AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Wenfa Ng, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore.
Citation: Wenfa Ng (2022) Surface Charge Characteristics of Bacillus Subtilis NRS-762 Cells. J, Biotechnology and Bioprocessing 3(2); DOI: 10.31579/2766-2314/074
Copyright: © 2022 Wenfa Ng, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 January 2022 | Accepted: 20 January 2022 | Published: 25 January 2022
Keywords: zeta potential; electrophoretic mobility; surface charge; bacillus subtilis; wash buffer; resuspension buffer; deionized water; sodium nitrate; sodium chloride; growth temperature
Bacterial cell surface carries an electrical charge due to the myriad functional groups present, as well as assortment of ions and molecules non-specifically adsorbed to the cell surface. Thus, solution in contact with the bacterial cell surface play a critical role in influencing the overall surface charge characteristics through conferring non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules. Various wash buffers are commonly used in removing non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules for revealing the real surface charge of the bacterium. Using electrophoretic mobility measurement of zeta potential, this study attempted to understand the surface charge characteristics of Bacillus subtilis NRS-762 (ATCC 8473) with the help of three wash buffers: deionized (DI) water, 0.1M sodium nitrate, and 9 g/L sodium chloride. Experiment results revealed that B. subtilis NRS-762 was negatively charged over the entire pH range from 1.5 to 12. Specifically, with deionized water as wash buffer, the point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) was at pH 1.5, which indicated that large amount of negatively charged functional groups were present on the cell surface. Comparison between the zeta potential-pH profiles of B. subtilis NRS-762 cultivated at 30 oC and 37 oC revealed that the profile for growth at 37 oC was more negatively charged over the entire pH range compared to that for growth at 30 oC. This highlighted that physiological adaptation might had occurred on the cell surface for coping with growth at a higher temperature. Zeta potential-pH profiles obtained revealed that DI water could not remove significant quantities of the non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules. On the other hand, the zeta potential-pH profiles of cells washed with 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride overlapped each other substantially and were more negatively charged over the pH range from 2 to 11, compared to that of cells washed with DI water. This revealed substantial removal of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules with the use of 0.1M sodium nitrate (0.1M ionic strength) and 9 g/L sodium chloride (0.15M ionic strength), which helped reveal the actual surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 cells. Collectively, actual surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 was masked by non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules, which could be removed by 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride wash buffer. Thus, in the case of B. subtilis NRS-762, 0.1M ionic strength wash buffer was the threshold at which there was complete removal of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from the cell surface.
Graphical Abstract
Short Description
Nonspecific adsorption of ions and molecules on cell surface would mask the real surface charge. Thus, various wash buffers are commonly used in removing non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from the cell surface. Using the phenomenon of ionic strength mediated charge screening that could remove non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules, this study attempted to understand the surface charge characteristics of Bacillus subtilis NRS-762 cells (ATCC 8473) after treatment with 3 different wash buffers: deionized water, 0.1M sodium nitrate, and 9 g/L sodium chloride, with deionized water as resuspension buffer in microelectrophoresis analysis of surface charge. Experiment results revealed that the zeta potential-pH profiles of cells washed with 0.1M sodium nitrate (0.1M ionic strength) and 9 g/L sodium chloride (0.15M ionic strength) overlapped each other substantially and were more negatively charged over the pH range from 2 to 11 compared to cells washed with deionized water. This suggested that non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules were removed from B. subtilis NRS-762 cell surface and helped unmask the real surface charge of the cells. Thus, 0.1M ionic strength wash buffer could help remove non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules and reveal the real surface charge characteristics of B. subtilis NRS-762 cells.
Significance of the work
Bacterial cells carry a “memory” of the solution it contacted with in the form of a layer of ions and molecules non-specifically adsorbed to the cell surface. Such a layer of ions and molecules would thus mask the real surface charge characteristics of the cell. In micro electrophoretic measurement of surface charge of bacterial cells, various wash buffers had been used in removing the non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules, but their relative efficacy remain poorly understood. In this study, the surface charge characteristics of Bacillus subtilis NRS-762 (ATCC 8473) was determined using electrophoretic mobility measurement, where three wash buffers (i.e., deionized water, 0.1M sodium nitrate, and 9 g/L sodium chloride) helped remove non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from the cell surface. Experiment results revealed that B. subtilis NRS-762 cell surface was negatively charged over the entire pH range from 1.5 to 12. Furthermore, zeta potential-pH profiles of cells washed with 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride overlapped each other substantially and were more negatively charged than that obtained with deionized water as wash buffer. This indicated that both 0.1M sodium nitrate (ionic strength 0.1M) and 9 g/L sodium chloride (0.15M ionic strength) could remove the non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules through charge screening and helped unmask the real surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 when suspended in deionized water. Thus, 0.1M ionic strength was the threshold where there was complete removal of the non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from B. subtilis NRS-762 cells which reveal the real surface charge characteristics.
Surface of bacterial cell envelope is commonly covered with different functional groups that confer an electrical charge to the surface. For example, phosphate groups provide a predominantly negative charge to the bacterial cell surface [1, 2]. Similarly, amino groups confer a positive charge when the functional groups are protonated at low pH. Presence of an electrical charge naturally attract a counter-ion layer of opposite charge close to the cell surface, which partially neutralize the charge on the cell surface. Additionally, nonspecific adsorption of ions and molecules could also occur on the cell surface, which partially masks the cell surface charge [3].
Thus, understanding of the bacterial cell surface charge is in relation to the solution environment of the cell. Specifically, ions and molecules from the solution could non-specifically adsorb to the cell surface [3]. On the other hand, solution environment defines the conditions at which the bacterial cell surface would interact with the solution. For example, pH determines the protonation state of functional groups on the bacterial cell surface, while ionic strength affects the binding of molecules and ions onto the cell surface. Thus, is it possible to determine the true bacterial cell surface charge characteristics? The answer depends significantly on the type of solution in contact with the bacterial cell surface, and whether the non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules could be removed without affecting the intrinsic charge of the cell surface [3].
Currently, no experimental method exists for direct measurement of bacterial cell surface charge. However, proxy methods for inferring a surface charge of the bacterial cell are available to help understand various phenomena that hinge on the bacterial surface charge, one of which is bacterial aggregation and flocculation during wastewater treatment [4-6]. Specifically, zeta potential measured by the microelectrophoresis technique determine an electrical charge at the shear plane of the cell, which is a short distance away from the actual surface [1, 7]. Thus, zeta potential approximates the cell surface charge, but this approximation could be influenced by a variety of factors such as types and amount of ions and molecules that non-specifically adsorbed within the space between the cell surface and the shear plane [3].
Prior to measurement of zeta potential, cell samples are typically washed by various wash buffers as part of sample preparation. Depending on the ionic strength of the wash buffers, non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules could be removed; thereby, revealing more aspects of the bacterial cell surface charge [3]. On the other hand, high ionic strength wash buffers such as 0.1M sodium citrate could potentially damage the cell surface [3]. Thus, choice of wash buffers play an important role in allowing a better approximation to the actual cell surface charge to be determined. For example, 0.15M ionic strength wash buffer such as 9 g/L sodium chloride was found to be effective in removing almost all the non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules and helped unmask the real surface charge of Escherichia coli DH5α [3].
Thus, this study sets out to understand the cell surface characteristics of Bacillus subtilis NRS-762 (ATCC 8473) through the zeta potential measurement method, where wash buffer of 0.1M ionic strength (0.1M sodium nitrate) and 0.15M ionic strength (9 g/L NaCl) were chosen to help remove non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules that mask the actual surface charge. A Gram-positive bacterium, the cell surface of B. subtilis NRS-762 is defined by a thick peptidoglycan layer meshed with arrays of teichoic acid molecules. Thus, nonspecific adsorption of various ions and molecules likely mask the actual surface charge of the B. subtilis NRS-762 cell surface.
Materials
LB Lennox medium was purchased from Difco and used as is. Composition of LB Lennox medium was [g/L]: Tryptone, 10.0; Yeast extract, 5.0; NaCl, 5.0. Composition of LB Lennox medium with 2 g/L glucose was [g/L]: Tryptone, 10.0; Yeast extract, 5.0; NaCl, 5.0, D-Glucose, 2.0.
Growth of Bacillus subtilis NRS-762 in growth medium
Stock cultures of B. subtilis NRS-762 were prepared in 40% glycerol and kept at -70 oC until use. One glycerol stock culture of B. subtilis NRS-762 was used in inoculating 100 mL of LB Lennox medium in a 250 mL glass conical flask as seed culture. Incubation conditions were 30 oC and 230 rpm rotational shaking in a temperature-controlled incubator. After 8 hours of culture, 1 mL of seed culture was withdrawn and used as inoculum for 100 mL of LB Lennox medium with 2 g/L glucose in a 250 mL glass conical flask. Incubation conditions were 30 oC and 230 rpm rotational shaking in a temperature-controlled incubator (Yih Der LM-570D, Taiwan). Two biological replicates were prepared.
Sample preparation for zeta potential analysis
After 15 hours of incubation, 2.5 mL of culture broth was withdrawn and diluted with 37.5 mL of non-sterile wash buffer in a 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube and mixed vigorously by hand and vortex mixer. This content was centrifuged at 3300 x g for 10 minutes at 25 oC. Following centrifugation, wash buffer was carefully decanted off without disturbing the cell pellet. 40 mL of wash buffer was added to the centrifuge tube and the contents resuspended by vigorous mixing by hand and vortex mixer. The centrifugation and washing steps were repeated a total of three times prior to use of 40 mL of deionized water for resuspending the cell pellet through vigorous shaking by hand and vortex mixer. Nitric acid and sodium hydroxide was added to the samples for pH adjustment with pH measured by an Orion 9156 BNWP pH probe outfitted to a Mettler Toledo Delta 320 pH meter.
Zeta potential analysis
Samples were vigorously shaken by hand prior to zeta potential analysis by Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument. The microelectrophoresis cell was rinsed with deionized water 3 times prior to each analysis, and care was taken to avoid bubble formation during addition of sample into the measurement cell. Measurements were made at 25 oC. The ionic strength of wash buffers was estimated by the Debye-Huckel theory.
For B. subtilis NRS-762 cultivated in LB Lennox with 2 g/L glucose, the zeta potential-pH profile obtained with deionized water as wash buffer revealed that the cell surface was negatively charged within the pH range from 1.5 to 12 (Figure 1). Specifically, the point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) was pH 1.5, which defined a pH where the cell surface charge was zero. In general, with increasing pH, the zeta potential of the cell surface became more negative, which indicated that more negatively charged functional groups are exposed. In transiting from pH 4 to 5, there was a decrease in zeta potential, which indicated that carboxyl functional groups likely deprotonated with increasing concentration of OH- ions in the solution. In general, the zeta potential-pH profile of B. subtilis NRS-762 resembles a titration curve and comprised three segments: an initial rapid decrease in zeta potential values between pH 2 and 5, followed by a region of relatively stable zeta potential values between pH 5 and 9, and finally, a region of rapid decrease in zeta potential between pH 9 and 11, which culminated in an uptick in zeta potential at pH 12. Other studies have shown that the composition of the cell surface of B. subtilis changes as a function of pH due to the presence of different functional groups [8-11]. Specifically, potentiometric titrations of B. subtilis cells have revealed that the cell surface of the bacterium is negatively charged over the pH range from 2 to 10 with a point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) < 2>B. subtilis NRS-762 cell population was highly heterogeneous due to the presence of a variety of cell lineages [12], some scatter in the zeta potential data was expected given that cells belonging to different differentiation pathways likely exhibit different cell surface characteristics.
Comparison of zeta potential-pH profiles of B. subtilis NRS-762 grown at 30 oC and 37 oC in LB Lennox medium with 2 g/L glucose revealed that the cell surface of B. subtilis NRS-762 was more negatively charged after cultivation at 37 oC compared to 30 oC (Figure 2). Specifically, at all measured pH, zeta potential of cells cultivated at 37 oC was more negative compared to that of cells cultivated at 30 oC. This observation could arise due to fundamental changes to the cell surface of B. subtilis NRS-762 after cultivation at 37 oC, for example, through the generation of more negatively charged functional groups on the cell surface. On the other hand, cells grown at 37 oC could also secrete more acidic metabolites that non-specifically adsorbed to the B. subtilis NRS-762 cell surface that confer a more negative cell surface charge. Overall, cells cultivated at 37 oC likely had a different set of surface functional groups compared to those cultivated at 30 oC.
Observation of zeta potential-pH profiles of B. subtilis NRS-762 cells cultivated in LB Lennox medium with 2 g/L glucose at 30 oC and 230 rpm rotational shaking, and washed with deionized water, 0.1M sodium nitrate, or 9 g/L sodium chloride revealed that washing of cells with 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride rendered the cell surface to be more negatively charged over the entire pH range from 2 to 9 compared to that of cells washed with deionized water (Figure 3). This could be due to the removal of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from the cell surface of B. subtilis NRS-762 by wash buffers. Specifically, the zeta potential-pH profile of cells washed with 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride overlapped each other substantially; thereby, indicating that the small difference in ionic strength between the two wash buffers (i.e., 0.1M ionic strength for 0.1M sodium nitrate, and 0.15M ionic strength for 9 g/L sodium chloride) did not result in significant differences in the types and amounts of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules removed. Overall, deionized water was not able to remove substantial amount of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules.
Taken together, 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride helped unmask the real surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 over the pH range from 2 to 12 through the charge screening effect that helped remove the non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules on the cell surface. While possibilities exist that the ionic strength of the wash buffers might have damaged the cell surface, previous studies have shown that wash buffers of 0.1M and 0.15M ionic strength are unlikely to result in cell surface damage [3]. In contrast, with respect to Escherichia coli DH5α, 0.15M ionic strength is the threshold upon which there was complete removal of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from the cell surface of the Gram-negative bacterium [3]. This is slightly higher than the 0.1M ionic strength threshold for complete removal of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from B. subtilis NRS-762 cell surface. Differences in cell wall structure and composition of functional groups on the cell surface could account for the observed difference in threshold ionic strength for unmasking the real surface charge of E. coli DH5α and B. subtilis NRS-762.
Zeta potential measurement revealed that the cell surface of B. subtilis NRS-762 was negatively charged within the pH range from 1.5 to 12. Thus, the Gram-positive bacterium holds application potential for use as a biosorbent in understanding the binding of heavy metals to the cell surface, which is relevant to many aspects of environmental geochemistry. Zeta potential-pH profiles of B. subtilis NRS-762 cultivated in LB Lennox medium with 2 g/L glucose at 30 and 37 oC exhibited different characteristics. Specifically, cells cultivated at 37 oC were more negatively charged over the entire pH range from 2 to 11 compared to that of cells cultured at 30 oC. This suggested that the cell surface composition of B. subtilis NRS-762 was different upon cultivation at different temperatures and could be due to physiological adaptation to growth at a higher temperature. The point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) of B. subtilis NRS-762 cultivated at 30 oC was pH 1.5, which indicated that large amount of negatively charged functional groups were present on the cell surface. With deionized water as wash buffer, no substantial removal of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules occurred. More importantly, more negative charges on the cell surface were revealed with 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride wash buffers, where higher ionic strength of 0.1M and 0.15M, respectively, helped removed non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules. Finally, removal of the layer of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from B. subtilis NRS-762 cell surface by 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride revealed the real surface charge of the cells with deionized water as resuspension buffer. Thus, 0.1M ionic strength is the threshold ionic strength below which there would be no complete removal of non-specifically adsorbed ions and molecules from B. subtilis NRS-762 cell surface.
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
The author thanks the National University of Singapore for Financial support.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
