AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Kunal Duggal, Central Cardiology Medical Center, USA.
Citation: Kunal Duggal, Sarabjeet Singh, (2023), Pheochromocytoma: An Often-Overlooked Differential in Patients with Syncope and Hypertension, Cardiology Research and Reports. 5(6); DOI:10.31579/2692-9759/110
Copyright: © 2023, Kunal Duggal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 October 2023 | Accepted: 27 November 2023 | Published: 06 December 2023
Keywords: syncope; palpitations; pheochromocytoma; hypertension; catecholamines
Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is often overlooked in elderly presenting with uncontrolled hypertension, palpitations, syncope or other cardiovascular emergencies. The first patient presented with recurrent syncope, which is a rare presentation of pheochromocytoma, and the second patient was misdiagnosed as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and uncontrolled hypertension. Timely recognition of atypical presentations can have a profound impact on patient outcomes, such as preventing stroke and other life-threatening complications. Through the presentation of these cases, we hope to emphasize the importance of considering uncommon etiologies in cardiovascular complaints among the elderly population.
Pheochromocytoma, a rare neuroendocrine tumor, originates from chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla or extra-adrenal paraganglion chromaffin tissue and secretes catecholamines [12, 16]. The clinical manifestations of patients with pheochromocytoma are diverse, ranging from asymptomatic to cardiac arrest [12]. The typical triad of clinical presentations of pheochromocytoma, including episodic headache, palpitations and sweating, only occurs in 24% of patients [16]. Hypertension is one of the most common manifestations of pheochromocytoma and can be persistent or paroxysmal [16].
The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is often overlooked in seniors presenting with uncontrolled hypertension, palpitations or other cardiovascular emergencies, leading to delay in diagnosis and treatment [1]. However, recent advances in understanding the molecular biology of pheochromocytomas offer potential to improve therapeutic interventions for these tumors [12].
An 82-year-old female presented to the emergency room with three episodes of syncope, each preceded by prodromal tinnitus, over the span of a year. The patient had reported feelings of light-headedness prior to the syncopal episodes. The patient denied any headaches, flushing, or palpitations. Despite multiple hospitalizations and extensive workup of possible cardiovascular causes, her etiology remained undiagnosed.
Her past medical history included lung nodules, hyperthyroidism, and hypertension. Medications included amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, methimazole, and aspirin. Her blood pressure, heart rate, and thyroid function were well controlled on this regimen. Upon referral to a cardiologist, a CardioNet study was done, showing no significant arrhythmia and a carotid ultrasound revealed no significant stenosis. An incidental finding of a 3-centimeter heterogeneous left adrenal mass was found on a computerized tomography (CT) scan of the chest, which was ordered due to her shortness of breath and history of lung disease. This prompted a referral to endocrinology and biochemical testing revealed plasma metanephrines test and 24-hour urine metanephrines were 2.3 times the ULN (upper limit of normal).
Her plasma metanephrines were elevated at 244 pg/mL (normal 0-62 pg/mL), and her 24-hour urine normetanephrines and metanephrines were 673 mcg hours (normal 75 to 375 mcg/24 hours) and 324 mcg (normal 140-785 mcg/24 hours), respectively. These values were confirmed on repeat testing, which confirmed the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. To treat her pheochromocytoma, she was managed preoperatively, according to protocol, with α and β blockade in order to prevent an intraoperative hypertensive crisis as a result of a catecholamine storm [9]. The patient underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. She did well postoperatively, with resolution of syncope. Her blood pressure optimized and repeat catecholamine levels were within the normal limits.
A 72-year-old white female presented with tachycardic episodes which began 2 years prior and were associated with severe headaches. After a year, she also developed chest pain and palpitations and uncontrolled hypertension, on one instance 194/120. Her blood pressure was uncontrolled on 25 mg metoprolol (2 times daily) and hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg daily). Over the course of the 2 years of spells, her metoprolol was titrated up from 50 mg b.i.d. to 100 mg b.i.d. She was referred to cardiology and underwent a stress test which was unremarkable.
Eventually, she was referred to a psychiatrist. She was diagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and prescribed escitalopram. Because her symptoms remained unresolved, she saw an endocrinologist where a full workup was done. Urinary normetanephrines were 5 times the ULN (2096 μg, normal is 75-375 μg/24 hrs) and urinary norepinephrine was 7 times the ULN (622 μg, normal is 15-80 μg/24 hrs). Her norepinephrine level in the blood was 4141 pg/mL, 2.4 times the ULN (normal is <1700>
The classic triad of symptoms of pheochromocytoma consists of episodic headache, sweating, and tachycardia [19, 4]. Headaches occur in 90 percent of symptomatic patients [15]. In contrast, a much rarer presentation of pheochromocytoma is that of episodic hypotension as seen in our first case. Additionally, there can also be rapid fluctuations of hypertension and hypotension in some patients [23]. This sometimes happens in tumors that secrete only epinephrine and no other metanephrines [8].
Pheochromocytoma can often be difficult to diagnose due to the rarity of the disease and the nonspecific clinical manifestations. As in our first case, syncope may be the first symptom, making the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma challenging yet important. If pheochromocytoma is suspected, biochemical testing should be initiated, including measurement of fractionated metanephrines and catecholamines in a 24-hr urine or plasma specimen. Measurement of plasma fractionated metanephrines is often advised as a first diagnostic test for pheochromocytoma [6]. This has a sensitivity of 96 to 100 percent [18].
It’s also crucial to recognize the episodic nature of pheochromocytoma spells, which can introduce complexities in diagnostic accuracy. False negatives and false positives may arise due to various factors, including dietary influences, medications, and concomitant medical conditions [6]. To mitigate these diagnostic challenges, repeated biochemical testing should be considered, especially when clinical suspicion remains high.
Pheochromocytoma rarely presents as syncope or hypotension. Although syncope is relatively common in the older population, most incidences of syncope stem from neurocardiogenic etiology. Many people suffer from recurrent syncope without being diagnosed. It is estimated that the annual incidence of syncope in older patients is 7% [19, 22]. Although orthostatic hypotension has been reported in pheochromocytoma [21], that of the first case was extremely severe and not related to posture. Aronoff et al. reported a patient who suffered from recurrent cardiopulmonary arrests and the patient’s hypotension was spontaneous [3].
A literature review finds that there are few similar cases of pheochromocytoma induced syncope, and these cases are often misdiagnosed due to the highly improbable nature of pheochromocytoma as an etiology of syncope. Thus, it is our recommendation that practitioners consider uncommon causes of syncope should they not find evidence of the more common causes.
In the first case, since the patient’s hypotension disappeared after the excision of tumor, her hypotension was deduced to be likely from excess catecholamine secretion. Several reasons for this phenomenon could be considered: e.g., hypovolemia, intermittent secretion of catecholamines, ratio of epinephrine to norepinephrine in the secretions, impairment of peripheral responses to catecholamine elevation, adrenocortical insufficiency, or baroreflex failure [14].
Importantly, pheochromocytomas can be misdiagnosed in women as anxiety disorders, as it was in case 2. The patient was misdiagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and remained untreated for a further 2 years. In this case, institutional expectations and gender-related biases prevented the patient from seeking treatment. Given these concerning findings, we would like to highlight the need for comprehensive and unbiased diagnostic approaches.
Previous studies have shown that up to 40% of patients who develop pheochromocytoma carry germline mutations [11, 13]. Ideally, all patients with pheochromocytoma should undergo genetic testing because the results of genetic testing can better guide the clinical treatment and prognosis [5].
The average age at diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is 47.1 years of age, making all of our cases remarkable outliers [10]. This underscores the importance of recognizing the potential for atypical presentations across a wide age spectrum, especially in elderly patients.
In conclusion, the cases presented in this series illuminate the remarkable diversity of presentations that pheochromocytoma can manifest. These cases underscore the critical importance of considering uncommon presentations, especially in elderly patients, and the need for a comprehensive and unbiased diagnostic evaluation.
The infrequent occurrence of pheochromocytoma should not dissuade its consideration as a diagnosis when encountering symptoms that deviate from the classic triad. Swiftly identifying these unusual presentations can significantly influence patient outcomes.
Further research is warranted to delve deeper into the mechanisms behind these atypical presentations of pheochromocytoma. Avenues for exploration include the identification of novel genetic markers, the elucidation of pathophysiological pathways contributing to unusual clinical manifestations, and the development of advanced diagnostic tools that account for the episodic nature of this condition.
A comprehensive understanding of the diverse presentations and diagnostic challenges associated with pheochromocytoma is paramount for improving patient care and outcomes. By continuing to explore these atypical cases and refining diagnostic approaches, we can advance our ability to identify and manage this rare but potentially life-threatening condition effectively.
none.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
