AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Sunitha cherukuri, Browns college of pharmacy, Khammam, India.
Citation: Sunitha ch (2019) Persistent high prevalence of smoking reflects a major failure of public health. Addiction Research and Adolescent Behaviour 2(1): DOI:10.31579/2688-7517/007
Copyright: © 2019 Sunitha ch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 11 April 2019 | Accepted: 31 May 2019 | Published: 11 June 2019
Keywords: prevalence of smoking reflects; major failure of public health; cigarette smoking; patients
Patients with mental health and addiction disorders are the only core cigarette smokers left in the Western world as the number of smokers in the general population has declined dramatically over the last decades. Simultaneously there is a gap in life expectancy of more than 20 years between patients who have been in treatment for mental disorders and the rest of the population and this gap has not declined in the last two decades. Adding to this are new research findings that show that cigarette smoking has a detrimental effect also on mental health being a risk factor for depressive symptoms.
There is therefore a need for concentrated action to curb the smoking epidemic among people with mental health and addiction disorders. There is limited research and guidelines on how to both prevent and cease smoking in this group. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the current literature of the size of the problem, how to handle smoking cessation both individually and at system level and on the prevention of smoking.
The review confirms that the rate of smokers among patients with mental health and addiction disorders is huge with some figures pointing up to 80 % in specific groups. It also confirms that cigarette smoking is a strongly addictive making the success rates low, especially without aides like snooze and e-cigarettes. It also shows, however, that it is safe to create a smoking free environment in all mental health and addiction units which also might be beneficial to the patients in the long run.
Historically, smoking has been very common among mental health patients and mental healthcare workers, and only recently has smoking declined among healthcare professionals [1,2]. Smoking by mental health patients while receiving treatment for their mental health problems has been used to reduce feelings of aggression and anxiety [1]. The ability to smoke while in treatment has been used as a tool by healthcare providers to exact punishment or reward to influence the behavior of mental health patients. For many mental health professionals, smoking was seen as a way to break down barriers between themselves and their patients. Moreover, many mental health professionals had longstanding belief that mental health disorders lessened the detrimental effects of smoking [1].
Smoking remains very common among people with mental health problems, particularly those with substance abuse disorders [2]. When people with mental health disorders are receiving treatment, smoking poses a health risk to their fellow patients and the mental health professionals providing their care. Countries worldwide have prohibited smoking in the workplace in an effort to curb smoking and thereby protect the health of both the smokers and those in the vicinity of the smoker. Mental health treatment centers in many countries remain an important exception to this trend [1]. Given the high prevalence of smoking among patients receiving treatment, the clientele, staff, and healthcare providers at these treatment facilities are commonly exposed to second-hand smoke [2]. The aim of this narrative review is to present an overview of the prevalence of smoking among people with mental health disorders and the impact of smoking on mental health morbidities and life expectancy, and to describe efforts to curb smoking among people with mental health disorders, both in and out of treatment, and barriers to the enactment of prohibiting smoking at treatment sites. We conclude with proposals for future research and smoking policy updates.
Smoking among People with Mental Health Disorders
Tobacco use is still one of the leading preventable causes of death in the world killing up to half of its users [3]. The tobacco epidemic is one of the biggest public health threats, killing around six million people a year [3]. More than five million of those deaths are the result of direct tobacco use while more than 600,000 are the result of non-smokers being exposed to second-hand smoke [3]. The number of smokers in the general population is rapidly decreasing in the Western world. For example, in 1973 in Norway almost 45 % of the populations were daily smokers, in 2004 this was reduced to 26 %, and last year only 13 % of populations were daily smokers [4].
The severely mentally ill comprise a large proportion of the heavy smokers of today in the western world [2]. A third of all cigarettes smoked in England are the people with a mental disorder, and in contrast to the marked decline in smoking prevalence in the general population, smoking among those with mental disorders has changed little, if at all, over the past 20 years [5]. A study from the US based on the National Comorbidity Survey conducted from 1991 to 1992 reported that 44.3 percent of all cigarettes in America were consumed by individuals who live with mental illness and/or substance abuse disorders [6]. This means that persons with mental illness were about twice as likely to smoke as other persons, even at times when the general population smoking rate was higher [6].
Impact of Smoking on Life Expectancy and Mental Health
Life expectancy among mental health patients has recently become a pressing issue. Studies from the Nordic countries of Sweden, Finland, and Denmark show that men and women who have been in hospital with a psychiatric diagnosis, except for mental retardation and dementia, have a shortened life expectancy of 20 years and 15 years, respectively, compared to the rest of the population. Despite major changes in the health services available to people with mental illnesses, the life expectancy gap between people with a psychiatric hospitalization and the rest of the population has not changed significantly over the last 20 years [7].
The higher death rate is present in all psychiatric diagnostic groups, where it is highest for those with drug addiction and lowest for those with mood disorders [8]. About 40% of the total excess mortality among patients with schizophrenia is caused by external causes, primarily suicides, while approximately 60
In 2000, the US National Comorbidity Study found evidence that smoking preceded and was a risk factor for mental health problems [6]. Later studies confirmed this finding, such as Lineberry’s observation that smoking is a risk factor for suicidality [11]. Similarly, a longitudinal study among teenagers showed that daily smokers at 15 years of age were more likely to be depressed 3 years later. This same study did not show that depressive symptoms increased smoking [12]. A large birth cohort study from Australia also identified an association between age at first tobacco use and subsequent psychosis-related outcomes in young adulthood [13]. All the studies mentioned are general-population based which exclude inpatient populations and thus make it impossible to study the impact of smoking among inpatients on their own health and on those around them.
In contrast to the evidence showing negative effects of smoking on mental health outcomes, a report by the Royal College of Psychiatrists summarizes the potential positive effects of cigarette smoking [5]. The investigators found that there is experimental evidence to suggest that nicotine can relieve symptoms of anxiety, depression, schizophrenia and attention deficit hyper activity disorder (ADHD). The authors also note, however, that nicotine withdrawal symptoms may then exacerbate symptoms of mental disorders. The evidence supporting a positive impact of smoking on mental health outcomes suggests that some people with mental disorders may self-medicate with nicotine to ameliorate mental health symptoms such as depression or anxiety. It is important to acknowledge these apparent positive effects when motivating patients for smoking cessation. On the other hand, it is important to state that the symptoms of mental disorders can be confused with or exacerbated by those of nicotine withdrawal, resulting in false attribution of cessation to the relief of symptoms of mental disorders [5].
Other studies have examined other relevant dimensions between smoking and mental health. One such study found that there was an association between smoking severity and poor self-reported quality of life connected to leisure activities, social relationships, and finances [14]. Another study showed that mental health patients who smoked had a poorer prognosis, more problems with medication, and more hospitalizations than non-smokers [15]. A recent meta-analysis of smoking and psychosis included 61 studies up to 2014 and involved 14,555 tobacco smokers and 273,162 non-smokers [16]. The investigators hypothesized that if the high rate of smoking among people with psychosis was related to self-medication, then smoking rates could be expected to be normal at the time of the first psychotic episode and subsequently increase in reaction to the symptoms. Instead, the analysis of case-control studies found that 57% of people with a first episode of schizophrenia were already smokers, for an overall odds ratio for smoking of 3.22 among people with an episode of schizophrenia (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63 - 6.33) [16]. The authors noted some evidence of publication bias. An additional sub-analysis of five longitudinal, prospective studies showed a more modest association, but daily smokers were still approximately twice as likely to develop new psychotic disorders as nonsmokers (relative risk, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.23 - 3.85). In addition, those who smoked daily were found to develop psychotic illness approximately one year earlier than non-smokers. There was no significant difference in age of smoking debut between those who did and did not develop psychosis [16].
There have also been a few studies investigating the possible biological underpinnings of the association between psychosis and smoking. One study showed that nicotine could cause a change in the dopaminergic system through induction of super sensitivity of D2 receptors, which has been proposed as an explanatory mechanism for several risk factors for schizophrenia and as a common pathway for psychotic symptoms [17]. Finally, a key cluster of genes — CHRNA5, CHRNA3, and CHRNB5— on chromosome 15, which have been linked to schizophrenia in the largest genome-wide association study of the disease to date, are also associated with nicotine dependence and smoking behavior [18].
Double Trouble – Smoking While In Mental Health Treatment
Given the decline in smoking among mental healthcare workers, the potential advantage of closeness between mental health patients and their providers who smoke has diminished. Currently, smoking at treatment facilities must often take place in special shelters with specific ventilation systems, which removes some of the ease and comfort related to smoking [1]. Moreover, the combination of reduced interpersonal interaction related to smoking and ease of smoking may increase the patient’s feelings of isolation and alienation. The stigma connected to smoking might also be a problem in creating social networks while in treatment and connecting with visiting family members. For smokers with mental health problems and substance abuse this creates a double marginalization where not only the mental health problems generate barriers to work and social interaction but smoking also introduces barriers to socialization.
Efforts Towards Smoking Cessation Among People With Mental Health Disorders
Barriers to smoking cessation
The US National Comorbidity Survey observed that more than a third of patients with a history of mental illness had quit smoking by the time of the survey [6]. Furthermore, they found that persons abstinent from alcohol had quit rates equal to those of persons without mental illness [6]. The Smoking and Mental health report states that smokers with mental disorders are just as likely to want to quit as those without, but are more likely to be heavily addicted to smoking [5].
So why then is it so difficult to reduce smoking among patients with mental health problems and especially those with severe problems? First, mental health care workers do not always view smoking as an addiction comparable to addiction to alcohol and other drugs. Rather, smoking is seen as one of few pleasures in an otherwise tumultuous life. Second, there is the belief among mental healthcare workers that pressure to quit might lead to feelings of shame and guilt among patients, of which they typically already have plenty. Moreover, the expectations of success with smoking cessation are extremely low [1].
Other obstacles to smoking cessation among patients with mental health problems come from experience-based knowledge among health workers. For example, the increased emotional stress they observe among patients abstinent from cigarettes. A strongly held belief is that to abandon smoking might lead to increased violent behavior. These are some of the reasons that health workers and managers may justify violating smoking laws. A third and more theoretical reason for allowing smoking is that cigarettes or smoking privileges are seen as a stable object while working on other addiction treatments [1].
There is increasing pressure from health workers to reduce smoking among patients to ensure a smoke free work environment. As discussed above, however, there are many barriers to attempts to “denormalize” smoking in treatment facilities. One important question is how to motivate people with mental health problems to reduce or quit smoking. General public information campaigns don’t seem to work as smoking has not been reduced among people with mental health problems compared with the general population. An important measure that works especially well among youth is price control on cigarettes. While youth are sensitive to marked increases in the price of smoking, this measure seems to only increase the financial burden for those with mental health problems. Studies report some patients with mental health disorders spend up to 30 % of their income on cigarettes. Since restrictions seem difficult to impose and public health measures are insufficient, innovative methods to reach people with mental health problems should be developed [5].
One approach may be to increase the impact of existing approaches, such as media campaigns, by tailoring them to the specific needs of the mental health patient populations. Also, given the opportunities presented by contacts with mental health services, these visits may be points at which to intervene to support smoking cessation and harm reduction. Smoke-free policies are more likely to be successful and effective if they are comprehensive, and can be implemented successfully in mental health settings with appropriate leadership and support strategies for patients and staff. Training and support to overcome prevailing misconceptions and negative or indifferent attitudes towards treating smoking among mental health staff is needed [3].
Psycho education for chronic psychiatric patients indicates that patients are willing to learn more about the effects of smoking, although most find it difficult to quit [19]. A review article mentioned that people with mental health disorders are as motivated to quit smoking as the general population, although those with psychotic disorders may be less motivated as individuals with depression [20]. A common experience however, is that health care providers are less motivated than their patients, which may be due to lacking of experience and tools to work with patients to reduce smoking. Moreover, health care workers at mental health treatment facilities are often working at capacity and introducing more interventions may be overwhelming and thus not implemented [1].
So, are there effective smoking cessation interventions? The combination of cognitive behavioral smoking cessation counseling session with cessation pharmacotherapy is effective in the general population, and has also been shown to be effective in people with mental disorders. Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) {nicotine patches, gums, sprays or lozenges} is effective in people with mental disorders, but may require high doses, for longer durations, and include more intensive behavioral support compared to the general population of smokers [21]. In addition to their effectiveness at reducing smoking among people with mental health problems, smoking cessation programs have also been shown to be highly cost-effective. A randomized controlled trail of a stage-based smoking cessation service at a psychiatric hospital found the intervention did not result in higher mental health care costs in the short-term and were highly cost-effective over the projected lifetime of patients [21].
First line drugs like bupropion, varenicline and second line drugs nortriptyline and clonidine are effective in people with mental disorders, but should be used with appropriate supervision and monitoring [22]. Smoking cessation reduces the metabolism of some drugs, such as clozapine, necessitating prompt reduction in doses of affected drugs at the time of quitting, and increases in the event of relapse. Naltrexone hydrochloride is another drug that can be used for smoking cessation which reduces desire of smoking if combined with CBT (cognitive behavior therapy).Smokers who do not want to quit smoking, or else feel unable to make a quit attempt, should be encouraged to cut down on smoking, and to use snooze or e-cigarettes in line with the tobacco harm reduction guidance of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [23].
There is a need for increased focus on the prevention of lifestyle diseases in people with mental illness based on the known recommendations on diet, smoking, alcohol, and exercise. Risk factors should be followed closely and interventions should be planned based on the individual patient's everyday life while aiming to create change with 'small steps'. There is good evidence that the prevention intervention of lifestyle diseases is effective among patients with mental disorders. Studies evaluating efforts to increase physical activity in people with schizophrenia are consistently positive [24]. Positive effects have also been observed among depressed patients, and these physical activity prevention interventions were also noted to be very cost effective [25].
Achieving cessation in 25%, 50%, and 100% of people with mental disorders would, respectively, result in a gain of 5.5 million, 11 million, and 22 million undiscounted life-years in the UK [5]. At 3.5% discounting, the corresponding figures are 1.4, 2.7, and 5.4 million life-years gained [5]. Harm reduction through lifelong substitution with medicinal nicotine is highly cost-effective when compared with continuing smoking, at around £8,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for lifetime nicotine patch use and £3,600 per QALY for inhalators. Addressing the high prevalence of smoking in people with mental disorders offers the potential to realize substantial cost savings as well as benefits in quantity and quality of life [5].
Child and adolescent mental health services, and local authority foster care and smoking policies, should explicitly protect children from passive smoke, and promote smoke-free foster homes. Professionals working with or caring for young people should provide positive non-smoking role models and be trained to deliver cessation advice and provide or arrange further support for those who want help to quit. In settings where young people are most vulnerable, such as adolescent in patient units, there should be a broad program of health promotion aimed at preventing initiation of smoking as well as smoking cessation [5].
People with mental health disorders smoke at higher rates, and they are more nicotine-dependent, and suffer greater morbidity and mortality from smoking-related illnesses than the general population. Helping people with mental health disorders to quit smoking is a public health priority; however, some mental health professionals assume that those with mental illness are not motivated to quit.
On the contrary, studies suggest that people with mental health disorders are indeed motivated to quit smoking, although more research is needed studying in-patient populations in particular [1]. The commonly held false belief that people with mental health disorders are not motivated to cease smoking means that opportunities to encourage smoking cessation among this disenfranchised group are being missed. It is likely that the persistent acceptance of smoking as normal behavior in primary and secondary care, and failure by health professionals to address smoking prevention as a health priority, drives and perpetuates the high prevalence of smoking among people with mental disorders.
This persistent high prevalence of smoking reflects a major failure of public health and clinical services to address the needs of a highly disadvantaged sector of society. There is a moral duty to address this problem in the future, and to prioritize the rights of people with mental disorders to the same protection and health interventions as the general population. Smoke-free policy is crucial to promoting smoking cessation in mental health settings. All healthcare settings used by people with mental disorders should be completely smoke free.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
