AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Timothy E Paterick, Department of Cardiology, and Bay Care Clinic Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
Citation: Timothy E Paterick (2022) The Bicuspid Aortic Valve – Various Phenotypic Expressions J. Cardiology Research and Reports 4(5); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9759/055
Copyright: © 2022 Timothy E Paterick, this is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 19 April 2022 | Accepted: 26 April 2022 | Published: 31 May 2022
Keywords: bicuspid aortic valve; aortopathy; coarctation; heterogeneity; genotype; phenotype
The phenotypic expressions of the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are unpredictable, and difficult to compartmentalize. In current times the BAV is noted to represent approximately 50% of isolated severe aortic stenosis cases requiring surgery, and has been associated with aortic regurgitation, bacterial endocarditis and aortic dissection. Echocardiography is the diagnostic test to identify BAV. The clinical associations coupled with the high prevalence of BAV have made this an important area of clinical inquiry. We will explore the vast horizons and multifaceted challenges of the bicuspid aortic valve and our current understanding of this complex entity.
The phenotypic expressions of the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are unpredictable, and challenging to compartmentalize. In contemporary times the BAV is noted to represent approximately 50% of isolated severe aortic stenosis cases requiring surgery, and has been associated with aortic regurgitation, bacterial endocarditis and aortic dissection [1, 2]. Echocardiography is the diagnostic test to identify BAV. [3] The clinical associations coupled with the high prevalence of BAV have made this an important area of clinical inquiry.
The heterogeneous clinical presentations, varied valvuloaortopathies with wide-ranging phenotypes and unpredictable outcomes, uncertain natural history, and ambiguity as to whether it is an innocent bystander or a primary disease make the bicuspid valve an enigmatic clinical challenge to even the expert clinician [2]. We will present five cases that attempt to explore the multifaceted faces of the bicuspid aortic valve and our current understanding of this complex entity.
The clinical presentations and effects of BAV are diverse with few clinical or genetic indicators to predict outcomes or associated complications. BAV can be diagnosed at any stage of life from newborn to octogenarian and may be related to inconstant clinical circumstances [4]. The spectrum of identification is vast ranging from a heart murmur in an asymptomatic patient to severe aortic valve disease manifesting as heart failure. Life threatening associations include bacterial endocarditis and thoracic aortic aneurysm dissection [5, 6]. The variable clinical presentations and the various phenotypic expressions make the diagnosis and management of BAV a challenge for physicians.
Bav Is a Valvuloaortopathy with Diverse Phenotypic Expressions and Arbitrary Outcomes
The high incidence and prevalence of BAV requiring surgical intervention and the high incidence of associated thoracic aortic aneurysm formation mandates that it be viewed as a valvuloaortopathy for an orderly relationship among phenotypic disease expressions.
The BAV has various phenotypic expressions (7), which are classified as:
The two cusps of most BAVs exhibit asymmetrical systolic excursion and eccentric systolic flow pattern.
The ascending aorta displays a spectrum of aneurysmal phenotypes, tubular ascending aorta dilatation being the most common (60-70%) and exhibiting the fastest growing rate (.4-.6 mm/year). There is also a sinus of Valsalva dilatation phenotype (approximately 25% of dilated aortas) and it associated with Type 1 BAV and male sex [8,9,19,11]. Aortic phenotypes encountered in BAV include:
The underlying mechanisms responsible for such varied BAV associated valvuloaortic phenotypes remains enigmatic. There is a major knowledge deficit and it remains a mystery as to why a BAV becomes stenotic, another regurgitant, another associated with a TAA, and yet another remains functional. Most perplexing is the lack of insight into why a few BAV patients will incur aortic dissection and that aortic diameters are modestly predictive at best [12].
BAV is associated with congenital and genetic syndromes with cardiovascular manifestations such as ShoNes complex, coarctation, ventricular septal defect, anomalous pulmonary veins, and syndromic conditions such as familial TAA, Loeys- Dietz, Turner’s and aortic dissection due to smooth muscle alpha actin (ACTA2) gene mutation. There has been identification of Notch1 and GATA5 gene in families with BAV [13, 14, 15, 16]. But the genomic causes and their clinical manifestations remain largely unknown. There may be very different genomic substrates that lead to more complex conditions in children and isolated BAV, or BAV associated aortopathy in adults. It is a mystery why some children have severe BAV dysfunction, an adult may have moderate BAV disease and develop aortic dissection, and a 91-year-old is incidentally found to have a BAV that functions essentially normal. It is clear that genetic and environmental factors play a role and that pathogenetic economy is not occurring.
Expert consensus opinion suggests that the following management principles are the best available evidence - based medicine for BAV.
Herein we present six cases of BAV with a succinct history, physical examination, multi-modality imaging and clinical decision making elucidating the points outlined above.
Clinical presentation:
43-year-old male presented for evaluation of fatigue. He denied chest pain, dyspnea, palpitation or syncope. The patient was referred for aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.
Examination:
Blood pressure 130/80 Pulse 80 bpm
Normal JVP, normal carotid upstroke, and normal S1 and S2, 2/6 systolic ejection murmur at the base.
Echocardiography:
Normal LV size and systolic function
Bicuspid aortic valve
Peak AV velocity = 4.6 m/sec
AV mean gradient = 43 mm Hg
LVOT-tvi = 23 cm
Calculated AVA (continuity equation) = 1 cm2
Genetics: Negative for NOTCH1, ACTA2, KCNJ2, and GATTA5
Clinical Decision-making:
The echo revealed a type 2 bicuspid AV (Figure 1) and the ascending aorta revealed a tubular phenotype that measured 38 mm (Figure 2).
Type 2 bicuspid aortic demonstrating the right and left coronary cusps
Ascending aorta measuring 38 mm
Doppler data revealed a peak velocity of 4.6 m/sec (Figure 3). The calculated valve area using the continuity equation was 1 cm2. The planimetry of the AV revealed a normal valve area. (Figure 3) and visualization revealed a normal valve excursion. (Cine 1) The calculated valve area and the visual appearance were discordant.
Continuous wave Doppler from the suprasternal notch across the AV
The visualization of the AV reveals there is no aortic stenosis. So why is the gradient elevated?
Clinical presentation:
47-year-old male presents with exertional dyspnea and fatigue for approximately one year.
Examination:
Blood pressure 140/60 Pulse 75 bpm
Carotid: rapid upstroke with rapid collapse Normal JVP
3/4 blowing holodiastolic diastolic murmur
Brisk femoral pulses with systolic and diastolic sounds
Echocardiography:
Mild LV dilation with preserved LV systolic function Type 2 bicuspid AV with leaflet prolapse and severe eccentric AV regurgitation and enlarged aorta involving the sinus of Valsalva and tubular aorta with effacement of the Sino tubular junction measuring 43 mm.
Cardiac catheterization:
Normal coronary arteries
Genetics: Positive for G4.5 (Tafazzin) Negative for NOTCH1, ACTA2, KCNJ2, and GATTA5
Clinical Decision-making:
47-year-old with type 2 BAV (Figure 4) and dilated ascending aorta involving the sinus of Valsalva and tubular aorta with sinotubular junction effacement and measuring 44 mm.
Planimetry of the AV with AVA ~ 3.4 cm2
(Figure 5) The patient had LVNC with normal systolic function. (Cine 2) The BAV prolapsed (cine 3) and revealed severe eccentric aortic regurgitation.
Phenotype: Type 2 bicuspid AV still frame in systole demonstrating right and non-coronary cusp fusion
(Cine 4,5) The debate was whether to proceed with a Bentall operation or AVR with aortic wrapping. The TEE suggested a maximum aortic dimension of 44 mm. A CT scan was obtained and measured 43 mm as the maximum dimension of the ascending aorta. (Figure 6).
Dilated ascending aorta measuring 44 mm with a phenotype involving the entire ascending aorta: involving the sinus of Valsalva
The guidelines recommend aortic root replacement at 45 mm or greater. These guidelines are non-evidenced based and extrapolated from the Marfan guidelines. In type 1 BAV there is data suggesting it is associated with rapid aortic root dilation. Since the valve was type 2 the debate persisted and it was decided the decision would be made at surgery. (Figure 7) The maximum dimension was 40 mm at surgery and according to guidelines an AVR with aortic root wrap was performed. The guidelines for post -operative imaging of the aortic root were recommended.
Cardiac tomography of the ascending aorta measuring 43 mm
Clinical presentation:
57-year-old female presented with six-month history of dyspnea. She also had a history of vasodepressor syncope, diabetes and pulmonary sarcoidosis. Her father had a bicuspid valve.
Examination:
Blood pressure 150/50 Pulse 76 bpm
Carotid upstroke is bounding with rapid collapse
S1 S2 RRR with water hammer pulses
2/4 diastolic murmur
Echocardiography:
Mildly dilated LV cavity
LVEF = 50%
Elevated LV filling pressure manifest as early closure of the mitral valve
Bicuspid AV with eccentric aortic regurgitation
Genetics: Negative for NOTCH1, ACTA2, KCNJ2, and GATTA5
Cardiac catheterization:
Normal coronary arteries
Aortography: Severe aortic regurgitation
Clinical Decision-making:
57-year-old female with type 2 bicuspid aortic valve (Figure 8) and tubular ascending aorta measuring 45 mm
Intraoperative assessment of the ascending aorta measuring 40 mm
(Figure 9) and prolapsing AV (Cine 6) with eccentric AR. (Cine 7,8) There was a difference of opinion regarding the severity of the AR from echocardiographic imaging.
The clinical examination suggested severe AR and that was confirmed by aortography. (Cine9). The constellation of finding of severe aortic regurgitation and an ascending aorta measuring 45 mm led to a recommendation for a Bentall procedure.
Phenotype: Type 2 bicuspid AV still frame in systole demonstrating right and noncoronary cusp fusion.
Clinical presentation:
62-year-old male presented with increasing fatigue and shortness of breath and a heart murmur. He had a brother with an aortic valve replacement for bicuspid valve.
Examination:
Blood pressure 130/85 Pulse 85 bpm
JVP normal Carotid upstroke normal
S1 S2 RRR with normal pulse
1/4 diastolic murmur with the patient leaning forward from a sitting position
Echocardiogram:
Normal LV size and systolic function
Type 1 bicuspid AV with trivial to mild aortic regurgitation
Dilated sinus of Valsalva measuring 53 m
Genetics:
Negative for NOTCH1, ACTA2, KCNJ2, and GATTA5
Clinical Decision-making:
62-year-old male with type 1 bicuspid aortic valve (Figure 10) and isolated dilation of the sinus of Valsalva measuring 53 mm (Figure 11) and mild aortic regurgitation. (Cine 10,11,12,13). The recommendation was repeat echocardiogram in 6 months because predominant sinus of Valsalva dilatation phenotype is associated with type 1 bicuspid aortic valves and male sex. This root phenotype has been associated with faster tubular ascending root dilation.
Ascending aorta is tubular phenotype with maximum dimension measuring 45 mm
Phenotype: Type 1 bicuspid AV still frame in systole demonstrating right and left cusp fusion
Clinical presentation:
65-year-old male presented for evaluation of recalcitrant hypertension and exertional shortness of breath. His blood pressure was 160 systolic despite treatment with Dilacor XR 240 mg/day, Toprol XL 100 mg/day, Lisinopril 40 mg/day and Hydrodiuril 25 mg/day.
Examination:
Blood pressure 170/88 Pulse 75 bpm
Normal JVP Normal carotid upstroke
S1 S2 S4 2/4 SEM
Pulses revealed brachial femoral delay
Echocardiogram:
Normal LV size and systolic function
Increased LV wall thickness: septum and posterior wall measure 15 mm
Bicuspid aortic valve with mild aortic regurgitation
Dilated sinus of Valsalva and ascending aorta with effacement of the sinotubular junction – maximum dimension of the aorta is 45 mm
The aortic arch is poorly visualized
PW Doppler of the abdominal aorta revealed decreased pulsatile flow and continuous flow in diastole
Cardiac catheterization:
Mild coronary artery disease
Genetics:
Negative for NOTCH1, ACTA2, KCNJ2, and GATTA5
Clinical Decision – making
65-year-old male with type 3 bicuspid aortic valve (Figure 12) and dilated sinus of Valsalva with tubular ascending aorta and effacement of the sinotubular junction (Figure 13).
Ascending aorta phenotype isolated dilation of the Sinus of Valsalva
Phenotype: Type 3 bicuspid AV still frame in systole demonstrating left and noncoronary cusp fusion
He had resistant to medical therapy hypertension propting a concern for a secondary etiology. Transesophageal short axis and long axis imaging revealed mild, eccentric aortic regurgitation. (Cine 14, 15) PW Doppler in the abdominal aorta raised a suspicion of coarctation of the aorta. (Figure 14) MRI imaging revealed a coarctation. (Figure 15)
The recommendation was an evaluation by the interventional and surgical team for repair of the coarctation.
Phenotype of the dilated ascending aorta measuring 45 mm with a phenotype involving the entire ascending aorta: involving the sinus of Valsalva and tubular aort
PW Doppler of PW Doppler of the abdominal aorta limited pulsatile flow a continuous flow in diastole
MRI of the thoracic aorta demonstrating coarctation
The presented case explores the various phenotypic expressions of the bicuspid aortic valve, The cases identify how the clinical presentation, physical examination and multi-modality imaging allow the clinician to make the diagnosis and enlightened clinical decisions regarding surgical treatment.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
