AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Suman Jain , Orthopaedics Department NDMC Medical College & Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India.
Citation: Suman Jain and GBS Kiran. “The effects of different cell-based therapies at a critical time point during the soft-tissue healing process”, J. Orthopaedics and Surgical Sports Medicine. 1(2); Doi: 10.31579/2641-0427/010.
Copyright: © 2018 Suman Jain. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 08 October 2018 | Accepted: 27 October 2018 | Published: 30 October 2018
Keywords: Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Platelet Rich Plasma; Medial Collateral Ligament; Soft-tissue
Background: Cell-based therapy for soft tissue injuries remains controversial. Adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are therapeutic candidates given their capacity for self-renewal, immunoprivilege, and differentiation capacity for chondrocyte and tenocyte lineages. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been reported to promote collagen synthesis and cell proliferation, influencing the healing of ligaments and cartilage. We hypothesize that allogeneic MSCs and PRP have additive effects on promoting ligament healing in an in-vivo rat medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury model.
Methods: MCLs of 20 females Sprague rats were bilaterally transected and treated with either saline (controls) or 1 of 3 treatment groups; (1) allogeneic MSCs (105 cells), (2) PRP and (3) allogeneic MSCs & PRP. In addition, five rats were used for the Sham group (surgery + no ligament injury). Rats were sacrificed two weeks post-surgery and the MCLs harvested for histological analysis by hematoxylin and eosin and alcian blue staining. Statistical analysis was performed using Fischer’s exact test with pair-wise comparisons and Bonferroni multiple comparison correction.
Results: Histologically, differences across all injured groups (treatment groups and controls) were observed in cellularity (p < 0.0185), regeneration of collagen fibers (p < 0.0084), vascularity (p = 0.0129), inflammation (p = 0.0121) and glycosaminoglycan content (p = 0.0085). From pair-wise comparisons, only the combination allogeneic MSCs & PRP group differed significantly from controls in increased cellularity (p = 9.04 x 10-4) and regeneration of collagen fibers (p = 6.58x10-4). In addition, the PRP group showed significant increase in glycosaminoglycan (p = 0.006) content when compared to the allogeneic MSCs group.
Conclusion: The addition of allogeneic MSCs and PRP to an injured MCL show a significant histological increase in degree of cellularity, vascularity and the regeneration of collagen fibers when compared to controls. These data support a possible additive effect of combining allogeneic MSCs and PRP therapy to increase important repair factors during the proliferation/repair phase of post ligament injury. This preliminary study demonstrates that additional functional and biomechanical studies are warranted to determine the role that inflammatory responses versus tissue regeneration are contributing to this mechanism.
Abbreviations
MSCs: Mesenchymal Stem Cells; PRP: Platelet Rich Plasma; MCL: Medial Collateral Ligament; BM: Bone Marrow; SYN: Synovial Membrane; GFP: Green Fluorescent Protein; MEM: Minimum Essential Medium; PBS: Phosphate Buffered Saline; ACP: Autologous Conditioned Plasma system; H&E: Hematoxylin and Eosin; GAG: Glycosaminoglycan; ECM: Extracellular Matrix; SAS: Statistical Analysis Software; TGF-β: Transforming Growth Factor beta; VEGF: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.
In recent years, regenerative cell therapy for soft tissue injuries such as ligaments has generated wide-spread interest in the field of orthopedics. Soft tissue injuries are often problematic because of the limited ability of the tissue to self-repair. These injuries commonly result in the formation of inferior scar tissue and can cause a decrease in both function and performance of the affected area [1]. Regenerative cell based therapy aims to promote healthy tissue repair by providing the necessary elements, i.e. cells, growth factors and environment [1].
Adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have received considerable attention in soft tissue repair because of their high capacity for self-renewal and multipotency to differentiate into chondrocytes and tenocytes [2-8]. Also, MSCs migrate chemotactically to injured tissue and secrete cytokines with anti-inflammatory effects [6,7]. Adult MSCs can be isolated from several tissues including bone marrow (BM), synovial membrane (SYN), adipose and periosteum [2]. Of those BM and SYN MSCs have shown the greatest potential to repair soft tissue defects [5]. In a previous study investigating the tissue regenerative capabilities of MSCs, Wantanabe et al. injected MSCs into transected rat MCLs and detected donor cells with spindle shape nuclei comparable to native fibroblasts [8]. In a similar study, Nishimori et al. found increase regeneration of collagen fibers when compared to controls in injured rat MCLs treated with MSCs [9].
Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is platelet enriched blood plasma that contains several growth factors and cytokines with the potential to promote collagen synthesis and cell proliferation, thereby enhancing tissue repair [10-15]. Numerous studies have examined the potential healing effects of PRP therapy on soft tissue injury [16-18]. Although animal studies evaluating PRP therapy for cartilage and ligament injuries have shown promising effects, large scale controlled human clinical trials have yet to produce consistent results making the efficacy of PRP treatment for these injuries still up for debate [12,15].
The MCL is the most commonly injured knee ligament [19]. Its native healing ability often permits nonsurgical treatment, however, the repair process can take several years, and the healed ligament may never fully recover to its original mechanical function [20,21]. Despite this most patients achieve excellent results in terms of returning to play and normal ligament function with non-surgical management. The MCL’s healing properties suggest a potential role for cell-based/blood therapies to improve the ligament’s repair. Thus we are able to affectively investigate the MCL’s healing process following application of one of the above-mentioned regenerative therapies. Whether MSCs and PRP have an additive effect on soft-tissue repair when applied together is not known. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the histological effects of MSCs, PRP and their combined treatment application to ligament repair using a well-established rat MCL model [8,9,20,22,23]. We will examine whether there is histological evidence of an increased healing response when combining allogeneic MSCs and PRP therapy for soft tissue injuries. We hypothesize that combining MSCs and PRP treatment will have an additive effect towards ligament healing.
Isolations of MSCs
Bone marrow was obtained from the femurs and tibias of one adult green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic Sprague-Dawley male rat. Briefly, after flushing femur and tibia cells were plated in culture dishes containing Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) alpha supplemented with L-glutamine, ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), 20
No complications were observed following surgery or throughout the observation period. Post-surgery, rats did not exhibit any signs of ligamentous injury such as a limp or altered gait. Data demographics are shown in table 4. H&E slides were analyzed for degree of cellularity, change in collagen, vascularity, and inflammation. Sham group received grades of 0 for all variables indicating normal ligament tissue.
Spearman correlation coefficients for the measured variables revealed that increase cellularity and regeneration of collagen fibers were highly correlated (r = 0.996). The remaining variables demonstrated either mild ) or moderate) correlation to each other (Table 5).
Treatment groups (MSCs, PRP, MSCs & PRP) and controls demonstrated histological differences in early ligament healing across all graded variables relative to a healthy medial collateral ligament. () Fisher’s exact test indicated significant histological differences during the proliferative/repair phase of ligament healing among injury groups (Controls, MSCs, MSCs & PRP, PRP) in degree of cellularity, regeneration of collagen fibers, degree of vascularity and inflammation (; across all groups). Pairwise comparisons revealed the allogeneic MSCs group differed nominally from controls in inflammation and degree of vascularity. For the PRP group, nominal significance when compared to controls was observed in degree of cellularity, regeneration of collagen fibers, inflammation, and vascularity. The combination allogeneic MSCs & PRP group demonstrated nominal histological significant differences in both inflammation and vascularity when compared to controls (See Table 2). Following correction for multiple comparisons, only the combined MSCs & PRP group reached significance histologically for degree of cellularity (p = 9.04 x10-4) and regeneration of collagen fibers (p = 6.58x10-4) when compared to controls during the proliferative/repair phase of ligament healing (Table 2). Treatment groups did not differ significantly from each other for any of the above variables (Table 3). The area of tissue involved in the healing process was significantly different among injured groups (p = 0.0021) with PRP and combination allogeneic MSCs & PRP having a significantly greater area of tissue involved then controls (p < 0>).
Alcian blue staining was used to determine histological changes in the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of the extracellular matrix (ECM) (Figure 1). All treatment groups and controls demonstrated on average an increase in GAG content within the extracellular matrix compared to a healthy MCL (Figure 1). Fischer’s exact test revealed significant differences in GAG content among injured groups (p = 0.0085). In addition the PRP group demonstrated nominal significance in increase glycosaminoglycan content when compared to controls (Table 2). Treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to GAG content except the PRP group, which reached significance in increased GAG content when compared to MSCs alone (p = 0.006) (Table 3).
The purpose of this study was to to evaluate using a rat MCL model the histological effects of three different therapies intended to promote soft tissue healing during the early phases of ligament regeneration. Previous in-vivo studies investigating the healing properties of combining MSCs and PRP therapy have focused mainly on cartilage or bone defects. Our animal study looks at the potential additive effects at the histological level of combining allogeneic BM derived MSCs and PRP therapy for soft tissue healing. This current study examines early phases of ligament healing ≤ 14 ± 2 days), particularly the proliferative or regenerative/repair phase, enabling the examination of the basic histological changes that occur early on in the ligament tissue, thereby providing key insight and focus for future cell based therapy studies. Previous studies have used autogenic MSCs and employed a different type of injury [27]. Instead, in the current study we used an established rat MCL injury model to create a complete disruption of the MCL ligament. These characteristics make the results of this study distinct from previous studies [8,9,20,23].
Although a ruptured MCL has the ability to heal, prior studies have indicated inferior mechanical properties in the healed ligament one year after injury [22,29]. Previously, normal healing of the rat MCL was demonstrated to be an inflammatory driven process that resulted in inferior scar-like tissue [20,30]. The healing process is described to have three overlapping phases; inflammatory (day 0-day 5), proliferative or regenerative/repair phase (day 3-day 21) and remodeling (day 14-21-months) [20,31]. During the initial phases an influx of growth factors, cytokines and blood vessels are observed that help promote the healing process. Additionally, the proliferative phase or regenerative/repair phase demonstrates an influx in glycoproteins, proteoglycans and fibroblasts for collagen formation. These deposited collagen fibers mark the cornerstone of the regenerated tissue, maturing and organizing during the remodeling phase [32]. These attributes make the proliferative/repair phase a key time point to assess the early effects and regenerative properties of the various cell-based treatments. Additionally, the correlation of graded variables within the study emphasizes that although independent, these biological processes work together as part of the larger soft-tissue healing response.
Only the combination allogeneic MSCs & PRP group histologically displayed (p < 0>) an increased degree of cellularity and regeneration of collagen fibers when compared to controls (Cellularity p-value = 9.04x10-4, Collagen p-value = 6.58x10-4) (Table 2). Both MSCs and PRP therapy look to prevent the formation of scar tissue by promoting healthy tissue regeneration through various mechanisms. In addition to MSCs’ differentiation and direct engraftment ability, MSCs also have important paracrine effects. Implanted MSCs have been shown to increase the secretion of a variety of cytokines and growth factors and attract other local and distant cells from the host [33]. These signals stimulate various internal cells, playing important roles in promoting tissue recovery. Although in our study the MSCs were harvested from the bone marrow of an adult male GFP Sprague-Dawley rat we were not able to detect GFP 14 ± 2 days post-injury with immunofluorescent staining. While previous studies have indicated difficulty staining for GFP in transgenic mice [29,34], this suggests the possibility the tissue effects seen in the MSCs groups may be a result of paracrine effects instead of direct differentiation. Indeed, therapeutic benefits in organ damage have been seen with MSCs therapy without any evidence of sustained engraftment [33].
Previously, Martino et al found that injured sheep tendons treated with PRP, autogenic MSCs or both also demonstrated an increase in collagen when compared to controls [27]. These data support a possible additive effect of combining therapies (MSC & PRP) on the early stages of ligament healing.
There are several potential benefits for using allogeneic MSCs versus autogenic MSCs for cell-based therapies. The use of donor cells spares the patients from the risks and discomforts of cell-harvesting procedures from the iliac crest and also allows for collection of MSCs from optimal donors [35]. Recent studies have concluded that the allogeneic MSCs showed no significant alloimmune reactions and found the safety profile to be equivalent between the two groups [36]. Additionally using allogeneic MSCs/PRP has the potential to standardize the quantity and quality of these products, improving outcomes [37]. Furthermore producing these cells can be prepared ahead of time allowing immediate application when needed by patients making the clinical application of MSCs for tissue regeneration in orthopaedic medicine more readily achievable [38].
When treatment groups were compared to each other no individual treatment groups differed significantly (p > 0.008) from another with respect to cellularity, collagen fibers, vascularity or inflammation. Due to the similar processes induced by both therapies, it is possible that a larger sample size is needed to fully observe statically significant differences between treatment groups. One area that did display significant differences among treatment groups was the extent of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content within the extracellular matrix (ECM). The PRP group displayed statistically significant increased GAG content when compared to the MSCs treatment group (p = 0.006). PRP was indicated previously to stimulate matrix biosynthesis in chondrocytes [36-39]. Following injury, GAGs help regulate inflammatory cell function and contribute to fibrogenesis [18,41-44]. Changes in GAG content have also been associated with scar formation and degenerative tissue [45-47]. These data suggest differences in the healing response stimulated by each therapy.
There are several limitations within this animal model. A surgically transected rat MCL is not equivalent to a torn human MCL; however, the biological processes are similar suggesting the results to be applicable for human MCL injury [20]. Although we found no changes in gait after transection of the MCL, the biological changes observed were compatible with significant injury. Previous studies have shown that the remodeling phase of the rat MCL healing process extends months past injury. Our results show potentially positive effects of combining MSCs and PRP during the early stages of ligament healing; however, a larger study with a longer observation period would be helpful to follow the healing process to its completion. This could help determine whether the regenerative tissue is of normal ligament tissue quality or of that of scar tissue. In addition, a study with multiple sacrificial time points would be helpful to determine at what point during the healing process does combining MSCs & PRP therapy demonstrates the most benefits toward soft-tissue healing. Although the focus of this study was to examine changes at the histological level, a study with biomechanical testing at the completion of the healing process would allow one to assess the overall functional behavior of the regenerative ligament tissue.
There are a variety of PRP formulations currently used in both clinical practice and research due in combination to individual variability of platelet concentration as well as different commercially available PRP centrifuge protocols. There is currently no consensus of what the optimal PRP concentration is for tissue regeneration. Both in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated healing benefits using PRP therapy with a variety of platelet concentrations (2x-6x baseline) [37,48]. The PRP protocol used for this study (Arthrex (ACP) Double Syringe centrifuge system™ (Arthex, Inc, Naples, Florida)) employs a plasma-base method to create Autologous Conditioned Plasma (ACP), a PRP formulation with generally 2x-3x baseline platelet concentration [49]. This specific protocol was applied because of the familiarity with it in our clinical practice.
In conclusion, this was a histological study that focused on the effects of different cell-based therapies at a critical time point during the soft-tissue healing process. While preliminary, these data suggest that at the peak of the proliferative/regenerative & repair phase of after ligament injury, combining MSCs and PRP therapy significantly increases cellularity and regeneration of collagen fibers when compared to controls and Sham ligaments. In addition, PRP influences GAG content within the ECM during the post-injury process. We have shown that combining allogeneic MSCs and PRP therapy leads to a significant histological response during the post-injury process. This preliminary study demonstrates that additional functional and biomechanical studies are warranted to determine the extent that inflammatory response versus tissue regeneration is contributing to the findings reported here. Collectively, these data support the potential benefit of cell-based therapies for soft tissue injuries and the translations of these therapies into clinical care.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
