AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Djingri Labodi Lompo, Tingandogo University Hospital, Health Sciences Training and Research Unit, Joseph Ki-Zerbo University, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Citation: Djingri L. Lompo., Kadari Cissé., Adja M. Ouédraogo., Nagaonlé E. Somé., Ousséni Diallo. et all (2022). Short-Term Prognosis of Patients Hospitalized for Status Epilepticus in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 11(5); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/230
Copyright: © 2022 Djingri Labodi Lompo, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 07 January 2022 | Accepted: 18 April 2022 | Published: 25 April 2022
Keywords: status epilepticus ; intra hospital mortality ; disability ; altered consciousness
Introduction: Status epilepticus is one of the most common neurological emergency, with high morbidity and mortality and an often poor functional prognosis in survivors. We carried out the present study, to describe the intra-hospital clinical course and to identify the risk factors for intra-hospital death of patients hospitalized for status epilepticus in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Patients and methods: it was a prospective, cross-sectional, multi-center hospital, descriptive and analytical study, which took place from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019, involving patients consecutively hospitalized in the university hospitals of Ouagadougou, for status epilepticus. Sociodemographic characteristics, clinical data on admission, biological assessment on admission, EEG characteristics, brain scan and / or brain MRI results ; etiological diagnosis of status epilepticus and intra hospital evolutionary data of the patients, have been analyzed. Univariate analysis between the general characteristics of patients and the intra-hospital mortality, was performed in order to identify the risk factors for the intrahospital mortality.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 36.6 years with an M / F sex ratio of 1.4 ; 66 patients (72.5%) had no clinical history of epilepsy, while 25 patients (27.5%) were already known to have epilepsy. The generalized tonic-clonic SE immediately (50.5%) and the focal secondarily generalized convulsive status epilepticus (29.7%) were the most common seizure types. The average duration of an SE episode was 18 hours. status epilepticus were subdivided into status epilepticus symptomatic of acute brain conditions with 61 cases (67%), dominated by central nervous system infections and acute strokes, and status epilepticus of non-acute or sequelae etiologies with 30 cases (33%), dominated by the sequelae of head trauma. Intra-hospital complications were dominated by prolonged post-critical mental confusion, 45 cases (49.4%) and aspiration pneumonia, 30 cases (33%). In-hospital mortality was 12.1% (11 patients). At the end of hospitalization, 49 patients (53.9%) still had moderate to severe disabilities. In univariate analysis, comatose non convulsive status epilepticus (p = 0.003), and altered consciousness on admission (p = 0.026), were the risk factors for in-hospital mortality.
Conclusion: Prognosis of status epilepticus in Burkina Faso remains unfavorable with early mortality in more than one in 10 patients and poor functional outcome in more than half of the patients. Altered consciousness on admission and non-convulsive comatose status epilepticus were risk factors for early mortality. The fight against infectious diseases, the prevention of vascular risk factors, the promotion of helmet wearing in cyclists and motorcyclists, early admission of patients sufferinf of status epilepticus, and adequate and standardized management of status epilepticus, will help reduce the frequency and severity of this disease in our African regions.
Status epilepticus (SE) is the second most common neurological emergency after stroke, with high morbidity and mortality and an often poor functional prognosis in survivors [1, 2, 3].
The short-term mortality reported in the literature is very variable from one study to another, in the order of 3% to 39% [1], due to the heterogeneity of the methods used and the populations studied, in particular the inclusion or not of pediatric cases [4], strongly influenced by the underlying aetiology, the age of the patients, the clinical form of the seizures, the delays in patient admission [5].
In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), early mortality appears to be higher, particularly in adult patients, in the order of 21.3% to 44.3% in most cases [6, 7], but a lower in the order of 13.3 to 16.9% is reported in some more recent African studies including pediatric cases [8, 9], probably due to the implementation of standardized treatment protocols, better availability of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) and adequate emergency and intensive care services.
Advanced age, initial alteration of consciousness prior to administration of treatment, non-convulsive comatose SEs and acute potentially lethal etiologies, and duration of SE> 1 hour, have been identified as the strongest predictors of short-term mortality [10, 11, 12]. Their prevention or adequate management if possible, could contribute to a significant reduction in SE mortality, in particular in a context of under-equipment of health services.
Burkina Faso, like other SSA countries with limited resources, has a high prevalence and incidence of epilepsy, seizures and etiological factors of epileptic seizures, contrasting with a double diagnosis and treatment gap, exposing them to a high risk of SEs and their morbidity and mortality [7, 9, 13]. It is strong of this observation that we carried out the present hospital, multicenter, cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study. The objectives were to describe the intra-hospital clinical course and to identify the risk factors for intra-hospital death of patients hospitalized for SE in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. This study will help improve the management and the prognosis of patients hospitalized for SE.
This was a prospective, cross-sectional, multi-center hospital, descriptive and analytical study, which took place from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019, involving all patients consecutively hospitalized in the university hospitals (UH) of the city of Ouagadougou (Tingandogo, Yalgado Ouédraogo, Bogodogo, Charles De Gaulle Pediatric), for SE during the study period.
Were included in our study, patients of all ages consecutively hospitalized in the different hospitalization units of said HUs (emergency reception, neurology, pediatrics, or intensive care units, or any other services), for diagnosed SE clinically and / or confirmed by an electroencephalogram (EEG), during the study period. Note that consent to participate in the study was obtained in all patients who were aware, consistent and cooperative. For those who had altered consciousness and / or were aphasic and / or inconsistent and / or uncooperative, or for any other medical reasons, we obtained the consent of their respective families. Patients who presented with a seizure that did not meet diagnostic criteria for SE and those who did not give informed consent to participate in the study were not included in our study. The data was collected directly from patients or their families during hospitalization and recorded in their medical files, then transcribed on a data collection sheet.
Confirmation of the positive diagnosis of SE and the etiology of SE was made by a neurologist. The management of SEs at the different sites of our study was based on the recommendations of the 2009 Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF) consensus conference [14]
Data on the history of the disease, history and physical examination were systematically recorded. Complementary biological and neuroradiological examinations were performed according to the context. In an unknown patient with epilepsy: plasma biological assessment (blood count, C Reactive Protein (CRP), blood ionogram, occasional glycemia, azotemia, serum creatinine, hepatic transaminases) and brain CT scan, were made. In any febrile patient regardless of the context, a brain CT scan and a lumbar puncture with cytological, biochemical and bacteriological study of the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) were performed. In a known epileptic patient under treatment: search for factors of imbalance in the antiepileptic treatment (discontinuation of treatment, suboptimal dosage, intercurrent events such as diarrhea / vomiting, feverish state, etc.). The test for toxic subtances in the blood or urine has not been carried out in our context due to its expensive cost. Depending on the clinical course of the SE, in the emergency department, the patient was either transferred to the neurology unit (discontinuation of the SE) or to intensive care (refractory SE and/or comatose SE). Patients who were in refractory SE and / or in larvae or subtle SE and / or in comatose SE on admission to the emergency room, were directly hospitalized in the intensive care unit. The patient benefited from clinical and / or biological monitoring depending on the context. EEG was not essential for the diagnosis of SE except in non-convulsive SE cases. The outcome at discharge from hospital was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).
The following variables were taken into account in our study: sociodemographic characteristics of the patients; clinical data (history of epilepsy, time to hospital, duration of SE, number of SE episodes, semiology of SE, clinical examination upon admission); biological assessment on admission; characteristics at the critical and / or inter-critical EEG; Brain scan and / or brain MRI results ; etiological diagnosis of SE (acute epileptogenic cerebral diseases / attacks, non-acute or sequelae epileptogenic cerebral lesions, undetermined etiologies) and evolving data of the patients: duration of hospitalization, intra-hospital complications, vital and functional prognosis according to the GOS at the end of hospitalization.
The data collected were analyzed using Epi-info 7.2.1.0 software in its French version. The analysis focused on calculations of numbers, frequencies, averages, and percentages of the data collected. We carried out an univariate analysis using the Chi-square test and Fisher's test, between the general characteristics of the patients (independent variables) and the intra-hospital mortality (dependent variable), in order to identify the risk factors for the intrahospital mortality. The variables whose significance threshold was p was less than 0.05 were retained.
SE has been defined, in a general sense, by continuous epileptic seizures or by the short succession of at least two epileptic seizures without recovery of consciousness intercritically, over a period of at least 30 minutes. The generalized convulsive SE, because of its severity, was defined by continuous seizures beyond 5 minutes or by the succession of at least two epileptic seizures without complete recovery of consciousness in intercritical over a period of at least less than 5 minutes [15, 16].
The classification of SEs in the present study was adapted from that proposed by the consensus conference of the French Language Society of Resuscitation [15]. Alertness on admission was assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale.
During the study period, we consecutively collected 91 patients hospitalized for SE. The mean age of the patients was 36.6 years +/- 24.5 years (2 days and 86 years). Patients aged 15-45 and 0-14 were the most represented with 34 cases (37.4%) and 29 cases (31.9%), respectively. There was a male predominance, with 67 men (73.6%) and 24 women (26.4%); the sex ratio M / F was 1.4. The majority of patients, or 43 patients (47%) were married. Unemployed patients with 27 cases (29.7%) and retirees with 14 cases (15.4%) were the most frequent socio-professional categories. Patients residing in urban areas with 63 cases (69.2%) were the most represented (Table I)
Among our patients, 66 patients (72.5%) had no clinical history of epilepsy, while 25 patients (27.5%) were known to have epilepsy. Among non-epileptic patients, in 55 patients (83.3%), SE occurred early between 1 and 14 days after the onset of an acute brain disease compared to 11 patients (17.5%) in whom SE occurred later (beyond 14 days). For patients with known epilepsy, the mean duration of epilepsy was 39.7 months +/- 54.1 (2 - 252 months); the average seizure frequency was 2.1 seizures +/- 3.2 (1-7 monthly seizures).
Of all the patients, 88 patients (96.7%) presented with convulsive SE versus three (3) patients (3.3%) who presented with confusional non-convulsive SE. Generalized tonic-clonic SE from the start and focal secondarily generalized convulsive SE were the most represented types of seizures with respectively 46 cases (50.5%) and 27 cases (29, 7%) (Table II).
The average duration of an SE episode was 18 hours +/- 31 (5 minutes - 6 days).
SEs lasting> 2 hours and SEs lasting ≤ 30 minutes were the most represented with 36 cases (39.6%) and 34 cases (37.4%) respectively (Figure 1).
The mean number of SE episodes during hospitalization was 3.5 +/- 3.1 (1-20 episodes). EEG was performed only in 22 patients (24.2%), after monitoring of vital functions, in 9 patients (9.9%) percritical and 13 patients (14.3%) postcritical. The tracing was normal in 3 patients (13.6%) post-critical; he found epileptic paroxysms mainly focal or multifocal in 19 patients (86.4%).
On admission, a focused motor deficit with 36 cases (46.7%), fever in 28 patients (30.8%), hypertension in 21 patients (23.1%), aphasia with 16 cases (20.8%), meningeal syndrome with 10 cases (12.9%), were the main clinical signs; hyperleukocytosis with 23 cases (25.3) and anemia with 22 cases (24.2%), were the main laboratory abnormalities. A lumbar puncture with study of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was performed in 10 patients and found hypercytosis and hyperproteinorachia, respectively in 4 patients (4.4%) and 3 patients (3.3%). Brain CT scan was performed in 64 patients (70.3%), sequelae with 33 cases (51.6%), acute stroke with 14 cases (21.9%) and acute meningoencephalitis with 8 cases (12.5%), were the most frequent (Table III).
NB : Several lesions were found in the same patient
* Sequelae lesions : cortical atrophy, porencephalic cavity, hypodensity / gliosis sequelae of head trauma, stroke, post anoxo-ischemic encephalopathy or meningoencephalitis
Etiologically, SEs were subdivided into SEs symptomatic of acute brain diseases with 61 cases (67%) and SEs of non-acute or sequelae etiologies with 30 cases (33%) (Table IV).
Intra-hospital complications were observed in 58 patients (63.7%) ; prolonged post-critical mental confusion, 45 cases (49.4%), aspiration pneumonia, 30 cases (33%) and malnutrition, 21 cases (23.1%) were the most frequent (Table V)
The average length of hospital stay for patients was 10.6 days +/- 16.7 (1 - 60 days). A total of 11 patients died during hospitalization, for an intra hospital mortality rate of 12.1%. According to the age groups, the highest rate of intra-hospital mortality (33.3%) was observed in the oldest patients (> 65 years) (Table VI).
The immediate causes of death were refractory SE in 4 of 11 patients, severe sepsis and multi-organ failure in 3 of 11 patients each, and respiratory distress in 1 of 11 patients.
At the end of hospitalization, there was good recovery with normal resumption of activities in 31 patients (34.1%), 35 patients (38.5%) still had a moderate handicap (patient however autonomous in daily life) and 14 patients (15.4%) still had a severe disability (conscious but dependent patient with mental or motor impairment or both) (Figure 2).
In univariate analysis, during the analytical study, comatose or larval EME (p = 0.003), impaired vigilance during admission (p = 0.026), were the risk factors for intra-mortality. hospital identified (Table VI).
Certain important data in this study, in particular the duration of the evolution of the SE, the semiology of the seizures, obtained on the basis of the only questioning of the patients and / or their entourage, could therefore be biased. Indeed, most SEs started before the patients were admitted.
The relatively low proportion of pediatric cases (31.9%) could have biased the data of this study when we know that the high prevalence of epilepsy in children. Conversely, the intra-hospital mortality rate in our study could have been underestimated due to the inclusion of pediatric cases with a better life-threatening prognosis.
Nonetheless, the multicenter nature of our study, extended to all 3 university hospitals in the city of Ouagadougou, allowed us to have fairly exhaustive, representative and reliable data.
In SSA, with fairly comparable methodologies, the intra-hospital or short-term mortality rates reported to date vary from 13.3% to 44.3% [6, 7, 8, 13, 17], contrasting sharply with the low short-term mortality rates of 3.4% reported in the United States of America [5] and 7.6% in Switzerland [18]. However, higher death rates have also been reported in other developed countries [15]. This variation in mortality between studies was linked to whether or not post-anoxic states were taken into account and the differences in initial management.
The causes of death during a SE are, in descending order: its etiology, the patient dying due to the underlying disease and not their SE directly; the complications of intensive care, proportional to the length of stay in intensive care, and therefore also linked to the refractory nature of the SE; prolonged non-controllable refractory SEs [19], including refractory SEs of autoimmune etiology, referred to as NORSE (New Onset Refractory Seizures), or FIRES (Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome) [20]. These causes of death, with a few exceptions, were indeed found in our series.
The availability and accessibility of SE drugs, medico-technical infrastructures and equipment (multi-purpose medical resuscitation, neurological intensive care units, etc.) and timely transport of patients, in developed countries, may explain the marked regional disparity in mortality figures.
This heavy mortality of SE in SAA could be explained by the difficulties of the management of SE, linked to the late admissions of patients at the stage of larvae or even refractory SE, the low availability of intensive care units and / or resuscitation, the unavailability of injectable forms of certain AEDs of proven efficacy (such as clonazepam, phosphenytoin, sodium valproate, Levetiracetam), thus causing difficulties in applying SEs support protocols [7]. We must also mention the high proportion of generalized convulsive forms, clinical gravity specific to acute infectious or cerebrovascular aetiologies, the most frequent in this region [7, 9, 17]. In our series, the relatively low early mortality rate of SE is explained by the inclusion of pediatric patients representing 31.9% of cases, the inclusion of a proportion of 17.6% of non convulsive SEs without alteration of consciousness, of better prognosis. In our opinion, the low rate of intra-hospital mortality in our series could also be explained by the efforts to implement protocols for the management of SEs as soon as patients are admitted to the emergency room.
The most robust predictors of intra-hospital or early mortality reported in the literature are: advanced age, most often ≥ 65 years old [10, 11, 12, 21, 22]; acute etiologies of SE, in particular potentially fatal ones such as acute central nervous system infections and acute strokes [10, 11, 21, 23, 24] ; altered consciousness in the initial phase of SE (before administration of treatment), especially non-convulsive SEs with coma [22, 25, 26, 27], maximum duration of seizures (≥ 1 hour) [21, 22]. In our study, only alteration of consciousness in the initial phase of SE and non-convulsive SE with coma, were identified as risk factors for early death, in accordance with the data from the literature. The other predictive factors could not be found, probably due to the inclusion of pediatric cases and certain limitations inherent in our study.
In our series, at the end of hospitalization, 34% of cases had good recovery with normal resumption of activities, close to the results of the study by Cissé et al in Guinea, where a favorable evolution without sequelae was only found in 21.1% of cases [7]. However, in the study by Doumbia et al [13] in Côte d’Ivoire, satisfactory progress with cessation of SE was noted in 63.3% of cases. More than half of our patients had a moderate to severe disability at the end of hospitalization, due to subsequent motor and / or cognitive impairment. However, the responsibility of the SE in the genesis of these sequelae is very difficult to isolate from the neurological deficit associated with the causal neurological injury. Nevertheless, drug-resistant epilepsy and sequelae cognitive-behavioral disorders have been reported after very prolonged SE secondary to bi-hippocampal involvement (edema then cortical atrophy) [28], corroborated by anatomical pathology data in one patient [29].
SE more often affects young patients without a history of epilepsy. The clinical profile is dominated by generalized convulsive forms from the outset or secondarily. Acute central nervous system infections, acute strokes and sequelae of head trauma are the main aetiologies. The prognosis remains unfavorable with early mortality in more than one in 10 patients and poor functional outcome in more than half of the patients. Altered consciousness on admission and non-convulsive comatose SEs were risk factors for early mortality. The fight against infectious diseases, the prevention of vascular risk factors, the promotion of helmet wearing in cyclists and motorcyclists, early admission of patients sufferinf of SE, and adequate and standardized management of SEs, will help reduce the frequency and severity of this disease in our African regions.
Conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
