AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Gabriel Ifeoluwa Makinde, Institutional affiliation: Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan.
Citation: Obioma C. Uchendu, Gabriel Ifeoluwa Makinde, Hadiza Adeoti, (2023), Psychometric Properties of Patients' Health Questionnaire Assessed on Obstetric Fistula Patients in Northwestern, J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, 13(5): DOI: 10.31579/2578-8868/285
Copyright: © 2023, Gabriel Ifeoluwa Makinde. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 27 June 2023 | Accepted: 20 October 2023 | Published: 24 October 2023
Keywords: Identity; migration; transculturality therapy
Nigeria is among the highest contributor to global prevalence of obstetrics fistula (OF) and weak health care policies and services have left the victims reeling in untold psycho-social and physical morbidities. This study was aimed at assessing the psychometric properties of a globally used Patients’ Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) among these patients. A descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed to study the fertility desires, mental health and patients’ quality of life among women with obstetric fistula in three selected OF centers in Northwestern region of Nigeria. Using two-stage sampling technique four hundred twenty (420) OF patients were recruited into the study. Maximum likelihood (ML) factor analysis was deployed to produce latent factors from the responses to the PHQ-9 scale, internal reliability and construct validity were determined by Cronbach alpha values while comparative mean analysis was used to validate standardized scores of the derived PHQ-9 scale factors against socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics. Mean age and standard deviation of respondents were 26.4±8.4 years as 60% aged between 20-25 years. The married, divorced and those in polygamous were 45%, 47.1% and 73.6% respectively. More than half (55.5%) were traders while majority (89.8%) earned NGN4500 or less monthly. Three factors of somatic (r= 0.72-0.82; α=0.86), non-somatic (r= 0.64-0.76; α=0.77) and affective (r= 0.64-0.96; α=0.74) constructs emerged from the ML factor analysis. Patients of ages 20-25 years, divorced/single and widows, the formally educated and farmers significantly differed with high scores of the affective construct of the PHQ-9 scale. Those who had more than four pregnancies and greater than a single stillbirth significantly differed with affective symptoms (0.29±0.90; 0.69±0.9 The 15–17-year-olds at first birth and those who waited more than ten years for OF surgical repairs differed with non-somatic symptoms’ construct of the PHQ-9 scale (0.21±1.04; 0.31±0.87) significantly differed with affective factors. The PHQ-9 instrument exhibited possibility of being used to assess the quality of OF patients’ mental health. Future studies could expand the sample size to accommodate advanced inferential psychometric methods.
Obstetric fistula (OF) which could be vesico-vagina fistula (VVF) or recto-vaginal (RF) fistula is a devastating condition in which urine or faeces ceaselessly leak through an irregular opening between a woman’s vagina and bladder (de Bernis et al, 2007). Globally, not less than 2 million sufferers of the condition are existing at an annual incidence estimation of 50,000–100,000 cases (WHO, 2014). The incidence in Africa is about 2–5/1000 deliveries and 33,000 new cases occur annually in sub-Saharan Africa (Umoiyoho et al., 2011). West Africa alone records an incidence of 3 to 4 cases per 1000 deliveries (Mikah et al, 2011). According to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA, 2014) Nigeria account for an estimated of 12,000 new cases annually with a current estimated total of 150,000 cases (WHO, 2014). The actual prevalence of obstetric fistula may be higher due to the under-reporting of cases in Sub-Saharan Africa (Okoye et al, 2014). Obstetric fistula is an outcome of elongated obstructed labor unrelieved by Cesarean section. Neonatal Fetal/early mortality results in most obstetric fistula cases, and hemorrhage, infection and infertility are some of the evidenced clinical complications in patients (Wall, 2006). Women who experience fistula frequently becomes victims of stigma, social ostracism, and withdrawal owing to the stench from urine/feces leaking from the vagina (Engender Health, 2006; Ahmed et al., 2007; Gharoro et al., 2009). These negative societal perception and actions towards VVF patients have resulted into report of high rates of general mental health breakdown, extreme depression to the level of multiple suicide attempts, low self-esteem and poor quality of life (Gharoro et al., 2009; Weston et al., 2011; Pope et al., 2011). Currently, the mental health effect of living with obstetric fistula has been acknowledged and reported (Bashah et al., 2018; Goh et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2015). The WHO has advocated the addition of psychosocial support in the care of obstetric fistula (WHO, 2006). However, few Nigerian studies have attempted to quantitatively investigate the psycho-social dimensions of the impact of obstetric fistula on women. (Raji et al, 2021; Nduka et al, 2023). Accurately assessing and comprehending the mental health state of fistula patients is essential to providing them with holistic relief. There are several quality-of-life tools that can be used to measure patients’ health and psychological state which is a function of their cultural and value orientation in relation to their life’s goals and expectations (WHO, 1998). One of such tools is a widely used and validated Patients' Health Questionnaire (PHQ), created by Kroenke et al. (2001) for mental assessment and diagnosis in a variety of non-communicable disease conditions (Ngo et al, 2013; Kiene et al, 2017) Some researchers in sub-Saharan countries have validated their country’s language version of the tool (Sibera et al., 2020; Ssebunnya et al., 2019; Adewuya et al., 2006). Although, the primary validation study of the PHQ-9 scale produced a single underlying construct of depression (Kroenke et al., 2001), however, subsequent investigations in the United States have reported mixed results regarding the scale's factor structure (Krause et al., 2010; Richardson and Richards, 2008). A single or two factor structure have been reported in a systematic review from 43% of validation studies of language-specific-version of PHQ-9 in LMICs (Carroll et al., 2020). Rigorous psychometric evaluation of PHQ of mental health issues in OF patients is warranted for reliability, validity, and its culturally suitability in Nigeria. This is because the psychometric properties are critical to public health planning and intervention efforts owing to its ability to precisely identify unobserved but inherent constructs of mental issues and their related sub-characteristics. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the PHQ 9 scale among patients of OF and to validate them against some externally influencing factors.
Methodology
This study was part of a cross-sectional study on determination of the fertility desires and mental health of patients with obstetric fistula in selected health facilities in North Western Nigeria
Sample size and sampling technique
The minimum sample size of 420 was estimated by Leslie Kish sample size formula for determining single proportion for descriptive studies. A two-stage sampling method was used to select the sample population at the centers. Firstly, three OF repair centers at Zaria, Gusau and Sokoto were selected by balloting from the pool of ten centers in the north western zone. From a register of patients’ record in the selected center, proportional sampling was conducted to produce an estimate of the number of patients to be interviewed in each fistula center. At each of the ward and clinics of the repair centers, systematic sampling was then used to determine the number of patients needed after identifying an appropriate sampling interval. A response rate of 100% from the 420 participants approached for the study The inclusion criteria used in recruiting participants are: fistula patients attending the clinic for consultation (prior to surgery); follow up fistula cases after repair surgery and patients on admission at the fistula rehabilitation centers.
Data collection procedure and instrument
Data collection was done using a pretested semi-structured questionnaire. The one-hundred (110) items questionnaire which was developed in English language and translated into Hausa language was interviewer administered between the months of September - November 2014.
Assessment of the mental state of the patients was determined by the PHQ-9 mental health questionnaire Kroenke et al. (2001). A four-point Likert scale options of , “Not at all”, “Several days”, “More than half the days” and “Nearly every day” were assigned to the items of the scale which were scored and coded as “0”, “1”, “2” and “3” respectively.
Data entry of collected questionnaire were entered into IBM SPSS packages that was also used in computing the comparative analysis. Maximum likelihood analysis was conducted in r-statistical packages on Varimax orthogonal rotation. Eigen values of factors greater than 1 were retained and their percentage and cumulative variances were recorded. For this study, the validity tests of measure sampling adequacy were first performed to confirm that collected data have patterned relationships. The factorability of data on these parameters particularly KMO(MSA) whose value range from 0 to 1 and significant value of 0.5.
The maximum likelihood factor analysis is an extraction method that allows for partitioning of the shared variance of a variable from its unique variance and error variance to reveal the underlying factor structure so that only shared variance appears in the solution (Olarenwaju et al., 2020).
Respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics
Respondents age range was between 13 to 55 years having a mean and standard deviation of 26.4±8.4 years and 60% ageing between 20-25 years. Those married had a 45% population while 47.1% were divorced and majority (73.6%) reported being in polygamous marriage union. More than half (55.5%) main occupation was trading and a vastly majority (89.8%) earned a living of NGN4500 or less monthly.
Result of factor analysis
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) analysis yielded 0.62 value and the ML analysis produced three factors that constitute 28.0%, 21.5% and 17.6% of the total variance of correlations which as well as 67.1% in aggregate cumulation. Fig 1.
Figure 1: Number of factors produced from the Patients’ Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) factor analysis.
Internal and construct validity of the PHQ-9 scale
The first factor extracted by the analysis composed of four items of the PHQ-9 scale (Q57, Q59, Q60, Q61) which correspond to somatic construct of a factor correlation that ranged 0.72-0.82 and a Cronbach alpha reliability of 0.86. The second factor produced was non-somatic construct from three items of Q62, Q63 and Q64 which has a correlation range of 0.64-0.91 and Cronbach alpha reliability of 0.77. The third factor emerged from scale items of Q58 and Q65 having a factor correlation coefficient that ranged between 0.64-0.96 and a Cronbach alpha value of 0.74. The overall Cronbach of the scale is 0.66. Table 1.
Table 1: factor structure of PHQ-9 and constructs reliability coefficients
External validity
The standardized mean scores of domains of PHQ scales were assessed against independent variables of socio-demographic characteristics and
some obstetrics risk factors of study participants. Those who were greater than 25 years in age, the singles/divorce and widows had statistically significant difference with higher scores of the construct of affective construct of the PHQ scales (0.39±0.96; 0.11±1.03; 0.11±1.03). p<0>
Table 2: Comparative mean analysis of socio-demographic characteristics of patients and the standardized mean scores of constructs in PHQ-9 scale
With respect to levels of education women who had no formal education had significant difference with high scores of PHQ scale construct of non-somatic symptoms (; those who had qur’anic education had statistical difference with the somatic l symptoms construct and those who had formal education statistically differed with life affective symptoms of the scale (0.21±1.04; 0.19±0.96; 0.57±1.15). p<0>
There are statistical differences between the category of the women’s occupation and somatic symptoms domain scores of the PHQ scale among those not working (0.31±0.71). p<0>
There is an insignificant difference between increasing construct scores of somatic symptoms of the scale with women who either got pregnant once or had more than four pregnancies. p<0>
Table 3: Comparative mean analysis of socio-demographic characteristics of OF patients and the standardized mean scores of constructs in PHQ-9 scale
Women who had their first child under or at 14 years of age statistically differed with non-somatic PHQ-9 constuct while those who were between 15-17 years statistically varied with high scores of affective symptoms’ construct (0.21±1.04; 0.12±0.95). p<0>
This study psychometrically examined the quality of life of fistula patients using the patient health questionnaire tool.
Construct validity
This study reported three constructs of somatic, non-somatic and affective symptoms in the exploratory factor analysis of PHQ-9 instrument assessed on VVF patients. According to previous studies, items of the PHQ-9 tool having good internal reliability thematically coalesce under non-somatic and affective symptoms’ constructs (Nduka et al, 2023; Kayondo et al., 2011). However, the items aggregating under somatic construct were perhaps indirectly precipitated from the other factors of non-somatic and affective symptoms. This is because there is dearth of literatures supporting the somatic symptom items of the construct as correlates of experience of VVF patients. Although, general information regarding the potential impact of psycho-social problems on anorexia and insomnia may be available yet this may not be specific to VVF patients but can be relevant to understanding the broader context. It is important to note that while the factors inherent in mental health of VVF patients may impact their physical health, the specific relationship between these factors and anorexia and insomnia in VVF patients may vary depending on individual circumstances. Public health intervention based on the identified construct is highly recommended based on the fact that challenges associated with OF condition have an indelible effect on the mental health of patients even after surgical intervention. According to a study in Malawi, survivors still experience difficulty in proper communal reintegration, childbearing, conjugal relation, and community activity participation aspects (Singh et al, 2015). Hence, mental health rehabilitation of OF patients into their roles could be one of the critical avenues to restore women into their reproductive and family roles.
External validity
This study found respondents of 25 years and above to have significantly rising scores of the affective construct of the PHQ scale. Affective symptoms could arise in individuals with VVF due to the significant impact the frequent occurrence of the condition is having on their quality of life and self-esteem. Regarding the rising ages of greater than 25 years, it's important to note that VVF can occur in women of any age, but certain factors may increase the risk. These factors include prolonged obstructed labor during childbirth, particularly in areas with limited access to medical care or skilled birth attendants. In such cases, older women may be more prone to VVF due to factors like age-related changes in the pelvic anatomy, reduced tissue elasticity, or pre-existing medical conditions (Gharoro et al, 2009; Delamou et al, 2021). In this study the single/divorced women as well as widows reported significant correlation to high scores of the affective symptoms’ construct of the PHQ. The clinical issues associated with fistula such as urine leakages, offensive odour and childlessness could make women to remain single or become divorced (Nweke et al, 2017). High rate of divorce due the condition of VVF have been reported in studies conducted in Zambia and Nigeria (Goh et al, 2005; Ibrahim et al 2000). The fact that this present study found divorced participants to have higher scores of affective disorders than the married is supported by previous findings of Weston et al (2005) and Zeleke et al (2000). The psychological condition may be triggered by a combination of social and domestic stigma as well perceived inability to accomplish marital obligations (Ahmed et al. 2007; Nweke et al, 2017).
Respondents who had Quranic education and those who had no formal education were found to consecutively and significantly correlate with somatic and non-somatic constructs of the PHQ scale. The extensive diversity in the quality of education across sub-Saharan Africa implied that women who develop fistula belong to the most socio-economic and educational disadvantaged in a society (Maheu-Giroux et al, 2016). The correlation between those who had formal education with the affective symptoms construct could be explained by the issue of early marriage among VVF patients; a common phenomenon to the location of respondents in this study. The variables of occupation and monthly income had statistical contrast with the PHQ scale’s derived factors. Respondents who are jobless, those into farming and those earning ≤2500-naira monthly’s significant differences with at least one construct of the PHQ scale in this study underscore the fact that poor socio-economic characteristics of rural women are risk factors for VVF. A study conducted in Northern Nigeria identified low socioeconomic status as one of the underlining factors that characterize VVF patients (Melah et al, 2007). A Tanzania study also reported that VVF patients are essentially farmers who would be 50% more economically impoverished by losing their job after sustaining the injury (Wall, 2006; Pope et al, 2011). This study found significant differences between characteristics of age at first birth, number of pregnancies and number of children birthed with the domains of the PHQ scale. Those who had first child at 14 years had higher scores of non-somatic. The 15-17 years old respondents, those who had more than four pregnancies and those who had greater than one stillbirth had higher scores in affective symtpoms construct of the PHQ scale. Early marriage is a predisposing factor in unfavorable maternal and infant outcomes due to biological, economic social unpreparedness of very young mothers to handle parental responsibilities. Child marriage and childbearing at a young age are drivers of outrageously high incidence of obstetric fistula and it’s attending mental issues (Bello et al, 2020). Africa owns a record of 42% of married under 18 girls whilst Nigeria account for the highest girl-bride population of 23 million in the world leading to sexual experience and activity for a very immature group of persons (UNICEF, 2018). The often-predictable consequences of pregnancy, deaths during childbirth, stillbirth and living with VVF and its psycho-social complications in Nigeria as a whole are associated with being married at an early age in Northwestern and Northeastern regions (NPC, 2019; UNICEF; 2018; UNICEF, 2015; Erulkar, 2007).Women who had reparative surgery more than ten years after occurrence of fistula statistically differed with raised scores of non-somatic and affective symtoms constructs of the PHQ survey. The delay in having fistula repair has been attributed to a current huge backlog of women requiring fistula repair due to limited number of fistula surgeons and delay in training programs of others (UNFPA, 2003). This could worsen VVF patients physiological and mental related symptomatic experience. There are evidences of inequitable allocation of social resources for women, access to maternal health care and reproductive rights which combinedly constitute fundamental factors in the cause of obstetric fistula prevention. These were because of the gap in the commitment of the Nigerian constitution, justice environment National obstetric fistula policy of 2011-2015 (Amodu et al, 2018).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
