AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Pedro Clarós, Clarós Otorhinolaryngology Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Citation: P.Clarós, N. Końska, P. Clarós-Pujol, D. Clarós-Pujol, J. Sentís, et.al. (2021). Prevalence of maxillary sinus alterations after zygomatic surgery. A comparative study between intra-sinus and ZAGA approaches. J Dentistry and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 3(1); DOI: 10.31579/2643-6612/018
Copyright: © 2021. Pedro Clarós, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 26 April 2021 | Accepted: 04 May 2021 | Published: 10 May 2021
Keywords: zygomatic implants; rhinosinusitis/surgery; lund-mackay score; zygoma anatomy-guided approach; edentulism; rehabilitation; antrostomy; Zygomatic Brånemark technique
Zygomatic implant (ZI) is an option of the edentulism. Complications associated with ZI are maxillary sinusitis and soft tissue recession. The Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach (ZAGA), reduce the complications of the Original zygomatic intra-sinus Surgical technique (OI-ST).
Study Aims: 1) report and compare the prevalence of sinus complications between ZAGA and OI-ST. 2) propose therapeutic guidelines for sinus.
Material and Methods: ZAGA has been proposed to reduce the complications of the OI-ST.
Results: Statistically significant increase of the "Modified Lund Mackay" (MLM) score (was noted in CT of patients after ZI surgery in comparison with the pre-surgical Lund-Mackay (LM) score (t=5, 0, p<.0005).
Our study indicates that patients who underwent the ZI surgery according to the OI-ST. (M = 2.93, SD = 3.65) demonstrated a significantly higher ML-M score (t = 2.99, p < .003) compared to the patients operated with the ZAGA Concept (M = 1.52, SD = 2.36).
Conclusions: ZI procedures can lead to sinus alterations. Significant differences have been found between two different approaches.
Severe tooth loss and edentulism is one of the leading causes of disability in some high-income countries. Loss of natural tooth increases with age and, due to demographic changes (ageing population), is still a frequent condition, even with better dental care.
Tooth loss has a broad impact on general and psychological health. It limits an individual’s capacity in biting, chewing, smiling and speaking; it distorts facial support and aesthetics, and leads to decreased self-esteem and lower quality of life.
Loss of masticatory pressure in areas of missing teeth is followed by the bone resorption of maxilla, first the alveolar process and afterward basal bone, which are a challenge in prosthetic rehabilitation. Lack of the alveolar bone prevents retention of a standard prosthesis, and the placement of conventional implants is impossible due to insufficient bone tissue for its anchorage.
There are several surgical techniques to treat severely resorbed maxilla with deficient alveolar bone, such as bone grafting and sinus augmentation. One of the therapeutic alternatives is the use of zygomatic implants. Zygomatic implants use zygomatic bone as the main support structure for implant fixation. Indications for rehabilitation with zygomatic implants are total or partial maxillary edentulism with extreme resorption (Fig. 1a, b), failure of conventional implant placement, failure of sinus augmentation or grafting procedures and rehabilitation after tumor resection and trauma [1].
Recent studies have shown that the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with the placement of zygomatic implants has higher success rates than bone reconstructions using large bone grafts from intra or extra-oral provenance [2].
Zygomatic implants were developed by Professor P. Brånemark. Initially implants had an intra-sinus path (OI-ST). Sinus entrance was performed from the palatal side; no care was taken about Schneider’s membrane integrity [1, 2]. A “window type” maxillary anterior wall antrostomy was performed at the superior level close to the zygomatic bone boundary to control zygoma drilling and the implant insertion path. Surgery was performed in two stages. The greater the concavity of the anterior walls of the maxilla, the greater the palatal emergence of the implant head. Typical complications associated to the original method are late rhinosinusitis and bulky prostheses due to the palatal emergence of the implant head. In the year 2000, Stella and Warner proposed a modified method of implantation. In opposition to the “window type” osteotomy of the OI-ST, a slot type antrostomy was performed previous to implant placement along the foreseen future maxillary implant position. The implant is then placed through the crestal bone into the sinus, following the contour of the maxillary bone via a narrow slot until introducing the implant in the zygomatic process (Fig. 2).
In this method detachment of the sinus membrane is not recommended [3, 4]. In 2006, the Aparicio group [5] described for the first time a one -year experience using a new approach for zygomatic surgery. In presence of concave maxillary wall that would lead to a bulky prosthesis, zygomatic implants were placed thorough the crestal bone. The implantation path was located partially outside of the maxillary wall. Neither window osteotomy, nor detachment of the sinus membrane was used. Almost simultaneously, the Brazilian group of Migliorança [6] named this approach as the Exteriorized technique. After a 3 year prospective study, Aparicio et al. [7] suggested that the extra-sinus approach eliminates the need for maxillary antrostomy or the creation of a slot previous to the surgery (Fig. 3a, b).
The approach has fewer surgical stages than classic and sinus slot methods, is less invasive, reduces surgical time, and provides a shorter cantilever by the position of the implant emerging from the crestal bone at the level of the first molar region. The extra-maxillary technique didn’t describe clear protocols of where to start the drilling, nor about the way the osteotomy should be performed [8, 9].
A relatively new concept named Zygomatic Anatomically Guided Approach (ZAGA) has been evaluated with promising results [10-12]. ZAGA is a development of the original zygomatic Brånemark technique, the Sinus Slot, and the extra-sinus approach, focused on inter-individual anatomical differences.
ZAGA Concept includes a variety of possibilities of implantation path according to the patient anatomy variations. If the residual alveolar bone at the sinus floor level has a minimum 4 mm height x 6 mm wide and the patient does not have a history of periodontitis, the crest bone entry point should be closed thorough the middle part of the crest with intra-sinus path of the implant (Fig. 4).
If, on the other hand, the bone height/thickness at the crest level is smaller or the anterior maxillary wall is more concave, the alveolar entry should be displaced towards the buccal area (Fig. 5 a,b).
The osteotomy will be in the shape of a tunnel or a canal depending on the height of the pristine bone and the concavity of the maxillary wall.
Late sinusitis is reported to be the most common complication after the implantation of zygomatic implants [13, 14]. (Fig. 6)
The aim of this study is: 1) to report long-term outcomes in prevalence of sinus complications in patients rehabilitated using zygomatic implants; 2) to compare the prevalence of sinus complications depending on the type of surgical approach used; and 3) to propose diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines to treat sinus complications after placement of zygomatic implants.
Our retrospective study included 200 patients with severely atrophic edentulous maxillae restored with zygomatic implants with a follow-up at least 5 years after surgery. The surgeries were performed from 2004 to 2014 at the Aparicio Clinic, Clarós Clínic and others.
The patients were divided into two radiological groups depending on type of surgical procedure: the first group, Group 1, original zygomatic intra-sinus surgical technique (OI-ST), included 40 patients with 80 implants placed with the classical intrasinus approach, including those placed thorough a sufficient sinus floor bone, and the Slot technique. The second group, Group 2 included 160 patients treated with 320 implants placed according to the ZAGA Concept. In order to facilitate a non-biased radiological classification, patients from ZAGA Type 0, where an intra-sinus path was chosen because the residual alveolar bone at the sinus floor level had at least 4mm high x 6 mm wide, were excluded from the ZAGA Group.
All patients included in the study had one preoperative and two postoperative exams with CT scan done immediately after the implant placement and the second at least 5 years after surgery. For most of the post-surgical Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) scans, a Kodak 9500 Cone Beam 3D System was used (Kodak, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). The images were obtained in the oblique-coronal, coronal, axial and horizontal planes, and cuts of 1.0mm in thickness.
Each CBCT pre-operative scan was scored using the Lund-Mackay (L-M) staging system for assessment of sinus abnormalities on tomographies.. Accordingly, the sinuses were divided into six groups: frontal sinus, anterior ethmoidal cells, posterior ethmoidal cells, maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus and osteomeatal complex. Each group was given a score of 0, 1 or 2. Score 0 represented no abnormality or opacification thickness of sinus mucosa less than 3 mm. A score of 1 indicated a partial opacification for the sinus with a mucosal thickening of more than 3 mm; a score of 2 was given in cases of complete opacification of the sinus. The osteomeatal complex was assigned a score of either 0 (not obstructed) or 2 (obstructed). Each side was graded separately. A combined score ranged from 0 to 24.
If the preoperative CT scan showed significant sinus alteration, in particular obstruction of osteomeatal complex, which plays a fundamental role in the development of rhinosinusitis, a functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) was performed. Twenty-five patients (12.5 %) underwent a FESS operation before zygomatic implant placement. The surgeries consisted of an enlargement of the maxillary sinus ostium in an anterior or posterior direction with the inferior edge of the ostium untouched so as not to interfere with natural drainage patterns. The zygomatic implant surgery was postponed for a minimum of 6 months after the endoscopic sinus surgery, and a CT scan was conducted to check sinus status and to confirm the effectiveness of the operation.
Statistical analysis
The analysis was made using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 software. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize qualitative data. Quantitative data was described using means and standard deviations, indicating the highest and the lowest score. To compare qualitative data between two groups, the Chi-Square test was used, and to compare means of independent quantitative data, the t-student test was used.
The dependent t-test was used to compare the means between two related groups (pre- and post- zygomatic implantation) on the same dependent variable (L-M score).
The significance level used in our study was p < .05.
Ethical Approval:
Prior to starting the study, all the researchers fully revised the material (X Rays and CT-Scans) received and bearing in mind, not one of them carried information of any of the patients and there has been absolutely no contact with any of them, the ENT Department of Clarós Clínic waived the Ethical Approval.
All participant data have been anonymized.
At the moment of the implant placement surgery, 63% of patients (n=126) represented completely normal (negative) CT scan without any opacification in the sinuses, meaning that the L-M score was 0. The remaining CT scans presented certain degree of opacification of the sinuses. The mean L-M score was 1.111.79 points, with the maximum L-M score of 8.
A T-student test was performed to compare the preoperative L-M score between the two groups of patients. The difference in radiological sinus alterations between patients who qualified for zygomatic implantation using two different surgical approaches is not significant (M₁=0.83, SD1 = 1.3 vs M₂=1.18, SD2 = 1.83, t=1.13, p>.05).
When comparing the pre with the postoperative CT scans, 112 (56 %) patients presented a L-M score of 0 points (negative result) illustrating decreased or constant value over time, and 88 (44 %) of patients represented an L-M score of 1 or more (positive result). From the group of patients with a positive CT scan 86 patients (97,7 %) presented an increased degree of opacification in one or both maxillary sinuses (L-M score for maxillary sinus 1 to 4). The maximum L-M score was 14 points, the mean M=1.8, SD = 2.71.
The forty patients who underwent the zygomatic implantation according to the classical intrasinus and crestal entrance (Slot & ZAGA Type 0) approaches (M = 2.93, SD = 3.65), were compared to the 160 patients operated with the ZAGA Concept (M = 1.52, SD = 2.36). Intra-sinus group, demonstrated a significantly higher ML-M score t= 2.99, p < .003.
Pre- and post-operative L-M scores were found to be positively correlated, (r =.7, p<.0005) in the entire studied population, and also in the Group 1 (r=.532, p<.0005) and Group 2 (r=.835, p<0005) when studied separately. This suggests that the normal (healthy) pre-surgical sinus condition is crucial in avoiding further sinus complications.
Of the twelve patients (6 % of total 200 patients) who developed massive maxillary sinus alterations and obstruction of OMC underwent FESS, 8 of them belonged to Group 1 (intrasinus technique) and 4 patients belonged to Group 2 (ZAGA Concept). A Chi-Square test of independence was performed to examine the relation between type of surgical approach and the necessity of sinus surgery in patients after zygomatic implantation. The relation between these variables was significant, χ2 = 17, 4 p < .0005. Patients from the Group 1 were more likely than patients from the Group 2 to undergo FESS.
Two patients from Group 1 had an oro-sinusal fistula and massive sinusitis with peri-implant infection. Two implants (in 2 different patients) were removed despite pharmacological and surgical treatments.
A T-student test was performed to examine the relation between zygomatic implant surgery and tomographic alterations in sinuses. A statistically significant increase of the L-M score was noted in CT scans of patients after zygomatic implant surgery in comparison with the pre-surgical L-M score (t=5, 0, p<.005) in the entire studied population.
Moreover, when the 2 groups of operated patients were evaluated separately, a statistically meaningful increase in the L-M score was noted in the group operated using the classical intrasinus approach t=4, 3, p<.0005, and also for the extra sinus group t =3, 3 p <.001.
Several authors have reported that rhinosinusitis can be a problem associated with zygomatic implants that emerges even after a long period of follow-up [13, 14]. Currently, there is no consensus on how to report rhino-sinus status after zygomatic implantation. Actually, the term used to describe the sinus pathology in most of the studies about ZI, is “sinusitis”, without clarifying the type, the associated signs and symptoms, or whether a CT scan or endoscopy was performed to confirm the diagnosis.
Our research outcomes showed a statistically meaningful increase in radiographic evidence of sinusitis in patients that underwent zygomatic implant surgery. The present results are consistent with data from previous studies [12].
The correlation between implantation of zygomatic implants and inflammation of the sinuses was reported by Aruajo et al. in 2017[15]. Between the years 2007-2014, 129 implants were placed in 37 patients using the sinus slot technique. Sinusitis was the most prevalent complication (8 patients, 21.4%), which occurred from 10 months to 5 years postoperatively, although no clear diagnosis criteria was mentioned (clinical/ radiological). Five of the 8 studied patients were treated with antibiotic-therapy and the other 3 required maxillary antrostomy associated with antibiotics. Following the treatment, one patient shown recurrent sinusitis and the others had no new episodes.
D'Agostino et al. (2015) [16] analyzed 41 patients with 133 zygomatic implants placed (106 with intrasinus and 27 with extra sinus method) in years 2005-2014. Diagnosis of the sinusitis was based on clinical symptoms, which were evaluated using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20) and the radiological findings were evaluated on CT scans using the Lund-Mackay Staging System. Radiologic evidence of sinusitis was found in 45.3% and 11.1%. The sinus symptomatology was 15.6% and 11.1% of evaluated patients treated using the intrasinus and extra sinus techniques, respectively.
In a controlled study from 2014, Aparicio at al. [12] compared 2 groups of patients: treated by implantation of zygomatic implants using the classical technique (22 patients with 41 implants) versus the zygomatic anatomy- guided approach (ZAGA- 80 patients with 157 implants). The results showed significantly lower Lund-Mackay scores for the ZAGA group (2.38 +/- 3.86 vs 0.56 +/- 1.26, p = .042) and a statistically significant difference (54.55% vs 76.25%, p = .047) concerning the percentage of patients with no signs or symptoms of rhinosinusitis: Lanza and Kennedy test negative and Lund-Mackay score zero. They concluded that ZAGA is associated with lower risk of maxillary sinus-associated pathology [12].
Acute maxillary sinus infection is an absolute contraindication to zygomatic implant placement and chronic sinusitis is a relative contraindication. The obstruction of the osteomeatal complex plays a fundamental role in the development of rhinosinusitis. Opacification, no permeability, of the rhino-sinus ostium should be treated before zygomatic implantation. The treatments methods must follow the current recommendations for the treatment of rhinosinusitis, including functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The obstruction of the osteomeatal complex plays a fundamental role in the development of rhinosinusitis. The purpose of FESS is to remove any anatomical obstructions that prevent proper mucosal drainage.
Olarte et al. suggest in their study that performing an inferior meatal antrostomy as a prophylactic intraoperative manoeuvre in patients who require zygomatic implant surgery is an effective method in preventing postoperative sinusitis [17]. D'Agostino et al. studied 13 patients who had undergone placement of 4 zygomatic implants and concurrent middle meatal antrostomy with an endoscopic approach. Twelve months after surgery mucosal, hypertrophy was found in 3 maxillary sinuses (11.5%). They concluded that preoperative endoscopic sinus surgery provides statistically significant improvement in the health of the rhino-sinus system after zygomatic implant placement [18]. In our opinion, prophylactic sinus surgery before zygomatic implantation on the sinuses without any symptoms of alteration is not beneficial. It is important to be aware that any sinus operation will change the internal sinus environment. In the normal condition, unlike the post-surgical sinus, bacteria, viruses, and other foreign material that enter the nasal cavity invade the maxillary sinus itself very infrequently. Furthermore, the natural drainage pathway of the maxillary sinus is toward the natural ostium, located in the anteromedial aspect of the sinus towards the middle meatus, and persists even after performing inferior meatal antrostomy [19].
The best way to avoid sinus complications after zygomatic implant surgery is meticulous, pre- and postoperative radiological and clinical examination and appropriate treatment of sinusitis. If preoperatively the CT scans do not present any abnormalities in the sinuses, we see no reason to perform any kind of surgical prophylactic. However, if the patient presents any sinus abnormality in the CT scans, it is recommended to be evaluated by an ENT specialist and choose an appropriate treatment setting, either surgical, pharmacological or both.
Becktor et al.[20] established that sinusitis in patients with zygomatic implants can be attributed to the communication from the oral cavity into the antrum created by the internal threaded abutment screw chamber of the zygomatic implant; or to the loss of osseointegration, bone to implant contact, at the marginal level in the palatal area and the functional loading resulting in transversal mobility of the long coronal part of the zygomatic implant, which could imply a higher risk of communication between the antrum and the oral cavity. This may suggest that oral bacteria reached the sinus following the resorption of the peri-implant alveolar bone. One potential problem may therefore be the development of sinus pathology when bone, already atrophic, is subjected to further bone loss such as by peri-implantitis; diagnosis was odontogenic sinusitis of peri-implant origin and was resolved by removing the implant.
In the postoperative assessment, sinus reactions to zygomatic implants have to be evaluated. Many patients could be subject to subclinical alterations of the paranasal sinuses and may be predisposed to subsequent complications. If any abnormality in the sinuses occurs, it is required to decide about treatment options in order to avoid losing the implant.
The strengths of the study include a large population of 200 patients evaluated, a follow-up time of at least 5 years, division into 2 different groups depending on the surgical technique, and the standardized method of evaluation of the CT scans using the L-M score system. All in all, further studies are necessary to determine the correlation between radiological and clinical findings and to follow-up with patients with zygomatic implants who underwent sinus surgery to determine the recurrence rate of sinusitis.
Our research outcomes showed a statistically meaningful increase in radiographic evidence of sinusitis in patients after with zygomatic implant surgery. Zygomatic surgery can lead to sinus alterations. Significant increased prevalence of sinus symptoms has been found in the OI-ST with respect to the ZAGA Concept. For this reasons it is important to establish clear surgical planning, taking into account clear diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for the prevention and treatment of sinus complications.
Acknowledgements
All authors have reviewed the article and agreed to the submission.
Authorship Contribution
The principal investigator of the research, Pedro Clarós (MD PhD), states that he had full access to all data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.
In our research Pedro Clarós (Clarós Clinic, Barcelona, Spain), Natalia Końska (Clarós Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Stefan Zeromski Specialist Hospital, Cracow, Poland), Pedro Clarós-Pujol (Clarós Dental Clinics, Barcelona, Spain), Daniel Clarós-Pujol, (Clarós Dental Clinics, Barcelona, Spain) conducted and were responsible for the data analysis and wrote the paper. Miguel Peñarrocha (University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain), provide critical feedback, document formatting. Joan Sentís (Department of Public Health (Statistics), School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) conducted the statistical analysis. Carlos Aparicio (Hepler Bone Clinic, Barcelona, Spain) supervised the project. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript.
Conflict Of Interest
The authors report no potential conflict of interest.
Funding
The authors report no financial and material support for the research and the work in the manuscript.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
