AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Sergio Palandri, Radiographer – Umberto I Hospital Ordine Mauriziano – Turin – Italy.
Citation: Sergio Palandri, (2024), System expanded for postural analysis (s.e.p.a.): a starting point resulting from the evolution of an idea, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 18(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/495
Copyright: © 2024, Sergio Palandri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 22 June 2024 | Accepted: 01 July 2024 | Published: 05 July 2024
Keywords: posture; analysis; photographic
Acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) accounts for only 5-10% of cholecystitis cases, primarily studied in intensive care units (Background/Aim)
Importance and usefulness are characteristics of postural analysis now known and documented in the literature.
The absence of a standard is often a problem and a market offer, although broad and of a high level, is not always able to satisfy the needs of all professionals, also due to the non-negligible costs.
The aim of this article is to describe a new postural analysis system, named System Expanded for Postural Analysis (S.E.P.A.), based on previous experiences and to promote the comparison between professionals which has allowed its realisation.
Materials and Methods
S.E.P.A., analyzing the problems of its previous versions, implements new strategies based on simplicity, essentiality, practicality and completeness.
Added to this is a new possibility of simultaneous acquisition of the feet standing print during video recording of the subject's position, both from the top and from the feet.
Results
Stability and simplicity were immediately found during the preliminary tests carried out on the system both in the hardware and software components, making the operator's work easier.
Conclusions
Although the first findings are encouraging, a direct and intense use of S.E.P.A. is mandatory and essential to consolidate its characteristics and, nevertheless, the contribution of other professionals who want to use it, to be able to suggest new improving aspects.
Postural analysis has now produced many evidences in support of its ability to highlight disharmonies, starting from the observation of signs and symptoms that are often poorly or not at all correlated with each other. This shows a preventive character of significant interest, as can be easily inferred from the articles of several authors [1-8] present in the literature.
Searching in literature seem to be equally evident the absence of a univocal standard for postural analysis, whether it is a first analysis or a follow-up one, documented by the lacjk of specific article about this issue.
These two different and complementary areas have specific goals and, accordingly, specific needs. The first is aimed to evaluate the subject in her/his entirety and complexity to document any disharmonies present or hidden and therefore it needs a broad spectrum of investigation to ensure detailed research in all the main systems that intervene in the posture management along with a time limited duration to avoid interference on the subject undder analysis. The second is indtead aimed to monitor the effects of an ongoing or ended therapeutic treatment and therefore needs high repeatability measurements to compare with certainty resultsd of different analyzes performed at different time on the same subject.
Although the market currently provides increasingly sophisticated and precise systems with multiple potentials, they are sometimes impractical as they are complex, or inflexible, or very specific for some analysis, but not for all, thus forcing the professional to purchase different ones to integrate them or do without some data which could be useful in contextualising the case, even if not immediately connected. Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that these systems often have a very high cost.
In 2021 an article published presented a system that tried to respond to these various needs [9] and at the same time wanted to raise awareness among professionals with the aim of improving the system itself. Being essentially a prototype, the proposed system soon highlighted its various problems and limits, which were also directly detected by the author himself who proposed an upgrade in 2023 [10]. The system was designed to be portable, able to be disassembled and reassembled \wherever the professional needs, so despite the upgrade, several minor and substantial problems prevented adequate use.
A deep redesign of the system was clearly necessary and thanks to the collaboration with a physiotherapist, it has been possible. The new system developed draws its origins from the two previous ones, but which broadens their possibilities and aims to solve the problems they highlight. It has been named System Expanded for Postural Analysis (S.E.P.A.).
The aim of this article is to describe S.E.P.A. both in the parts inherited from the previous release and in the new features and opportunities implemented with this evolution.
Also, the continuing stimulation of comparison with other professionals in order to further improving remains a fundamentl aim of this work, underlining how it is precisely thanks to discussion that this release has been born.
Conceptually S.E.P.A. appears as in the outline shown in Fig.1 in a front view
Figure 1: S.EP.A. outline in front view (A) in top view (B) and in lateral view (C)
(A), in a top view (B) and in a side view (C), that physically correspond as in Figure.2 in the same views. In particular Figure. 2 shows a detail of the new upgraded platform that supports the entire frame, providing at the same time, best stability, restrained size and best adptability to each floor.
Figure 2: S.E.P.A. Show in front with details (A) in top view (B) and in lateral view (C)
Comparing Figure.1 and Figure.2 is possible to identify the composition of the system and specifically the webcams for the top view (WH), for the feet view (WF), for the central view (WM) and the reference laser levels from top (LH), for the upper part of the subject (L1, L2) and for the subject's pelvis (L3, L4).
In technical detail WH and WF are two Logitech C270 HD 720p webcams, while WM is a Logitech Brio UHD 4K. LH is a red laser level
Stanley, L1 and L2 are green laser levels Nikotek while L3 and L4 are red laser lavels Blinky with the option to activate independently the horizontal and vertical trace. All laser lavels have duoble trace horizontal and vertical and are self-levelling.
The main structure described above is completed by two mats visible in Figure.3
Figure 3: mats and specific positions
where are shown in particular the specific positions reported for the base of the structure support (1), for the feet standing print acquisition scanner platform (2), for the subject under examination (3a,3b) and for the execution of the Fukuha test (4). In technical detail the scanner is a Canon Canoscan Lide 300. It should be underlined that both LH and the lights present in the acquisition scanner platform are remote controlled by the operator, autonomously and conveniently. The system brain is a miniPC provided with an Intel Core i3 4130T CPU @ 2.90 GHz, 8GB of RAM, 250GB of HDD SSD and a Windowa 10 embedded OS on which run the programs to manage WM (Logitech CAPTURE), WH and WF simultaneously (OBS Studio)), the scanner (NAPS2), the spreadsheet for reporting the acquired data (Libreoffice 6.4.7.2) and the post-processing graphic editor (GIMP for Windows). All peripheral devices are connected to the mini-PC via USB 3.0 with a 4-port hub.
Figure 4: total view of S.E.P.A
Figure.4 shows a complete view of S.E.P.A. in all its components. Note that S.E.P.A. has been designed to be easily transportable as shown in
Figure 5: S.E.P.A. disassembled and packaged
Figure.5 in which S.E.P.A. is disassembled and packaged. To support professional in his worrk, S.E.P.A. is also provided with a protocl to collect acquired data and professional observations. It is made up of a Libreoffice Calc file, equipped with two sheets: one to include data/observations and one with all the references necessary for their interpretation, such as e.g., the position of the markers used by the professional differentiated by gender or e.g., the convention used in the Fukuda test. An ezample of the sheets is showen in Fig.6 (data/observcation) and Figure.7 (references).
Figure 6: Data and observation sheet
Figure 7: References sheet
Note that both sheets are printable and customizable with the professional references to create the final report of the analysis and. Also note, in particular, that the sheet to include the acquired data and the operator's observations has been designed to dynamically adapt to the operator's needs in the current analysis and divided in four dedicated sections integrated each other that reflect four distinct aspects of the analysis. Now these sections will be described individually in detail.
Medical History Data [11]
To frame in a suitable way the values and results that are obtained from the postural analysis, it is fundamental that current data and medical histories be collected for each subject. The list of items considered essential is shown in Table 1
| MEDICAL HiSTORY DATA |
| Age [aa] |
| Weight [Kg] |
| Height [m] |
| BMI |
| Childbirth type |
| Four-footed infant walking |
| Visual problems |
| Vestibular problems |
| Dental problems |
| Spine problems |
| Feet problems |
| Scars description |
| Physical activity |
| Particular notes |
It is important to highlight that postural analysis is not exclusively performed by physicians as well as is used to aid physicians in decision-making processes; thus, the collection of medical history data should not be considered as an attempt to search for a disease or its diagnosis or to develop a rehabilitation plan. Indeed, the purpose is to acknowledge existing behaviours and conditions that could influence the subject posture.
None of the items listed in Table 1 need explanations since they are inherently clear and easy to understand. However, relating to "scars description", it is believed that some clarification may be useful: as reported by Caiazzo in 2007 [11], “every scar is potentially a source of disturbance", it is always very important to consider not only the exterior aspect of the scar, but also the inside activity using the Vascular Automatic Signal (VAS) test, also known as Réflexe Arteriel de Nogier (RAN). Further, it should be understood that the same test can also be used to investigate parts of the same scar to understand whether the produced activity is linked to specific segments thereof.
Photographic References [11-18]
Experience and observation free of prejudice and judgment are essential and fundamental tools in postural analysis and a specific contribution of the operator.
Sometimes the needs of this statement may crash with the previously described goal of making the analysis as limited in time as possible.
In this light, a set of photographic references enables precise postprocessing without the need for the subject to be present. This requires the possibility of carrying out real measurements from the aquired images. So, it is necessary to have a calibration system that easily allows the pixels measured on the acquired image to be converted into the corresponding millimeters on the subject.
This has been achieved by applying a rectangular label of known size (we use labels with the long side equal to 75mm) positioned on the thigh in the planes of the four main views (AP, PA, LL SN, LL DX). This choice allows to have the label always as flat and orthogonal to the floor as possible to obtain the best precision in measurement. A note remembering the label type used is included in the report form as in Table 2.
| PHOTOGRAPHIC REFERENCES |
| Calibration [mm] |
In the same light is the objectification of the pelvis rotations (described later). To let it in a off-libe mode, is firstt necessary to highlight Postero Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS) and Antero Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) to make them easily visible in post-processing image.
This has been obteined using a bright colored eyeliner that ensure a better precision then an adhesive marker.
Note that other markers can be positioned on particular points of the subject's body for particular needs identified by the professional. In this case round-shaped adhesive markers with a diameter of around 15mm can be validly used.
Once this preliminary phase of preparing the subject has been completed, it is now possible to carry out the planned photographic surveys.
A first set of images that will be acquired consists of the four main views of the subject in its entirety: AP, PA, LL SN, LL DX.
It is highlighted that in the AP view, only L3 or L4 is on with its horizontal trace centered on the interASIS line to create a fixed reference for future analyses. Vertical trace is off to further safety for patient, as well as L1 and L2.
In the PA views the L3 or L4 horizontal trace is still centered on the interASIS line and is off as well as its vertical one, while the other is on with its horizontal trace centered on the interPSIS line and its vertical one according to Barrè vertical. L1 and L2 are on with the horizontal trace positioned on the intermeatal line, on the line joining the lower edges of the scapulae, or where professional considers relevant, while their respective verticals are generally out of the FOV or on particular vertical axes deemed of interest by the professional as before.
In LL view only L3 or L4 vertical trace is on according to the Barrè vertical. May be the horizontal trace corresponding can be on. L1 and L2 are off or can be used for particular references the operator deems necessary.
Figure 8: Sights example in AP view (A) LLDX view (B) PA view (C) PA view with intermeatal line and under scapular line (D) LLSN view (E)
An example is shown in Figure.8, regarding to which, an important clarification must be made: we are well aware of the limits that the use of a mannequin introduces, but it is also, at the same time, the simplest and most effective way to immediately give the idea of how the subject relates to the system of postural analysis and how this in turn relate to the subject. The same observation is also valid for the other figure where the mannequin has been employed. Note that to acquire these images the subject must remain in position 3b of the mat.
A second set of images, again with the subject in the same position 3b, will be added to the previous one in order to objectify he rotation of the pelvis on the coronal and sagittal plane.
To obtain a picture enabling quantification of the pelvis rotation in the coronal plane, it is necessary to use L3 and L 4 (L1 and L2 are off), one with its horizontal tarce centred on the right ASIS, the other with its horizontal trace centred on the left ASIS (vertical traces are off) and then take a picture of both traces with the patient in orthostasis in the AP view.
The measurement of the rotation is therefore given by the vertical distance between the two traces.
To obtain a picture enabling quantification of the pelvis rotation in the sagittal plane, it is necessary to use again L3 and L4 (L1 and L2 are still off), one with its horizontal trace centred on the right ASIS (in the AP view), the other with its horizontal trace centered on the right PSIS (in the PA view) and then take a picture of both traces (vertical traces are still off) with the patient in orthostasis in the right lateral view.
In this picture, the trace centred on ASIS crosses the anterior body profile at a specific point (A). Analogously, the trace centred on PSIS crosses the posterior body profile at a specific point (P). The measurement of the rotation is therefore given by the angle between the horizontal line and the line joining A and P. The procedure is repeated in the same manner on the left side. The results will be compared according with Guigui et al. finding [18].
Figure 9: pelvis rotation assessment in AP and LL view
Figure.9 shows an example.
The third set of images to be acquired needs the subject in 3a position of the mat. From this position, with the aid of the zoom software made available by the WM management program it will be possible to acquire in AP the mutual position of the dental arches, the maximum buccal
opening, the subject's ability to bring tongue to the palatine spot and, in LL, a video of at least 2-4 consecutive swallowing acts, to detect possible atypical swallowing. The video may include interposition of a rest break for the subject if necessary for her/him.
An example of the result of this type of acquisition is shown in.10.
Figure 10: Images acquired with VM relative to the dental arches (top) mouth opening (bottom left) tongue mobility (bottom right) swallowing position (lateral right)
The fourth and final set of acquired images sees the subject positioned on the acquisition scanner platform, with her/his back facing the system support frame.
In these conditions the feet standing print will be acquired while WH and WF will record simultaneously a video with the subject's movements during the scans. The acquisitions of the feet standing print will be performed with eyes open and teeth open (OEOT), eyes closed and teeth open (CEOT), eyes open and teeth closed (OECT), eyes closed and teeth closed (CECT).
Figure 11: breech support acquisition with top and feet video recording
Figure. 11 shows an overview example.
Two important features have to be noted about the feet standing print acquisition scanner platform: first, the housings for the LED bars that provide the necessary light are directly placed inside the surface on which the subject will place his feet, thus simulating a conventional podoscope
in all respects and, second, the same surface has been designed to be in direct contact with the scanner acquisition surface for a better acquisition condition.
These features are shown in Figure.12.
Figure 12: breech support acquisition particular features and result
Overall Observation [11,19-20]
| OVERALL OBSERVATION |
| TMJ |
| occlusion/tongue/swallowing |
| dominance |
| CPP |
| Cover Test |
| head rotation (AX-COR-SAG) |
| scapulo-humeral girdle rotation (AX–COR) |
| pelvic rotation (AX – COR – SAG) |
| Barré's vertical |
| femuro-tibial joint |
| feet standing print |
Table 3 shows the list of the item considered for the analysis to describe how the subject holds herself/himself in the space in a general manner. The first column on the left shows the specific item on each row while the second column on the right will contain the operator's findings and related comments for each individual item.
The organization of the analysis follows a directional logic in a cranial-caudal sense, starting from the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and ending with the feet standing print as documented above by the photographic references.
The overall observation is not meant to be an exhaustive evaluation, but rather to be an examination of a wide spectrum of possible receptor influences on posture within a limited amount of time. The aim of this set of items is to acknowledge the possibility that each receptor system influencing posture could be a source of postural disturbance, with the minimum interference on the observed system. Thus, if some findings are suggestive of disharmonies, it is possible to consider a specialist consultation like ophthalmologist, odontostomatologist, otolaryngologist, orthopaedic, physiatrist, podiatrist or others for a more detailed evaluation based on what was objectively found.
Note that to aid overall observatin performing, a dedicated tools kit has been especially made and it is visible in 13.
.
Figure 13: tools kit for overall observation
Also note that the sheet has been designed to be customized by the professional adding or removing item from the list, according to the particular needs of the current analysis.
TEST [11]
| TEST |
| postural cone |
| Autet |
| Bassani |
| De Cyon |
| Fukuda |
| visceral |
| forward bending |
| taperulè |
Table 4 shows the list of selected tests. The first column on the left shows the specific item on each row, while the second column on the right will contain the operator's findings and related comments for each individual item.
The first five tests must be performed initially and their main purpose is to identify the presence of a possible disharmonic syndrome according to Caiazzo 2007 [11].
It should be observed that it is not the result of a single test that indicates the presence of disharmony, but congruent results from multiple tests to indicate its probable presence, as is common in posturology.
All tests are widely described in the literature and do not need further explanation. However, for the “visceral” test, additional details can be
useful: this test examines the possible influences of the visceral apparatus on postural disturbance and after it is performed the previously described items must be re-evaluated if abnormal results have been found.
The two final tests aim to analyse the spine mobility, in particular the possibility of shifts in the coronal plane and the mobility of the layers of torso-lumbar region musculatur
The first experimental tests of S.E.P.A. immediately highlighted overall its greater simplicity and practicality of use, both for the hardware and software parts.
The system is now more stable from a mechanical point of view and the webcam and laser levels are consequently more stable, thus allowing greater precision in positioning and also greater speed in their management.
Even the assembly of the system is simple and easy, thanks also to the positions traced on the mats. Please note in this context that all the characteristics of the system in its "in door" configuration are maintained and usable as well in the "outdoor" configuration.
On the other side, the greater stability of the system is paid with an increase in its weight which is particularly felt “outdoor" use, as expected.
Undoubtedly a particular upgrade of this new version is provided by the possibility of simultaneous acquisition from WH and WF during the scanning of the feet standing printt.
The increase in the structure weight is a non-negligible problem still to be solved without reduce the achieved great stability, although the benefits obtained in this sense right now attenuate its severity.
The preliminary test of S.E.P.A. are encouraging, but it is clear that a intense use in daily practice is to be considered the real test to measure its true potential and highlight its problems and now this represent its fisrt big limit.
In this light, specific requests and observations from other professionals are essential,
The proposed postural analysis system represents a good balance of various and often opposing needs being simple, reasonably complete, flexible and capable of providing comparable analysis over time.
Further confirmations will be derived from systematic use of this system over time, which will be necessary for its improvement and overcoming its current limits.
AP: antero-posterior
ASIS: anterior-superior iliac spine
DX: right
FOV: field of view
LL: latero-lateral
SN: left
PA: postero-anterior
PSIS: posterior superior iliac spine
A heartfelt thanks to Dr. Daniela Fandavelli for her indispensable professional contribution to the enhancement that led to the S.E.P.A. as well as her precious friendship.
The author declares to have no conflict of interested.
All figures were created personally by the author and whereas been necessary they represent himself.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
