AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Cheryl Ann Alexander, Institute for IT innovation and Smart Health, Mississippi, USA.
Citation: Cheryl A. Alexander, Wang L., (2024), The Development of an Identity and Access Management Plan for a Medical Center, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 16(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/353
Copyright: © 2024, Cheryl Ann Alexander. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 17 November 2023 | Accepted: 22 December 2023 | Published: 02 January 2024
Keywords: identity and access management; authenticator; attacks; mitigation; access review; healthcare; public health
Over the last decade many changes have occurred to Healthcare Information Technology (HIT). IT professionals must find new ways to manage the massive amounts of healthcare data. The correct information to the right patient is the most critical factor in identity and access management. IT professionals can set Authenticator traps for preventing cyberattacks and mitigating cybercrimes. Preventing attacks is an enormous undertaking for IT professionals. Access review determines what IT professionals need to do to prevent cyberattacks in the enterprise. This could include many activities. Labeling and identification are essential to preventing attacks. This paper explores access management and review, authenticator, attacks, mitigation, and access review and implementation in healthcare. All this is essential to a successful endeavor at preventing attacks on healthcare information.
Health Information Technology (HIT) has rapidly developed over the last decade and has contributed to many advances in the confidentiality of patient data and the management of patient health records. Health Information workers are members of the allied health team and have greatly impacted the protection of health data to secure the privacy, confidentiality, and integrity of the patient’s electronic health record (EHR) and electronic medical record (EMR). When the EMR went digital, many new responsibilities fell to the IT professionals. Once digital records accumulated over the last few years, IT professionals began to look for ways to manage the massive amounts of patient data and the means to keep them safe. New laws were passed and blockchain and big data analytics became popular methods of repelling cybercriminals. Advancements in data storage and data analytics enabled IT professionals to utilize advanced algorithms such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (Stanfill & Marc, 2019). The most popular AI algorithms are currently being used in the Picturing and Communications System (PACS) and other radiological applications. However, many factors are driving the use and development of AI in healthcare including financial pressures and keeping up with competitors the most common. The growing elderly population is putting a strain on healthcare as well as simply the huge amounts of healthcare data. Data that requires ever more sophisticated interpretation is continually driving data for the provider. The right information to the right individual is a major concern for the IT professional. The increased use of AI and ever more sophisticated practices of access point care such as practical entry point testing, medical coding appropriately, and the ability for Health Information Management (HIM) to manage Health Information and Management (Stanfill & Marc, 2019).
With the modernization of healthcare imaging data, the amount of data is expanding exponentially. Most HIM and IT professionals are using advanced tools to manage the privacy and confidentiality issues associated with the use of medical imaging tools. Patient imaging data contains sensitive information, and most programs contain large amounts of patient data such as computer imaging technology (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, etc. Transmission of patient imaging data is highly at risk for cybercriminals and interception of the transmission of any imaging data is a security challenge. A catastrophic event can occur when there is an interception of imaging by any malicious actors or there is tampering with the images or privacy disclosures. Effective services, then, can only be provided when medical data is secure (Zhang et al., 2020). The responsibility for medical data security lies with medical personnel. Medical data is susceptible to hackers looking to make money on the information related to the patient (Madhusudhan & Sakthivel, 2021). Patient data is more valuable to hackers than a person’s social security number because third-party businesses can use medical data to deny or modify insurance. For example, with a person’s medical data in possession, an insurance company has access to all of their history. The patient may then be flagged, and their insurance claims or application denied.
With telemedicine becoming widely available in multiple care areas, data security becomes an issue for maintaining confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Some medical images need to be transmitted over an insecure public network so that treating hospitals and medical providers can interact. Maintaining confidentiality then becomes the problem. Studies have been published but are not widely available. There are no systematic literature reviews related to patient data security for telemedicine. Therefore, the available options for data transmission need to be studied (Zhang et al., 2020). Big data analytics can store vast amounts of data and can provide patient data with a secure and private access model. To branch off this cloud networking plays an integral part in saving data. Traditional EMRs pose a real challenge to the access of patient data. Despite the ease of medical records programs, they still present some challenges, both for integrity and confidentiality. Because the EMR contains many sensitive and confidential information about the patient, it is a very likely target of malicious actors (Mani et al., 2021). A centralized database of patient data can expose the data to cyberattacks and malicious actors. However, stakeholders and providers can have further challenges when trying to access patient data and the EMR. Patient data can be permanently lost when it is deleted from the hospital database, thereby making it more difficult for stakeholders and providers to access patient data in the mobile setting. Patients also have limitations when accessing mobile apps that give them a wide variety of their patient data including labs, imaging, provider notes, and scheduling doctors’ appointments (Mani et al., 2021).
Hospitals and other healthcare facilities still maintain stewardship over patient data despite patients having the increased freedom to modify their patient data, view their data, and share their data with other stakeholders and providers. By sharing patient data, the healthcare data management system becomes more secure and effective (Ismail & Materwala, 2020). The qualities of healthcare data have a propitious future for protecting data characteristics such as confidentiality, integrity, and availability. With issues such as integrity taking the spotlight in protecting patient data, the need for solutions is increasing. There is an increasing need for the healthcare industry to work on such critical issues and produce a proposed model for protecting healthcare data. The introduction of smart controls such as cybernetics for the protection of data against cyberattacks should produce a model with strong performance against malicious actors (Ismail & Materwala, 2020).
4. Integrity and Availability
The unprecedented number of cyberattacks has led to a challenging task for protecting health data. Healthcare data has been targeted more often and by cyber-invasions. The management and direction of smart healthcare facilities have become directly dependent upon digital cyberstructure. Hence, there is a need for healthcare workers to define their facilities and the digital interactions that are currently being used from a new perspective. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic defined fault lines across the smart healthcare infrastructure that need to be defined and protected maintaining a new perspective (Alhakami et al., 2020). Healthcare data management must be improved while ensuring trust within the healthcare community. The exponential growth of healthcare data and the overall improved healthy living situations of seniors, the disabled, etc., at home, in residency, and in hospitals, demand a stronger, more propitious healthcare data protection program. Currently, healthcare data is protected in a secure centralized data management plan. However, a decentralized program could provide a more secure and improved plan. Blockchain has been examined by scholars for protecting healthcare data (Naresh et al., 2021).
Nurses, providers, staff, etc. providing patient care and responsible for documenting patient care may be responsible for transporting a tablet or cell phone outside of patient care areas although it has patient data on it. These cell phones and tablets must have cybersecurity protection. The vulnerability of patient data is the highest priority for all staff and providers of patient care. All smart devices have made healthcare data transmissible, portable, and more likely for a cyberattack. Confidentiality is typically a passcode known only to the user or biometrics, barcodes, or other biometric entries to protect healthcare data. Confidentiality is preserving authorized restrictions on information access.
Integrity means guarding against unsuitable information destruction or modification. Availability means guaranteeing reliable and timely access to and utilization of information by authorized users. If data have not been adequately backed up, an integrity problem due to attacks can happen (Warsinske et al., 2019). Other actors who play a role in the security of healthcare data may be external stakeholders or services such as dining servers who provide food for the patient or patient and family. There also may be Durable Medical Equipment suppliers and other suppliers of equipment, medications, or dialysis machines. The security of healthcare data must be vigorous and detailed.
5. Security and Resilience of Systems and Assets
It is vital to improve the resilience of information systems in the Medical Center to ensure the security and resilience of systems and assets. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is performed. Only authorized employees have access to sensitive resources and employees’ online activities are properly monitored and audited. Important assets are tracked, and asset data are captured and reported in time. Annual training regarding identity and access management as well as data security protection is offered to all employees in the Medical Center.
6. People, Devices, and Services in Identity and Access Provisioning
Access control and identity settings should be maintained up to date (Warsinske et al., 2019). It is necessary to update the identity and access status of people who leave the Medical Center or change departments or jobs within the center. An internal employee’s tasks, access, and trustworthiness are evaluated frequently to decide if his/her access matches the tasks. An employee has the minimum access right needed for assigned tasks (Warsinske et al., 2019).
There are many devices (such as computers, laptops, tablets, and biometric devices) in the Medical Center. If an employee does not work in the center anymore, the employee will be asked to return devices that had been issued to him/her for work. Authentication services such as biometric services are constantly advancing. A service or server with a centralized credentials aggregation is a major attacking target (Warsinske et al., 2019). In the Medical Center, only authorized professionals have access to important resources to provide medical services.
External people including providers from other hospitals may be seeking a high level of care for patients. They use a higher level of resources such as trauma care (including access to expert providers) and specialized testing devices and services. They are only authorized a short lime of access depending upon their requirements.
Table 1 lists authenticator threats/attack mitigations (Grassi et al., 2020) in the Medical Center.
| Authenticator Threats/Attacks | Description | Examples | Mitigation Strategies |
| Duplication | Subscribers’ authenticators have been copied with or without their knowledge. | Passwords (stored in an electronic file or written on paper), biometrics (such as fingerprint), and passcodes to rooms (such as medication rooms) with patient data are copied without owners’ knowledge. | Using an authenticator with long-term authentication secrets (difficult to extract and duplicate), and changing passcodes on a staggered timeline (every week, once a month, or every three months). |
Theft | An authenticator is stolen. | A cellphone (with patient data), badge (allowing access to protected health data), or tablet (including medical charting) is stolen. | Using multi-factor authenticators (activated through a biometric or memorized secret) or two-step authenticators. |
| Social engineering | An attacker creates trust with a subscriber by convincing the subscriber to expose the authenticator output/secret. | A password is exposed by a subscriber during a telephone inquiry from an attacker who masquerades as a coworker or the administrator of the system. | Avoid using an authenticator with a risk of social engineering of a third party (e.g., a customer service agent). |
| Phishing | An authenticator output is obtained by fooling a subscriber into believing an attacker is a verifier or reliable party. | An online attacker acts like a verifier, steals a password, and receives entry to patient data. | Using an authenticator that provides verifier impersonation resistance. |
| Online guessing | An attacker connects to a verifier online and tries to guess a valid authenticator output in the context of the verifier. | An online dictionary attacker tries to guess a memorized secret. | Using an authenticator that locks up after a few repeated failures in activation attempts or generates high entropy output. |
| Eavesdropping | An authenticator secret or authenticator output is exposed to an attacker as a subscriber is authenticating. | An attacker listens for codes to enter patient care areas or overhears an authenticator's secret and patient information in the medical ward near the nurses’ station or in a patient’s room. | Avoiding non-trusted wireless networks as unencrypted secondary out-of-band authentication channels; ensuring the security of the endpoint, especially regarding freedom from malware. |
Table 1: Authenticator Threats/Attacks and Mitigations in the Medical Center
8. An Access Review Schedule with Provisioning and De-provisioning, Auditing, and Enforcement.
For user access review, access privileges must be periodically reviewed (once a year in the Medical Center) according to each user. The review process includes all the accounts, databases, computers, applications, data that a user can see or change, and websites controlled by the Medical Center. As for system account access review, the process is fulfilled (once a year) system by system, for every security device and computer on the network, every database, and every technical entity—to see which systems and software can do any of the things such as connection, reading or changing access settings, and performing privileged actions, or acting as a system administrator (Warsinske et al., 2019).
Provisioning is the act by which an identity is made available for use. It is what the Information Security Department of the Medical Center does when creating an account on the center’s computer for an employee. De-provisioning is the act of deactivating an identity and associated access. If a person is not an employee in the Medical Center anymore, his/her account will be deactivated. Additional aspects of de-provisioning include removing the employee from the list of authorized computer users and any role-related access control lists, disabling his/her email, etc. (Warsinske et al., 2019).
It is necessary to perform auditing and enforcement to avoid or reduce mistakes and oversights in identity and access management. Internal auditing is conducted once a year in the Medical Center. The center makes rules as appropriate, provides training, measures performance (auditing is part of this), and then enforces consequences for failure. The failure can be problems in policies or actions of human resources, the poor execution of technical steps by the Information Security Department, oversight by a manager or team member, etc. (Warsinske et al., 2019). Auditing and enforcement work together in the Medical Center.
Medical centers are highly vulnerable to malicious actors. These attacks can disable medical care and resources. The medical center must be protected against these types of attacks. By identifying these malicious acts, IT professionals can intercept the attacks and mitigate damage. Identity and access management is a key issue in mitigating many risks. Access review, auditing, and enforcement are necessary steps to protect security and make the medical center safer.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
