AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Mini Review
*Corresponding Author: Abdulwahab Alahmari, 1 Radiology Specialist, Radiology Department, Al-Namas General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
Citation: Abdulwahab Alahmari (2023) Smpte in Radiology: The Forgotten Quality Control Test − A Pictorial Essay. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials. 7(1) ; DOI :10.31579/2693-4779/116
Copyright: © 2023 Riyan Al Islam Reshad, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 18 October 2022 | Accepted: 21 November 2022 | Published: 13 January 2023
Keywords: radiology; quality control; smpte pattern; american college of radiology; accreditation
One of the most unused quality control tests in radiology is SMPTE. Even thought, it is a simple test, but it is rarely done in radiology departments around the world. The American College of Radiology request a SMPTE test as a part of the evaluation and accreditation of radiology departments. This paper will explain the historical background of this test and undocumented literature in radiology about SMPTE. As well, how this test is done in order to increase awareness about the usefulness of such quality control tests in a simple way.
All of us saw those colored images on Television (TV) with buzzing sound and especially in old public TVs see (Figures. 1, 2, and 3). These screens are called SMPTE screen which are used to tone the image and the sound for the people watching the TV before the TV shows started. There are three designs of TV SMPTE, the new ones are presented in see (Figure. 1 and 2) and the older one is presented in see (Figure. 3). The letters SMPTE stands for the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. However, SMPTE is used in radiology, not only in TVs. SMPTE is used as a quality control (QC) test for monitor display to tests its performance for The American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation process. It is a standard test for screen QC program in hospitals which mean it must be done by specialized personnel, not like quality assurance (QA) where anyone can do it and be proactive. This paper will focus on image quality of monitors in radiology departments by testing those monitors by using the.
Figure 1: The SMPTE older color bars (SD) type. There is another SMPTE color bars called (HD) version with different colors.
Figure 2: The SMPTE color bars (HD) type.
Figure 3: The older SMPTE color bars.
Image display monitor is the weakest link in the digital imaging chain. The displayed image quality might affect the radiologist decision in reporting the examination. Not all computers have high quality monitors that can be used to interpret medical images due to the cost of monitors used in radiology workstations. The radiologist’s workstation monitors have the highest quality, usually 2K-3K for radiographs and computed tomography, and even up to 4K for mammogram images. Megapixel measurements can differentiate which monitor can be used in medical imaging and which can’t be used. Meanwhile, commercial monitors have 1K resolution. Therefore; the quality of the image on radiology monitors and printers must be maintain at the highest level of quality using the SMPTE pattern test.
History
In 1939, they used in most TVs in the United States the “Indian-head” image pattern which was introduced by Radio Corporation of America (RCA) see (Fig. 4). In 1951, the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers formed a committee of clinical radiology departments, representatives of the industry, and the SMPTE society representatives. Many versions of patterns were introduced and tested. In 1985, a recommendation practice was published by the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (PR-133) [1]. This recommendation entitled “specification for medical diagnostic imaging test patterns for TV monitors and hard-copy cameras”. This practice guide introduced the SMPTE as monochrome test pattern to be the quality control test of hard-copy films, videos, and image display systems. The monochrome test has higher resolution than the color display because the color display has a ½ of the monochrome test resolution. Therefore; the monochrome image is used, not the color bars. Even thou, some companies made colored SMPTE that is close in resolution to the monochrome SMPTE. Before SMPTE used, the output including amplifier, analogue-to-digital converter, film (a hard-copy), and displays were not tested [2].
Figure: 4 The Indian-head test pattern which was introduced by RCA in 1939.
Concept
The recommendation practice of SMPTE sets specifications and attributes for the SMPTE pattern. This SMPTE pattern is sold by medical devices industries and medical equipment vendors. This SMPTE is introduced to test image display systems and films printer.
Designs and Parts of the SMPTE
Here are the parts of the patterns: 1) the uniform grey at the 50% level which allows to detect uniformity issues or artifacts in the image, 2) A cross-hatched pattern which is set at 75% of maximum level of the picture to determine the spatial distortion effect to determine whether the whole picture is on the film?, 3) the low contrast resolution on the film in all four corners and the low contrast resolution ranging from 1% to 5%, 4) the high contrast resolution on the film in all four corners and the high contrast resolution patterns which all at the level of 100%, 5) a grey scale pattern placed in the center of the SMPTE to avoid the light associated with recording system or image display, or output falling-off. This grey scale is the 12 boxes with 10%
increment from 0 to 100%, except the box 50% is duplicated, 6) the 5% incremental patch at the end of each path placed in the big boxes of the 0-5% box and inside the 95-100% box see (Figs. 5 and 6) (i.e., the green arrow and the red arrow respectively). These boxes from 0-100% test whether the range of data is displayed correctly and it allows calibrate the brightness and the contrast controls, 7) a white window with black box in which test the system transition (from black to white) and low frequencies responses, 8) a black window with a white box in which test the system transition (from white to black) and low frequencies responses. Both 7 and 8 windows must show a clean transition without any smearing, overshooting, or ringing, 9) the border which is set at 75% of maximum level of the picture to determine the spatial distortion effect to determine whether the whole picture is on the film? All these number are illustrated on the SMPTE pattern see (Fig. 5). The Spatial resolution is demonstrated with the linearity of the lines. Any aliasing or distortion indicate poor image quality. It is within acceptable limits if contrast bars white and black are distinct from each other.
Figure: 5. The SMPTE image with all parts illustrated.
Performing the Test
A-Display Monitor
Software like MediCal QAWeb have all required patterns by the ACR. There are two important boxes in the SMPTE pattern, the 0- 5 % box (the red arrow) and the 95-100% box (the green arrow) see (Fig. 6). If the evaluator of the screen/monitor sees these two boxes then the screen passes the test. It is like checking if the old viewing boxes’ lights are working and the intensity of the light can be manipulated until the X-ray or CT scan films are clear on the viewing box.
Figure 6: The SMPTE Quality Control of monitors by the checking the 0-5% box (the red arrow) and the 95-100% box (the green arrow).
The SMPTE is used to adjust the contrast and brightness of a video display like CT and MRI or a video monitors like US and fluoroscopy. The signal of voltage peak coming from an image is different than the signal of voltage peak coming from a video. In order to show a video correctly, turn off the contrast and brightness control then turn it on until the raster pattern is barely visible. Then adjust the control of the contrast until the 95% patch is clearly seen without smearing or tearing of the alphanumeric or the pattern. So, the brightness first is done followed by the contrast. The room lighting must be adjusted to prevent any reflection of the light on the screen. The image display is similar, but the appropriate window width and level must be selected.
B-Films Printer
The 0% patch is set to produce 2.45 density on a laser hard-copy recorder; even though; higher densities can be printed on the film. But if higher densities are used, it will make the 5% patch disappear, the diagnostic information on the film will disappear too, and the film will look different than the visual display (the monitor). The use of a photometer to adjust the contrast and brightness to have the same luminance on all displays theoretically, but it will not work. The fact that all display has different light output colors; even though; they all have the same phosphor amount and type in all of them which will result in a quantitative mismatch.
To perform the SMPTE test on a film printer, send the SMPTE pattern to the film laser printer as 1 picture on 1 film or 4 pictures on 1 film format which are the most commonly used format in radiology film printing. If the film needs processing, then the processing must be done (only if applicable). Place the film on the viewing box after adjusting the light of the box and the light of the room appropriately. Then compare the image on the film to the image on the monitor (the monitor must have been tested). As well, compare the film gray scale densities to monitor gray scale densities. If an object is whiter or darker on the screen than the film, then the printer needs to be fixed (if possible) or replaced.
The Effect on Hard-Copy
Printed films and compact discs (CDs) are both hard copies of the image display. These are some effects that might be spotted on a hard-copy: burn of the cathode ray tube (CRT) phosphor, effect of a raster erase feature, the effect of two raster erasing features one from the video hard-copy recorder and one from the image source working simultaneously, excessive CRT phosphor grain, and smearing or tearing of the image of the high-density portions. The SMPTE is helpful in detecting the source of the problem in the laser hard-copy recorder’s timing issues and smoothing algorithms. Eventually, it is possible to produce a film that looks like the displayed image on the monitor.
Look-Up Table
Look-Up Table (LUT) controls the luminescence and brightness of an image. LUT is made of binary numbers that use mathematical equations in post-processing stage to reference histogram, create accurate mapping function, and reassign grey scale image into different values that makes a new image. Many confuse luminescence with fluorescence. The difference between luminescence and fluorescence is that photon is emitted without heat/atom excitation and with heat/atom excitation respectively. The LUT controls the luminescence by assigning for an input value an output value. The LUT will calculate the values very quickly. The pixel value for a grey scale and black and white picture is from 0-255. In black and white image, the value of 0 represent very dark black and the value 255 represent the lightest white. For example; an 8-bit image done using the LUT which will take all values from 0-127 (which are grey scale pixels) and turn them into white and take the values of 128-255 (the darker shade pixels) and make them black see (Figure. 7). In radiology, if a radiograph is too white or too dark the computer will look into the LUT to adjust the image to look better. Some information in the radiograph can be lost and never be retrieved in the post-processing due to the use of LUT. As well, artifact can be present due to the post-processing using the LUT. Unsharp masking is an example of using the LUT which makes a copy, blur the image, and subtract it from the original image. Bone edges are not clear on the blurred image, but the subtracted image will make bone edges appear clearly. The rest of the image will be adjusted until pixel values become closer to each other.
Figure: 7. An example of gray scale and LUT. The (A) image is a gray scale image and (B) image is black and white image generated using LUT.
The LUT will change the image/gamma contrast, brightness alteration, grey value spreading, and setting individual gradation curves. The LUT will not increase the work load on the Central Processing Unit (CPU) of the computer. In order to get a good image quality, the image with a bit depth of 10 bits per pixel is being processed, if the bit-depth of the imaging machine is greater than the LUT, the LUT output will have an interpolated linearly. As well the monochrome images will not be able to apply false-color LUT. In addition, it is not able to define separate LUT characteristic for each Red, Blue, and Green (RBG) color. Even thou, there are many software developers came over this issue by allowing giving colors to a monochrome image and for LUT images by assigning different LUT for each RBG color [3]. In image acquisition computers used in radiology departments, the look-up table used to correct nonlinearity in the hard copy recorders. If the system does not use a look-up table, then the printed film and display image on the monitor will look different. New techniques now make the colored display test has the same spatial resolution of the monochrome test. The lack of convergence and the issue of maintaining the purity of colors on a color display system as when the surrounding of the MRI field is exceeding 0.5 gauss. Another issue with color display is the low dynamic range compared to monochrome image, because the color image will have the three colors RBG making a one pixel. Which makes the output of the colored pixel 1/3 of the spatial resolution of a monochrome image. As well, the shadow mask that is used in color display to separate the phosphor will reduce the spatial resolution of colored image into 2/3 of the monochrome. Which as well will make the luminescence of the colored display 20-25% of the monochrome display similar to the contrast.
Color Display
Any typical monochrome display has a bandwidth of 15 MHz at minimum. A regular video display −Television (TV)− has a typical bandwidth of 3.5 MHz the monochrome phosphor is a continuous layer coating, while the color phosphor is made by different elements of red, blue, and green, divided by a shadow mask. Therefore; a monochrome pattern is used in radiology, not a color pattern.
The SMPTE pattern is useful to test monochrome and colored display of film printers and monitors. It provides quantitative and qualitative assessment of any reduction in contrast, resolution, and dynamic range of monochrome or color images on monitors or films.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
