AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Augustine I. Airaodion, Department of Biochemistry, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Citation: E. I. Ezebuiro, E. O. Ezirim, E. M. Akwuruoha, O. R. Omole, A. I. Airaodion, et al, (2024), Prevalence, Awareness, and Attitudes towards Breast Cancer among Women in Southeast Nigeria, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 8(5) DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/223
Copyright: © 2024, Augustine I. Airaodion. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 06 June 2024 | Accepted: 14 June 2024 | Published: 24 June 2024
Keywords: breast cancer; southeast Nigeria; awareness; prevalence; risk factors; screening; healthcare access
Background: Breast cancer is a significant health challenge in Southeast Nigeria, contributing to high morbidity and mortality among women. Factors such as limited access to healthcare, lack of awareness, and cultural stigmas exacerbate the burden, leading to late-stage diagnosis and poor survival rates.
Objectives: This study aims to assess the prevalence, awareness, and attitudes towards breast cancer among women in Southeast Nigeria, and to identify the risk factors and preventive measures practiced in this region.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted in Southeast Nigeria. A stratified sampling method was used to select participants from urban and rural areas. Data were collected from 360 women using a structured. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations were utilized for data analysis.
Results: Awareness of breast cancer was high (96.67%), primarily obtained through the internet/social media (43.51%) and healthcare professionals (19.18%). However, knowledge about risk factors and symptoms was moderate to low, with only 14.17% considering themselves very knowledgeable. Regular breast self-examinations were practised by 30.28%, while 69.72% had never undergone clinical breast examinations. The prevalence of breast cancer diagnosis was 16.39%. Attitudes towards screening were positive, with 71.11% strongly agreeing that regular screening aids early detection. Despite this, confidence in identifying symptoms was low, with only 3.33% feeling very confident.
Conclusions: The study highlights significant gaps in knowledge and practices related to breast cancer despite high awareness levels. There is an urgent need for targeted educational programs to enhance knowledge about risk factors, symptoms, and the importance of regular screening. Improving healthcare access and addressing cultural barriers are crucial for early detection and better outcomes.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and represents a significant public health concern [1]. In Southeast Nigeria, as in many other parts of Africa, breast cancer poses a critical challenge due to late-stage presentation and inadequate healthcare infrastructure. Understanding the prevalence and awareness of breast cancer in this region is essential for developing effective strategies to combat this disease.
Globally, breast cancer accounts for approximately 24.2% of all cancer cases among women, making it the most prevalent cancer in this demographic [1]. Despite advances in detection and treatment, breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women, with significant disparities in outcomes between high-income and low-income countries. In high-income countries, early detection through regular screening and advanced treatment options have substantially improved survival rates. Conversely, in low-income countries, including many in Africa, the lack of resources and awareness often results in late diagnosis and poor prognoses [2].
In Africa, breast cancer incidence and mortality rates are on the rise. The increasing urbanization, lifestyle changes, and improved life expectancy contribute to this growing burden [3]. However, African women typically present with breast cancer at more advanced stages compared to women in high-income countries. This disparity is attributed to limited access to healthcare services, cultural beliefs, and a lack of awareness about breast cancer symptoms and screening methods [4].
Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, faces significant challenges in addressing breast cancer. The country has a high burden of breast cancer, with regional variations in incidence and mortality rates. Southeast Nigeria, in particular, has been reported to have a relatively high incidence of breast cancer, yet studies focusing specifically on this region are limited [5]. The healthcare system in Nigeria is under-resourced, with insufficient facilities for cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. This inadequacy is further exacerbated by a shortage of trained healthcare professionals and poor health-seeking behaviour among the population [6].
The prevalence of breast cancer in Nigeria varies across different regions. A study conducted by the Nigerian National Cancer Control Program reported that the prevalence rate of breast cancer was higher in urban areas compared to rural areas, largely due to better diagnostic capabilities in urban centres [7] In Southeast Nigeria, studies have shown a significant lack of awareness about breast cancer symptoms, risk factors, and the importance of early detection [8]. This lack of awareness is a major barrier to early diagnosis and effective treatment.
Cultural beliefs and practices play a crucial role in the health-seeking behavior of women in Southeast Nigeria. Many women rely on traditional medicine and only seek medical attention when the disease has advanced significantly. Additionally, socioeconomic factors such as poverty, low educational levels, and lack of health insurance contribute to delays in seeking treatment [9]. Fear of stigmatization and the misconception that breast cancer is a death sentence also deter women from undergoing screening and seeking early medical intervention [7].
Figure 1: Two hypothetical theories of breast cancer initiation and progression [10].
(A) All subtypes of tumor are derived from the same stem cells or progenitor cells. Different tumor phenotypes are then determined by subtype-specific transforming events. (B) Each tumor subtype is initiated from a single cell type (stem cell, progenitor cell, or differentiated cell). Random mutations can gradually accumulate in any breast cells, leading to their transformation into tumor cells when an adequate number of mutations have accumulated [10].
Increasing awareness about breast cancer through education and community-based programs is essential to improving early detection rates in Southeast Nigeria. Studies have shown that awareness campaigns can significantly
enhance knowledge about breast cancer and encourage women to participate in regular screening practices [11]. Healthcare policies aimed at reducing the barriers to breast cancer screening and treatment, such as subsidizing the cost of mammograms and establishing more cancer care centres, are also crucial.
Study Design
A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted to assess the prevalence, awareness, and attitudes towards breast cancer among women in southeast Nigeria
Study Area
Southeast Nigeria, comprising states such as Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo, faces significant health challenges, including breast cancer. Breast cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women in this region. Several factors contribute to this high burden, including limited access to healthcare facilities, lack of awareness about breast cancer symptoms, and cultural stigmas that delay diagnosis and treatment. Healthcare infrastructure in Southeast Nigeria is relatively underdeveloped, with many rural areas lacking adequate medical services. This results in late-stage presentations of breast cancer, which significantly reduces survival rates. Efforts to improve early detection through awareness campaigns and mobile screening units are vital. Additionally, addressing cultural barriers and educating women on the importance of regular breast self-examinations and seeking prompt medical attention can improve outcomes.
Population and Sampling
Target Population
The target population comprised women aged 18 years and above residing in Southeast Nigeria.
Sampling Method
A stratified sampling method was employed to ensure representation from both urban and rural areas within the southeast states. The steps involved were:
i.Selection of States: Three states were randomly selected from the five states in Southeast Nigeria.
ii.Selection of Local Government Areas (LGAs): Six LGAs were selected from each state, with an equal representation of urban and rural areas (three urban and three rural LGAs per state).
iii.Selection of Hospitals: Two general hospitals were randomly chosen from each LGA.
iv.Selection of Participants: From each hospital, ten participants were selected, resulting in a total sample size of 360 women.
Instrument
Data was collected using a structured questionnaire developed by the research team. The questionnaire was divided into different sections covering socio-demographic information, awareness of breast cancer, knowledge of breast cancer, medical history, as well as attitudes and practices towards breast cancer screening.
Procedure
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages to summarize the socio-demographic information, awareness of breast cancer, knowledge of breast cancer, medical history, as well as attitudes and practices towards breast cancer screening. Cross-tabulations were used to explore associations between the dependent and independent variables.
Ethical Considerations
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before the interviews. Participant anonymity was ensured by assigning codes to the questionnaires and keeping all information confidential. The study protocol was approved by the relevant ethics committees in each of the selected states.
The socio-demographic profile of the 360 participants reveals that the majority are aged between 30 and 39 years (52.50%). Educationally, most participants have attained secondary education (58.89%), while a significant portion has tertiary education (29.17%). In terms of marital status, 84.17% are married. Employment status shows that 56.94% are self-employed, and half of the participants reside in rural areas, with the other half in urban areas (Table 1).
| Socio-Demographic Information | Frequency (n = 360) | Percentage (%) |
| Age (in Years) | ||
| Less than 20 | 19 | 5.28 |
| 20 – 29 | 86 | 23.89 |
| 30 – 39 | 189 | 52.50 |
| 40 and above | 66 | 18.33 |
| Educational Level | ||
| No formal Education | 11 | 3.06 |
| Primary Education | 32 | 8.89 |
| Secondary Education | 212 | 58.89 |
| Tertiary Education | 105 | 29.17 |
| Marital Status | ||
| Single | 36 | 10.00 |
| Married | 303 | 84.17 |
| Divorced/Widowed | 21 | 5.83 |
| Employment Status | ||
| Employed | 62 | 17.22 |
| Self-Employed | 205 | 56.94 |
| Unemployed | 93 | 25.83 |
| Retiree | 00 | 0.00 |
| Residence | ||
| Rural | 180 | 50.00 |
| Urban | 180 | 50.00 |
Table 1: Socio-Demographic Information of Participants
Regarding breast cancer awareness, an overwhelming 96.67% of participants have heard of breast cancer, with the primary sources of information being the internet and social media (43.51%) and healthcare professionals
(19.18%). Additionally, 36.67% know someone diagnosed with breast cancer (Table 2). The degree of awareness varies, with 39.72% having a good awareness level and 21.94% having a very good level (Figure 1).
| Variables | Frequency (n = 360) | Percentage (%) |
| Have you heard of breast cancer? | ||
| Yes | 348 | 96.67 |
| No | 12 | 3.33 |
| *If yes, where did you first hear about breast cancer? (Select all that apply) (n = 485) | ||
| Television/Radio | 83 | 17.11 |
| Newspaper/Magazines | 42 | 8.66 |
| Internet/Social Media | 211 | 43.51 |
| Healthcare professionals | 93 | 19.18 |
| Family/Friends | 42 | 8.66 |
| Community outreach programs | 11 | 2.27 |
| Others | 03 | 0.62 |
| Do you know anyone who has been diagnosed with breast cancer? | ||
| Yes | 132 | 36.67 |
| No | 228 | 63.33 |
* signifies multiple responses
Table 2: Awareness of Breast Cancer
Figure 1: Degree of Awareness of Breast Cancer
Participants' knowledge about breast cancer shows that the most recognized risk factor is a family history of breast cancer (29.11%), followed by lifestyle
factors (23.77%). Common symptoms identified include pain in any area of the breast (25.06%) and lumps in the breast or underarm (22.99%). However,
self-assessed knowledge levels are modest, with 23.06% considering themselves somewhat knowledgeable and 24.44% not knowledgeable at all. Most participants (80.28%) recognize breast cancer as a serious health issue (Table 3).
| Variables | Frequency (n = 360) | Percentage (%) |
| *What do you think are the risk factors for breast cancer? (Select all that apply) (n = 711) | ||
| Family history of breast cancer | 207 | 29.11 |
| Age | 49 | 6.89 |
| Gender | 74 | 10.41 |
| Hormonal factors (e.g., early menstruation, late menopause) | 82 | 11.53 |
| Lifestyle factors (e.g., diet, alcohol consumption, smoking) | 169 | 23.77 |
| Radiation exposure | 76 | 10.69 |
| Lack of physical activity | 07 | 0.98 |
| Obesity | 42 | 5.91 |
| Others | 05 | 0.70 |
| *What are the common symptoms of breast cancer that you are aware of? (Select all that apply) (n = 1209) | ||
| Lump in the breast or underarm | 278 | 22.99 |
| Change in breast shape or size | 211 | 17.45 |
| Nipple discharge | 136 | 11.25 |
| Pain in any area of the breast | 303 | 25.06 |
| Skin changes on the breast | 258 | 21.34 |
| None | 00 | 0.00 |
| Other | 23 | 1.90 |
| How knowledgeable do you consider yourself about breast cancer? | ||
| Very knowledgeable | 51 | 14.17 |
| Somewhat knowledgeable | 83 | 23.06 |
| Neutral | 79 | 21.94 |
| Not very knowledgeable | 59 | 16.39 |
| Not knowledgeable at all | 88 | 24.44 |
| Do you believe breast cancer is a serious health issue? | ||
| Yes | 289 | 80.28 |
| No | 71 | 19.72 |
Table 3: Knowledge of Breast Cancer
Figure 2: Degree of Knowledge of Breast Cancer
The medical history data indicates that 16.39% of participants have been diagnosed with breast cancer, primarily diagnosed between the ages of 50 and 59 (40.68%). Regular breast self-examinations are conducted by 30.28%, and 16.94% have a family history of breast cancer. Additionally, 69.72% have never had a clinical breast examination, and 91.11% have not had any other type of cancer (Table 4).
| Variables | Frequency (n = 360) | Percentage (%) |
| Have you ever been diagnosed with breast cancer? | ||
| Yes | 59 | 16.39 |
| No | 301 | 83.61 |
| If yes, at what age were you diagnosed? | ||
| Below 30 | 00 | 0.00 |
| 30-39 | 09 | 15.25 |
| 40-49 | 15 | 25.42 |
| 50-59 | 24 | 40.68 |
| 60 and above | 11 | 18.64 |
| Do you perform regular breast self-examinations? | ||
| Yes | 109 | 30.28 |
| No | 251 | 69.72 |
| How often do you undergo clinical breast examinations? | ||
| Annually | 33 | 9.17 |
| Every 2 years | 25 | 6.94 |
| Every 5 years | 51 | 14.17 |
| Never | 251 | 69.72 |
| Do you have a family history of breast cancer? | ||
| Yes | 61 | 16.94 |
| No | 299 | 83.06 |
| Have you ever had any other type of cancer? | ||
| Yes | 32 | 8.89 |
| No | 328 | 91.11 |
| *Do you have a history of any of the following conditions? (Check all that apply) (n = 363) | ||
| Diabetes | 44 | 12.12 |
| Hypertension | 59 | 16.25 |
| Obesity | 29 | 7.99 |
| None | 231 | 63.64 |
* Signifies multiple responses
Table 4: Medical History of Participants
Figure 3: Prevalence and Awareness of Breast Cancer in Southeast Nigeria
Regarding attitudes and practices towards breast cancer screening, confidence in identifying symptoms is low, with 38.06% not confident and 49.72% unsure. However, 71.11% strongly agree that regular screening aids early detection, and 80
The results of this study indicate a high level of breast cancer awareness among women in Southeast Nigeria, with 96.67% of respondents having heard of the disease. This high awareness is consistent with findings from similar studies in other parts of Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa. For instance, Agbo et al. [12] reported a comparable awareness level of 94.8% among women in Northern Nigeria, suggesting a widespread recognition of breast cancer across different regions of the country. The primary sources of information identified in this study were the Internet and social media (43.51%), followed by healthcare professionals (19.18%), and television/radio (17.11%). These findings reflect the growing influence of digital media in disseminating health information, a trend also observed in studies by Balogun et al. [13] and Akintola and Olubiyi [14].
The significant role of healthcare professionals as a source of information underscores the importance of medical practitioners in health education. This aligns with the findings of Akinola et al. [15], who emphasized the critical role of healthcare providers in improving health literacy and awareness. Conversely, the relatively lower impact of newspapers/magazines (8.66%) and community outreach programs (2.27%) suggests potential areas for targeted improvement, particularly in rural and underserved communities where digital access may be limited.
The study also revealed that 36.67% of respondents knew someone diagnosed with breast cancer. This personal connection to the disease could potentially enhance awareness and understanding, as suggested by the Health Belief Model, which posits that personal experiences and perceived susceptibility influence health behaviors [16]. The relatively high percentage of respondents with a personal connection to breast cancer in this study is higher than the 24% reported by Okobia et al. [11] in a study conducted in Edo State, Nigeria. This increase may reflect a growing incidence of breast cancer or improved diagnosis and reporting over the years.
When examining the degree of awareness, 39.72% of respondents rated their knowledge as good, while 21.94% rated it as very good, and 11.67% as excellent. These results are promising but also highlight room for improvement. Comparatively, a study by Bassey et al. [17] found that only 25% of women in Calabar, Nigeria, rated their awareness as good or better, indicating significant regional variations in the depth of knowledge about breast cancer.
The distribution of awareness levels in this study—with 20.83% rating their awareness as fair and 5.83% as poor—suggests that while initial recognition of breast cancer is high, detailed understanding and knowledge may be lacking for a substantial portion of the population. This is consistent with findings from a systematic review by Donnelly et al. [18], which highlighted that although general awareness of breast cancer is often high, specific knowledge about symptoms, risk factors, and early detection methods is frequently insufficient.
The findings of this study are consistent with the broader literature, which indicates high levels of awareness but varying degrees of detailed knowledge about breast cancer across different populations in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa. For instance, Okobia et al. [11] and Bassey et al. [17] both highlight the gap between general awareness and specific knowledge, a trend also observed in studies from other regions, such as East Africa [19] and South Africa [20].
The study identified that only 29.11% of the respondents recognized family history as a significant risk factor for breast cancer. This is relatively low compared to other studies in different regions. For instance, a study conducted in Lagos, Nigeria, found that about 48% of the participants acknowledged family history as a risk factor [7]. This disparity may indicate regional differences in health education or awareness programs.
Lifestyle factors such as diet, alcohol consumption, and smoking were identified by 23.77% of the participants as risk factors. This is slightly higher than the findings from a study in South Africa, where only 18% of women identified lifestyle factors as contributing to breast cancer [21]. The awareness of hormonal factors, including early menstruation and late menopause, was acknowledged by 11.53% of the participants, which is comparable to the 13% reported in a study in Kenya [22].
Interestingly, only 0.98% of the participants recognized lack of physical activity as a risk factor, a stark contrast to findings in developed countries where physical inactivity is well-documented and more commonly recognized by the public as a risk factor [23]. This suggests a need for targeted education on the importance of physical activity in reducing breast cancer risk in Southeast Nigeria.
Regarding symptoms, 25.06% of the respondents were aware that pain in the breast is a common symptom, while 22.99% identified lumps in the breast or underarms as a key symptom. These findings are lower compared to a study in Ghana where 35% of the women could identify lumps as a primary symptom of breast cancer [24]. The awareness of changes in breast shape or size was 17.45%, which is somewhat aligned with the findings in rural India, where approximately 20% of women recognised changes in breast shape as a symptom [25].
The high level of awareness about skin changes on the breast (21.34%) and nipple discharge (11.25%) aligns with previous studies that highlight these symptoms as less commonly known among women in developing countries [26].
The self-perceived knowledge about breast cancer among the respondents showed that only 14.17% considered themselves very knowledgeable, while 24.44
While awareness of breast cancer is high, there is a significant gap in regular screening practices and detailed knowledge. Interventions should focus on increasing practical knowledge and encouraging preventive practices through targeted awareness programs and improved healthcare access. Addressing cultural barriers, enhancing education on breast cancer prevention, and improving healthcare infrastructure are critical for reducing breast cancer morbidity and mortality in Southeast Nigeria.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
