AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Akshay Mehta, Department of Paediatric Cardiology Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Citation: A Mehta, B Malik, Z Smith. (2021) Synopsis on Non-invasive Ventilation in Neonatology. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 7(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/128
Copyright: © 2021 Akshay Mehta, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 March 2021 | Accepted: 28 June 2021 | Published: 02 July 2021
Keywords: heated humidified high flow nasal cannula; nasal continuous positive airway pressure; nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; noninvasive ventilation; preterm infants
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a mode of respiratory support commonly used on the neonatal unit. Since the advent of NIV, it has evolved from being used as a mode of respiratory support to wean infants from mechanical ventilation (MV) to a primary mode of respiratory support. NIV improve the functional residual capacity in the newborn (at term or preterm) avoiding invasive actions such as tracheal intubation. Newer methods of NIV support such as nasal bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HHFNC) have emerged in attempts to reduce intubation rates and subsequent MV in preterm infants. With this synopsis, we aim to discuss various available NIV modes of ventilation in Neonatology, including indications, physiological principle, practical aspects and effects on important short and long-term morbidities associated with the use of NIV.
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) has been the primary treatment in Respiratory distress Syndrome (RDS) for Very low birth weight babies (VLBW). Although lifesaving, IMV is an important risk factor in developing Broncho pulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and its related complications [1].
Affected infants require comprehensive medical followup and treatment after hospital discharge with frequent hospital readmissions, home based oxygen therapy, treatment for pulmonary hypertension, these factors thus significantly affect quality of life of affected infants [2].
Despite advances in neonatal medicine, such as improved antenatal care, antenatal corticosteroids and surfactant administration; there hasn’t been significant fall in incidence of BPD in last decade [3].
IMV causes volutrauma, barotrauma, inflammatory mediated alveolar and vascular destruction resulting in progressive impaired gas exchange. To alleviate the harmful effects of IMV on the premature lungs, nasal CPAP was introduced as a non-invasive ventilation strategy. CPAP was first used clinically in 1971, CPAP significantly reduced the need for IMV, but failure rates of almost 50% have prompted for seeking more effective NIV modalities [4, 5].
There are various non-invasive ways in which respiratory support can be provided to neonates with parenchymal lung disease or apnoea viz heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC), Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV).
Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC)
HHHFNC is commonly used in most NICUs throughout the world. It is a flow based non-invasive respiratory support which delivers heated and humidi- fied gas.
Oxygen delivered by “low flow” nasal cannula (LFNC) typically refers to the use of flow rates of less than or equal to 1-2 L/minute. Usually the gas used is unblended (i.e.100% oxygen), unheated and non-humidified. LFNC is used commonly in growing convalescent preterm infants (often with chron- ic lung disease). In contrast, “high flow” nasal cannula (HFNC) has been used to refer to the administration of oxygen or blended oxygen/air to new born infants via nasal cannula at higher flow rates than LFNC. The use of devices providing use of humidified high flow by nasal cannula (HFNC) to these babies has increased dramatically over last few years due to relative simplicity of its use and user friendly nature [6]. Most commonly it is used for babies recovering from RDS on low pressure nCPAP and FiO2 and who would traditionally undergo a period of cycling nCPAP regimen before discontinuing respiratory support. Anecdotally, HFNC allows infant to be handled less, makes easier to receive kangaroo care and breast feeding than nCPAP. The clinical role of HFNC is still evolving and further controlled clinical trials are needed to identify which infants benefit most from HFNC. Despite its popularity, the use of HFNC should not be extended as a routine replacement for nCPAP until further large randomised controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety are published and the unit gains enough ex- perience using it on stable babies [7].
Physiological Principles of HFNC (8)
1. Washout of Naso-pharangeal dead space
2. Reduces respiratory resistance and hence decreases work of breathing
3. Provides continuous distending pressure; pharyngeal pressure provided is directly related to flow but inversely related to infant size.
4. Respiratory gas conditioning; improves lung and airway mechanics by eliminating the effect of drying/cooling.
Differences from nCPAP
HFNC should not be regarded as a form of nCPAP. Rather, it is a distinct respiratory support modality that should be assessed on its own merits in the same way as for other modalities of ventilation.
nCPAP has been shown to reduce extubation failure, treat apnoea and respiratory distress syndrome, and may reduce chronic lung disease by minimising duration of mechanical ventilation. Oxygen administered by nCPAP is usually blended, humidified and heated. Contrary to HFNC, the pressure delivered by the circuit for nCPAP is measured and regulated directly. The use of binasal prongs to deliver nCPAP can be associated with trauma to the nasal septum and distortion of the nares. Difficulties with successful application of nCPAP are principally related to the bulky interface with the patient leading to problems maintaining proper position and effectiveness. It also is less patient friendly making handling and feeding more difficult while on nCPAP [9].
In contrast, HFNC provides blended, heated, humidified oxygen at flow rates higher than the patient’s inspiratory flow rate thereby reducing work of breathing and ensuring that intended oxygen concentration is delivered. If prongs are selected properly, HFNC is an open system potentially reduc- ing the risk of baro/volutrauma and reducing nasal mucosal damage. It cre- ates a flow related variable distending pressure delivered to the neonates upper airway and lungs that unlike CPAP is unmeasurable in clinical practice. Adult studies suggest it provides low PEEP, improves mucosal perfusion and stimulates respiratory drive. The interface is less bulky, allowing easy access for parents and nurses for handling and feeding purposes. [10, 11]
Possible Risks
Concerns that have been expressed include increased risk of infection (Vapotherm only), excessive airway pressure generation (avoid a tight fit nasal prong) and local trauma (avoid a tight fit nasal prong)
Indications for use
No formal recommendations are available for specific clinical indications published. Collectively published studies suggest a wide potential role for HFNC in respiratory care of the neonate.
Consider HFNC on:
• Stable babies recovering from RDS or with chronic lung disease
• FiO2 ≤ 30%
• Ready to be cycled off on nCPAP at a pressure of 5cm H20 or lower.
• No significant apnoea, desaturations or bradycardia requiring frequent stimulation. These set of babies are likely to benefit from HFNC as weaning will be more physiological, and user friendly.
Relative Contraindications:
• Should not be used on babies where a suitable loose fit nasal cannula is not available (extremely small nares). Avoid tight fit nasal cannula at all cost
• Use judgment for babies with significant CLD. This may take some experience
• Not to be considered for babies who can be taken off nCPAP to air directly i.e. stable term/ near term babies.
Nasal CPAP- Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
CPAP aims to prevent alveolar collapse at end expiration. It is used for infants with moderate respiratory distress and for recurrent apnoeas. It is also used for weaning from mechanical ventilation. Use of early CPAP has significantly reduced the need for invasive ventilation and surfactant administration in preterms [12, 13].
Physiological principle:
1. Provides continuous distending pressure to maintain functional residual capacity (FRC) –reduction of airway collapse by decreased airway resistance and reduces work of breathing
2. Splints the pharyngeal airway to avoid obstruction
3. Keeps the surfactant on alveolar surface and thus promotes reduction of alveolar edema
4. Improves the ventilation-perfusion ratio and decreases intrapulmonary shunting
Indications for CPAP include (14):
• Babies weighing less than 1000 grams with respiratory distress and a good respiratory drive.
• Clinically increasing respiratory distress in any gestation (check to rule out pneumothorax)
• Post-extubation in VLBW babies.
Use CPAP with caution in:
• Meconium aspiration syndrome, for the risk of pneumothorax in a vigorous baby
• Gastrointestinal malformations for e.g. Tracheo-oesophageal fistula; for the risk of abdominal distension causing splinting of the chest leading to a further compromise of ventilation. In this situation insert an NG tube and aspirate the stomach periodically.
Practical considerations:
• The most appropriate size of hat and nasal prongs / mask should be selected.
• The fit of these should be “snug” but never tight. The fixing ties should never be over tightened in order to maintain a seal as this may cause damage to the face.
• Humidity must be used when delivering CPAP; humidified oxygen
must be delivered at a temperature of 37 C at the baby’s nose.
• Babies with respiratory distress and who weigh less than 1000grams, requiring non-invasive respiratory support should be nursed on nC- PAP.
• Normal CPAP pressures are 5 to 6 cm of water. The use of higher levels of CPAP for individual babies must be agreed by the multi -disciplinary team (MDT) and this decision documented in the notes. As the condition of the baby improves the pressures can be carefully weaned to 4cm water.
• Some babies become agitated on CPAP. Appropriate “nesting” and removal of noxious stimuli such as light and noise can alleviate this. Occasionally sedation such as Chloral Hydrate may need to be considered if these strategies are not working.
For babies extubated onto CPAP not being able to maintain an adequate respiratory effort, reintubation will be required. Signs that aid in the assessment for the need to be reintubated are:
• Significantly increased frequency and severity of apnoeas and brady-cardias
• Increasing oxygen requirements over 60% in term babies and over 40% in preterm babies
• Increased work of breathing
• Poor gases
Complications of CPAP (15):
• Gaseous distension of the stomach +/- feeding difficulties
• Nasal trauma from the pressure of the prongs / mask
• Pneumothorax
Weaning from CPAP:
• Once respiratory distress is settling, weaning from CPAP may be commenced.
• Gradually try to wean the oxygen to air and the PEEP to 5 cm water.
• When the PEEP is 5 cm water and the oxygen requirement is ≤30% consider switching over to High flow nasal cannula Oxygen (HFNC) and monitor work of breathing. See HFNC guideline.
• Babies weighing less than 1000 grams, who are being nursed on nC- PAP, should not be weaned from CPAP until the MDT decide that the baby has a consistently strong respiratory drive.
• If the baby has to work excessively to maintain respiratory status then CPAP should be reinstated. Signs of increase in work of breathing include:
Tachypnoea consistently >60 /min
Tachycardia - >160beats / min
Increasing sub and intercostal recessions
Increase in oxygen by more than 10-20%
Increase in the number of desaturations/bradycardias
Removal from CPAP without Weaning:
Term/Near term babies may require CPAP for only a short time and may not need to wean incrementally from CPAP but may cope well in ambient oxygen or air.
Use of Blood Gases in babies on long term CPAP
Any baby who is placed on CPAP for worsening respiratory distress should have gases taken as frequently as clinical condition dictates. As a guide –
1. For Term / near term babies
• Take gases 4 hrs after CPAP discontinued if clinical condition remains stable in between. Earlier gases are recommended if clinical condition seems unstable to assess need for escalating support.
• If subsequent saturations are > 98% in air, gases do not need to be taken again.
• If in oxygen, take at least one gas daily
2. Preterm/LBW Babies 1 to 14 day old
• Gases should be taken at least daily for babies who are on CPAP in oxygen or on HFNC in oxygen
• Gases should be taken at least 2 times a week for babies on CPAP in air.
• Preterm/LBW Babies 14 days to 28 days
• Gases should be taken at least 2 times a week for babies who are stable on CPAP in oxygen.
• Gases should be taken once a day for babies who are on HFNC in oxygen and on alternate days in those who are on HFNC in air.
Non-invasive Positive pressure Ventilation
Non-invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation has emerged as an alternative strategy to n-CPAP. It delivers time-cycled positive pressure ven- tilation above a PEEP level in the absence of ET tube [16].
NIPPV can be delivered as:
1. CMV NIPPV
2. BiPAP (Bilevel - NIPPV)
CMV-NIPPV: CMV-NIPPV uses a ventilator to provide intermittent breaths at PIP and rates similar to those used for Mechanical Ventilation.
Physiological Principle:
1. Stablises the alveoli by providing positive airway pressure(PEEP)
2. Promotes better ventilation by delivering positive pressure breaths to the lower airway
3. Triggers an augmented inspiratory reflex (head’s paradoxical reflex) in preterm infants.
4. Less inflammation than Invasive Mechanical Ventilation BiPAP:
It is a form of non-invasive ventilation that provides two alternating levels of CPAP at set intervals using nasal prongs or face mask while the baby is breathing spontaneously. Difference between high and low nCPAP pres- sure is < 4cm>
1. Delta P produced by the ventilator creates a switch from FRC level to another one
2. Derived changes in FRC improves alveolar ventilation
3. Vt depends on both Delta P and lung compliance.
CMV-NIPPV and BiPAP are respiratory support modality with different mechanism to support breathing and their use should be assessed on mer- its and clinical judgement in the same way as for other modalities of ventila- tion.
CMV-NIPPV and BiPAP can be delivered either synchronised or non-syn- chronised. There are various ways of synchronising breaths while the new- born is on CMV-NIPPV/BiPAP however, it is difficult to obtain synchronisa- tion due to open ventilation and very low pressure in preterm infants. NAVA presently offers better possibility of synchronisation. Oesophageal feeding tube is used for NAVA. It signals the onset of diaphragmatic contractions. However, in preterm the combination of diaphragmatic contractions/glottis opening is out of phase in 60‰ cases because glottis opening doesnot fol- low immediately diaphragm contraction. Therefore, ventilation flow could find the glottis closed although diaphragm starts to move downward.There- fore, synchronisation of breaths is difficult with CMV-NIPPV or BiPAP and hence both are generally used in a non-synchronised mode.
When compared with nCPAP; CNV-NIPPV/BiPAP improves thoraco-abdom- inal synchrony, increases tidal volume and minute ventilation and thus de- creases work of breathing and improves CO2 clearance. These effects are better pronounced with synchronised than non-synchronised ventilation.
Indications for NIPPV [17]:
1. Post-extubation failure: In comparison with n-CPAP, NIPPV decreases the frequency of post extubation failure; based on clinical judgement can be considered in neonates with CPAP failure.
2. Apnea of prematurity: In preterm with recurrent apneas while on CPAP, NIPPV has shown to reduce frequency of apnea or need for intubation.
There are 3 kind of interfaces applicable for NIPPV between device and newborn.
1. Short binasal prongs
2. Hypopharangeal tube
3. Nasal mask
Short binasal prongs represent the better interface for both the comfort of the neonate (they adapt correctly and with minimal injury) and the success of the technique (lower flow resistance).
1. Abdominal distension: Less likely to be clinically significant if regular OG tube aspiration is done.
2. Nasal septum erosion/nasal trauma similar to that observed with nCPAP
3. Air leak Syndrome
NIPPV Failure
Consider invasive ventilation in neonates on NIPPV with:
1. Worsening respiratory acidosis
2. Cardiorespiratory compromise
3. FiO2 requirement > 60%.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
