AUCTORES
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Ramachandran Muthiah, President of all Nations Morning Star Hospital, Enayam Thoppu, Kanykumari District, India
Citation: Ramachandran Muthiah, (2024), Surgical aspects of proximal aortic dissection with rupture into the main pulmonary artery, Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery; 5(6): DOI: 10.31579/2693-2156/115
Copyright: © 2024 Ramachandran Muthiah, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 18 October 2024 | Accepted: 05 November 2024 | Published: 06 December 2024
Keywords: dilated aortic root; intimal flap; aortic insufficiency; aortic rupture; aortopulmonary fistula
The aorta is a large elastic artery composed of three layers, the thin delicate intimal layer is lined by endothelium and can be easily traumatized, the thick middle layer is the media, composed of sheets of spirally arranged elastic tissue which affords maximum tensile strength, smooth muscle cells and collagen. Adventitia is the outer layer composed of loose connective tissue and carries vasa vasorum which nourishes the outer half of the aortic wall including much of the media
Aim: Topresent a rare occurrence of aortopulmonary fistula due to rupture of proximal aortic dissection in 48-year-old women.
Aortic dissection is defined as disruption of the medial layer provoked by intramural bleeding, resulting in separation of aortic wall layers and subsequent formation of a true lumen and a false lumen with or without communication.
Case Report: A 48-year-old women presented with vague anterior chest discomfort, high blood pressure, systolic-diastolic murmur in the left sternal border with ECG changes of myocardial ischemia. Echocardiography revealed a dilated aortic root with intimal flaps, a leak into the pulmonary artery and regionalhypokinesis with contractile dysfunction suggesting a proximal aortic dissection with rupture into the main pulmonary artery.
Discussion: The etiology of aortic dissection include mostly hypertension in 80 % of cases and aortopathies such as connective tissue disorders, inflammatory and sometimes idiopathic. Aortic wall stress is a major trigger of intimal tear and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography is an excellent, initial diagnostic gold standard to detect the dissecting flaps, especially in proximal aortic dissection. Conclusion: Blood pressure control is the mainstay of treatment and urgent surgery is indicated in proximal aortic dissection since there is higher chance of rupture with an increase in mortality.
The aorta is a large elastic artery composed of three layers, the thin delicate intimal layer is lined by endothelium and can be easily traumatized, the thick middle layer is the media, composed of sheets of spirally arranged elastic tissue which affords maximum tensile strength, smooth muscle cells and collagen. Adventitia is the outer layer composed of loose connective tissue and carries vasa vasorum which nourishes the outer half of the aortic wall including much of the media. The ascending aorta is 5 cm long and its lower segment, the aortic root is 3.3 cm, begins at the level of the aortic valve, extends to the sinotubular junction and the upper tubular segment joins with the aortic arch. Aorta may be considered as dilated if the diameter is > 40 mm at the level of ascending aorta, 35 mm at the arch and thoracic descending aorta and 30 mm at abdominal aorta. Aortic root dilatation predisposes to dissection or rupture which accounts for 1-2% of deaths in industrialized nations [1]. The maximal internal diameter of ascending aorta in dissection is 55.7±12.4 mm (range 35-90 mm). Aortic dissection is not always associated with aneurysmal dilatation of aortic root [2]. The dissection may originate from an area of non-dilated aorta even in Marfan’s syndrome, especially in children [3] as a result of abnormal vascular extracellular matrix protein, the fibrillin [4] due to mutation in fibrillin-1 gene [5] and also in a spectrum of overlapping diseases such as Goldberg syndrome, familial or isolated forms of aortic aneurysm, “ Mass” phenotype which are collectively called as “ Type-1 fibrillinopathies”[6] or structural defects in the pro α-1 (III) of type III collagen in Ehler-Danlos syndrome (EDS) type IV (EDS vascular type). Mutation in other genes such as COL3A1 gene [7] is also reported in these connective tissue disorders.
Cystic medial necrosis (smooth muscle cell necrosis and elastic fiber degeneration with the presence of cystic spaces filled with mucoid material in the media) associated with connective tissue disorders was once believed to contribute to degeneration of the aortic medialeading to aortic dissection most frequently in the ascending aorta( first few cms of ascending aorta and 90% found within 10 cm of aortic valve). Degenerative changes associated with aging leads to breakdown of collagen, elastin, smooth muscle cell as well as an increase in basophilic ground substance contributing the histologic change of cystic medial necrosis associated with dissection. However, a study showed that a minority of patients with aortic dissection established medial degeneration [8]. Sometimes these changes lead to weakening of the aortic wall and results in formation of fusiform aneurysm often involving the aortic root. The term annuloaorticectasia is used to describe this condition which was first coined by Ellis et al in 1961, occurs in 5 to 10% of patients with aortic regurgitation and the aortic root is bulbous, pear-shaped as shown in Figure 1, pyriform appearance or flask shaped. In syphilis, the spirochetes directly infect the aortic media during the second phase of the disease, most commonly involving the ascending aorta after a latent period of 5-40 years, destroy the muscular and elastic elements of the media and the inflammatory response is replaced by fibrous tissue that frequently calcifies. The medial destruction often results in progressive aneurysmal dilatation of the aortic root, only potentially causes aortic dissection in tertiary stage [9] and it has become a rarity today [10] as a result of aggressive antibiotic treatment at its early stage.Thus, aortic diseases such as aortic dilatation, aortic aneurysm, annuloaorticectasia, chromosomal aberrations (eg. Turner syndrome, Noonan syndrome), aortic arch hypoplasia, coarctation of the aorta, aortic arteritis, bicuspid aortic valve and hereditary connective tissue disorders (Marfan’s syndrome-majority of dissection is < 40>
Mechanical forces contributing to aortic dissection include flexion forces at fixed sites, radial impact of pressure pulse, and the shear stress of the blood. Aortic dissection occurs in the region of aorta that are subjected to the greatest dP/dt (the rate of increase in pressure or the LV ejection force) and pressure fluctuation [15]. The hydrodynamic forces in the blood stream that are generated by the propagation of a pulse wave with a velocity increase from 4- 5 m/s in the ascending aorta to 5-6 m/s in the abdominal aorta [16] and systolic BP during each cardiac cycle deliver kinetic energy to the aortic wall and the repeated motion of aorta related to contractile function of the heart results in flexion stress which are more marked in the ascending aorta and eventually leads to dissection and its propagation. Hypertension is one of the most significant triggers for aortic dissection in 72-90% of cases [17] and tends to be higher in distal dissections (70%) than proximal dissections (36%). Hypertension adds to a mechanical strain and the shearing forces exerting a longitudinal stress along the aortic wall contributing to the development of aortic dissection. Severe hypertension is relatively common during the period of hospitalization after an acute aortic dissection even without a prior history of hypertension and it may reflect marked increase in sympathetic tone, triggered by severe inflammation of aortic wall due to dissection process rather than renal ischemia. Weightlifting is known to elicit profound hemodynamic stress on the wall of the aorta [18] and may predispose the younger persons to aortic dissection, particularly type I.
Classification systems are used to locate the aortic dissection and its extent. The Stanford classification was developed from a functional approach based on whether the ascending aorta was involved as shown in Table 1 [19]. Dr.MichaelDeBakey, a pioneer in vascular surgery developed a classification as shown in Table 2 [20]. Many cases of aortic dissection do not fit into these classifications since a dissection limited to aortic arch, proximal to left subclavian artery but not involving ascending aorta may not be classified as type A or type B. Therefore, it is prudent to simplify the classification into anatomical categories, the proximal aortic dissection refers to involvement of aorta proximal to the origin of left subclavian artery which may or may not extend distally and distal aortic dissection refers to the involvement of aorta distal to the origin of left subclavian artery. In 1999, a classification based on the pathophysiologic features of aortic lesion rather than its location [21] as shown in Table 3 by the European Society of cardiology. Some authors state that type A dissections are confined proximal to brachiocephalic artery and type B dissections are confined distal to it. Thus, it is recommended that acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is classified according to both lesion type and location [22].
A leak or rupture of the dissection process into the surrounding structures is rapidly fatal and so this case had been reported.
Table 1: (Stanford classification)
Type A
Type B | Dissection involves the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch, and possibly the descending aorta. The tear can originate in the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, or more rarely, in the descending aorta. It includes DeBakey types I and II.
Involves the descending aorta or the arch (distal to the left subclavian artery), without the involvement of the ascending aorta. It includes DeBakey type III.
|
Table 2. (DeBakey classification- an anatomical description of aortic dissection):
Type 1 (68%)
Type II (10-15%)
Type III (25-30%)
Type IIIa
Type IIIb | Originates in ascending aorta and propagates at least to the aortic arch and often beyond it distally. It is most often seen in patients less than 65 years of age and is the most lethal form of the disease.
Originates in the ascending aorta and is confined to it.
Originates in the descending aorta and rarely extends proximally, but will extend distally. It most often occurs in elderly patients with atherosclerosis and hypertension.
Propagates proximally or distally, mostly above the diaphragm
Propagates distally to the abdominal aorta
|
Table 3. (Pathophysiological classification- ESC (European Society of Cardiology) classification:
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
Class 5 | Classical aortic dissection with an intimal flap between true and false lumen
Medial disruption with formation of Intramural haematoma/ haemorrhage
Discrete/subtle dissection without haematoma, eccentric bulge at tear site
Plaque rupture leading to aortic ulceration, penetrating aortic atherosclerotic ulcer with surrounding haematoma, usually subadventitial
Iatrogenic and traumatic dissection
|
Table 4 (Risk factors for aortic dissection):
Hypertension
Genetically triggered thoracic aortic disease Marfan syndrome Bicuspid aortic valve Loeys-Dietz syndrome Vascular Ehlers- Danlos syndrome
Congenital diseases/syndromes Coarctation of the aorta Turner syndrome Tetralogy of Fallot
Atherosclerosis Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
Trauma, blunt, or iatrogenic Catheter/stent Intraaortic balloon pump Aortic/vascular surgery Motor vehicle accident Coronary artery bypass surgery/aortic valve replacement
Cocaine use (catecholamine induced acute hypertension)
Inflammatory/infectious diseases Giant cell arteritis Takayasu arteritis Behet’s disease (immune mediated small- vessel systemic vasculitis) Aortitis Syphilis
Pregnancy (hypertension precipitates proximal aortic dissection and aortic rupture commonly occurs during 3rd trimester or during the first stage of labour)
|
Review of literature:
The first case of aortic dissection was reported by Frank Nicholls in an autopsy report of King George II of Great Britain who died suddenly while straining in a toilet [23] on 25 October,1760 and found a dissection in the aortic arch which ruptured into the pericardium [24],[25]. J., P., Maunoir, a French physician introduced the term´”aortic dissection” in 1802. Thomas Bevill Peacock, a London cardiologist reported two series as 19 cases in 1843 and 80 cases in 1863 in the literature [26]. In 1924, Boyd reviewed 4000 autopsy reports of thoracic aortic aneurysms, finding 1197 cases of rupture with a 4% occurrence of aortopulmonary fistula [27]. In 1970, Bory and associates first reported an aortopulmonary fistula in a young woman [28]. In 1972, McCarthy and associates described an acute aortic dissection spreading through the ductusarteriosus to the pulmonary artery [29]. In 1995, SpierAnd Associates [30] described a unique case of rupture into both right ventricle and pulmonary artery with good outcome. In 1998, Atay and associates [31] reported a case of aortopulmonary fistula in a 73-year-old man.
A 48-year-old, hypertensive woman was admitted with sudden onset of palpitations and chest discomfort for 3 days duration. She skipped the antihypertensive medications for one week and experienced pain over the anterior chest without any migratory character or radiation and the pain was a vague discomfort rather than sharp and knife like. The pulse rate was 115 bpm and blood pressure 200/130 mmHg and no pulse or BP differentials in the extremities. General examination revealed no features of Marfan’s syndrome. Physical examination revealed basal crackles over the lung fields and cardiac auscultation revealed to-and-fro systolic- diastolic murmur over the left second and third intercostal spaces mimicking grade 3/6 continuous murmur. Blood chemistry revealed normal. ECG revealed sinus tachycardia with ischemic changes as T-wave inversions in left precordial leads as shown in Figure 1. X-ray chest revealed normal as shown in Figure 2. Emergency transthoracic 2D echocardiography revealed a dilated aortic root with an intimal flap in the infero-medial aspect of the aortic root as shown in Figures 4 and 5which was fibrosed suggesting a chronic proximal aortic dissection and the aortic cusp was displaced due the tear of dissection. Another dissection flap was found in the right lateral wall of the aortic root close to the right aortic cusp as shown in Figure10 with a regurgitation jet in the LVOT (left ventricular outflow tract) as in Figures6 and 8and a leak into the pulmonary artery as shown in Figures 16 to 18 suggesting an aortic rupture with fistulation into the main pulmonary artery (aotopulmonary fistula). The patient was treated with IV nitroglycerin, labetalol 100 mg twice daily and diuretics. She was stabilised with medical therapy and planned for surgical correction, preferably Bentall’s procedure with closure of the fistula, but died suddenly following a syncopal episode when begin too ambulant.
Figure 1 – ECG showing sinus tachycardia and ischemic changes as T- wave inversion in left precordial leads
Figure 2. X-ray chest PA (postero-anterior) view- normal
Figure 3. Parasternal long axis view showing the pear-shaped dilated aortic root
Figure 4- Parasternal long axis view showing the fibrosed dissection flap in the infero-medial aspect of the aortic root, tear in the flap with displacedleft aortic valve leaflet (LT AVL), teared from the annulus (AN) (double arrows).
Figure 5. Parasternal long axis view showing the features of annuloaorticectasia as normal aortic annulus, dilated aortic root, normal sinotubular junction and displaced left aortic valve leaflet due to tear.
Figure 6. Parasternal long axis view showing the leak into the LVOT (left ventricular outflow tract) as aortic regurgitation due to rupture at the site of annular support of the aortic valve.
Figure 7- Apical view showing the dilated aortic root, normal aortic valve and dissecting membrane with a beak appearance.
Figure 8. Apical 5 chamber view showing the leak into the LVOT (left ventricular outflow tract) from the site of rupture with normally attached aortic valve
Figure 9. Short axis view showing the aortic dissection, the intimal flap and rupture into the main pulmonary artery
Figure 10. Short axis view showing the intimal flap at the right lateral wall of the aorta close to the aortic cusp.
Figure 11. Short axis view showing the perpendicular dissection flap with a large true lumen
Figure 12. Short axis view showing the intimal flaps and the leak into the aorta.
Figure 13. CW (continuous wave) Doppler showing the leak jet mimicking as aortic regurgitation (AR)
Figure 14. Short axis view showing the leak into the aorta from the ruptured site
Figure 15. Short axis view showing the progression of leak into the aorta
Figure 16. Short axis vies showing the leak into the pulmonary artery (aortopulmonary fistula). MPA-main pulmonary artery.AO- aorta.
Figure 17. Short axis view showing the progression of leak into the pulmonary artery.MPA- main pulmonary artery.
Figure 18. Short axis view showing the aortopulmonary fistula.MPA- main pulmonary artery.
Figure 19- M-mode LV study showing the inferior wall hypokinesis with contractile dysfunction (EF 40%)
Figure 20. Suprasternal window showing the normal aortic arch
Figure 21. Color flow imaging showing no leak in the aortic arch
Figure 22. Parasternal long axis view showing the fibrosed dissection membrane and a leak into LVOT (left ventricular outflow tract)
Aorta plays an important role in modulating left ventricular performance and arterial function throughout the entire cardiovascular system [32]. An increase in distending pressure during systole induces an increase in aortic dimension, which is directly related to the elastic properties of aorta. Aorta expands at a rate of 0.9 mm in men and 0.7 mm in women for each decade of life and a diameter larger than 6 cm are definitely more prone to rupture than smaller ones [33]. The ascending part of the aorta bears the largest pressure during the cardiac cycle [34] and its exposure to elevated pressures causes a tear in the intimal lining at the sites of greatest wall stress and results in dissection which propagates either anterograde or retrograde directions along the arterial wall. This entrance tear is the initiating event and blood enters into the media and splits the aortic lumen to form a double-channel aorta with a true and false lumen. The intima and the inner part of the media form the intimomedial flap which separates the false lumen from the true lumen and is composed mainly of aortic media delaminated from the aortic wall [35]. When blood flows into the false lumen, it may cause secondary tears in intima, blood can reenter the true lumen and creating additional communication between the true and false lumens in the distal aorta. The true lumen is usually small with high-velocity flow whereas the false lumen is larger with slower velocity and turtbulent flow.
In autopsy series, as many as 13% of aortic dissections do not have an identifiable intimal tear [36]. In a minority of cases, the initiating event is the medial hemorrhage due to rupture of vasa vasorum. The intramural hematoma weakens the aortic wall and may progress either to outward rupture of the aortic wall in 35% of cases or to inward disruption of the intima, leading to communicating dissection in 3 to 5% of cases [37]. In penetrating aortic ulcer, an atheromatous plaque burrowing deeply through the intima into the media [38], the media is exposed to pulsatile arterial flow, which causes hemorrhage into the walls that then leads to intramural hematoma [39] and adventitial erosion may cause rupture in 42% of cases [40]. These nonflap lesions are more common in the descending aorta especially in elderly hypertensive individuals [41]. Spontaneous resolution of an aortic intramural hematoma also has been reported [42]. The noncommunicating dissection is characterized by no entry tear and no flow in the false lumen, the false lumen is more often filled with thrombus and the differentiation from intramural hematoma may be difficult [43]. In the Japanese Guidelines for thoracic aortic dissection 2011, it is defined the non-communicating dissection as no communication between the false lumen and true lumen [44].
Clinical Perspectives:
Von Kodolitsch et al [45] identified the independent predictors of aortic dissection in a study of 200 patients. Aortic dissection is also classified according to its duration, defined as length of time from symptom onset to medical evaluation as acute (< 2> 2 weeks and chronic (> 6 weeks after the onset of pain). The characteristic symptom of tearing pain in the chest was recognized in 1855 when a case was diagnosed in life. Pain is the most common symptom of acute aortic dissection in 96% of cases and those without pain are found to have chronic dissection [46]. The pain could be sharp (64%), tearing or ripping type (51%) or knife – like and its abruptness is the most specific characteristic feature. Pain is severe, unbearable at its inception and forces the patient to writhe in agony, fall to the ground or pace restlessly in an attempt to gain relief and has a tendency to migrate along the path of dissection in 17% of cases. The pain was located in anterior chest in > 90% of cases of ascending aortic dissection, in interscapular area (36%) and back (53%) in descending thoracic aortic dissection, in abdomen and lower extremities (30%) when extending distally into the abdominal aorta. The initial pain of aortic dissection may be followed by a pain-free interval lasting from hours to days and then pain returns, is an ominous sign of impending rupture [47]. About 4% of acute dissections may be painless especially in diabetes and older individuals, making a delay in diagnosis [48]. Pulse deficits were reported in < 20> 20 mmHg of systolic blood pressure may be found in 10 to 20% of unaffected individuals [49]. The presence of pulse differential is the most specific physical sign of aortic dissection in 38% of cases, may be transient, secondary to decompression of the false lumen by distal reentry into the true lumen or secondary to the movement of the intimal flap away from the occluded orifice. When a false lumen reenters the true lumen, the duplication of pulse due to difference in flow rates in the true and false channels and it is a rare physical finding of aortic dissection [50].
Myocardial infarction occurs in 1-2% of cases of aortic dissection secondary to the compression of coronary artery by the expansion of false lumen or the extension of dissection process. Involvement of right coronary artery is more common than the left one and, occasionally dissection and myocardial infarction occur concomitantly [51].
Aortic regurgitation accompanies in 18 to 50% of cases of proximal aortic dissection [52]. The mechanisms include dilatation of aortic root, annular dilatation, tearing of annulus or valve cusps, rupture of the annular support of the leaflets as shown in Figures 6 and 8, cusp prolapse due to pressure from asymmetric false lumen and physical interference of valve closure by intimal flap (intimal flap prolapse). In Marfan’s syndrome, the aortic dilatation is confined to sinuses, effacement of sinotubular junction (failure to narrow at sinotubular junction) results in malcoaptation of leaflets and subsequent aortic regurgitation [53].
The risk of fatal rupture in patients with untreated proximal aortic (the aortic root and ascending portion) dissection is around 90% and 70% of ruptures occur into pericardium, pleural cavity and mediastinum [54] leading to cardiac tamponade, left sided pleural effusion, hypotension and shock. Rare cases have been described in which the dissection eroded into the pulmonary artery and producing aorto-pulmonary fistula [55]. It is important to rule out the presence of pseudohypotension due to obstruction of an aortic arch branch in aortoarteritis.
Raised concentrations of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (a protein that released from damaged aortic medial smooth muscle) at higher levels (51 ± µg/L) than in acute myocardial infarction (2.1 ± 1.6 µg/L) occurs in aortic dissection [56] and it is elevated (> 2.5 µg/L) from the normal level (0.9 ± 0.4 µg/L in healthy individuals) within 6 hours of the onset of dissection. It may become a useful initial step in triaging the patients with suspected aortic dissection provided that the patients present within 6 hours and preferably within 3 hours. Its level is higher in proximal dissection than the distal and levels > 10 µg/L shows 100% specificity for aortic dissection within 30 minutes of the assay. A blood D-dimer level < 500>
Radiologically, mediastinal widening (bulge to the right with ascending dissection and to the left with descending dissection), localized hump on the aortic arch with widening of aortic knob distal to left subclavian artery and the separation of intimal calcification from the outer aortic soft tissue border by 10 mm, a finding on chest X-ray is called as “calcium sign” are the characteristic features of aortic dissection. About 12 to 20 % of aortic dissections had normal chest X-rays as shown in Figure 2.
It is important to prevent misdiagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection. About 20% of patients with type A dissection had ECG evidence of acute ischemia or acute myocardial infarction [59] and erroneous administration of thrombolytic therapy may be unavoidable and hazardous. A compilation of reminders, symptoms, and risk factors called as Ritter rules (named for the actor John Ritter who died due to thoracic aortic dissection in September 11, 2003 which was misdiagnosed and treated as acute myocardial infarction) was formulated to predict the aortic dissection [60]. Aortopulmonary fistula should be suspected in a patient who had aneurysmal dilatation of aortic root and exhibits signs of heart failure.
Echocardiographic Features
Two-dimensional echocardiography is currently considered as the first non-invasive technique when aortic dissection is clinically suspected in an emergency room [61] and it has a sensitivity of 78 to 100 % to diagnose type A dissection [62]. A dissection may extend weeks to months after its onset [63] and the tear is defined as a disruption of the flap continuity with fluttering of the ruptured intimal borders [64] as shown in Figures 4 and 5. The visualization of an intimal flap that separates the true and false lumens within the aorta is pathognomonic of aortic dissection [65] as shown in Figures 4 to 12. The two-dimensional echocardiography appears to be superior [66] in the recognition of an intimal flap and its utility is limited in visualization of a small circumscript dissection segment in the distal part of ascending aorta and anterior part of the arch, known as ‘blind spot’ due to interposition of trachea and left main stem bronchus between the esophagus and the aortic arch. Two echocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of aortic dissection are
There are 3 types of intimal flap were identified as shown in Table 5.
Table 4. (Types of intimal flap)
Type 1
Type 2
Type 3 | Long (> 1 cm), thin, bright, mobile in the lumen and undulating, vibrating or waving with a sail like motion in M-mode recording (long oscillating flap)
A long but minimally mobile linear echo which was duplicated and parallel to one or two aortic walls.
A short, double linear image with a rapid systolic motion and high frequency oscillations
|
In some cases, a linear echo criss-crossing or dividing the aorta perpendicularly is highly diagnostic of an intimal flap as shown in short axis images in Figures 9 to 11. If a thrombus is detected, the intimal flap is immobile and an aortic wall thickness > 15 mm suggests dissection with thrombus in the false lumen. The intimal tear is usually > 5 mm, located at the level of ascending aorta in 60 to 65% of cases and this segment is more prone to rupture. The oscillating intimo-intimal flap always indicate an acute dissection without thrombosis of false lumen [69] and a parallel wall motion with absence of oscillating flap indicates a chronic dissection [70]. The intimal flap, an anatomical marker of identifying the false lumen may appear as ‘cobweb’ or ‘beak’ appearance as shown in Figures 4 to 8 [71]. In acute dissection, the false lumen is more often larger and it is smaller in chronic dissections. The intimal flap is usually thick, may be calcified, less mobile andfibrosed as in chronic dissection as shown in Figures 4 to 7 and 22.
In rare instances, fistulous formation between the aorta and pulmonary artery may complicate dissection due to rupture as shown in Figures 14 to 18.A disturbed diastolic flow signal was detected in the left ventricular outflow tract as aortic regurgitation as in Figures 6 ,8 and 22 due to involvement of annular support of leaflets at the site of rupture and this leak between aorta and pulmonary artery creating an acquired aortopulmonary fistula in this patient as shown in Figures 18.
A dilated aortic root as in Figure3 with regional wall motion abnormalities, particularly the inferior hypokinesis as shown in Figure 19due to right coronary occlusion is suggestive of acute type A aortic dissection with a dissection flap and small false lumen in the right lateral wall of the aorta close to the leaflet attachments as in Figures in an already existing chronic disease leading to contractile dysfunction (EF 40%).
Management
Therapy for aortic dissection is directed to halt the progress of dissection process since lethal complications may arise from the the intimal tear and its subsequent course may result in vascular compromise or aortic rupture [72].
Medical therapy:
Since the arterial dP/dt reflects the force of LV ejection and it is the major stress acting on the aortic wall that contributes to both genesis and subsequent propagation of dissection, its diminution and reduction of systolic blood pressure are the two primary goals of pharmacological therapy. Acute dissection generally presents as a hypertensive emergency and the prime consideration of medical management is to maintain the mean arterial pressure around 60 to 75 mmHg and the systolic blood pressure to be reduced to values between 100 and 120 mmHg with an initial decrease should be at 20 % [73]. Historically, Wheat et al [74] first introduced the aggressive drug therapy for aortic dissection by originally using reserpine and guanethidine. A combination of beta blocker and a vasodilator (sodium nitroprusside) remains as a standard medical therapy recently. To reduce the dP/dt, an intravenous beta blocker, preferably propranolol 1 mg every 3 to 5 minutes (0.15 mg/kg) until a satisfactory beta blockade (heart rate 60 to 80 beats/minute) up to a total dose of 2 to 6 mg and then at 6 to 8 hours interval to maintain the adequate heat rate. In patients with labile arterial pressure or obstructive pulmonary disease, an ultra- short-acting beta blocker esmolol500 mcg/kg IV bolus, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 50 mcg/kg/minute and titrated up to 200 mcg/kg/minute is useful especially if surgery is to be planned. Labetalol, an alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist is an alternative drug to lower both dP/dt and arterial pressure. It is given in an initial dose 20 mg IV over 2 minutes period, followed by 40 to 80 mg every 10 to 15 minutes until the heart rate and blood pressure have been controlled and then a maintenance dose of 2mg/minute.
The most appropriate drug to provide pain relief is an opiate, the IV morphine sulphate. It reduces the force of cardiac contraction and the rate of rise of aortic pressure (dP/dt), retards propagation of dissection, delays rupture and also prevents exacerbation of tachycardia and hypertension. AHA (American Heart Association) guidelines recommend beta blocker as a first – line treatment. Vasodilators should be given if systolic blood pressure > 120 mmHg after beta blocker therapy and pain control. Appropriate rate control medications are mandatory before the initiation of vasodilator therapy as they induce reflex tachycardia and worsens the stress on the arterial wall. Calcium channel blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the acceptable alternatives in patients with contraindications to beta blockers. In refractory hypertension (persistent hypertension on the maximum dose of three different classes of antihypertensive drugs), an involvement of renal arteries with release of large amount of renin should be considered. In this setting, the most effective agent is IV ACE inhibitor, the enalaprilat given in an initial dose of 0.625 mg every 4 to 6 hours to control the blood pressure. Sublingual nifedipine is also successful to treat refractory hypertension associated with aortic dissection [75]. The efficacy of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker and a direct vasodilator is less predictable and it may cause tachyphylaxis, severe hypotension, urinary retention, and ileus. Hydralazine and minoxidil should be avoided since they produce a hyperdynamic response that would increase the dP/dt.
The potential problems encountered during medical therapy could be extension of dissection, aortic rupture and organ malperfusion resulting in hypotension and shock. In such cases attempts must be done to stabilize the patient with medical therapy which includes volume expansion with crystalloids and vasopressors (norepinephrine and phenylephrine) to titrate the mean arterial pressure at 70 mmHg. The extreme aggressive attempts at doing so may result in further propagation of false lumen [76] with adverse outcome, the aortic insufficiency and pericardial tamponade since both conditions are preload-dependent [77]. Therefore, treatmentof shock associated with aortic dissection should be managed by rapid surgical intervention.
If coronary insufficiency occurs, nitrates may be used, but therapy with thrombolytic agents and aspirin should be avoided.
Surgical therapy:
The principal aim of cardiac surgery in type A aortic dissection is to obliterate the entry tear in the ascending aorta, thereby preventing flow into the false lumen, encouraging thrombosis of the false lumen and healing of the aortic dissection [78]. Definitive surgical therapy was first developed by Michael E. DeBakey, Denton Cooley, and Oscar Creech, the cardiac surgeons associated with the Baylor college of medicine, Houston, Texas in 1954 [79]. DeBakey developed aortic dissection himself at the age of 97 in 2005 and underwent surgery in 2006 [80]. The fenestration procedure is the first surgical approach to aortic dissection in which the dissected aorta was incised and a distal communication was created between the true and false channels, thereby decompress the false lumen. This procedure is used in selected cases of dissection involving the descending aorta to relieve the renal or mesenteric or limb ischemia [81].
When the proximal aorta is fragile or badly torn or entire root is aneurysmatic, Bentall procedure, a radical approach is used mostly, in which a composite prosthetic graft (aortic valve plus ascending aorta tubular graft, ie, a prosthetic aortic valve sewn on to the end of a Dacron tube graft) facilitates replacement of both ascending aorta and aortic valve together and coronary arteries are reimplanted as buttons of aortic tissue into the graft wall [82],[83]. Bypass grafting of coronary arteries using saphenous vein segments is to be done when the coronary ostia were torn by the dissection.
The first successful repair of aortopulmonary fistula was reported by Giacobine and Cooley in 1960 [84]. Closure of the fistula results in immediate hemodynamic and symptomatic relief.
Interventional therapy:
Endovascular stent grafts are not indicated for repair of the ascending aorta or aortic arch and it is a standard treatment in most cases of distal aortic dissection. The fenestration/stent treatment could be used in unstable proximal dissection as a palliative treatment in high surgical risk patients. There are two endovascular techniques used to manage the acute vascular complications secondary to aortic dissection as follows.
Percutaneous aortic graft stenting is currently available and shows better results than surgical graft stenting [85]. Aortic stenting is primarily used to supplement fenestration as well as to reduce the dissection flap. In high grade compression of true lumen supplying to major aortic branch, stenting may play a role to enlarge the compressed lumen and to increase the distal flow. An average stent grafts are 3.5 cm (2.4- 4.5 cm) in diameter and 10.5 cm (preferably< 15>
Outcome:
The IRAD (International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection) study reported mortality rate of 27% for type A aortic dissection in 464 patients undergone surgical therapy [90] and in experienced centers, the long-term survival rate was > 90%. The Japanese association of thoracic surgery reported an overall hospital mortality was 9.1% in 2013 in a study of 4,444 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent surgical correction.
Prophylactic measures:
The accepted critical aortic root diameter of 5-5.5 cm at any age even in infancy, the prophylactic replacement of aortic root should be performed at a diameter of 5.5 cm and this general agreement is not applicable to other segments of the aorta. All patients should receive lifelong antihypertensive medications including beta blockers and blood pressure should not exceed 130 mmHg systolic for both children and adults [91] and to be titrated to < 120>
Aortic Dissection is the most frequent form of acute aortic syndrome and it is a serious condition that require immediate medical and surgical care. It is relatively rare, occurring at a rate of 3 per 100,000 people per year. The risk of rupture is 10 times higher in hypertensive individuals and 75% die within 2 weeks without surgery, especially in ascending aortic dissection and so urgent, immediate surgery is done in Type A aortic dissection.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.