AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Yassine Kilani, Chief Resident, Department of Medicine Lincoln Medical Center/Weill Cornell Medicine Bronx, New York, NY, USA 234 East 149th Street New York, NY 10451.
Citation: Yassine Kilani, Mohammad Aldiabat, Chee Yao Lim, Fatima Kamal SA, Priscila C. Puelo, et al, (2024), Subtypes of VenousThromboembolism in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Assessment, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 9(3); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/186
Copyright: © 2024, Yassine Kilani. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 31 January 2024 | Accepted: 23 February 2024 | Published: 05 March 2024
Keywords: IBD; ulcerative colitis; Crohn’s disease; venous thromboembolism
Background
Data detailing the risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) subtypes among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain limited. We looked to assess the odds of VTE subtypes among hospitalized individuals with IBD as compared to those without IBD.
Materials & Methods
Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we applied a multivariable regression analysis to compare the odds of primary VTE-related hospitalizations among individuals with and without IBD from 2016 to 2020, including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), portal vein thrombosis (PVT), Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS), renal vein thrombosis (RVT), and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST).
Results
Overall, there were 15,565 primary VTE-related hospitalizations among individuals with IBD, as compared to 1,449,164 among individuals without IBD. Having IBD increased the odds for DVT (aOR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.25–1.43), PVT (aOR = 3.16, 95%CI: 2.65–3.76), and CVST (aOR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.05–2.00), without significant increase in the odds of a PE, BCS, or RVT. Further, individuals with ulcerative colitis (UC) were at a higher risk for the majority of VTE-subtypes as compared to those with Crohn’s disease (CD). Among individuals with a VTE-related hospitalization, the presence of IBD was not associated with increased mortality (aOR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.40–1.50), but was associated with an increased length of stay (CD – 4.8 days, UC – 5.3 days, without IBD – 4.3 days, p<0.01).
Conclusions
Clinicians should retain a high index of suspicion when evaluating VTE-related symptoms among individuals with IBD, as the presence of IBD confers a higher risk of DVT, PVT and CVST related-hospitalizations, and longer stays as compared to individuals without IBD.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the gastrointestinal tract and is widely prevalent. [1] In 2017, more than 6.8 million individuals globally had IBD, corresponding to a prevalence rate of 464 per 100,000 individuals in the U.S. alone. [1] As this number continues to rise, the number of individuals who will experience both disease and treatment-related adverse outcomes will also increase.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is of particular interest, as it carries high morbidity and mortality, and occurs more commonly among individuals with IBD. Further, with the aging of the IBD patient population [2], coupled with the growing use of JAK-inhibitors, the number of individuals with IBD who experience a VTE event may continue to rise. Recent data have even shown that rates of VTE among hospitalized patients with IBD are increasing over the past 2 decades, from 192 to 295 cases per 10,000 hospitalizations. [3]
Despite the increasing number of VTE events among individuals with IBD, there are scant data exploring its different subtypes, as the majority of studies have only focused on the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). However, individuals with IBD have also been shown to be at increased risk for portal vein thrombosis (PVT), Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS), renal vein thrombosis (RVT), and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). [4-12] A recent retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database analyzed a subset of these conditions, finding that individuals with both UC and CD had higher odds of DVT, PE, PVT and mesenteric ischemia as compared to the general population. [13] However, 1) the inclusion of all individuals with VTE rather than those with a primary diagnosis of VTE may capture a percentage of individuals who develop a VTE while hospitalized, possibly influencing the odds observed 2) only a few subtypes of VTE were captured including DVT, PE, and PVT, and 3) the analysis was restricted to only one year (2016). Additionally, the finding that individuals with both UC and CD are at higher risk for VTE subtypes has not been confirmed in prior studies, including meta-analyses. [3, 5, 14, 15]
Therefore, in order to add to what is known, we conducted a large database study from 2016 to 2020 exploring differential odds of a primary VTE- related hospitalization among individuals with IBD as compared to those without IBD, including comparisons of CD and UC. Additionally, we explored differences in inpatient mortality, and length of stay for VTE- related hospitalizations among individuals with and without IBD.
Data source:
Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), we conducted a study of individuals hospitalized from 2016 to 2020. The NIS database was developed for the Healthcare Cost Utilization Project and is currently the largest public all-payer database in the U.S. [16] It provides U.S. regional and national estimates of inpatient hospital admissions. The NIS represents a 20% sample of hospitalizations from all non-federal acute care hospitals [17], compiled annually by multiple statewide organizations [18], and includes uniform collection of demographic and administrative data on healthcare utilization, cost, quality, and outcomes. [19] The NIS data is selected from a stratified systematic random sample of hospitalizations and is weighted to calculate national estimates for the entire U.S. [19] Since October 2015, the NIS uses International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10 CM) codes, which were used in our analysis. Data from the NIS is de-identified and publicly available, and is therefore exempt from Institutional Review Board review. According to the Data User Agreement for HCUP, cell sizes <11>Study population:
Individuals with and without IBD ≥18 years old who were hospitalized during 2016-2020 were included in the analysis. A VTE-associated hospitalization was defined as a hospitalization in which VTE was listed as a primary diagnosis. In order to capture this, we used ICD-10 CM codes for DVT, PE [20, 21], PVT, BCS [21], RVT [22], and CVST (Supplemental
Table 1). [23, 24] The presence of IBD was defined with a secondary diagnosis code for IBD, including both CD and/or UC. [3] Individuals with a diagnosis code for both UC and CD were included in our primary analysis (comparing individuals with IBD vs. without IBD), but excluded when assessing individual IBD subtypes (UC and CD).
Patient and hospital characteristics:
We captured data available within the NIS on age, sex, body mass index (BMI; ≤19.9, 20 to 24.9, 25-29.9, ≥30 kg/m2), race (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Other), primary insurance (Medicare, Medicaid, Private Insurance, Self-pay), income quartile, and hospital characteristics (region, teaching status, bed size). [15] Comorbidities were also captured as part of the Charlson comorbidity index, and categorized as 0, 1, 2, ≥ 3. [25]
Comorbid Thrombotic Conditions:
We additionally captured comorbid thrombotic conditions that can increase the risk of VTEs [26], including a prior history of VTE [3], smoking status (current or prior) [27], active malignancy [24], congestive heart failure [28], oral contraception (OCP) use, pregnancy [29], limited mobility [30], thrombophilia (including prothrombin excess, protein C deficiency, and other thrombophilia) [3], hyperhomocysteinemia [31], and concomitant immune-mediated diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), and systemic sclerosis (SS; Supplemental Table 1).
| PATHOLOGY | ICD-10-CM code |
| Crohn’s disease | K50.X3 |
| Ulcerative colitis | K51.X3 |
| Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) | I80.1X, I80.2X,I82.2X, I82.4X, I82.6X, I82.890, I82.90, I82.A1, I82.B1, I82.C1, O22.3, O22.5, O22.9,O87.119,20 |
| Pulmonary embolism (PE) | I26, O88.2X19,20 |
| Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) | I8120 |
| Budd Chiarisyndrome (BCS) | I82.020 |
| Renal vein thrombosis (RVT) | I82.321 |
| Cerebral veinsinus thrombosis (CVST) | I63.6, I67.6, O22.5X, O87.3, G08.X22,23 |
| VTE history | Z86.7X, Z87.8913 |
| Nicotine dependence | F17.X27 |
| Malignancy (current) | CX, D0.X,D1.X, D3.X, D4.X24 |
| Clostridioides difficile infection | A047.X3 |
| Congestive heart failure | I09.81, I50.x, I51.81, I97.130, I97.131, I11.0, I13.0,I13.2, R57.028 |
| Chronic oral contraceptive use (OCP) | Z92.0, Z79.329 |
| Pregnancy | O.X |
| Bed confinement | Z74.0130 |
| Nephrotic syndrome | N04.X33 |
Thrombophilia (Prothrombin excess, Protein C deficiency, other thrombophilia) | D68.5X, D68.6X3 |
| Hyperhomocysteinemia | E72.1131 |
| Auto-immune diseases (SLE,RA, systemic sclerosis) | M05, M06, M32.X, M34.X32 |
Supplemental Table 1. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, ClinicalModification (ICD-10-CM) codes for the primary and secondary diagnoses.
[32]We additionally adjusted for C. difficile infection, which has been associated with VTE in patients with IBD, and as a specific confounder for RVT, we also included nephrotic syndrome. [3, 33]
Outcomes:
Our primary outcome was the odds of a primary DVT, PE, PVT, RVT, or BCS-related hospitalization among patients with UC and CD as compared to those without IBD. Secondary outcomes including inpatient mortality, length of stay, and total healthcare expenditures.
Statistical Analysis:
Baseline characteristics were compared using a t-test for continuous variables and a Chi-square test for categorical variables. A multivariable
logistic regression analysis was then applied to estimate the odds of a primary VTE-related hospitalization, as well as its subtypes, among patients both with and without IBD. Additionally, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were also calculated to assess overall VTE- related mortality, as well as length of stay, among individuals with and without IBD. Analysis of weighted samples was completed using Stata/SE® Version 17.0 software (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
Patient Characteristics:
Overall, from 2016-2020 there were a total of 148,687,525 hospitalizations, with 1,182,655 (0.8%) corresponding to individuals diagnosed with IBD (Table 1).
CD: Crohn’s disease;UC: Ulcerative colitis; OCP: Oral Contraceptive pills; CHF: CongestiveHeart Failure; AI: Autoimmune; RA: Rheumatoid arthritis,SLE: Systemic Lupus Erythematous; SS: Systemic sclerosis
Table 1: Baseline characteristics when evaluating primaryVTE-related hospitalizations among individuals with and withoutIBD.
More specifically, 737,290 (0.5%) hospitalizations were associated with a diagnosis of CD whereas 440,495 (0.3%) were associated with a diagnosis of UC. A total of 4,870 discharges were associated with both diagnoses of CD and UC.Individuals hospitalized with IBD were more likely to identify as non- Hispanic White (81% in IBD vs. 67% in non-IBD, p<0>Table 1).
When evaluating IBD subtypes, individuals with CD were younger (mean age: 55 years ± 0.1 years in CD vs. 60 years ± 0.1 years in UC), and more likely to identify as Non-Hispanic Black (11% in CD vs. 9% in UC, p<0>Table 2).
CD: Crohn’s disease;UC: Ulcerative colitis; OCP: Oral Contraceptive pills; CHF: CongestiveHeart Failure; AI: Autoimmune; RA: Rheumatoid arthritis,SLE: Systemic Lupus Erythematous; SS: Systemic sclerosis
Table 2.Baseline characteristics when evaluating primary VTE-related hospitalizations associated with Crohn’s diseasevs.ulcerative colitis.
Prevalence of VTESubtypes:
Overall, 1,464,729 (1.0%) of all hospitalizations were associated with a primary ICD-code for VTE. On univariable logistic regression, individuals with IBD (1.3%) were more likely to have a primary VTE-related hospitalization as compared to individuals without IBD (1.0%, p<0 xss=removed>When considering all individual subtypes of VTE, we found that the presence of IBD significantly increased the odds of a primary DVT (aOR =
1.34, 95%CI: 1.25–1.43), PVT (aOR = 3.16, 95%CI: 2.65–3.76), and CVST
(aOR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.05–2.00). However, there was no significant increase in the odds of a primary PE (aOR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.99–1.12), BCS (aOR = 1.63, 95%CI: 0.51–5.13), or RVT-related (aOR = 1.75, 95%CI: 0.63–4.84)
hospitalization (Figure 1a). This, however, was driven largely by individuals with CD who were not at increased odds of having a primary BCS (aOR = 2.55, 95%CI: 0.81–8.05), RVT (aOR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.16–5.29), or PE (aOR
= 0.94, 95%CI: 0.87–1.01; Figure 1b). In contrast individuals with UC were at higher odds of having both a primary PE (aOR = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.15–1.36) and RVT (aOR = 3.47, 95%CI: 1.10–10.95), though there were no cases of BCS observed in this subgroup (Figure 1c).
Figure 1: Prevalence and odds of venousthromboembolic (VTE) eventsamong individuals with and withoutIBD. IBD is associated with increased odds of VTE, including DVT, PVT, and CVST compared to patients without IBD, and no significant change in the odds of PE (figure 1-A). While both CD (figure 1-B) and UC (figure 1-C) are associated with increased odds of DVT and PVT, only UC increases the odds of PE, RVT, and CVST related hospitalizations (figure 1-C).
When comparing individuals with UC vs. CD, the presence of UC was associated with a higher overall VTE risk (aOR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.27–1.51), as well as a higher risk of DVT (aOR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.22–1.61), PE (aOR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.20–1.51), and CVST (aOR = 2.31, 95%CI: 1.15–4.65;
Supplemental Figure1).
Mortality and Healthcare ResourceUtilization:
Among individuals with a VTE-related hospitalization, the presenceof IBD was not associated with increased mortality (aOR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.40 – 1.50), but was associated with an increased length of stay (CD – 4.8 days, UC – 5.3 days, without IBD – 4.3 days, p<0>
*Adjusted for age, race, BMI, comorbidity index,income, insurance status,hospital characteristics, and dayof admission.
NB: Variables (Reference values): Age (18-44), Sex (Male), Race (non-Hispanic White), BMI (19-25 kg/m2), Income quartile (1st-25th percentile), Hospital size (Small), Hospital region (Northeast), Hospital teaching status (Non-teaching), Insurance status (Medicare), Day of admission (Weekday), Charlson comorbidity index (0).
Supplemental Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis assessing predictors of among individuals admitted with a primary ICD code for venous thromboembolism.
In this nationwide study we found a 20% increase in the overall odds of VTE- related hospitalizations among individuals with IBD compared to those without IBD. Notably, both UC and CD were associated with higher odds of DVT and PVT, while only UC exhibited elevated risks for PE, RVT, and CVST. Additionally, the presence of IBD does not lead to a significant difference in mortality within VTE-related hospitalizations, but is associated with significantly longer lengths of stay as compared to individuals without IBD.
VTE poses a significant risk of both morbidity and mortality [34], and there is growing concern that this will continue to increase over the next decade. One contributing factor to this potential increase is the expanding use of JAK-inhibitors, coupled with the aging of the IBD patient population. [2] Further, although prior studies have shown an elevated risk of VTE among individuals with IBD, data have largely focused on the presence of DVT and PE. [4, 35, 36, 37] More specifically, these data have shown that IBD confers a 1.3 to 4-fold increase in the odds of DVT and PE. [4, 5, 15, 35, 36, 38-40] In our study, we observed similar results, as we found increased odds of DVT-related hospitalizations for individuals with both CD and UC. However, when evaluating primary PE-related hospitalizations, we found similar odds among individuals with IBD as compared to those without IBD. Further, when stratifying by subtype of IBD, we can see that this finding may largely be driven by the presence of CD, as individuals with UC had higher odds for a primary PE-related hospitalization. This is consistent with a prior meta-analysis showing no difference in rates of PE between individuals with and without IBD [41], though prior studies have shown UC to carry a higher risk of PE as compared to CD. [13, 42]
When evaluating PVT, RVT and CVST, we found similar findings. Notably, odds of a primary hospitalization for PVT were higher among individuals with both CD and UC, while hospitalization for RVT and CVST were higher only among individuals with UC. Although the pathogenesis of VTE in IBD is still incompletely understood [43, 44], prior data have shown higher levels of pro-coagulant factors (Factor V and Factor VIII) among individuals with UC as compared to individuals with CD, which may potentially contribute to the findings observed. Further, higher levels of plasminogen, a protein responsible for clot fibrinolysis, were also observed among individuals with
CD as compared to those with UC, offering an additional explanation as to
the increased risk of VTE seen among individuals with UC. [45] Last, upadacitinib, a JAK-inhibitor recently approved for treating moderate to severe IBD, has also been shown to increase the risk of VTE among individuals with UC but not CD. [46, 47]
These findings are of particular importance, as despite the higher VTE risk observed among individuals with UC, they are often less likely to receive pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis while hospitalized. [48] This is likely due to the presence of hematochezia, which can deter providers from using pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis, despite data showing it to be both safe and effective in this population. [48, 49] Further educational efforts should therefore focus on highlighting the increased risk of VTE among individuals with UC, as well as the safety and efficacy of pharmacologic prophylaxis in this population.
Additionally, although VTEs are known to increase the risk of overall mortality, there are limited data exploring whether VTEs disproportionality increase the risk for mortality among individuals with IBD as compared to those without IBD. [3, 28] Reassuringly, in our study, we did not observe that the presence of IBD significantly increased the odds of VTE related mortality, though further data are needed to confirm this. We did, however, find that VTE-related hospitalizations were associated with longer lengths of stays and healthcare related costs among individuals with IBD as compared to those without IBD. This is in accordance with prior data [14], and underscores the need to focus on preventative VTE efforts.
Our study has several strengths. This is the first study that comprehensively analyzes the risk of several VTE subtypes among individuals with IBD, including disease-based comparisons between UC and CD. Moreover, using the NIS we were able to capture 148 million hospitalizations across the U.S., ensuring adequate power and generalizability of our results. Furthermore, uniform collection of variables included in the NIS helps to mitigate potential referral and reporting biases, which are commonly encountered in single- center studies and voluntary registries. Moreover, the inclusion of individuals with a primary VTE-related hospitalization allows us to exclude individuals who may have developed a VTE during hospitalization, thereby minimizing potential confounders.
There are also methodological biases inherent to our study design. First is the reliance on ICD codes which cannot be verified by manual review, however, ICD-10 CM codes for DVT and PE have been shown to have high sensitivity for VTE related hospitalizations, though no study has evaluated this specifically within the NIS database. [21] Moreover, although data pertaining to medication use (e.g., corticosteroids), disease activity, recent hospital admission or surgery is not available in the NIS database, we adjusted for additional VTE-related risk factors such as smoking, OCP use, and comorbid thrombotic conditions (e.g., cancer, thrombophilia). Last, it should be noted that one individual can account for several admissions, though the likelihood of presenting with multiple primary VTE -related hospitalizations over the five-year study period are rare.
In sum, individuals with IBD have a higher risk for DVT, PVT, and CVST, without significant increase in the risk of PE, BCS, and RVT. Further, on subgroup analysis, we observed that individuals with UC appear to be at higher risk for the majority of VTE subtypes as compared to individuals with CD. Additionally, having IBD did not confer additional mortality risk among those with VTE-related hospitalizations, however individuals with IBD had on average longer lengths of stay. These findings hold significant clinical implications, as the identification of individuals with IBD who are at a heightened risk for specific VTE-related subtypes carries substantial clinical significance. This recognition not only informs future evaluations for VTE in the IBD patient population, but also underscores the necessity for heightened efforts in the prevention of VTE manifestations among hospitalized patients with IBD. Last, a strategic focus on post-discharge and outpatient prophylaxis initiatives may be warranted among those individuals with IBD who are at highest risk for VTE.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
