X (monosomy X). This is in accordance with various studies which state that monosomy X is quite common in embryos that experience spontaneous abortion, which can be seen in 10% of total cases. A small proportion of these embryos will develop to full-term gestation but still be born as stillbirth, and very few are born alive [3,5,6]. Trisomy 12, found in this study, is a lethal chromosomal abnormality and often ends up as a first-trimester spontaneous abortion. This is due to the very disorganized development of the embryo in the early stages of embryogenesis [3,6]. The trisomy 21 karyotype accompanied by monosomy 16 found in this study is also a lethal aneuploidy. Isolated monosomy 16 is already a lethal disorder, especially with the addition of trisomy 21, which causes this disorder to worsen, and the fetus experiences spontaneous abortion [3,19,20].
In this study, three samples showed Mos 46, XY/46, XX karyotype, which could be confined placental mosaicism (CPM) in a single fetus or twin pregnancy with both male (46, XY) and female fetus (46, XX) or karyotype of a male fetus (XY) with maternal cell contamination (XX). Confined placental mosaicism is a dis-concordance between the placenta’s and fetus’s karyotypes [21-23]. If we analyze the three patients with CPM, we find several possibilities. In samples with Mos 47, XX,+21/46, XX/46, XY, it can be caused by pregnancy with a single fetus with a three cell-line CPM or a triplet with one XX cell-line, one XY cell-line, and one XX with trisomy 21 cell-line; or it can also be twin pregnancies with karyotypes 46, XY and 47, XX,+21 accompanied by MCC. The Mos 47, XX,+12/46XX sample can be interpreted as the possibility of a CPM in a single pregnancy or a female fetus with trisomy 12 who has MCC. In samples with 46, XY/46, XX, it can be interpreted as MCC or twin pregnancy. Because overall analysis shows the majority of XX karyotypes, this sample is more likely to be a twin pregnancy.
The results of this study indicated that the success rates for culture and diagnosis were higher in good samples (no necrotic tissue, blood clots and mucus were found). Chromosomal abnormalities in this study included Turner Syndrome, trisomy 12, trisomy 21 with monosomy 16 and mosaicism. We find that the better the sample quality, the higher the diagnostic success rate. Therefore, it is necessary to make requirements for sample acceptance, and when samples are received, a macroscopic examination must be carried out to determine whether the sample can be processed. In addition, an examination must also be carried out with a dissection microscope to see the presence of chorionic villi. If no chorionic villi are found, culture should not be continued because of the high failure rate.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank all for providing assistance with the manuscript preparation. We also thank everyone involved in the collection and interpretation of data.
Conflict of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
