AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research
*Corresponding Author: Elie NKWABONG, Obstetrician & Gynecologist, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences & University Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Citation: Elie NKWABONG, Manuella F. MAGNOUI, Florent F. YMELE. (2021). Risk factors for early neonatal death despite cesarean section. J Clinical Research and Reports, 9(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/202
Copyright: © 2021, Elie NKWABONG. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 September 2021 | Accepted: 04 October 2021 | Published: 15 October 2021
Keywords: early neonatal death following emergency cesarean section; risk factors; birth weight less than 2000g; intra-partum hemorrhage; intra-partum fever
Objective: To identify the risk factors for early neonatal death (NND) despite cesarean section (CS).
Methods: This case-control study was carried out between 1st February and 31st May, 2019. Files of women whose newborns died within seven days following CS and those of women whose newborns were alive seven days after CS were examined. The main variables recorded included maternal age, educational level, gestational age at delivery, number of antenatal visits done, whether the woman was referred or not, intrapartum fever or hemorrhage, indication of CS, decision delivery interval, birthweight and sex of newborn. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Fisher exact test, t-test and logistic regression were used for comparison. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Our frequency of NND after CS was 4.8% (51/1053). Significant risk factors for NND after CS were birth weight <2000g (aOR 48.18, 95%CI 12.97-152.21), intra-partum hemorrhage (aOR 12.15, 95%CI 5.77-25.97), intra-partum fever (aOR 5.64, 95%CI 1.81-17.66), ˂4 antenatal visits (aOR 4.13, 95%CI 2.71-6.74), arrival ˃1h after referral (aOR 3.09, 95%CI 1.67-5.71) and primary school education level (aOR 2.39, 95%CI 1.16-4.92).
Conclusion: From the risk factors identified above, we can recommend that women, especially those with primary school education level, should be counselled to attend at least four antenatal visits to allow the diagnosis and treatment of some diseases. Moreover, CS should be carried out as fast as possible in the cases of intrapartum hemorrhage. Women with intrapartum fever needs particular attention. Lastly, referral should be organized so that the woman arrives earlier.
Cesarean section (CS) consists of performing a laparotomy and hysterotomy to deliver the fetus, though other techniques such as vaginal cesarean delivery does not need a prior laparotomy. The rate of CS has risen in the last decades in almost all the continents. Nowadays, these rates range approximately between 16% and 51.9% [1,2]. High rate of 87.9% has been observed in Brazilian private health sectors [2].
This surgical procedure carries some risks, especially the emergency CS. The frequent immediate maternal complications include bladder or bowel injuries, hemorrhage and even maternal death. Short- and long-term complications include surgical site infection, thrombo-embolic diseases, urinary tract infection, uterine synechiae, morbidly adherent placenta and even uterine rupture during subsequent deliveries [3-5]. This procedure has a cost, especially in low- and middle-income countries where health insurance policies often do not exist and the family has to afford all the cost.
Although many of these emergency CSs are carried out to safe the fetus life, it frequently happens that some newborns die after the operation. Early neonatal death (NND), defined as the death of a newborn between delivery and seven days after birth, represents 73% of all postnatal deaths worldwide [5]. It is a very difficult condition for the mother or the couple to lose the baby, especially after having spent sometimes lot of money through a CS, operation they would qualify as useless.
There is scarcity of studies in the literature on neonatal death despite emergency CS. The available studies found that prematurity, low birth weight, neonatal asphyxia, late arrival after referral and neonatal infection were the main risk factors for NND after CS [6]. Some other risk factors might exist especially in our country where for various reasons CSs are sometimes carried out late. This lateness might be associated with increased risk of NND. Identifying the risk factors might help in the prevention of some cases of NND after CS.
No study aimed at determining the risk factors for NND despite emergency CS has been carried out in our country. This study, therefore, aimed at identifying these risk factors.
This case-control study was carried out between 1st February and 31st May, 2019 in two University Teaching Hospitals. Files of women whose newborns died within seven days following a CS were recruited as cases. For each case, the files of the three women whose newborns were delivered by CS immediately after the case and who were alive and healthy seven days after CS were recruited as controls. Files of women with multiple pregnancies and intrauterine fetal demise before CS were excluded. A written informed consent was obtained from each woman or from their relatives. This study was approved by the two institutional ethics committees.
The variables recorded on a pre-established questionnaire included maternal age at delivery, educational level, marital status, parity, gestational age at delivery (confirmed by an ultrasound scan performed before 20 weeks’ gestation), number of antenatal visits done, number of intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) against malaria (using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine), HIV status, fetal presentation, whether the woman was referred or not, intrapartum fever or hemorrhage, the indication of CS, the decision delivery interval (time interval between decision of CS and the delivery of the newborn), birthweight, sex of newborn, presence or not of fetal malformation, Apgar score at 1st and 5th minutes.
The necessary minimum sample size was calculated as needing at least 47 cases of NND after CS, using the following formula: N=2×(Zα+Zβ/P0-P1)2×P×(1-P) [7], where Zα =1.65 corresponds to a type I error of 5%, Zβ =0.84 corresponds to a type II error of 20% or a power of 80%, P0 the assumed percentage of referred women in the group with NND (50%), P1 the assumed percentage of referred women in the group without NND (25%) and P is (P0+P1)/2. To increase the power of our study, we decided to recruit three controls for each case.
Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Data of cases were compared to those of controls. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables and t-test to compare continuous variables. We used odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to present the comparison between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to control for confounders. P<0>
During the study period, we had a total of 51 NND out of 1053 CS performed, giving a rate of 4.8%. Also, the files of 153 newborns who were alive and healthy seven days after CS were recruited as controls. Some sociodemographic and obstetrical variables are given in (Table 1).
Variables | Group (n=51) with early NND after CS N (%) | Group (n=153) without NND after CS N (%) | OR | 95% CI | P-value | |
Maternal age (y) | 28.3 ± 6.5 (18-45) | 28.1 ± 7.2 (16-43) | - | - | 0.860 | |
Parity | 1.9 ± 1.5 (0-6) | 1.37 ± 1.4 (0-6) | - | - | 0.022 | |
Gestational age (w) | 34.1 ± 9.0 (29-42) | 39.0 ± 1.1 (37-42) | - | - | ˂0.001 | |
Birthweight (g) | 2330.1 ± 108.6 (850-5900) | 3125.2 ± 461.3 (1705-4600) | - | - | ˂0.001 | |
Marital status | Married | 24 (47.0) | 73 (47.7) | 0.97 | 0.51-1.83 | 1 |
Single | 27 (53.0) | 80 (52.3) | ||||
Level of education | PS | 16 (31.4) | 21 (13.7) | 2.87 | 1.35-6.08 | 0.005 |
˃PS | 35 (68.6) | 132 (86.3) | ||||
Women referred | Yes | 28 (54.9) | 41 (26.8) | 3.32 | 1.72-6.41 | ˂0.001 |
No | 23 (45.1) | 112 (73.2) | ||||
Intra-partum fever | Yes | 9 (17.6) | 5 (3.3) | 6.34 | 2.01-19.94 | 0.001 |
No | 42 (82.3) | 148 (96.7) | ||||
Intra-partum hemorrhage | Yes | 13 (25.5) | 5 (3.3) | 10.12 | 3.40-30.15 | ˂0.001 |
No | 38 (74.5) | 148 (96.7) | ||||
Birthweight (g) | <2000> | 25 (49) | 2 (1.3) | 72.59 | 16.21-325.09 | ˂0.001 |
≥2000 | 26 (51) | 151 (98.7) | ||||
Neonatal resuscitation | Yes | 39 (76.5) | 9 (5.9) | 52.00 | 20.43-132.30 | ˂0.001 |
No | 12 (23.5) | 144 (94.1) | ||||
NND: Neonatal death, OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, CS: Cesarean section, PS: primary school
Table 1: Some sociodemographic characteristics of the population under study
The mean number of IPT against malaria was lower amongst cases (1.9 ± 1.1, range: 1-6) than amongst controls (2.8 ± 1.3, range: 1-7), P˂0.0001. Also, the mean number of antenatal visits was lower amongst cases (3.0 ± 1.6, range: 1-8) than amongst controls (4.6 ± 1.6, range: 1-9), P˂0.0001.
Babies of women who had ˂4 visits were more found amongst cases than amongst controls (29 or 56.9% vs 29 or 19.0%, OR 5.63, 95%CI 2.83-11.19, P˂0.001). Attendance of less than 4 visits remained significantly associated with NND despite emergency CS after adjustment for confounding factors (aOR 4.13, 95%CI 2.71-6.74, P<0>
No woman living with HIV-AIDS was found amongst cases compared to three amongst controls (P=0.420). Women referred were more found amongst cases (Table 1).
Women who arrived more than one hour after decision of referral were more found amongst cases than amongst controls (27 or 52.9% vs 39 or 25.5%, OR 3.28, 95%CI 1.70-6.35, P˂0.001). Arrival more than one hour after referral remained significantly associated with NND despite CS after adjustment for confounding factors (aOR 3.09, 95%CI 1.67-5.71, P=0.006).
Concerning gestational ages at delivery, those between 40 and 42 were less frequent amongst cases than amongst controls (5 or 9.8% vs 45 or 29.4%, OR 0.26, 95%CI 0.09-0.70, P=0.002). Prematurity (˂37 weeks) was more frequent amongst cases than amongst controls (25 or 49.0% vs 6 or 3.9%, OR 23.55, 95%CI 8.80-63.00, P˂0.001). Babies born before 34 weeks were more found amongst cases (17 or 33.3% vs 1 or 0.6%, OR 76, 95%CI 9.77-590.84, P˂0.001).
With regards to fetal presentations, the frequencies of breech were similar amongst both groups (2 or 3.9% vs 6 or 3.9%, P=0.680). Abnormal presentations were less frequent amongst cases (1 or 2.0% vs 10 or 6.5%), but the difference was statistically insignificant (P=0.189). Cephalic presentations were commoner in both groups (48 or 94.1% vs 137 or 89.6%, P=0.250). As concerns to the type of CS, the majority of the CS in both groups were emergency CS (49/51 or 96.0% for cases, compared to 135/153 or 88.2% for controls). Emergency CS was more associated with NND, though the difference was statistically insignificant (OR 3.26, 95%CI 0.73-14.59, P=0.080). The majority of CSs in both groups were carried out by residents (40/51 or 78.4% and 106/153 or 69.3%). NND was slightly more frequent when the CS was performed by a resident (OR 1.61, 95%CI 0.76-3.41), but the difference was statistically insignificant (P= 0.140). Table 2 shows the indications for CS.
Indications | Group (n=51) with early NND after CS N (%) | Group (n=153) without NND after CS N (%) | OR | 95% CI | P-value |
Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia | 16 (31.4) | 9 (5.9) | 7.31 | 2.98-17.92 | ˂0.001 |
Acute fetal distress | 10 (19.6) | 20 (13.1) | 1.62 | 0.70-3.74 | 0.179 |
Placenta abruption | 7 (13.7) | 2 (1.3) | 12.01 | 2.40-59.90 | 0.001 |
Placenta praevia | 5 (9.8) | 3* (2.0) | 5.34 | 1.25-23.61 | 0.024 |
CPD | 4 (4.8) | 91 (59.4) | 0.05 | 0.02-0.17 | ˂0.001 |
Cord prolapse | 3 (5.9) | 1 (0.6) | 9.50 | 0.96-93.47 | 0.049 |
Imminent uterine rupture | 3 (5.9) | 6 (3.9) | 1.53 | 0.36-6.35 | 0.399 |
Obstructed labor | 1 (2.0) | 6 (3.9) | 0.49 | 0.05-4.16 | 0.441 |
Breech presentation | 1* (2.0) | 4* (2.6) | 0.74 | 0.08-6.82 | 0.632 |
Transverse lie | 1* (2.0) | 2* (1.3) | 1.51 | 0.13-17.01 | 0.580 |
Double scarred uterus | 0 (0) | 9* (5.9) | - | - | 0.070 |
NND: Neonatal death, OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, CS: Cesarean section, CPD: Cephalopelvic disproportion.
*Elective CSs.
Table 2: Indications for cesarean sections in the study population
NNDs were a little bit more found amongst cases than amongst controls when the decision delivery interval was more than 60 minutes (42/51 or 82.3% vs 114/153 or 74.5%, OR 1.59, 95%CI 0.71-3.57), but the difference was statistically insignificant (P=0.170).
The distribution of birthweights in the population under study are illustrated in Table 3. No fetal malformations were observed amongst cases as against two amongst controls (P=0.561).
Birthweight (g) | Group (n=51) with early NND after CS N (%) | Group (n=153) without NND after CS N (%) | OR | 95% CI | P-value |
<1500> | 11 (21.6) | 0 (0) | - | - | ˂0.001 |
1500-1999 | 14 (27.4) | 2 (1.3) | 28.56 | 6.21-131.22 | ˂0.001 |
2000-2499 | 2 (3.9) | 3 (1.9) | 2.04 | 0.33-12.57 | 0.367 |
2500-2999 | 4 (7.8) | 63 (41.1) | 0.12 | 0.04-0.35 | ˂0.001 |
3000-3499 | 14 (27.5) | 51 (33.3) | 0.75 | 0.37-1.52 | 0.274 |
3500-3999 | 5 (9.8) | 24 (15.7) | 0.58 | 0.21-1.62 | 0.211 |
≥4000 | 1 (2) | 10 (6.5) | 0.28 | 0.03-2.29 | 0.189 |
Total | 51 (100) | 153 (100) |
| ||
NND: Neonatal death, OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, CS: Cesarean section.
Table 3: Distribution of birth weights
With regard to fetal sexes, male sex proportions were similar amongst both groups (25 or 49.0% vs 78 or 51.0%, OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.49-1.74, P=0.467).
First minute Apgar score was poorer (˂7) amongst cases (41/51 or 80.4%) than amongst controls (10/153 or 6.5%), OR 58.63, 95%CI 22.83-150.51, P˂0.001. Furthermore, fifth minute Apgar score was poorer (˂7) amongst cases (27 or 53.0%) than amongst controls (2 or 1.3%), OR 84.93, 95%CI 18.96-380.48, P˂0.001.
After regression analysis, the risk factors for NND after CS were birthweight <2000g>
Risk factors | OR | 95%CI | P-value | aOR | 95%CI | P-value |
Birthweight <2000g> | 72.59 | 16.21-325.09 | ˂0.001 | 48.18 | 12.97-152.21 | <0> |
Intra-partum hemorrhage | 10.12 | 3.40-30.15 | ˂0.001 | 12.15 | 5.77-25.97 | ˂0.001 |
Intra-partum fever | 6.34 | 2.01-19.94 | 0.001 | 5.64 | 1.81-17.66 | 0.003 |
˂4 antenatal visits | 5.63 | 2.83-11.19 | ˂0.001 | 4.13 | 2.71-6.74 | <0> |
Arrival ˃1h after referral | 3.28 | 1.70-6.35 | ˂0.001 | 3.09 | 1.67-5.71 | 0.006 |
Primary school education level | 2.87 | 1.35-6.08 | 0.005 | 2.39 | 1.16-4.92 | 0.018 |
OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CS: Cesarean section.
Table 4: Independent risk factors for early neonatal death following CS
The protective factors were cephalopelvic disproportion, birthweight between 2500 and 2999g and gestational age between 40 and 42 weeks.
Our rate of NND after CS (4.8%) is lower than those of 7.3% and 9.0% observed in Nepal and Rwanda respectively [8,9]. The high rates in those studies might be attributed to the fact that they dealt only with emergency CS. Moreover, the commonest indication was fetal distress in those studies.
We found no association between maternal age, parity, marital status, HIV status, fetal presentation, qualification of the surgeon (obstetrician vs resident) and NND. This might be attributed to our small sample size. The absence of association between fetal presentation and NND is in accordance with other studies which found no association between NND and the fetal presentation (whether breech presentation or cephalic presentation) in cases of cesarean deliveries [10]. In breech, deaths occur frequently during vaginal delivery due to higher risk of birth asphyxia.
No significant association was found between decision delivery interval ˃60 min and NND. This might be attributed to the fact that cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) (one of the protective factors for NND after CS) was the most frequent indication amongst the total population (82/204 or 42.0%). Moreover, the majority of CS with NND were carried out amongst women referred from less equipped health structures (28 cases or 54.9%), with 27 of them arriving more than one hour after decision of referral. Late arrival after referral might be associated with fetal hypoxia or acidosis, therefore, with brain injury. Henceforth, the promptitude or not of performing CS might have little effect on the neonatal outcome.
No association between acute fetal distress (AFD) and NND was observed in our series. It might be explained by the fact that the realization of CS was speedy when AFD was diagnosed.
CS should be carried out as fast as possible (within 30 min as recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other societies [11], especially in cases of placenta previa, placenta abruptio, cord prolapse, preeclampsia/eclampsia and AFD, since they were significantly associated with NND in our series. Some authors observed that for some other indications (with maternal or fetal compromise but not immediately life-threatening), the CS could still be practiced after 60 or even 90 minutes without increasing the risk of early NND [12].
Arrival ˃1h after referral was a risk factor for NND in our study. Late arrival has also been associated with NND in other studies with an OR of 2.11 [13]. More precisely, arrival more than 60 min after referral has been associated with NND with an OR of 5.82 [9]. This lateness in our series might be due to transport difficulties, traffic jam or reluctance of the woman to leave the health structure. Studies should be carried out to elucidate this.
CPD was protective for NND after CS. When there is CPD, the fetal head does not engage easily. Therefore, no hypoxia resulting from a cord compression or traction or from maternal hemorrhage is present. It is only in cases of prolonged second stage of labor that the fetal head and therefore the fetal brain can be seriously traumatized by the maternal bony pelvis, leading to AFD with subsequent neonatal asphyxia and death [14].
The newborns whose birthweight was ˂2000 g were at risk of NND. This shows that pregnancies should be well followed up to avoid as much as possible intrauterine growth restriction and premature deliveries. Moreover, our neonatal intensive care unit should be well equipped in order to take care of these babies, especially those ˂1500g.
Women should attend more visits (at least four), this would enable prevention if possible, early diagnosis and treatment of some diseases or unusual conditions such as preeclampsia, placenta previa or malaria. Some cases of intrapartum fever might be due to malaria given that the mean number of IPT was lower amongst cases. Emphasis should be carried out amongst women with primary school education level, who might not understand the importance of frequent visits.
Newborns with 5th min Apgar score ˂7 had an OR of 58.63 of dying within the seven days following CS. Some authors found an OR of more than 102 of dying when the 5th min Apgar score was ˂7 [15].
Our limitations are firstly our small sample size. Secondly, we could not appreciate the impact of the decision delivery interval on the neonatal outcome because the majority of referred cases arrived more than one hour after decision of referral.
NND after CS is more observed in women who had ˂4 visits, in women with pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, placenta abruption, placenta praevia, cord prolapse, birth weight ˂2000g, primary school education level and intrapartum fever. Therefore, women should be counselled to attend at least four antenatal visits to allow the diagnosis and treatment of eventual diseases. Moreover, CS should be carried out as fast as possible in the cases of intrapartum hemorrhage. Referral should be organized so that the woman arrives earlier. Women with intrapartum fever needs particular attention.
The authors report no declaration of interest.
AFD: acute fetal distress, AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, CI: Confidence interval, CPD: cephalopelvic disproportion, CS: Cesarean section, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, IPT: intermittent preventive treatment, NND: neonatal death, OR: odds ratio, SPSS: statistical package for social sciences.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
