AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Ahmed M. Essam ElDin Mansour, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Ain Shams University, Egypt, E-mail: Ayman_gamal07@yahoo.com
Citation: Ahmed M. Essam ElDin Mansour , Mostafa Abd El-nassier Abd Elgawad . Retrospective Research exploring gestational atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome ..J. Obstetrics Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, 1(1); doi. 10.31579/2578-8965/004
Copyright: © 2017 Ahmed M. Essam ElDin Mansour et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 01 January 2017 | Accepted: 10 February 2017 | Published: 27 February 2017
Keywords: hemolytic uremic syndrome, thrombotic microangiopathy, plasmapheresis, therapeutic plasma
Aim: A retrospective research study revealing clinical features and prognostic parameters of 22 cases of gestational atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.
Methodology: A retrospective research study in an analytical manner of 22 cases of gestational Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome from the Demerdash Maternity Hospital records using diverse management protocols.
Results: 12 cases underwent plasma exchange management protocol with a favourable impact regarding renal response in only 8 cases. On the contrary, 10 cases were managed with high dose plasma infusion with an excellent renal response in 7 cases by regaining renal functional capacity in managed cases.
Conclusion: The research performed by our group revealed considerable effectiveness of high dose therapy plasma infusion management of atypical HUS. Although therapeutic plasma exchange is the recommended treatment of HUS, this cumbersome procedure may not be available for all patients in an emergency. In this context, plasma infusion may represent an alternative first-line therapy.
Gestational atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is caused by thrombotic microangiopathy due to unrestrained complement system triggering during gestation. Gestational atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is a catastrophic clinical scienario as there is imperfect clinical knowledge and management understanding. A retrospective research approach is performed to explore and reveal in an analytical manner the clinical features and prognostic parameters of 22 patients of gestational atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome from the Demerdash Maternity Hospital records undergoing diverse management protocols. Sixteen cases clinically presented at some stage in the first gestation and nine cases demanded hemodialysis for management at the time of clinical diagnosis.13 patients had major, obstetric complications that triggered a thrombotic
microangiopathy cascade [1-5].
Postpartum stage carried the most hazardous risk for pathological development of the disease and the study category revealed a linkage and a significant correlation of cesarean delivery with gestational Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. 12 cases undergone plasma exchange management protocol with an encouraging impact as regards renal functional response revealed in only eight patients. Quite the opposite, 10 cases were managed by high dose plasma infusion with an outstanding renal functional response in 7 cases. Even though the group studied is somewhat small in number, however the research data obtained reveal that gestational atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome is similar to other clinical types of atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome and imply similarity of high dose plasma infusion management protocol with plasma exchange protocol. Findings obtained from this research are constructive to advance and enhance clinical prognosis in this category of case scienarios as regards gestational hemolytic uremic syndrome [6-15].
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy linked to underlying genetic or acquired pathological basis that result from unrestrained complement system triggering, causing renal failure and other complications.Gestation associated with atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome reflects thrombotic microangiopathy occurring within the period of gestation or after delivery in the postpartum time zone, additionally it is considered a systemic morbid disease with high rate of maternal mortality. However it is a rare clinical scenario occurring 1 in every 25,000 conceptions reflecting one fifth of all cases presented with atypical heamolytic uremic syndrome in females [16-20].
HUS represents a medical emergency, the prognosis of which has been outstandingly improved by the administration of large volumes of plasma, either associated with plasmapheresis or not. The efficacy of other agents, such as steroids and antiplatelet agents, has not been validated in randomized studies and remains widely debated [11]. Indeed, their use is empirical and depends on the clinician’s experience [24-28]. Large volumes of plasma are required for the management of HUS, and therapeutic plasma exchanges are usually recommended to avoid fluid overload [24, 25].
However, when compared with high-dose plasma infusion, therapeutic plasma exchange is a cumbersome [8] and invasive (23] procedure that may not be available easily, especially in emergency settings. Few studies have attempted to compare these 2 therapeutic modalities [18, 24]. The authors of a large prospective study reported therapeutic plasma exchange to be superior to plasma infusion [24]. In this study, however, the volumes of plasma administered in the plasma infusion group were low compared with those of the therapeutic plasma exchange group (15 versus 45 mL/kg per day, respectively), and therefore the clear effectiveness of high-dose plasma infusion could not be tested. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the relative efficacy of high-dose plasma infusion (25–30 mL/kg per day) and therapeutic plasma exchange to assess if high-dose plasma infusion could be used as an efficient and safe first-line therapy for TTP/HUS in emergency settings.
Data obtained for our research is obtained from demerdash maternity hospital and hemodialysis unit hospital records and data system. Tabulated and analyzed for observation of clinical outcomes of interest.
HUS is a severe life-threatening systemic disorder requiring prompt treatment. High-dose plasma therapy has improved the prognosis dramatically, permitting complete remission in 70%-80% of cases [24]. Since it allows the infusion of larger volumes of plasma, therapeutic plasma exchange has been reported to be the treatment of choice, compared with plasma infusion alone, in a comparative trial [24]. It also has been suggested that therapeutic plasma exchange may remove toxic factors from plasma and restore normal plasma viscosity [25]. However, therapeutic plasma exchange imposes a heavy demand on available resources, which may be difficult to obtain, especially in an emergency. Furthermore, the efficiency of plasma infusion alone has been largely reported, especially when large volumes of plasma are delivered [26]. Indeed, high-dose plasma infusion represents an interesting alternative therapy for HUS in emergency settings.
This approach was influenced at least in part by the fact that in previous studies [19,24]. Clinical and standard biologic parameters on admission were reported to have a poor prognostic value, particularly in terms of response to treatment. Despite the retrospective nature of our study and the fact that therapeutic decisions were not randomized, neurologic involvement was represented equally in both groups, including the more severe variants, and laboratory values on admission were comparable in the 2 groups. Importantly, patients with HUS associated with bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, metastatic cancer, or CDC stage C HIV disease were excluded because the disease course was determined by the primary underlying disease, regardless of initial treatment.
In both groups, patients received large volumes of plasma daily, with similar treatment duration. We found that complete remission and mortality rates in the HD-PI group were comparable to those of the TPE group.
However, the parenteral administration of large doses of protein (protein content of infused plasma is at least 5 g/dL, with 60% albumin) [27] is believed to enhance the glomerular epithelial cell absorption of albumin [28]. Studies on experimental rat models of overload proteinuria induced by infusion of bovine serum albumin have shown that increased transcapillary movement of proteins causes degenerative changes of glomerular epithelial cells. These lesions are characterized by swelling, vacuolization, increased reabsorption droplets, and detachment of glomerular epithelium from the underlying glomerular basement membrane, which lead to large pore defects. In these studies, however, changes were completely reversible [29]. In our patients, the possibility that preexisting glomerular lesions related to HUS may have facilitated an alteration in glomerular membrane pore structure cannot be ruled out.
In both groups, steroids were administered inconsistently compared with others [30], largely because in both groups of our study, infectious diseases hampered the use of steroids in many patients (8 patients in the HD-PI group and 6 in the TPE group).
Particularly, Rock et al [31] conducted a prospective and randomized study that compared therapeutic plasma exchange (45–60 mL/kg daily) with plasma infusion (15 mL/kg per day). The outcomes in the 2 groups were compared 9 days and again 6 months after entry into the trial. At both 9 days and 6 months, response rates were significantly higher in the TPE group than in the plasma infusion group (TPE group: 24/51 and 40/51, respectively; plasma infusion group: 13/51 and 25/51, respectively). However, one may hypothesize that higher volumes of plasma in the plasma infusion group may have improved the response rate in this group.
In a retrospective study, Novitzky et al [32] compared 10 patients treated with plasma infusion (25.9 mL/kg per day) as first-line therapy with 9 others treated with therapeutic plasma exchange. They found that with plasma infusion, 6 patients responded while 4 others did not and died. Three of these patients were switched to therapeutic plasma exchange with no efficacy.
As in other studies [33-35], no prognostic factors could be defined on admission, which emphasizes that specific therapies based on initial clinical and standard biologic parameters remain challenging in HUS.
Our results suggest that high-dose plasma infusion (25–30 mL/kg per day) is an efficient treatment of TTP/HUS in an emergency, especially when therapeutic plasma exchange is not available, since neither complete remission and mortality rates, nor median duration of clinical and biologic abnormalities are worsened. Moreover, high-dose plasma infusion may reduce the duration of central catheter use, which may prevent complications such as thrombosis or infections. However, high-dose plasma infusion may be rapidly hampered by fluid overload, and may thus require a switch to therapeutic plasma exchange until complete remission. Other side effects such as transient proteinuria may also be observed in prolonged high-dose plasma infusion treatment. Therefore, the occurrence of proteinuria or the exacerbation of preexisting proteinuria during high-dose plasma infusion treatment may not systematically indicate a renal manifestation of HUS, and should not warrant a renal biopsy.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
