AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Taiwo T Shogade Department of Internal Medicine, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State
Citation: Taiwo T Shogade, Asukwo E Onukak, Akpabio A Akpabio, Effiong A Bassey, Idongesit O Umoh, Olatunde Michael Tanimowo et al, (2020) Pulselessness in an HIV Infected adult Female: A Rare Case of Ergotism, 2(1): Doi: 10.31579/2690-8794/007
Copyright: © 2020 Taiwo T Shogade, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 January 2020 | Accepted: 28 January 2020 | Published: 03 February 2020
Keywords: ergotism, doppler, retroviral disease, pulselessness, thrombosis
Abstract: Ergotism can present with vascular, neurologic and gastrointestinal symptoms including gangrene in severe cases. In HIV, toxicity from interaction with protease inhibitors has been documented. We report case of a female who took cafergot for migraine resulting in absent peripheral pulses. She made a good recovery with steroids and pentoxyfilline
Ergotism is a complication of acute intoxication and/or chronic abuse of ergot derivatives. It expresses itself with symptoms ofperipheral vasospasm [1,2].(numbness, tingling, burning pain, pulselessness, gangrene) as well as neurologic (headache, psychosis) and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps)[3].This complication occurs more in patients taking ergot derivatives with certain drugs such as protease inhibitors for different indications[4].
A 37-year-old female was referred to our hospital, after she was managed for hypovolemic shock at the referring centre with intravenous crystalloids and hydrocortisone without improvement. She presented with numbness, pain and coldness of the extremities, nausea, several episodes of vomiting, lethargy and generalized body weakness. Physical examination findings were non-palpable peripheral pulses and unrecordable blood pressure.
Additional history revealed that she recently had a bout of migraine headache for which she ingested a total of 8 tablets of over-the-counter Cafergot (Ergotamine tartrate 1mg + Caffeine 100mg) at a dose of two tablets twice daily over 2 days with resolution of the headache, but development of multiple symptoms suggestive of drug adverse effects two days later.
She was diagnosed with HIV infection eight years prior and her antiretroviral drugs regimen at presentation comprised (Lopinavir 400mg/Ritonavir 100mg and Abacavir 300mg and Lamivudine 150mg) taken twice daily for the preceding 3 years with undetectable viral load. She had a 2-year history of migraine headaches for which she was treated and recovered completely from.
At presentation, other possibilities such as peripheral arterial disease, thrombosis and vasculitis were all considered. Peripheral arterial disease was not likely due to absence of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Thrombosis was excluded by a normal clotting profile, electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography (ECHO) findings and Doppler scan result, while a normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and absence of purpura or fever excluded a vasculitis.
Emergency Full blood count, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, electrolytes, urea, creatinine, fasting lipid profile, ECG and 2-D-echocardiography done at presentation were all normal. She was initially managed as a case of anaphylactic shock with intramuscular adrenaline, dopamine infusion and 20mg of oral nifedipine (she took without doctor’s instruction), then referred to cardiology unit.
At the cardiology unit a diagnosis of peripheral arterial vasospasm secondary to Cafergot toxicity was made. Though there was no facility to do arteriography, Doppler ultrasound scan of her extremities was done though after commencement of treatment showed generalized low resistance waveform and reduced flow volume involving both upper and lower limb arteries with details shown in table one and figure one.
She was commenced on a stat dose of intravenous methylprednisolone succinate 1mg/kg (80mg) in 500mls of normal saline, oral vasoprin 75mg daily, diclofenac 75mg twice a day, and pentoxyphiline 400mg twice daily. Patient started experiencing resolution of symptoms and her blood pressure as well as pulse rate became recordable two days after commencement of these medications (blood pressure 110/70mmHg, pulse rate 88beats/min). She was discharged home nine days post admission after counselling against usage of ergot derivatives. Her last follow-up visit, three months post-discharge, was unremarkable.
Vasospasm is a rare but well recognized complication of ergot alkaloid agents. The term “St. Anthony’s fire” was used in the middle ages to connote ergotamine intoxication following consumption of grain infected with the fungus Claviceps purpurea, which manifested with burning pain and limb necrosis. Ergotism mostly affects the lower extremities, but involvement of the carotid, coronary, mesenteric, and renal arteries has also been reported [5].
Toxicity may occur with ergotamine overdose or with normal doses administered along with drugs that inhibit its hepatic metabolism. Protease inhibitors such as lopinavir/ritonavir combination, which was part of the index patient’s antiretroviral treatment regimen, are potent inhibitors of CYP3A4. CYP3A4 is responsible for the metabolism of ergotamine and when inhibited can result in ergot toxicity[6].
Ergot toxicity has been previously reported in a Caucasian3 and Latin American patients[1,7].Reports from sub-Saharan Africa are scarce though one case was reported recently among 265 West African HIV-infected patients undergoing a protease inhibitor drug trial. The patient was inadvertently prescribed ergot derivatives for headache by a doctor who was unaware of the on-going study[8].In our index patient, self-medication resulted in her symptoms which were possibly worsened and prolonged by vasopressor therapies (dopamine, adrenaline) administered at the referring hospital.
Severe ergotism has been described in patients taking ritonavir, even after a single dose of ergotamine[9].Apart from discontinuing the offending medications, other therapies that have been tried in patients presenting with cafergot toxicity include prostacyclin, pentoxyfilline, nitroglycerin, calcium channel blocker and methylprednisolone.[1,3,4,10].
In severe forms refractory to pharmacological treatment, intra-arterial balloon dilatation or surgical sympathectomy can be effective[7].
In conclusion, It is important to maintain a high index of suspicion especially in HIV-infected patients in order to diagnose this rare but potentially reversible condition. Vasopressors are best avoided as they may worsen symptoms and prolong recovery. Treatment of spasm with methylprednisolone and pentoxyphylline appear to be effective for preventing limb necrosis and amputation.
PSV: T-test = -5.978, P-value = < 0>
EDV: T-test = 4.922, P-value = 0.001
R1: T-test = -9.815, P-value = < 0>
BA: Brachial artery, RA: Radial artery, CFA: Common femoral artery, SFA: Superior femoral artery, DPA: Dosalis pedis artery
a: value 10months after, PSV: Peak systolic velocity, EDV: End diastolic velocity, RI: Resistive index.
Doppler ultrasound scan of both upper and lower limb vessels
The upper limb arteries appear normal in caliber, wall thickness, no demonstrable calcification, plaque or focal narrowing from the subclavian arteries to the deep palmar arches and shows pulsatile colour flow in all the arterial segments bilaterally.
Spectral waveform analysis show generalized reduced peak systolic velocity (PSV), low resistance biphasic waveform with loss of early reversal diastolic flow from the subclavian to the Radial and Ulnar arteries bilaterally.
The lower limb arteries also show pulsatile colour flow in all the arterial segments. The arteries appear normal in caliber and wall thickness but show generalized reduced PSV values in all the arterial segments bilateral (left << right PSV=13cm/s>
Spectral tracing shows spectral broadening with low resistant biphasic waveforms and loss of the early reversal diastolic flow in all the arterial segment bilaterally.
The veins of the upper limb appear sonographically normal.
The ratios of the distal-to-proximal PSV is <2>
The upper and lower limb veins show normal colour flow, phasic variation with respiration, compressibility, and flow augmentation and absent reflux flow during valsalva maneuver.
There is no demonstrable supraclavicular, axillary, inguinal or femoral lymphadenopathy. No demonstrable upper or lower limb oedema.
Generalised low resistant biphasic waveforms with reduced flow velocities involving both upper and lower arteries suggestive of vasodilator actions of medication.
Repeat Doppler performed 10months later shows pulsatile colour flow with normal high resistant triphasic waveforms in all the arterial segments of the upper and lower limbs respectively.
Electrocardiography: Normal sinus rhythm
Echocardiography: Normal echocardiography findings
Packed cell volume 40%
Hemoglobin: 15.5g/l
Total white cell count: 9.4X109/L
Platelet: 273X109/L
Neutrophils 69%
lymphocyte 23%
Monocyte 6%
Eosinophils 6%
Creatinine: 66mmol/l
Urea: 3.0mmol/l
Sodium: 143mmol/l
Potassium: 3.2mmol/l
Chloride: 108mmol/l
Bicarbonate: 25mmol/l
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 8mm/1st hour
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
