AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Ahmed N Ghanem, General surgeon, University of Opole, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health.
Citation: Ahmed N Ghanem. (2023), Re-print: Update on Ghanem’s New Scientific Discoveries in physics, Physiology, and Medicine, J, Surgical Case Reports and Images 6(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-1897/142
Copyright: © 2023 Ahmed N Ghanem, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 23 January 2023 | Accepted: 30 January 2023 | Published: 18 February 2023
Keywords: shock; hyponatraemia; fluid therapy; The TURP syndrome; ARDS; LPHS; bladder cancer
Citation: Ahmed N Ghanem. Update on Ghanem’s New Scientific Discoveries in physics, Physiology, and Medicine. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 31(3)-2020. BJSTR. MS.ID.005117.
Introduction and Objective: To report the new scientific discoveries in physics, physiology and medicine by one author.
Material and Methods: Results of my research are summarized. It is based on 2 clinical studies one prospective and the second case series on hyponatraemia (HN) of the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) syndrome. A physics study on porous orifice (G) tube proves Starling’s law is wrong. I reported prospective study on nephroptosis revealing its link with the loin pain haematuria syndrome (LPHS) and curative surgery for it.
Results: Two physics and two physiological discoveries are reported. Acute HN presents as shock during surgery. It is induced by massive gain of sodium-free fluid recognized as volumetric overload shock (VOS). Features of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome occur, include ARDS, Acute renal failure (ARF) and Coma. The prospective study demonstrated volumetric overload is the most significant in patho-aetiology. The case series demonstrated mistaking VOS for a known shock and treating it with further volume expansion cause death. Correct diagnoses as VOS and treating it with hypertonic sodium is lifesaving. The physics study on the G tube demonstrated that proximal, akin to arterial, pressure induces suction not filtration producing the hydrodynamic phenomenon that replaces Starling’s law. The link of LPHS with nephroptosis is demonstrated by the IVU 7 sign. The curative surgery for LPHS is renal sympathetic denervation and nephropexy.
Conclusion: Dilution HN presents as shock that is mistaken for known shocks and treated with volume expansion causing death or ARDS. Manifestations include shock, ARDS, ARF and Coma. The correct treatment is hypertonic sodium. Starling s law has proved wrong. The correct replacement is the hydrodynamics of G tube. The puzzle of LPHS was also resolved.
HN: Hyponatraemia; ARDS: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; TURP: The Transurethral Resection of the Prostate; LPHS: Loin Pain
This article summarizes the full list of recent scientific discoveries in physics, physiology and medicine made by a single scientific medical investigator and independent researcher who was fully self-financed supported by a full list of reported articles in reputable open access journals.
The discoveries are:
Physics Discoveries
1. The hydrodynamics of the porous orifice (G) tube [1-4]
2. The Tree Branching Law (TBL) [5-8].
Physiological Discoveries
1. Proving Starling’s law for the capillary-interstitial (ISF) fluid is wrong and providing the correct replacement of the magnetic field like fluid hydrodynamics of the G tube.
2. The TBL Corrects two misconceptions on capillary physiology namely:
a. The cross-section areas of all the capillaries is larger than the aorta
b. The red blood cells (RBCs) speed in a capillary is thought “very slow” to allow for the slow perfusion of the capillary-ISF transfer as based on Starling’s forces.
Biochemical Discoveries
Medical Discoveries
Despite multiple and powerful reporting in the literature on my multiple and important scientific discoveries the whole medicalworld is not responding. It seems to be in a deep coma. Even the top Medical, surgical and scientific journals including Nature, Nature Medicine, Science, Lancet, British Medical Journal, New England Journal of Medicine. Journal of The American Medical Association, The Surgeon- The Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Physiology and Urology journals have repeatedly done serious mistakes rejecting the many articles I sent to them. They may ignore my person, but they cannot wrong any of my new discoveries. Here is a summary of my new discoveries to show you how wrong they all are [16-19].
My scientific discoveries are many and most important made over the last 32 years of my career life spent in investigating and reporting these articles. The articles recognize2 new types of shocksand its treatment, proves that Starling’s law for the capillary interstitial fluid transfer is wrong and provides an alternative mechanism: The hydrodynamics of a porous orifice (G) Tube.
These discoveries resolve the puzzles of 3 syndromes discovering its patho-aetiology and new successful treatments; namely the transurethral resectionof the prostate (TURP) syndromeand acute dilution hyponatraemia (HN), the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the loin pain haematuria syndrome (LPHS). Not only the exact patho-aetiologies of these syndromeswere discovered but also successful treatments for it were found. Thetwo new types of vascularshocks are volume kinetic shocks or VOS defined here.
Massive fluid infusions in a short time induceVO) of two types: Type one (VOS1)and Type two (VOS2). VOS1 is inducedby sodium- free fluid of 3.5-5 litersin one hour known as the TURP syndrome5 or hyponatraemic shock. VOS2 may complicate VOS1 or is induced by massive infusion of sodium-based fluids. VOS2 also complicates fluid therapy in critically ill and presents with ARDS.6 Volumetric gain of 12-14 litres of sodium-based fluids reported in ARDS.
Two clinical studies to understand the TURP syndrome and recogniseVOS were conducted. A prospective study on 100 consecutive TURP patients of whom ten suffered TURP syndrome [5]. Volumetric overload was the only significant factor in causing the condition (Table 1 & Figure 1). The second study was case series of 23 case cases s of the TURP syndrome manifesting as VOS1. Volumetric overload quantity and type is shown in (Figure2). Three patients died and remaining 20 patients were correctly diagnosed as VOS1 and treated with hypertonic sodium therapy (HST). Each patient passed 4-5 litres of urine followed by recovery from shock and coma. This treatment was successful in curing all patients bringing them back from dead [19,20].
Figure 1: Shows volumetric overload(VO) quantity (in litres and as percentof body weight) and types of fluids.Group 1 was the 3 patients who died in the case series as they were misdiagnosed as one of the previously known shocks and treated with further volume expansion. Group 2 were 10 patientsfrom the series who were correctly diagnosedas volumetric overloadshock and treated with hypertonic sodiumtherapy (HST). Group 3 were 10 patientswho were seen in the prospective study and subdivided into 2 groups;Group 3.1 of 5 patientstreated with HST and Group3.2 of 5 patients who were treatedwith guarded volume expansion using isotonic saline.
Table 1: Shows the multiple regression analysis of total per- operative fluid gain, drop in measuredserum osmolality (OsmM), sodium, albumin, Hb and increase in serum glycine occurring immediately post-operatively in relation to signs of the TURP syndrome. Volumetric gain and hypoosmolality are the only significant factors.
A study of the hydrodynamics of the porous orifice (G) tube comparing it to that of Poiseuille’s tube was done. Measurements of pressures at various parts of a circulatory system incorporating the G tube in a chamber to mimic the capillary-interstitial fluid compartment were done. The effect of changing the proximal (arterial), the distal (venous) pressures and the diameter of the inlet on side pressureof the G tube and chamber pressureas well as the dynamic magnetic field like fluid circulation around the G tube was evaluated. The dynamic magnetic field like fluid circulation around the G tube and surrounding it in C chamber (Figure 3) provides adequate replacement for Starling’s law. The physiological equivalent of this physics study was done on the hind limbs of sheep. It demonstrated that both salineand plasma inducesoedema when run through the vein not the artery, and the arterial pressurecauses suction not filtration due to effectof pre- capillary sphincter.
Starling’s hypothesis was based on Poiseuille work on strait uniform brass tubes. Eight decades latter evidence demonstrated that the capillary is a porous narrow orifice(G) tube as it has a pre- capillary sphincter [8] and pores that allow the passage of plasma proteins [9]. As the capillary pores allow the passage of plasma molecules, nullifying the osmoticpressure of plasma proteins, a call for reconsideration of Starling’s hypothesiswas previously made [10] but there was no alternative then. The replacement came to light when the hydrodynamics of the G tube were discovered and reported in 2001.
The hydrodynamics of the G tube [1,11] (Figure 3) demonstrated that the proximal(arterial) pressure inducesa negative side pressure gradient on the wall of the G tube causing suction most prominent over the proximal half and turns into positive pressure over the distal half. Incorporating the G tube in a chamber (C), representing the ISF space surrounding a capillary, demonstrated a rapid dynamicmagnetic field-like fluid circulation betweenC and G tube lumen. Incorporating the G tube and C in a circulatory modeldriven by electricpump induced proximalpressure similar to arterial pressure, causing suction from C into the lumen of G tube. This proves that the arterial pressure causes suction not filtration at the capillaryinterstitial fluid circulation, and hence Starling’s law is wrong on both forces and equations. The hydrodynamics of the G tube provide adequate correct replacement for Starling’s law. This illustrates how 2 new types of vascular shocks and a replacement of Starling’s law were discovered that have resolved the puzzlesof 3 clinical syndromes of TURP, hyponatraemia and ARDS [21,22].
Figure 2: Shows a diagrammatic representation of the hydrodynamic of G tube based on G tubes and chamber C. This 37-years old diagrammatic representation of the hydrodynamic of G tube in chamber C is based on several photographs. The G tube is the plastic tube with narrow inlet and pores in its wall built on a scale to capillaryultra-structure of precapillary sphincter and wide inter cellularcleft pores, and the chamber C around it is another bigger plastic tube to form the G-C apparatus. The chamber C represents the ISF space. The diagram represents a capillary-ISF unit that should replace Starling’s law in every future physiology, medical and surgical textbooks, and added to chapters on hydrodynamics in physics textbooks.
The numbers shouldread as follows:
1. The inflow pressure pushesfluid through the orifice
2. Creating fluid jet in the lumen of the G tube**.
3. The fluid jet createsnegative side pressuregradient causing suctionmaximal over the proximal part of the G tube near the inlet that sucks fluid into lumen.
4. The side pressure gradientturns positive pushingfluid out of lumen over the distalpart maximally near the outlet.
5. Thus, the fluid aroundG tube inside C movesin magnetic field-like circulation [5] takingan opposite direction to lumen flow of G tube.
6. The inflow pressure 1 and orifice2 induce the negative side pressure creatingthe dynamic G-C circulation phenomenon that is rapid, autonomous, and efficient in moving fluid and particles out from the G tube lumen at 4, irrigating C at 5, then sucking it back
7. again at 3,
8. Maintaining net negative energypressure inside chamberC.
**Note the shape of the fluid jet inside the G tube (Cone shaped),having a diameterof the inlet on right hand side and the diameter of the exit at left hand side (G tube diameter). I lost the photo on which the fluid jet was drawn,using tea leavesof fine and coarse sizes that runs in the centre of G tube leaving the outer zone near the wall of G tube clear. This may explain the finding in real capillaryof the protein-free (and erythrocyte-free) sub-endothelial zone in the Glycocalyx paradigm (Woodcock and Woodcock 2012) [3]. It was also noted that fine tea leaves exit the distal pores in small amount maintaining a higher concentration in the circulatory system than that in the C chamber-akin to plasma proteins.
Figure 3: Shows renal pedicle mapped on a supine IVU film (Horizontal) and erect film (Vertical) limbs of 7 where the renal pedicle is stretched to 3 times its normal length, causing stenosis and ischemia.
The TBL is a fundamental law of nature that govern the ramifications of all tress of green and red of the Aorta-arterial trees. It corrects two important misconceptions on the capillary physiology. This evidence sums up to demonstrate that the capillary-ISF transfer occurs according to a precise fast circulation of the magnetic field like fluid not the slow perfusion. That provides adequately for the demands of cells at rest and increased demand during strenuous physical activity. On another subject, this article12 reports the overlooked link of Loin Pain Haematuria Syndrome with Symptomatic Nephroptosis and the Results of a new curative surgery; Renal Sympathetic Denervation and Nephropexy Surgery. Two new signs namely; the IVU 7 sign (Figure 4) and tube stretch hypothesis were reported demonstrating that renal pedicle stretch causing vessel stenosis, ischaemia and neuropathy. Surgical treatment was used in 28 patients; 10 had simple nephropexy and 18 had Renal.
Two new physics discoveries of the G tube hydrodynamics and tree branching law with two related physiological discoveries of proving Starling’s law wrong and correcting two misconceptions on capillary physiology, and 6 new medical discoveries are reported. These resolved the puzzles of dilution HN of the TURP syndrome that presents as shock mistaken for known shocks and treated with volume expansion causing death or ARDS. Manifestations include shock, ARDS, ARF and Coma. The correct treatment is hypertonic sodium therapy. Starling’s law has proved wrong. The correct replacement is the hydrodynamics of G tube. The puzzle of LPHS was also resolved. A new point of technique for bladder replacement was reported.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
