AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Gabkika Bray Madoué, N’Djamena Faculty of human health sciences and N’Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital, Chad.
Citation: Gabkika B. Madoué, Mahamat A. Chene, Aché Haroune, Saleh Abdelsalam, Hawaye Cherif, et al, (2024), Post-Cesarean Parietal Suppurations; Clinical, and Therapeutic Aspects, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 8(5) DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/226
Copyright: © 2024, Gabkika Bray Madoué. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 27 June 2024 | Accepted: 10 July 2024 | Published: 26 July 2024
Keywords: caesarean; suppuration; n’djamena mother and child university hospital; chad
Background: Surgical site infections are one of the infectious complications after a surgical procedure. They are Mostly it’s responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in health individuals.
Objective: improve the management of post-caesarean parietal suppurations.
Method: This was a cross-sectional, prospective analytical study covering a period of 8 months from December,1st 2022 to July,31st 2023. This study was Performed in N’Djamena Mother and child about epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspect of past ceasarean section suppuration
Results: he frequency of parietal suppuration was 7.9%, the median age was 23.28±5.51 years with extremes from 16 to 45 years. Mains epidemiological characteristics were: housewives (47.6%), married (56%) and living in the commune of N'Djamena (45.2%). The time to rupture of the membranes was not specified (36.9%). More than around 75 %of caesarean sections were performed urgently (90.5%). Half of the parietal suppurations occurred between the 4th and 7th postoperative days with an average of 8.87±4.6 days. Proteus vulgaris was the germ most frequently found (50%). Most germs were sensitive to the combination of Amoxicillin and Clavulanic acid (32.1%). The mean length of hospital stay observed in this study was 17.40±14.3 days, with extremes ranging from 4 to 72 days.
Conclusion: Post caesarean section parietal suppuration remains frequent. Better identification of the factors favouring this condition could significantly reduce its incidence and consequently improve maternal prognosis.
Caesarean section, avoided because of its alarming mortality rate just over a century ago., However, it is now the mode of delivery for one in three women in the United States and up to four out of five women in other parts of the world [1]. The most prevalence of caesarean section in obstetric surgery can be found in ancient Egyptian and Greek legends [2]. Although Caesarean section can save lives and is generally considered to be very safe, it can nevertheless be associated with a risk of complications [3,4], in particular surgical site infections (parietal suppurations), which are one of the infectious complications that do not exist before the operation, and occur after surgery [2]. Despite the availability of various sterilization and hygiene facilities in healthcare establishments, these infections are increasingly persistent because of certain risk factors [5]. The prevalence of suppurations are different from country to country. For example, in the United States 10% in 2014 [6]. France 1.5% in 2016 [7]. Burkina Faso 3.5% in 2015 [8] were influenced from the suppurations.
In Chad, there are no data on post cesarean section suppuration, and this is way we conducted this study aiming to improve it management.
This was a cross-sectional, analytical study covering a period of 8 months from December, 1st 2022 to July, 31st 2023. The study was Performed in N’djamena Mother and Child University hospital about post caesarean section parietal suppuration: epidemiological, clinical and therapeutical aspects. Studied population consisted of patients having undergone a caesarean section and treated for parietal suppuration in the gynecology and obstetrics department. Data were collected using individual file. For Analize we used SPSS, 22 and Epi info 7.0. statistical methods like khi2 and p value were used to compare data’s (p sensitive when≤ 5%). Could you please add the IRB approved number.
During the study period, we recorded 1061 caesarean among 3927 giving a frequency of 27%. Among patients that have undergone caesarean section,84 from 1061 cases have developed a parietal suppuration, giving 7.9%.
The age group of 25-29 was the most represented with 51.2%. The median age was 23.28±5.51 years, with extremes ranging from 16 to 45 years.
Mains epidemiological aspects were: No schooled (54.8%), housewives (47.6%). married (56%), referred (57.1%) and had a low socio-economic status (78.6%).
Patients with pathological leucorrhea represented 39.3%. The amniotic membranal were ruptured before the beginning of labor in 36.9% In the half of case (50%) the duration of operations was between 60 and 90 mn, with an average duration of 37.78±9.10 mn and extremes of 20 and 75 mn (Table I).
| Characteristics | n | % | RR | IC (95%) | p | |
Unruptured
| 16 | 19.0 | ||||
| <12h | 10 | 11.9 | ||||
| >12h | 27 | 32.1 | 0.7 | 0.52-0.99 | 0,005 | |
| No precised | 31 | 36.9 | ||||
Duration of rupture of membranes (in hours)
| 6 à 8h | 12 | 14.3 | |||
| 8 à 10h | 13 | 15.5 | ||||
| 10 à 12h | 13 | 15.5 | ||||
| > 12h | 46 | 54.8 | 0.79 | 0.62-1.04 | 0.010 | |
| Duration of labour (mn) | 20 à 30mn | 4 | 4.8 | |||
| 30 à 60mn | 26 | 31.0 | ||||
| 60 à 90mn | 42 | 50.0 | 1.03 | 0.79-1.34 | 0.0001 | |
| 90mn- 120mn | 10 | 11.9 | ||||
| > 120mn | 2 | 2.4 | ||||
Table I: Distribution of patients according to risk factors for suppuration
In 40,5% women presented with a fever on admission (40.5%), and the majority of patients (61.9%) complained of abdominal pain. Caesarean sections (90.5%) were performed on in emergency. The number of health personal in the operating room during the operation was greater was at least than 6 in 67.9% and had and influence on the suppurations (p=0.02).
| Onset of infection (days) | n | % |
| < 3j | 6 | 7.1 |
| 4 - 7 | 42 | 50.0 |
| 7 -12 | 29 | 34.5 |
| >12 | 7 | 8.3 |
| Total | 84 | 100 |
Table II: time between caesarean section and onset of infection
Half of the parietal suppurations occurred between the 4th and 7th postoperative days with an average of 8.87±4.6 days, with extremes ranging from 4 days to 30 days (Table II).
| Identified Germ | n | % |
| E coli | 6 | 7.1 |
| Proteus mirabilis | 2 | 2.4 |
| Proteus vulgaris | 18 | 21.4 |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 9 | 10.8 |
| Streptococcus agalactie | 1 | 1.2 |
| Aucun test | 48 | 57.1 |
| Total | 84 | 100 |
Table III: identified germ
Bacteriological sampling for antibiotic susceptibility testing was not performed in 48 patients (57.1%). Proteus vulgaris was the germ most frequently found (50%) (Table IV).
Most germs were sensitive to the combination of Amoxicillin and Clavulanic acid (32.1%). Antibiotic prophylaxis combining ceftriaxone and metronidazole was the most common in 81% of cases.
| Type of bandage | n | % | p | |
Frequency of bandage
| One time daily | 31 | 36.9 | |
| 2 times daily | 47 | 56.0 | 0.021 | |
| 1 time each 2 days | 6 | 7.1 | ||
Type of bandage | Simple bandage | 28 | 33.3 | |
| Suture of wall | 54 | 64.3 | 0.009 | |
| Suture releasing | 2 | 2.4 | ||
Table IV: type of bandage
The suture of wall was performed in 64.3%, and in 56% the bandage was 2 times daily.
The maternal mortality rate was 1.19%.
The average length of hospital stay was 17.40±14.3 days, with extremes of 4 and 72 days.
During the study 84 cases of parietal suppuration were recorded out of a total of 1061 caesarean sections performed giving a frequency of 7.9%. Ibrahima et al. in Guinea in 2022 reported a frequency of 4.4 [9]. Several studies carried out across sub-Saharan Africa noted variable frequencies: wendmagegn et al [10] in Ethiopia (11.7%), Sawadogo etal.in Burkina Faso (3.5%) [8]. These findings showed that the incidence of post caesarean section infections is still high in developing countries.
We reported a high proportion of housewives representing (47.6%). Yobi et al. in Burkina Faso [11], and Sawadogo et al [8] noted the predominance of housewives (70%, and 74,3%),[12]. In terms of schooling, unschooled patients represented 54.8%, this is similar with the 64.3% reported by Sissokoet alin Bamako [12]. The high frequency of unschooled people women could be linked to female illiteracy in the general population on the one hand, and in the other with, it is related to cultural factors.
Married women accounted for the majority (56%) of cases of suppuration. This result is similar to that of Sawadogo et al. who reported 77% [8]. The predominance of married couples is linked to cultural and religious values, which do not allow pregnancy before marriage.
Surgical history was found in 33.4% of cases. Caesarean section was the most common, accounting for 22.6% of cases.
These results differ from those of Krieger et al, Saad et al. in Morocco and Kalibushi et al. in Rwanda, who noted a rate ranging from 26% to 52.6% of scarred uterus [15]. For Dupont J et al. in Yaoundé, prophylactic caesarean section was the most frequent indication with 41.52% [16]. The high frequency of scarred uterus could be linked to the increased indications for caesarean section among parturient nowadays. Genital infections played a significant role in this series, with 39.3% of pathological leucorrhea.
More than half of the patients were referred (57.1%). These results corroborate those of Salam [17] at Point G Hospital and Sylla [18] in Bamako, who reported 42.3% and 39.8%, respectively of referred patients.
More than 75% of caesarean sections were performed urgently (90.5%). This result corroborates those reported in the literature. Ibrahima KB et al. reported 83.33% of emergency caesarean section [9], this was same for Sawadogo et al. [8]. which is justified by the fact that emergency caesarean section is cited in the literature as a factor favoring post-caesarean section
suppuration, especially as asepsis and antisepsis measures are not well combined [19].
The time of rupture of the membranes on admission was in the majority of cases unspecified (36.9%) with a p-value=0.005, statistically significant. This result is similar to that found by certain authors [13,21, 22] who state that premature rupture of the membranes is considered to be an independent risk factor for surgical site infection.
With regard to the duration of labor, it was long (more than 12 hours) in half of the patients (54.8% of cases). This result is comparable to those of Ibrahima et al who reported 64.3% [9]. This could be explained by the fact that the longer the duration of labor, the longer the time to rupture of the membranes, the greater the number of vaginal examination and the greater the rise of germs from the vagina to the uterine cavity. The average duration of the procedure was 37.78 ± 9.10 min. The duration of caesarean section more than 1 hour increases the risk of post-caesarean suppuration and exposes the fetus to anaesthetic drugs; on the other hand, a shorter operation has a protective effect against surgical site infections [4]. In this context, to minimize the risk of infection, intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is systematically used, and this treatment is continued post-caesarean section. However, this antibiotic therapy is more or less standard and is not adapted to the bacterial ecology of the environment.
The mean time to diagnosis of parietal suppuration was 8.87±4.6 days, with extremes ranging from 4 to 30 days. The majority of suppurations (50%) were diagnosed between the 4th and 7th postoperative day in this series. Thus, post-caesarean section suppuration in this study is essentially due to a lack of therapeutic compliance and a failure by the patient and those around her to observe basic wound hygiene rules.
Bacterial infectious complications were dominated by parietal suppurations, accounting for 72.6% of cases. These results are similar to those of Diallo MH et al. [22] in Guinea and, who reported surgical site infection as the main postoperative complication, with 71.59%. In Tunisia in 2018, Latifa and al [23] found 5% surgical site infection, for Harou and al [24] in Morocco, this result could be explained by the fact that parietal suppuration remains one of the major post-caesarean complications in developing countries. The main germs identified were Proteus vulgaris, Staphylococcus aureus (25%) and Escherichia coli (16%). Those author [25] reported a predominance of Staphylococcus aureus representing 20%, followed by Escherichia coli (18%). In all case the best way is to prescribe antibiotics covering these germs when risk factors exist.
The duration of hospitalization stay observed in this study was 17.40±14.3 days, with extremes ranging from 4 to 72 days. This was comparable to the results of Berthé and al [5] in Bamako, who recorded an average hospital stay of 17.5 days. For Yobi and al [11], the average stay was 23.8 days, with extremes of eight (8) and sixty-four (64) days. This long hospital stay leads to complications such as infection, especially for patients and their families, and increases the risk of other types of nosocomial infection.
Management in this series was medical (two-time bandage associated with antibiotic) in 56%. This result is lower than that of Khaled G and al [26], who reported 62.9% out of 521 cases. Supplementary surgical procedure was done in 64.3%, this is higher than the 22% noted by of Khaled G et al [26]. The medical procedure involving the use of antibiotics (Amoxicillin+clavulanic acid) was similar to that used by Barry and al [27].
The majority of patients (63.9%) had no other pathology associated with parietal suppuration, and we noted a low maternal mortality rate (1.19%) in this series. Mpogoro and al [28] recorded one death due to septicemia, and Demisew and al [29] reported a case fatality rate of 9%. Factor like availability of medicine and the exemption of fees in our hospital during the study can explain our findings.
This study showed that caesarean section should not be considered as a simple procedure without morbid and even fatal maternal and fetal complications. Better identification and prevention of the factors contributing to these complications could significantly reduce post-caesarean section parietal suppuration and consequently improve maternal prognosis.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
