AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Tania Leme da Rocha Martinez, Nephrology Department, BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Citation: Anita L R Saldanha, Ana Paula Pantoja Margeotto, André L V Gasparoto, Bruno de C Abdala, Tania L da Rocha Martinez, et al., (2024), Pros and Cons of Metabolic Alterations in Hypertension Treatment, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 6(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/196
Copyright: © 2024 Tania Leme da Rocha Martinez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 01 January 2024 | Accepted: 15 January 2024 | Published: 23 January 2024
Keywords: hypertension; metabolic changes; cholesterol; triglycerides; pharmacological treatment
Systemic arterial hypertension, in addition to increasing the probability of occurrence of coronary artery disease, is one of the main factors that predispose to its development and progression; it is also a fact that most deaths of patients with systemic arterial hypertension are due to coronary heart disease. The role of insulin in increasing the activity of the sympathetic nervous system, in the greater retention of sodium and in the proliferation of smooth muscle cells (muscle hypertrophy) is well described, which can ultimately not only trigger but also exacerbate systemic arterial hypertension. Therefore, when we approach arterial hypertension, we must consider it as an "inherited" syndrome of metabolic, hemodynamic and genetic abnormalities and always remember that the simple reduction in blood pressure levels may not interfere with the other factors that contribute to coronary artery disease. The hypotensive drugs that may be the cause of all this negative picture are diuretics and beta-blockers, which, by the way, are the most commonly used drugs in the large multicenter studies included in the metaanalysis by Collins et al. The diuretics that have been shown to alter the lipid profile are thiazides. They have an average elevation of 34 mg/dl in triglycerides and 11 mg/dl in total cholesterol. Beta-blockers versus lipid metabolism produce elevation of total cholesterol (LDL-col-e and VLDL-col) and triglycerides. They work by inhibiting the activity of adenyl cyclase in fat cells and reducing the hydrolysis of fatty acids and triglycerides. Beta-blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity do not seem to have a negative effect on the lipid profile of hypertensive patients.
Systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) and dyslipidemia are proven to be the major risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) [1]. Hypercholesterolemia is frequently found during the clinical investigation of SAH, and the association of the two pathologies acts synergistically, increasing cardiovascular risk [2]. We will discuss the peculiarities of this association and the appropriate ways to approach it from a therapeutic point of view.
Epidemiological data
Large epidemiological studies [3-5] have shown that the risk of cardiovascular mortality increases with cholesterol levels - in the 55-year-old man the risk is 0.6%/year for a cholesterol level of about 245 mg/dl, falling to 0.2%/year for a level of 180 mg/dl. They also showed the existence of a positive and synergistic correlation between these serum total cholesterol (TC) values and blood pressure (BP) levels [6-11]. SAH, in addition to increasing the probability of CAD occurrence, is one of the main factors that predispose to its development and progression; it is also a fact that most deaths of patients with SAH are due to coronary heart disease. Published data [12] have shown that 40% of all individuals with BP>140/90 mmHg or who use antihypertensive medication have serum TC levels higher than 240 mg/dl; and 46% of those with TC>240 mg/dl also have BP>140/90 mmHg. A frequent association of hypertension with hypertriglyceridemia and hypoalphalipoproteinemia, described by Reaven and known as Syndrome X, has also been reported.
The result of the meta-analysis carried out by Collins et al. [13], which included 14 studies on the treatment of SAH, with about 45,000 patients and a median follow-up time of 5 years, demonstrated a 42% reduction in the risk of stroke versus a decrease of only 14% in the risk of myocardial infarction and/or death from CAD. The explanation for this unexpected phenomenon, a small reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction, since antihypertensive therapy has been proven to "protect" the patient against progression to more severe levels of SAH and its deleterious consequences, would be the occurrence of adverse metabolic effects of the drugs used [14], in association with the fact that coronary heart disease is multifactorial. In view of these data, we came to the conclusion that the treatment of SAH is not simply limited to the reduction of blood pressure levels; our goal is the protection of the so-called target organs, not forgetting the endothelium, which plays a major role in increasing cardiovascular risk in the association of the pathologies in question.
Although it is not our intention to study in depth the pathophysiology of arterial hypertension, we believe it is important to discuss, even if briefly, a "metabolic element" common to the association of SAH and dyslipidemia: insulin resistance. Insulin resistance begins with the occurrence of decreased glucose uptake, with consequent hyperinsulinemia as a response (there is an increase in insulin secretion by the pancreas and a decrease in extraction by the liver). The role of insulin in increasing the activity of the sympathetic nervous system, in the increased retention of sodium and in the proliferation of smooth muscle cells (muscle hypertrophy) is well described, which can ultimately not only trigger but also exacerbate SAH. It is important to emphasize that the existence of an associated genetic predisposition is reported and already well accepted as "scientific truth" - there are several studies carried out with normotensive children of hypertensive parents (with essential arterial hypertension), which demonstrated a higher occurrence of insulin resistance when compared to control groups. Therefore, when we approach arterial hypertension, we should consider it as an "inherited" syndrome of metabolic, hemodynamic, and genetic abnormalities, and always remember that a simple reduction in blood pressure levels may not interfere with other factors that contribute to CAD [15] (Table 1).
Table 1: Effects of antihypertensive drugs on various risk factors for coronary artery disease
Adverse effects of antihypertensive drugs
The presence of metabolic alterations, such as glucose intolerance and lipid alterations (often hypertriglyceridemia), is more "common" in treated hypertensive patients, reflecting possible adverse effects of hypotensive agents [16]," on tissue sensitivity to insulin; obesity and sedentary lifestyle, factors that can be modified, also contribute to this picture.
The hypotensives that may be the cause of all this negative picture are diuretics and beta-blockers, which, by the way, are the most commonly used drugs in the large multicenter studies included in the metaanalysis by Collins et al. [13].
Diuretics vs Lipid Metabolism
The diuretics that have been shown to alter the lipid profile are thiazides. They have an average elevation of 34 mg/dl in triglycerides and 11 mg/dl in TC [17]. Although these alterations are very discrete and allow a return to the baseline value when the drug is discontinued, we know that they are due to interference with the production, release and action of insulin, which makes these drugs so deleterious. They also increase the action of lipoprotein lipase, which hydrolyzes triglycerides and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL-col), increasing the production of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-col) and TC.
Beta-blockers vs Lipid metabolism
They produce an increase in TC (LDL-col-e and VLDL-col) and triglycerides [18].
They work by inhibiting the activity of adenyl cyclase in fat cells and reducing the hydrolysis of fatty acids and triglycerides.
Beta-blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) do not seem to act negatively on the lipid profile of hypertensive patients [12].
Favorable effects of antihypertensive drugs in relation to the modification of atherosclerosis
We know that the theory of "endothelial injury" is the common basis for the actions of SAH and dyslipidemia in the arterial wall and that the atherogenic "marker" of both is insulin resistance [19].Therefore, as previously discussed, we should seek the institution of an antihypertensive therapy also aiming at the regression of vascular structural alterations; it is important to have an integrated view that links SAH to atherosclerosis [20], even if, apparently, hypertension is not present by essentially numerical criteria. The preservation of vascular integrity, combined with the concern not to cause metabolic damage, assumes a higher priority and, in this regard, agents that potentially have an antiproliferative and/or protective role on the arteries can produce the expected clinical benefits [21]. Calcium antagonists (CaA) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the best options for the treatment of dyslipidemic hypertensive patients [14,20,22].
Calcium antagonists
Calcium is clinically and experimentally involved in the progression of atherosclerotic injury and also seems to be responsible, according to the theory of excessive calcium uptake (especially mitochondrial calcium overload), for a cell death mechanism common to several injuries [23]; several CaA were able to act effectively in this process.
Studies carried out in Japan, previously, had already shown that, in rabbits, arteries that had induced atheromatous lesions could be injured by calcium; Injections of calcium salts into these rabbits led to the disintegration of the inner elastic membrane of the vascular wall. It was also found that the ratio between lipid content and the presence of calcium in aortic and coronary lesions was 30 to 65% in the aorta and about 4 to 5% in the coronary arteries, compared to more than half of calcium in the coronary arteries (dry weight of the plaques). With proven antiatherosclerotic and vasculoprotective effects and having been shown to be effective in reducing the development of atherosclerosis in rabbits, it was necessary to verify whether CaA also had these effects in men, since the injury model is different [23]. Clinical studies have recently shown that the chronic use of this class of hypotensive agents in patients with incipient coronary artery disease significantly reduced the appearance of new lesions detectable by coronary angiography, when compared with placebo (the formation of new lesions seems to depend on cellular calcium) [24-26]. The clinical study carried out with Nicardipine (CaA) [27] presented interesting results: this drug did not show any effect in delaying or regressing the atherosclerotic lesion already installed, but in those patients who had minimal lesions (<20>
CaA would then act by decreasing endothelial damage and inhibiting the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells; Isradipine also appears to have positive effects on platelet aggregation and fibrinolytic activity [25].
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
The scientific interest in studying SAH in its initial phase, even before blood pressure changes are verified, is evidenced in the large number of publications on the subject. The Dutch Hypertension and Offspring Study [29] was conducted to describe the important etiological mechanisms in the "onset" of hypertension. The findings suggested that the alterations that appeared in the early stages would occur in renal hemodynamics: renal vasoconstriction and the presence of a more "active" renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. There is also evidence that the increase in serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (independent genetic marker) [30]; the same evaluation can be made for angiotensin II [30,31].Therefore, the use of ACEI as antihypertensive drugs in dyslipidemic hypertensive patients is due not only to the neutrality factor in the lipid profile [32], but also to their actions in attenuating the vasoconstrictive effects of angiotensin II and the sympathetic nervous system on the coronary bed, in the possible inhibition of LDL-col oxidation, in the increase in bradykinin levels (increase in nitric oxide production; antiproliferative effects) and in the control of ACE levels.
Drug Interactions
The interactions known or theoretically possible to occur are [33,34]:
Decreased LDL-col reduction with the combined use of bile acid sequestrants and thiazide diuretics;
Interference with the hypotensive action of various antihypertensive drugs when used concomitantly with nicotinic acid, aspirin, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents;
Potential adverse effect of thiazide diuretics on hyperglycaemia when administered together with nicotinic acid.
Familial dyslipidemic arterial hypertension syndrome
The grouping of high BP with other metabolic factors is described using various headings, such as Insulin Resistance Syndrome, Syndrome X and, more recently, Familial Arterial Hypertension, which would be present in about 12 to 16% of essential hypertensive patients and in 1 to 2% of the general population [35]. The population studies left no doubt as to the existence of a maintained association, and not merely a casual or dependent on possible adverse effect of antihypertensive treatment, between high blood pressure levels and altered lipid profile. The classic Utah study [35, 36] showed that patients with early CAD studied had lipid abnormalities. Of the alterations found, the most common were low HDL-col and hypertriglyceridemia (twice as high LDL-col). In this study, the occurrence of Dislipemic Familial Hypertension ranged from 21 to 54% and Combined Familial Hyperlipidemia from 36 to 48%. Williams et al. [37] observed a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia in middle-aged men with familial hypertension, which suggested a genetic character for this alteration. After the report made by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (USA) of the study carried out in 514 pairs of twins, in which the occurrence of Dislipemic Arterial Hypertension Syndrome was about three times higher in monozygotic patients, the genetic character (in a polygenic context) of the syndrome became evident. Although genetic factors are important in determining the variation between individuals in lipid levels and BP, these are also strongly influenced by environmental factors - particularly diet; It seems that we can achieve a reduction in blood pressure with the use of diets with reduced lipid content and rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. It is postulated that there is a "strong action" of the sympathetic nervous system based on the recognized capacity of vasoconstriction by adrenergic stimulus, added to the reduction of lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase - LCAT and LDL-col receptors [38]. There are also studies on transmembrane ion exchange that have suggested an alteration in the caton transport, secondary to a structural alteration of the membrane (for example, the cholesterol-phospholipid ratio of the platelet membrane of essential hypertensive patients is significantly high). We also have lipase-lipoprotein deficiency (heterozygous) appearing as the possible "promoter" of this syndrome. It is important that we investigate the occurrence of this syndrome in all essential hypertensive patients with a family history, since the risk for CAD is four times higher than that of each pathology separately.
Acknowledgments
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
