AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Martin Mumuni Danaah Malick, University for Development Studies, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy
Citation: Danaah Malick M M, Maaleku A, Rivera O. (2020) Prevalence and factors associated with anemia in pregnancy among women receiving antenatal care at the West Gonja District Hospital of Northern Ghana. J Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 4(3): DOI: 10.31579/2578-8965/042
Copyright: © 2020. Martin Mumuni Danaah Malick. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 June 2020 | Accepted: 20 July 2020 | Published: 14 September 2020
Keywords: prevalence; anemia in pregnancy; risk factors; socio demographics; nutritional status
Background:
Anemia in pregnancy is a major public health problem especially in Low and Middle-income countries (LMIC) including Ghana and is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as being present when the hemoglobin concentration in the peripheral blood is 11g/dl or less. In most African countries anemia in pregnancy occurs if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 10g/dl. Pregnant women are at a higher risk of developing anemia due to several factors such as hemodilution, nutritional factors, multiple gestation, socio-economic status and malaria infestation. Anemia in pregnancy is an important cause of maternal mortality and affects half of pregnant women worldwide; with 56% of West African pregnant women being anemic. The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence and identify the risk factors associated with anemia among pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the West Gonja Hospital (WGH)
Methods: A cross-sectional was conducted with 136 pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the WGH between January 2017 to February 2018. Random sampling was used to select participants and data was collected using a structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed using the SPSS Version 24.0.
Results: A total 71(52.2%) of the study population were anemic, while 65 (47.8%) were not anemic. 20(74.1%) of the 27 pregnant housewives were anemic, while 11(64.7%) of the pregnant farmers were anemic. 27 (96.4%) of the 28 pregnant women who took their iron/folate supplement only some few days were anemic. 12 (100%) of the 12 participants who took their iron/folate supplement a few times a week were anemic. 4 (80%) of the 5 participants who never took their iron/folate supplement were anemic. 21 (70%) of those who did not sleep under ITN were anemic. 33 (84.6%) of the 39 patients who were diagnosed with malaria were also anemic. 28 (87.5%) of the 32 participants who took only 2 meals a day were anemic. 27 (79.4%) of the 34 patients who took liver, beef, chicken and fish only twice weekly were anemic. 15 (88.2%) of the 17 patients who drank tea some days in a week were anemic.
Conclusion: Although most of the pregnant women were adequately educated on the most relevant aspects of anemia in pregnancy, more than half of them were still anemic. Anemia was more prevalent among pregnant uneducated housewives with poor nutritional habits. All the pregnant sickle cell disease patients as well as those diagnosed with malaria were also anemic.
Anemia is defined as a decrease in the oxygen carrying capacity of blood due to a decrease in blood volume, a decrease in the total number of red blood cells, a decreased concentration of hemoglobin or a combination of any of the three. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines anemia in pregnancy as being present when the hemoglobin concentration in the peripheral blood is 11g/dl or less [1]. In most African countries anemia in pregnancy occurs if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 10g/dl [2]. Pregnant women are generally at an increased risk of developing anemia due to scientifically determined factors such as nutritional status, grand multiparity, multiple gestation, low socio-economic status, inadequate child spacing, chronic blood loss, hookworm infestation, hemoglobinopathies, malaria infestation and hemodilution [3]
The symptoms of anemia are usually non-specific and vague but generally include fatigue, weakness, dizziness, breathlessness, headache, and when severe enough, there may be hypotension, dyspnea, palpitations, lethargy and paresthesia [4]. Although Anemia is a condition that can be easily prevented, it constitute a major cause of mortality and morbidity among pregnant women; and accounts for about 20% of maternal deaths worldwide [5].
About 24.8% of the world population is affected by anemia representing 1.62 billion people [6]. Anemia in pregnancy is a major public health problem especially in Low and Middle-Income Countries such as Ghana; and It has been estimated that 41.8% of pregnant women worldwide are anemic. In developing countries, the prevalence of anemia in pregnancy is 60.0% of which about 7.0% of these women are severely anemic [7]. In Africa 57.1% of pregnant women are anemic [8]. Sub-Saharan Africa is the most affected region, with prevalence of anemia estimated to be 17.2 million among pregnant women, which is about 30% of total global cases [9].
Despite the fact that the Government of Ghana through the Ghana Health Services has implemented several policies and interventions to reduce the prevalence of Anemia in Pregnancy; the country still has a prevalence rate of about 62.4%, with higher prevalence rates being recorded in the rural areas [10]. To the best knowledge of the researchers, the prevalence of anemia in pregnancy specific for West Gonja District of the Savannah Region of Ghana has not yet been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and identify the risk factors associated with anemia in pregnancy in the West Gonja District
This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 136 pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the west gonja District hospital between 28th January 2018 to 15th February, 2019. Study participants were randomly selected as they were waiting to receive care at the antenatal care unit. To avoid data duplication, a unique code was assigned to each study and recorded on the questionnaire to help identify them. An interview was conducted using a structured questionnaire to obtain data about the socio-demographic characteristics, obstetric history, antenatal visits, iron and folic acid supplementation, health conditions during the pregnancy, nutritional assessment and finally, knowledge of anemia assessed by the mother’s ability to correctly name at least one symptom, two causes, and two preventive measures of anemia. Hemoglobin levels were obtained from their antenatal records. Data was analyzed through the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences(SPSS) version 24.0 to obtain frequencies and cross tables for all relevant Variables. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to explore associations between the individual factors (independent variables) and the outcome variable. Chi square was used as the statistical test to test associations between the independent variables and the outcome variables using regression analysis. Each study participant gave their written informed consent to participate in the study and were assured of full confidentiality with their personal health related information. Written Permission to conduct the study was fully granted by the hospital management team and since the study did not involve any medical intervention nor did it pose any health risk on respondents, there was no need for an ethical clearance from the district health directorate.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Only pregnant women who had evidence of recently (during the study period) determined hemoglobin level documented and were compliant with their scheduled antenatal care appointments (based on details from their antenatal records); were included in this study. Pregnant women who were not compliant with their scheduled antenatal care appointments as well as those who were being prepared for labor and delivery were all excluded from the study
1.0: Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants.
The mean age range of the 136 respondents was 24-28, 41(30%) and closely followed by 19-23, 38(29%), with both age ranges representing more than 50% of the distribution. Only 8 (5%) were 18 years and below, and 49 (35%) were above 28 years. Most, 108 (79%) of the expectant mothers were married while the remaining 28 (21%) were single. 39 (29%) of the respondents were traders and 9(7%) were government workers. 69 (51%) of respondents were Christians while 67 (49%) were of the Islamic faith. 57 (41%) attained primary education, 29 (21.32%) had no education, 8 (5.88%) attained vocational training, 23 (16.91%) were secondary school graduates while 19(13.97%) completed tertiary education secondary and tertiary education (Table. 1)
Table. 1.0: Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants.
1.1: Obstetric and Antenatal background of study participants
43 (31.6%)of expectant mothers were primigravida whiles 93 (68.30%) were multigravida. 48 (35.5%) respondents were nulliparous. 88 (64.7%) respondents were multiparous of which only 3 (2.1%) had more than four deliveries past 28 weeks. 62 (45.6%) study participants had their youngest child two years ago or more while 24 (17.6%) had the youngest child less than two years of age. The rest, 50 (36.8%) were either nulliparous or had lost their child during their neonatal period. 65 (47.8%) were in their second (2nd) trimester, 36 (26.5%) in their third (3rd) trimester, and 35(25.7%) in their first (1st) trimester at the time of data collection. 99 (72.8%) had their first antenatal visit in their first (1st) trimester, 36 (26.5%) in their second (2nd) trimester and 0.7% (1) in their third (3rd) trimester. 38 (27.9%) had never had any prior antenatal visit. 3 (2.1) had more than 4 antenatal visits while 8 (5.9%) had four (4) antenatal visits. 91 (66.9%) were currently on iron/folate tablets supplementation, 45(33.1%) were not on any supplementation tablets. Of the 91 taking the iron/folate tablets supplementation, 69 (75.82%) started in their first (1st) trimester, 21(23.07%) in their second (2nd) trimester and only 1(1.1%) started in her third (3rd) trimester. In terms of compliance with iron/folate supplementation, 52 (38.2%) took twice daily, 39 (28.7%) had not yet taken and 5 (3.7%) had never taken though they have had more than one antenatal visit (Table. 1.1)
1.2: Health and Nutritional background of study participants
106 (77.9%) out of the 136 study participants sleep under insecticide treated nets and 30 (22.1%) do not sleep under insecticide treated nets. 39 (28.7%) were diagnosed with malaria in the past six (6) months while 97 (71.3%) did not suffer from any malarial infection. only 2 (1.5%) out of the 136 study participants were sickle cell disease positive while 134 (98.5%) were negative. 78 (57.4%) had averagely three meals a day, 32 (23.5%) averagely had 2 meals a day and 26 (19.1%) had averagely more than three (>3) meals a day. For the weekly intake of heme containing foods such as liver, beef, etc., 56 (41%) had averagely three (3) times per week, 42 (30.9%) had more than three (>3) times per week and Only 4 (2.9%) had the heme containing foods once a week. Regarding the weekly intake of non-heme containing foods such as beans, nuts etc., 65 (47.8%) had about three (3) times per week, 51 (37.5%) had more than three (>3) times per week and 4 (2.9%) had the non-heme containing foods only once a week. 77 (56.6%) did not consume tea weekly while pregnant, 40 (29.4%) consumed it a few days a week (about <3 days), 17 (12.5%) consumed it somedays a week (less than 7 days but more than 3 days) and only 2 (1.5%) consumed it every day (Table. 1.2)
1.3: Hemoglobin Concentration of Study Participants
65 (47.8%) of all respondents presented with normal Hemoglobin (Hb) of ≥11.0 g/dl, 42 (30.9%) respondents had mild anemia with Hb of 10.0-10.9 g/dl, 27 (19.9%) were moderately anemic with Hb of 7.0-9.9 g/dl and only 2 (1.5%) had severe anemia Hb of <7.0 g/dl. (Table. 1.3 /Figure.1)
1.4: Anemia Prevalence among Study Participants
The overall prevalence of anemia within the sampled study population was 71 (52.2%) as shown in (Table. 1.4/Figure. 2)
1.5: Distribution of Knowledge Level on Anemia in Pregnancy among Study Participants
The majority 94 (69.1%) of respondents had ever been educated about anemia in pregnancy while 42 (30.9%) had never been educated. Of the 94 respondents who had been educated on anemia, a significant number, 69 (50.7%) were educated at the ANC unit, 12 (8.8%) through the media, 6 (4.4%) were educated by friends and family while others where educated from other sources. Concerning knowledge level of respondents on the signs/symptoms of anemia in pregnancy, 88 (64.7%) scored poorly, 44 (32.4%) scored fairly and 4 (2.9%) scored very well.
Regarding knowledge level of respondents on the causes/ risk factors of anemia in pregnancy, majority, 74 (54.4%) scored poorly, 49 (36%) scored fairly and 13 (9.6%) scored very well. In the area of knowledge level of respondents on the preventive measures of anemia in pregnancy, 67 (49.3%) scored poorly, 39 (28.7%) scored very well and 30 (22.1%) scored fairly. (Table 1.5/Figure. 3)
1.6: Distribution of Anemia by Knowledge Level about Anemia in Pregnancy.
A Chi-Square Test of independence was run to determine whether there is an association between the anemic status of the study participants and some variables assessing the knowledge level on anemia. With a chosen significance level of 0.05, if the p-value is less than 0.05 then the association between the two variables is statistically significant hence the null hypothesis is accepted. If the p-value is greater than 0.05 then there is no association between the two variables hence the null hypothesis is rejected. (Table. 1.6)
1.7: Distribution of Anemia among Study participants by their Socio-demographic characteristics
Only occupation of the respondents had a statistically significant association with their anemic status as the P-value was less than 0.05. Hence, anemia was significantly high 20 (74.1%) out of the 27 housewives and 11(64.7%) out of the 17 farmers. There was no association between anemia in pregnancy and the remaining socio-demographic variables since their p-value was > 0.05. (Table 1.7)
1.8: Distribution of Anemia among Study participants by their Obstetric and Antenatal background.
Only number of folate/iron intake as a variable had a statistically significant association with the anemic status of study respondent as the P-value was less than 0.05. There were more Non-Anemics, 45 (86.5%) among the 52 that took their supplement twice daily. Also, anemia prevalence was significantly high, 4(80%) among the 5 that had never taken any iron or folate supplementation. (Table. 1.8)
1.9: Distribution of Anemia among Study participants by their Health and Nutritional background
Anemia was significantly high in 21 (70%) of the 30 respondents who did not sleep under insecticide treated nets. Also, non-anemic respondents were significantly high in 59 (60.8%) of the 97 who were not diagnosed with malaria in the last six (6) months. (Table.1.9)
The overall prevalence of anemia among the pregnant women was 52.2%, of which 30.9% of all the pregnant women were mildly anemic, 19.9% were moderately anemic and 1.5% were severely anemic. (Table1.4/Fig. 2). This finding is similar to the prevalence of 52% of anemia in pregnancy within the Sub-Saharan Africa (11). The results from this study is also consistent with the finding from a study conducted in 2009 which revealed a 56- 61% prevalence of anemia in pregnancy in developing countries A report from the world Bank in 2016 revealed a 54% of prevalence of Anemia among pregnant Ghanaian Women, which is slightly higher than our 52%. However, the prevalence is far lower than the study in Gushegu (Also a rural town in Northern Ghana), that showed a prevalence of 76.8% among pregnant women (12) and results from a study conducted in Bimbilla (Another rural town in Northern Ghana), which yield a prevalence of 75.3% among pregnant women [13].
Knowledge on anemia in pregnancy was assessed on the basis of knowing the signs/symptoms, causes/risk factors, and preventive measures of anemia in pregnancy. In this study, 69.1% of the respondents had been educated on anemia in pregnancy, while 30.9% of the respondents had never been educated on anemia in pregnancy (Table.1.6). Those who were not educated explained that was their first time of antenatal care. Among those that had been educated on anemia in pregnancy, the majority of them received the education during their routine antenatal care visits, while the rest were educated by family and friends.
Our results revealed that there is an association between the respondents’ knowledge about anemia in pregnancy and the likelihood of them been anemic. (p -value <0.001 and 0.001). 59.6% of the those educated on anemia were not anemic, whiles 78.6% of those that had never been educated on anemia in pregnancy were anemic. Concerning knowledge on anemia in pregnancy, 64.7% of the pregnant participants had poor knowledge on the signs/symptoms of anemia in pregnancy while only 2.9% had good knowledge, 54.4% of the pregnant participants had poor knowledge on the causes/ risk factors of anemia in pregnancy while 9.6% had good knowledge and 49.3% of the pregnant participants had poor knowledge on the preventive measures of anemia in pregnancy while 22.1% had good knowledge (Table 1.6 ) . This implies that more targeted educations efforts at the antenatal care unit are needed to help reduce the prevalence of anemia in pregnancy at the district level. This finding however differs from a study conducted in Ethiopia where 71.6% of the study participants were able to identify the symptoms of anemia, regarding causes, a combined 72.9% knew the causes of anemia and 57.3% had good knowledge towards the prevention of anemia in pregnancy [14].
There was a significant association (p-value 0.014) between the occupational status and the anemic status of the pregnant participant, where 74.1% of housewives and 64.7% of farmer were anemic and, only 38.5% of traders and 22.2% of Government workers were anemic. This is consistent with a study conducted in Gushegu, where 53.4% of housewives were anemic (12) but not consistent with a study which showed that 33% of employed pregnant women were anemic as opposed to 39% unemployed pregnant women who were anemic [15]. There was also a significant association (p-value <0.001) between the educational status and the anemic status of the pregnant participant, where 69.0% of those without any formal education and 68.4% of those with only primary level education were anemic, while, 87.5% of those with vocational level education and 78.9% of those with tertiary level education were not anemic. This is similar to the study in Gushegu, where 67.4% of pregnant women who had not received any form of formal education were anemic (12). However, there was no association between anemic status of pregnant participants and age, marital status and religion. This is contrary to the findings from a study in Sekyere West District, Ghana where there was a significant association between age and the anemic status of the pregnant participant, where prevalence of anemia was lower prevalence with increasing age of women [16].
Under the obstetric and antenatal background, only the number of times of iron/folate intake was significantly associated with the anemic status of the study respondents, with a high anemia prevalence of 96.4% and 80.0% in pregnant women who took in the iron/folate supplements some days in a week and never taken at all respectively. However, variables such as gravidity, parity, number of antenatal care attendance and whether currently on iron/folate supplement were not significantly associated with the anemic status of the pregnant women. This result somehow does not correspond with a study conducted in Accra, Ghana where parity and number of antenatal care visits where significantly associated with anemia in pregnancy. In the same study, However, gestational age was not significantly associated with anemia in pregnancy [17].
There was an intrinsic association between the anemic status of the pregnant women and sleeping under insecticide treated nets, number of meals taken in day, weekly intake of heme containing meals and weekly intake of tea (p-value 0.027, < 0.001, <0.001 respectively). 70.0% of pregnant women not sleeping under insecticide treated nets were anemic, 87.5% of pregnant women who ate only twice a day were anemic, 75.0% and 79.4% of pregnant women who ate heme containing foods only once and twice a week respectively were anemic, while 100% and 88.2% of pregnant women who consumed tea every day and somedays in a week were anemic. This result is different from the findings of a study conducted in the Bolga Regional Hospital, Ghana where there was no significant association between the number of meals taken in a day and the anemic status of the pregnant women [18]. Furthermore, a study conducted in Northern Ghana showed that the use of insecticide treated nets and anemia in pregnancy had no significant association as it did not differ among anemic and non-anemic participants; meanwhile sickling status was not significantly associated (p-value = 0.173) with the anemic status of the pregnant women [19]. However, sickling status was not significantly associated (p-value 0.173) with the anemic status of the pregnant women.
Study Limitations
Due to the disparities in the gestational ages of our respondents, we could not get the hemoglobin (Hb) levels at 28 and 36 weeks of gestation rather, the current Hb Level and Hb level at booking were used for data analysis. Data on the Morphological characteristics of the red blood cells was not available to help identify and classify the types of anemias. Most respondents did not have stool and urine microscopy done to identify Schistosoma species, Entamoeba histolytica, hookworm ova as some of the possible causes of anemia. The sickling status of some respondent was also not readily available for assessment.
Though this study was solely conducted within the West Gonja hospital as it has the highest antenatal visit turnout, the study findings cannot be used to generalize for the entire district. The study methodology did not create a conducive environment for the researchers to follow up on some of the participants who were most likely to experience pregnancy related complications due to their anemic status
From our research, the prevalence of anemia among pregnant women attending antenatal care at the West Gonja Hospital was 52.2%. The majority of the expectant mothers claimed to have been educated about the most relevant and common characteristics of anemia in pregnancy. Despite this knowledge, a significant number of the pregnant women exhibited very poor knowledge especially regarding the possible causes, risk factors as well as practical strategies to prevent anemia in pregnancy. And since the knowledge was associated with the anemic status of the pregnant women, most pregnant women who had poor knowledge on the signs/symptoms, causes/risk factors, and preventive measures of anemia in pregnancy were also anemic. The risk factors of anemia in pregnancy identified were unemployment (housewife), low educational status, noncompliance with iron/folate supplementation, not sleeping under insecticide treated nets, eating less than three times a day, eating less than three heme containing meals a week, daily tea consumption everyday whiles pregnant.
Acknowledgement
The authors of this study want to officially acknowledge the Management Team and Staff of the West Gonja District Hospital, especially all the nurses at the antenatal care unit for all their support and cooperation during the data collection Period.
Declaration of conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare
Source of funding
No financial support was received from any public or private institution for the conduct of this research. The activities of this research were conducted using monies from the annual Book and research allowances allocated by the Government of the republic of Ghana to every researcher within the public academic/research Institutions
Data availability Statement
The processed mixed qualitative/quantitative data that supports the findings and conclusions of this study are readily available through the corresponding author.
The research idea was conceived by MMDM and approved by all authors after putting the research topic through a re-wording exercise. MA conducted the literature review and collected all the relevant data. OR performed the data analysis. The Manuscript was written by MMDM, reviewed by all authors who agreed with its content and made a collective decision to submit for consideration and possible publication
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
