AUCTORES
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Saeed Shoja Shafti, Full Professor of Psychiatry University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR) Razi Psychiatric Hospital Tehran – Iran
Citation: Saeed Shoja Shafti, (2021) Psychosomatic Medicine: Reappraisal of a Concept in Developing Countries. J. Scientific Research and Biomedical Informatics, 2(1); Doi:10.31579/jsrbi.2021/005
Copyright: © 2021 Saeed Shoja Shafti, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 06 February 2021 | Accepted: 21 February 2021 | Published: 28 February 2021
Keywords: psychosomatic medicine; general hospital psychiatry; consultation – liaison psychiatry; consultation psychiatry; psychosomatic fellowship.
Consultation-liaison psychiatry is over 60 years old, and it emerged as an offspring of psychobiology, general hospital psychiatry, and psychosomatic medicine. While consultation-liaison psychiatry have played a major role in promoting the concept of integrated care, psychosomatic medicine continues as a science, studying the relationships between biological, psychological and social phenomena in health and disease, and the main promoters of the clinical application of the theories and discoveries of psychosomatic medicine are now the general hospital consultation-liaison psychiatrists and their allied health professional associates. Presently, a liaison service has become a recognized division of a general hospital psychiatric unit for the provision of psychiatric consultation and teaching to the non-psychiatric departments of academic hospitals. On the other hand, while in many developing countries the overall practice of consultation-liaison psychiatry remains quite basic, and it is mainly restricted to case-based consultation with other medical departments, it seems that psychosomatic medicine is not free from some sort of misperception, at least in some of the psychiatric departments in a number of developing countries. So based on the specific meaning of psychosomatic medicine in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and responsibilities of psychosomatic fellowship, which is determined by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the concept of psychosomatic medicine has been reviewed once more, particularly from an educational perspective, and with respect to its current situation in developing countries.
Consultation-liaison psychiatry or general hospital psychiatry arose in the mid-1960s from the milieu of psychoanalytically oriented psychosomatic medicine. But, the influence of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytically trained academic psychiatrists slowly faded. On the other hand, the liaison part of consultation-liaison psychiatry wiped out in the early 1980s, and most consultation-liaison services are now primarily fine psychiatric consultation services. Accordingly, the consultation-liaison services at some academic centers have eliminated the term “liaison.” (1) Basically, the overall aim of psychosomatic medicine was to incorporate psychiatry into the whole of medicine. Moreover, consultation-liaison psychiatric services could provide better treatment opportunities in general hospitals for somatically ill patients with co-morbid psychiatric disorders. Hence, it has been suggested that consultation liaison psychiatry could be mixed with primary prevention in high-risk groups, such as accident victims, dialysis or transplantation patients. As a result, in some countries, growing attentiveness to psychiatric co-morbidity, especially in elderly general hospital inpatients, has led to increasing interest in integrated medical-psychiatric units [2]. In addition, psychosomatic medicine, also acknowledged as consultation-liaison psychiatry, received approval as a subspecialty field of psychiatry by the American Board of Medical Specialties in the spring of 2003. This denotes a vital step in the development of the field of psychosomatic medicine and recognition of its importance by leaders in the fields of medicine and psychiatry. The approval of subspecialty status for psychosomatic medicine could help to promote the psychiatric care of patients with complex medical, surgical, obstetrical and neurological conditions, along with promising further improvements in the quality of training and research in this important area [3]. From many years ago it was obvious that mental disorders may be both risk factors for and poor prognostic indicators in chronic medical illnesses such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. On the other hand, psychiatric morbidity is very common in patients with medical conditions, with a frequency ranging from around 20 to 65 percent, depending on the sickness. The practice of psychosomatic medicine has evolved noticeably since its early clinical origins and has come to focus on psychiatric disorders that occur in the setting of physical health care. Patients in the general hospital have the highest rate of psychiatric disorders when compared to community samples or patients in ambulatory primary care. For example, compared to community samples, depressive disorders in the general hospital are more than twice as common, and substance abuse is two to three times as common. Delirium, too, occurs in around 20 percent of inpatients. Psychiatric morbidity has serious effects on physically ill patients and is often a risk factor for exacerbation of their medical disorders. For example, it is well recognized that depression is both a risk factor and a poor prognostic indicator in coronary artery disease. Similarly, psychiatric disorder worsens cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with a history of myocardial infarction, diminishes glycemic control in patients with diabetes, and decreases return to functioning in patients experiencing a stroke [4]. Additionally, depression and other mental disorders meaningfully impact quality of life and the ability of patients to adhere to treatment régimes. As a result, failure to identify, evaluate, diagnose, treat or achieve symptom resolution of psychiatric morbidity in medical care settings results in significantly increased service utilization. Therefore, the primary objective for psychosomatic medicine is the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric ailments in patients with complex medical disorders. In addition to the care of specific conditions, psychosomatic medicine also includes a variety of other clinical accomplishments that occur in the medical setting, including evaluation of decision-making capacity, attention to quality of life and symptom management in chronic and terminally ill individuals, provision of liaison services to medical staff, and assistance with management of primary psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. In many settings, psychosomatic medicine psychiatrists function as part of multidisciplinary teams, which include psychiatry, psychology, nursing, and social work. In most cases, these teams work within medical specialty settings that provide care to special populations such as those with HIV, cancer, cardiovascular disease, transplant, and diabetes [4]. At this time, education and training in psychosomatic medicine are integrated throughout the psychiatry curriculum in medical schools and general psychiatric training. There are some curriculums, as well, that combine psychiatry with internal medicine, family practice, pediatrics, and neurology. The clinical activities in which psychosomatic medicine fellows must demonstrate competence have been indicated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which include a range of evaluative, diagnostic, therapeutic, educational, and collaborative responsibilities [4] (Table 1).
Background:
The term psychosomatic is derived from the Greek words psyche (soul) and soma (body). The term exactly refers to how the mind affects the body (5). Regrettably, it has come to be used, at least by the lay public, to describe a person with medical complaints that have no somatic cause and are “all in your head.” To some extent due to this misconceptualization, the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in 1980, deleted the nosological term psychophysiological (or psychosomatic) disorders and replaced it with “Psychological Factors Affecting Physical Conditions” in DSM-5 [4]. The term psychosomatic medicine was first used by Felix Deutsch in the early 1920s. In 1968, John Schwab published the first consultation-liaison psychiatry textbook. The origins of consultation-liaison psychiatry fellowships can be traced to George Engel’s and John Romano’s fellowship program in psychosocial skills at Rochester University College of Medicine. This program, first offered in 1946, was offered to non-psychiatric physicians as well as psychiatrists. The Massachusetts General Hospital established its first consultation service in 1954. [6]. Consultation-liaison psychiatry (C-L psychiatry) was founded in the USA in the 1930's as a clinical pendant of psychosomatic medicine, and has now become an integrated part of the health care system in the North America and many of European countries (7). Besides, in 2003, the American Board of Medical Specialties and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology approved the specialty of psychosomatic medicine [8]. Historically, Walter Cannon and later Hans Selye explained the physiologic response to general stress. George Engel, as well, developed a stress theory based on conservation-withdrawal and helplessness. The concepts of alexithymia and Type A Behavior were also developed as contributing factors to disease. On the other hand, it became increasingly difficult to differentiate “psychosomatic medicine” from such fields as psychoneuroendocrinology and psychoimmunology. So, Engel proposed the Biopsychosocial Model as an alternative to the Biomedical Model prevalent in medicine [9]. Historically, psychosomatic medicine was known as consultation-liaison psychiatry, and it represented the care delivered by psychiatrists to patients with co-occurring medical and psychiatric problems who were treated primarily in medical settings [10]. In 1967, Zbigniew Lipowski formulated two most common diagnostic questions, which usually asked for psychiatric consultation: 1) Is this particular bodily complaint (or set of complaints) explicable as an expression of psychological ill-health, that is, is it partly or wholly psychogenic? 2) Is the inner experience of psychic change reported by the patient or his observable behavior explicable as the direct results of, or a psychological reaction to, organic disease? However, reasons for requests for help in patient management have extended since Lipowski’s formulation, and can be catalogued like this: 1) Suicidal attempt or threat, 2) Grossly disturbed behavior, such as, delirium and psychosis, 3) Excessive emotional reactions, such as, depression and anger, 4) Refusal to coöperate, 5) Delayed convalescence, 6) Conflict between patient and personnel, 7) Patient with psychiatric history, 8) Psychiatric side effects of drugs, 9) Selection and/or preparation of patients, such as, for surgery, 10) Disposition [4]. Therefore, consultation-liaison psychiatry, which is being practiced by general psychiatrists or psychosomatic fellows in general hospital settings, attempts to understand the biological and psychosocial aspects of patients including the role of genes, early environment, stress, and resilience in illness and health [9]. Current clinical trends in psychosomatic medicine include epigenetics, shortening and lengthening of telomeres, integrated care, placebo effect, etc. (11). In general, epidemiologic and clinical epidemiologic studies, mechanistic studies, treatment studies, and service delivery studies constitute the main field of investigations in psychosomatic medicine [4]. The approval of the subspecialty was both a response to and an opportunity for the field to highlight and expand the foundation in clinical care, research, teaching, and other scholarly activities related to the care of this special patient population. In this regard, the health psychology section of the American Psychological Association has over 3,500 members. In addition, social workers and nurses participate in care for these patients [4]. There has been an important development of consultation-liaison psychiatry in the last fifty years. Psychosocial factors and psychiatric symptoms which can be present in many somatic diseases have been considered as deserving of more specialized care. This could be achieved by a multidisciplinary team with the presence of a psychiatrist either permanently (consultation-liaison psychiatry) or episodically (psychiatric consultation). The said field is also involved with research and medical education. There is a general agreement that psychiatric care in a general hospital brings obvious benefits to the patient, to the psychiatrist, to non-psychiatric physicians, and to other team members, not only in terms of developing new professional opportunities, but also in terms of broadening the research field and improving medical education [12]. On the other hand, consultation-liaison psychiatry has had to reassess its priorities with the change in health care economics in the 80 s, and a need for focusing on cost-effectiveness of liaison services [13,14]. Now, psychiatric education in medical schools often includes a few months’ rotation to consultation-liaison service, which is now a need in psychiatry residencies [11].
Discussion:
Presently, a liaison service has become a recognized division of a general hospital psychiatric unit for the provision of psychiatric consultation and teaching to the non-psychiatric departments of the hospital [15]. Consultation-liaison psychiatry is over 60 years old. It emerged as an offspring of psychobiology, general hospital psychiatry, and psychosomatic medicine [18]. As is known, a third of medical and surgical out-patient clinic attendees have a psychiatric disorder. Half of these have depressive and anxiety disorders, and the rest have somatoform disorders. So, adequate recognition and treatment of their psychiatric disorder should be an integral part of management, since this has been shown to improve outcome. As said before, depression is a common cause of apparent worsening of a medical condition and panic disorder is an important cause of medically unexplained symptoms such as chest pain, dizziness and tingling. About 20% of medical and surgical in-patients have a depressive or anxiety disorder coexisting with their medical disease, 10% have a significant alcohol misuse problem and a third of elderly in-patients have an episode of delirium. Some patients with severe somatoform disorders get admitted and undergo multiple investigations and even surgery before the diagnosis is made. Psychiatric symptoms may be a response to the physical disease. For example, depression associated with cancer; sexual dysfunction after myocardial infarction; a body image disturbance after limb amputation. Moreover, there may be a shared cause, such as a major life event precipitating both a stroke and depression. The coexistence of a psychiatric disorder and a medical disorder is clinically important because it magnifies suffering and disability, prolongs medical care and increases overall health costs, and worsens outcome. For example, the mortality of heart disease, cancer or stroke is higher in those with a comorbid depressive disorder [17]. According to a study with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics of psychiatric referrals to psychiatric consultation - liaison service at a university hospital, the most common patient to be referred was a middle-aged woman. Internal medicine consistently accounted for almost one-third of all referrals, followed by neurology. The most prominent reasons for bio-psycho-social referrals were any signs of abnormal mood, behavior, psychotic symptoms or cognitive impairments. The most common mental disorders according to ICD-10 were adjustment disorders, depressive disorders, and delirium. Psycho-pharmacotherapy and combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy were the most frequent actions in both surveys, followed by bio-psycho-social evaluation pre-transplant [18]. Accordingly, psychosomatic medicine is the area of psychiatry concerned with the psychobiological care of the medically ill. This patient population includes people of all ages and those cared for in specialized locations such as surgery, internal medicine, organ transplantation, and many others. Psychosomatic medicine specialists, along with providing proficient formal psychiatric consultation to medical and surgical patients in the general hospital, specialized hospitals and outpatient clinic locations, also train psychiatrists and non-psychiatrist healthcare providers (e.g., neurologists, internists, surgeons, physician assistants, nurses) in the recognition of normal and abnormal reactions to disease and proper psychological care of patients with such reactions. Thus such a service functions both as a consultant and as part of the primary medical/surgical treatment team. By means of conjoint rounds and teaching sessions, formal consultations, and involvement in inpatient treatment and discharge planning, the psychosomatic medicine service provides a comprehensive approach to the behavioral, cognitive, and emotional needs of the patient [19]. Therefore, consultation-liaison psychiatry and general hospital psychiatry have played a major role in promoting the concept of integrated care. Due to the ageing population there is greater awareness of the importance of comorbidity and more support for the concept of integrated care. These changes will promote the further development of general hospital psychiatry [20]. Besides, there is a need for a valid taxonomy that addresses the most common form of psychiatric presentation in the community, the item of physical/psychiatric co-morbidity, and the outcome studies based on such taxonomy. Consultation-liaison psychiatrists need to inform their associates about the changes in concepts and terminology [21]. Therefore, generally, the major clinical problems in psychosomatic medicine include: psychiatric symptoms secondary to a medical condition, psychiatric symptoms as a reaction to medical condition or treatments, psychiatric complications of medical conditions and treatments, psychological factors contributing to medical symptoms, medical complications of psychiatric conditions or treatment, co-occurring medical and psychiatric conditions, and finally, psychiatric/psychosocial assessment. Psychosomatic medicine, whether as an integrated concept or divided impression, seems that is not free from some sort of misperception, at least in some of the psychiatric departments in a number of developing countries. Separating, scholastically, psychosomatic concept from consultation-liaison or consultation psychiatry, instituting indistinct psychiatric wards, designated as neurotic divisions, which involve a mixture of non-psychotic, non-suicidal, non-aggressive, non-addictive psychiatric patients, or wards involving neuropsychiatric cases, like epileptic patients with psychiatric comorbidities, are among the misapprehensions that may drive from the label of ‘psychosomatic’. Considering a specific clinical ward for psychosomatic patients in psychiatric hospitals, instead of general hospitals, is an incorrect perception that roots in old-fashioned dichotomy of soul and soma, mental and physical, or psyche and body, while supposing, unconsciously, psychosomatic equal to psychological. According to such out-of-date implication, treatment of each component’s ailment can be undertaken separately, without any precedence about the existent conditions. So, management of a patient with mild to moderate major depressive disorder, who may have an anemia, infection, or endocrine disorder, too, which has been detected during regular checkups, can be accounted as management of a psychosomatic case. So, it realizes the concept of psychosomatic in reverse, and wishes to treat a physical problem, which was not ever the main reason of reference, parallel to the management of primary psychiatric disorder, which was the foremost motive for seeking help, whether out-patiently or in-patiently. The case is more complicated when there is any suspect about the etiological role of medical illness in inducing psychiatric problem. The same problem, also, is true with respect to neuropsychiatric cases, where the same pathogenesis can be assumed about creation of both of physical ad psychiatric illnesses. Though all the said cases can be directly or indirectly, in the sphere of consultation psychiatry, psychosomatic medicine has its specific meaning: “Psychological Factors Affecting Other Medical Conditions”; a characterization that is specified in DSM-5 [22]. As stated by DSM-5, the essential feature of psychological factors affecting other medical conditions is the presence of one or more clinically significant psychological or behavioral factors that adversely affect a medical condition by increasing the risk for suffering, death, or disability. These factors can adversely affect the medical condition by influencing its course or treatment, by constituting an extra well-established health risk factor, or by influencing the underlying pathophysiology to precipitate or exacerbate symptoms or to cause medical attention [22]. Psychological or behavioral factors include psychological distress, patterns of interpersonal interaction, coping styles, and maladaptive health behaviors, such as denial of symptoms or poor adherence to medical recommendations. Many different psychological factors have been demonstrated to adversely influence medical conditions—for example, symptoms of depression or anxiety, stressful life events, relationship style, personality traits, and coping styles. The adverse effects can range from acute, with immediate medical consequences, to chronic, occurring over a long period. Many differences between cultures may influence psychological factors and their effects on medical conditions, such as those in language and communication style, explanatory models of illness, patterns of seeking health care, service availability and organization, doctor-patient relationships and other healing practices, family and gender roles, and attitudes toward pain and death [22]. Psychological factors affecting other medical conditions must be differentiated from mental disorder due to another medical condition, adjustment disorders, somatic symptom disorder, and Illness anxiety disorder [22]. So, primacy is in connection with the medical conditions, which are typically in the general hospitals or the associated facilities. In such a situation, the psychological factors may act as triggering or aggravating causes, which thus may demand supplementary psychotherapeutic or psychopharmacologic interventions, in addition to the current medical treatments. Such an intervention is asked by medical doctors and specialists, who feel or diagnose psychological problems in some of their medical patients. Accordingly, the later perspective, which recognizes mind and body as a cohesive entity that requests synchronized management, is different from the earlier outlooks, which habitually differentiates between mind and body and find the psychiatric problem as the main subject, by taking into consideration that patients who are admitted in the psychiatric hospitals or districts suffer from primary psychiatric disorders. Hence, psychosomatic ward does not have any working implication in the psychiatric hospitals. On the other hand, responsibilities of psychosomatic fellowship, which is determined by the related authentic experts, are clearly comprehensible (Table 1).
Adapted from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Program Requirements for
Graduate Medical Education in Psychosomatic Medicine. Available at
http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/409_psychosomatic_med_2016_1-
YR.pdf
Such group of tasks is not workable except than in general hospitals. By considering the other correlated terms, like general hospital psychiatry or psychological medicine, the necessity of implementation of consultation - liaison psychiatry in general hospital, as a mission that is set up by psychosomatic standpoint, becomes more palpable. On the other hand, while institution of psychiatric wards in general hospitals can be considered as part of a national mental health policy for academic integration of psychiatry into medicine, or as an administrative and remedial strategy with respect to deficiency of public psychiatric beds, labeling it as psychosomatic division is not sensible at all, because while the admitted patients in such kind of districts are generally acute primary psychiatric patients, psychosomatic medicine is typically with respect to chronic medical (physical) disorders. Also, since the psychiatric consultation is the backbone of contemporary psychosomatic medicine, without general medical wards undertaking such a mission is not attainable in a pure psychiatric hospital. As has been said by Jianlin et al [23], consultation-liaison psychiatry can be acknowledged as the clinical pendant of psychosomatic medicine, and no psychosomatic patient is plausible, independently, out of the aforesaid formulation.
Establishment of pure psychiatric wards, whether neurotic or else, under the name of psychosomatic division, without clarification of prime planning or obligation, may inspire an incorrect impression in the apprentices or ensuing psychiatrists, who may repeat it incorrectly in future. Though such a psychiatric ward can be helpful, educationally or clinically, it should have its own identification physiognomies, with no needless cover-up; if not, it is a contrived ward with deceitful messages. Since psychosomatic medicine, largely, take account of ‘cardiovascular disorders’, including coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, hypertension and stroke, ‘gastrointestinal disorders’, including inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome, ‘obesity’, ‘respiratory disorders’ including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease, ‘diabetes’, ‘endocrine and metabolic disorders’, ‘psycho-oncology’, ‘end-of-life and palliative care’, ‘stress’, ‘psychiatric morbidity following critical illness’, ‘psycho-cutaneous disorders’, ‘organ transplantation’, ‘psychiatric care of the burned patient’, ‘management of chronic pain’ including migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache, chronic daily headache, fibromyalgia, low back pain, phantom limbic pain, orofacial pain, and Parkinson disease, perplexing them with psychiatric disorders is a wrong attitude that may root in lack of insight as regards the philosophy of psychosomatic medicine. On the other hand, in many developing countries the overall practice of consultation-liaison psychiatry remains quite basic, and it is mainly restricted to case-based consultation with other medical departments (21). Anyhow, psychosomatic medicine continues as a science, studying the relationships between biological, psychological and social phenomena in health and disease, and the main promoters of the clinical application of the theories and discoveries of psychosomatic medicine are now the general hospital consultation-liaison psychiatrists and their allied health professional associates. Psychosomatic medicine is practiced in a variety of settings and comprises a mixture of consultative, treatment, and liaison undertakings. Historically, the most of this work has occurred within the general hospital setting. However, as more illnesses become chronic (e.g., HIV and cancer), there has been an increase in delivery of psychosomatic medicine services in outpatient settings as well. Regardless of where care is delivered, the basic approaches are similar: To conduct a psychiatric assessment, provide psychotherapeutic, behavioral, or pharmacologic interventions to patients, and to work thoroughly with other medical experts in a liaison dimension [4].
Conclusion
While psychosomatic medicine is a broad idea, for psychiatric assessment, management and collaboration with other medical specialists, its clinical, therapeutic, or investigational aims for further enhancement of care of medical patients with co-morbid psychiatric disorders is manageable only in the milieu of general medical hospital or related out-patient service area.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.